Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T14:59:08.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Occurrence of Stagnation Bubbles in Supersonic Jet Impingement Flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

G T Kalghatgi
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Bristol
B L Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

This paper reports an experimental investigation into the stagnation bubbles found in the shock layers of some supersonic jets impinging on perpendicular flat plates at small nozzle-to-plate distances. The experiments used twelve contoured nozzles within the Mach number range 1.42 to 2.83. Surface pressures were measured on the plate and free-jet pitot pressure distributions were obtained at the level of the centre of the plate shock. Schlieren pictures were taken of both impinging and free jets. It was found that the bubbles result from the interaction of the plate shock with very weak shock waves which are produced in the jet either by small imperfections in the nozzle wall or by slight inaccuracies in the design or production of the nozzle contour. The bubbles can be eliminated by suitable improvements to the nozzle. Other anomalous flows produced by shock interactions are described and explanations offered. It is shown that the bubbles sometimes encountered at close plate spacings with conical nozzles are also due to shock waves. However, for wide-angled nozzles, internal shocks can be an inherent part of the flow from the nozzle and the bubbles which they produce are thus an inherent part of the impingement flow. From physical arguments concerning the main factors involved in producing a bubble, a parameter is constructed whose values are shown to be a good criterion for whether a bubble occurs or not.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Donaldson, C DuP Snedeker, R S A study of free jet impingement: Part I, Mean properties of free and impinging jets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 45, p 281, January 1971.Google Scholar
2 Ginzburg, I P Semilentenko, B G Terpigorev, V S Uskov, V N Some singularities of supersonic under-expanded jet interaction with a plane obstacle. Journal of Engineering Physics, Vol 19, p 1081, 1973.Google Scholar
3 Gubanova, O I Lunev, V V Plastinina, L N The central breakaway zone with interaction between a supersonic underexpanded jet and a barrier. Fluid Dynamics, Vol 6, p 298, March 1973.Google Scholar
4 Gummer, J H Hunt, L The impingement of non-uniform, axisymmetric, supersonic jets on a perpendicular flat plate. Israel journal of Technology, Vol 12, p 221, December 1974.Google Scholar
5 Carling, J C Hunt, B L The near wall jet of a normally impinging, uniform, axisymmetric, supersonic jet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 66, p 159, October 1974.Google Scholar
6 Gummer, J H Hunt, B L The impingement of a uniform, axisymmetric, supersonic jet on a perpendicular flat plate. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol XXII, p 403, November 1971.Google Scholar
7 Adamson, T C Nicholls, J A On the structure of jets from highly under-expanded nozzles into still air. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, Vol 26, p 16, January 1959.Google Scholar
8 Puckett, A E Nicholls, J A Supersonic nozzle design. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions ASME, Vol 13, p A265, December 1946.Google Scholar
9 Carling, J C The impingement of uniform, axisymmetric, supersonic jets of air on plane perpendicular surfaces. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, 1974.Google Scholar
10 Kalghatgi, G T Some aspects of supersonic jet impingement on plane perpendicular surfaces. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, 1975.Google Scholar
11 Lamont, P J Hunt, B L The impingement of under-expanded jets on wedges. To be published in Journal of Fluid Mechanics.Google Scholar
12 Kalghatgi, G T Hunt, B L The response of a pitot tube in the presence of a weak shock wave. Aeronautical Journal, Vol 80, p 183, April 1976.Google Scholar
13 Henderson, L F On the confluence of three shock waves in a perfect gas. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol XV, p 181, May 1964.Google Scholar
14 Kalghatgi, G T Hunt, B L The three-shock confluence problem for the case of normally impinging over-expanded jets. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol XXVI, p 117, May 1975.Google Scholar
15 Back, L H Cuffel, R F Detection of oblique shocks in a conical nozzle with a circular arc throat. AlAA Journal, Vol 4, p 2219, December 1966.Google Scholar
16 Birch, S F Keyes, J W Transition in compressible shear layers. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol 9, p 623, August 1972.Google Scholar
17 Bradshaw, P Effects of streamline curvature on turbulent flow. AGARDograph 169, August 1973.Google Scholar
18 Görtier, H, Berechnung von Aufgaben der freien Turbulenz auf Grund eines neuen Näherungsansatzes. Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Mechanik, Vol 22, p 244, October 1942.Google Scholar
19 Erdos, J Pallone, A Shock-boundary-layer interaction and flow separation. Proceedings, 1962 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, p 239, June 1962.Google Scholar
20 Schlichting, H Boundary-Layer Theory. 6th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1968.Google Scholar
21 Ludwieg, H Tillmann, W Untersuchungen über die Wandschubspannung in turbulenten Reibungsschichten. Ingenieur-Archiv, Vol 17, p 228, 1949. (Translated as NACA TM 1285.)Google Scholar