Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T20:44:25.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative assessment of vibration control capabilities of a L-shaped Gurney flap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

V. Motta
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy
G. Quaranta*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy

Abstract

This work presents the capabilities of a novel L-shaped trailing-edge Gurney flap as a device for vibration reduction. The primary effect of this L-tab is represented by a modification of the reference aerofoil mean line shape through by two counter-rotating vortical structures created at the trailing edge. The comparison of the aerodynamic loads generated by the novel L-tab Gurney flap and a classical trailing-edge flap allows to estimate the ranges of reduced frequency where the L-tab is expected to perform better than a trailing edge flap and vice versa. Linear aerostructural models for a typical section representative of a helicopter blade equipped with a partial-span L-tab or a trailing-edge flap are built, and a higher harmonic control algorithm is applied. Performance are compared between the two devices to reduce separately the N/rev harmonics of the blade root rotating frame vertical force, flapping and feathering moments. The attainment of similar results with classical trailing-edge device is a further confirmation of the potential feasibility of this novel L-tab as an effective alternative means for vibration reduction on rotor blades.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Katz, J.Aerodynamics of race cars,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 38, (1), pp 2763.Google Scholar
2. Liebeck, R.H.Design of subsonic airfoils for high lift,” J Aircaft, 1978, 15, (9), pp 547561.Google Scholar
3. Kentfield, J. “The potential of Gurney flaps for improving the aerodynamic performance of helicopter rotors,” “International Powered Lift Conference, 1993, AIAA, Santa Clara, California, US.”Google Scholar
4. Storms, B.L. and Jang, C.S.Lift enhancement of an airfoil using a Gurney flap and vortex generators,” J Aircraft, 1994, 31, (3), pp 542547.Google Scholar
5. Myose, R.Y., Papadakis, M. and Heron, I.Gurney flap experiments on airfoils, wings, and reflection plane model,” J Aircaft, 1998, 35, (2), pp 206211.Google Scholar
6. Papadakis, M., Myose, R.Y., Heron, I. and Johnson, B.L. “An experimental investigation of Gurney flaps on a GA(W)-2 airfoil with 25% slotted flap,” “14th AIAA Applied Aerodynamic Conference, AIAA Paper, 1996, AIAA-96-2347-CP.” doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.1996-2437.Google Scholar
7. Zhang, W., Wang, J.J. and Wu, Z.Experimental investigations on the application of lift enhancement devices to forward-swept aircraft model,” Aeronautical J, 2006, 110, (1108), pp 361367.Google Scholar
8. Wang, J.J., Li, Y.C. and Choi, K.S.Gurney flap–Lift enhancement, mechanisms and applications,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2008, 44, (1), pp 2247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Baker, J.P., Standish, K.J. and van Dam, C.P.Two-dimensional wind tunnel and computational investigation of a microtab modified airfoil,” J Aircraft, 2007, 44, (2), pp 563572.Google Scholar
10. Maughmer, M. and Bramesfeld, G.Experimental investigation of Gurney flaps,” J Aircraft, 2008, 45, (6), pp 20622067.Google Scholar
11. Friedmann, P.P. and Millott, T.A.Vibration reduction in rotorcraft using active control: A comparison of various approaches,” J Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1995, 18, (4), pp 664673.Google Scholar
12. Milgram, J., Chopra, I. and Straub, F.Rotors with trailing edge flaps: Analysis and comparison with experimental data,” J American Helicopter Society, 1998, 43, (4), pp 319332.Google Scholar
13. Koratkar, N. and Chopra, I. “Analysis and testing of Mach scaled rotor model with piezoelectric bender actuated trailing-edge flaps for helicopter vibration control,” 40th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, 12–15 April 1999, St Louis, Missouri, US.Google Scholar
14. Roget, B. and Chopra, I. “Control of dissimilar rotor vibration,” “43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2002, Denver, Colorado,” US.Google Scholar
15. Shen, J., Yang, M. and Chopra, I. “Swashplateless helicopter rotor system with active trailing-edge flaps for primary and vibration controls,” “45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2004, Palm Springs, California,” US.Google Scholar
16. Roget, B. and Chopra, I.Wind-tunnel testing of rotor with individually controlled trailing-edge flaps for vibration reduction,” J Aircraft, 2008, 45, (3), pp 868879.Google Scholar
17. Greenblatt, D., Nishri, B., Darabi, A. and Wygnanski, I.Dynamic stall control by periodic excitation, part 2: Mechanisms,” J Aircaft, 2001, 38, (3), pp 439447.Google Scholar
18. Feszty, D., Gillies, E.A. and Vezza, M.Alleviation of airfoil dynamic stall moments via trailing-edge flap flow control,” AIAA J, 2004, 42, (1), pp 1725.Google Scholar
19. Lee, H. and Su, Y.Y.Unsteady airfoil with a harmonically deflected trailing-edge flap,” J Fluids and Structures, 2011, 27, (27), pp 14111424.Google Scholar
20. Lee, T. and Gerontakos, P.Oscillating wing loadings with trailing-edge strips,” J Aircaft, 2006, 43, (2), pp 428436.Google Scholar
21. Tang, D. and Dowell, E.H.Aerodynamic flow control of an airfoil with small trailing-edge strips,” J Aircraft, 2006, 43, (6), pp 18541866.Google Scholar
22. Tang, D. and Dowell, E.H.Aerodynamic loading for an airfoil with an oscillating Gurney flap,” J Aircaft, 2007, 44, (4), pp 428436.Google Scholar
23. Kinzel, M., Maughmer, M. and Duque, E.Numerical investigation on the Aerodynamics of oscillating airfoils with deployable Gurney flaps,” AIAA J, 2010, 48, (7), pp 14571469.Google Scholar
24. Li, Y., Wang, J. and Zhang, P.Influences of Mounting Angles and Locations on the Effects of Gurney Flaps,” J Aircraft, 2003, 40, (3), pp 494498.Google Scholar
25. Standish, K.J. and van Dam, C.P.Computational analysis of a Microtab-based aerodynamic load control system for rotor blades,” J American Helicopter Society, 2005, 50, (3), pp 249258.Google Scholar
26. Cole, J.A., Vieira, B.A., Coder, J.G., Premi, A. and Maughmer, M.D.Experimental investigation into the effect of Gurney flaps on various airfoils,” J Aircaft, 2013, 50, (4), pp 12871294.Google Scholar
27. Matalanis, C.G., Wake, B.E., Opoku, D., Min, B., Yeshala, N. and Sankar, L.Aerodynamic evaluation of miniature trailing-edge effectors for active rotor control,” J Aircraft, 2011, 48, (3), pp 9951004.Google Scholar
28. Palacios, J., Kinzel, M. and Overmeyer, A.Active Gurney flaps: Their application in a rotor blade centrifugal field,” J Aircaft, 2014, 51, (2), pp 473489.Google Scholar
29. Zanotti, A. and Gibertini, G.Experimental investigation of the dynamic stall phenomenon on a NACA 23012 oscillating aerofoil,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, 2013, 227, (9), pp 13751388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Zanotti, A., Grassi, G. and Gibertini, G.Experimental investigation of a trailing edge L-shaped tab on a pitching airfoil in deep dynamic stall conditions,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, 2014, 228, (1), pp 23712382.Google Scholar
31. Motta, V., Guardone, A. and Quaranta, G. “Numerical investigation of an L-shaped deployable Gurney flap for rotorcraft vibration control,” “International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, 2013, Bristol, UK.”Google Scholar
32. Motta, V. and Quaranta, G.Linear reduced-order model for unsteady aerodynamics of an L-shaped Gurney flap,” J Aircraft, 2015, 52, 18871904. doi:10.2514/1.C033099.Google Scholar
33. Bielawa, R.L. Rotary Wing Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity, 1992, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, DC, US.Google Scholar
34. Johnson, W. “Self-tuning regulators for multicyclic control of helicopter vibrations,” Tech Rep, NASA TP, 1996.Google Scholar
35. Richter, K. and Rosemann, H.Experimental investigation of trailing-edge devices at transonic speeds,” Aeronautical J, 2002, 106, pp 183193.Google Scholar
36. Li, Y., Wang, J. and Hua, J.Experimental investigations on the effects of divergent trailing edge and Gurney flaps on a supercritical airfoil,” Aerospace Science and Technology, 11, (2–3), pp 9199.Google Scholar
37. Küssner, H. and Schwarz, L. “The oscillating wing with aerodynamically balanced elevator,” TM 991, NACA, 1941. Translated from Luftfahrtforschung, vol. 17, pp 337–354, 1940.Google Scholar
38. Fung, Y. Theory of Aeroelasticity, 1955, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, US.Google Scholar
39. Bisplinghoff, R., Ashley, H. and Halfman, R. Aeroelasticity, 1955, Addison–Wesley Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US.Google Scholar
40. Johnson, W. Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, 2013, Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, US.Google Scholar
41. Patt, D., Liu, L., Chandrasekar, J., Bernstein, D.S. and Friedmann, P.P.Higher-harmonic-control algorithm for helicopter vibration reduction revisited,” J Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2005, 28, (5), pp 918930.Google Scholar
42. Milgram, J. and Chopra, I. “Helicopter vibration reduction with trailing edge flaps,” “36th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 1995, New Orleans, Louisiana, US.”Google Scholar
43. Lemmens, Y., Erdelyi, H. and Olbrechts, T. “Design study of an active Gurney flap system for helicopter rotor blades,” “28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2012, Brisbane, Australia.”Google Scholar