Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:49:26.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modern Methods of Investigating Flutter and Vibration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

H. P. Y. Hitch*
Affiliation:
British Aircraft Corporation (Operating) Ltd., Weybridge Division

Summary

The past several years have seen a steady advance in the techniques employed in flutter and vibration analysis. At the same time aircraft performance has been improved on every front and margins have had to be reduced: it is only by making full use of these modern methods that the accepted margins of safety have been preserved.

The paper reviews the processes which are currently used in the prediction and prevention of aircraft flutter in contrast to those of a few years back. The more recent types of flutter which have had to be considered are discussed briefly in relation to the methods which have been developed to deal with them. Ground and Flight testing methods are reviewed together with the use to which the results are put.

Finally there is a discussion of the increasing need to predict sub-critical response. The methods employed are discussed in relation to the more important problems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Broadbent, E. G.Aeroelastic Problems in Connection with High Speed Flight. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 60, p. 459, July 1956.Google Scholar
2.Collar, A. R.Aeroelasticity—Retrospect and Prospect. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 63, p. 1, January 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Muller, D.A Method for Solving Equations using an Automatic Computer. Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation, Vol. 10, No. 56, p. 208.Google Scholar
4.Strachey, C. and Francis, J.The Reduction of a Matrix to Codiagonal Form by Eliminations. Computer Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, p. 168.Google Scholar
5.Garner, H. C. Multhopp's Subsonic Lifting Surface Theory Wings in Slow Pitching Oscillations. R & M 2885, July 1952.Google Scholar
6.Richardson, J. A Method for Calculating the Lifting Forces on Wings (Unsteady Subsonic and Supersonic Lifting Surface Theory). R & M 3157, April 1955.Google Scholar
7.Pines, S., Dugundji, J. and Neuringer, J.Aerodynamic Flutter Derivatives for a Flexible Wing with Supersonic and Subsonic Edges. Journal of the Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 10, p. 693, October 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Harris, G. The Calculation of Generalized Forces on Oscillating Wings in Supersonic Flow by Lifting Surface Theory (unpublished).Google Scholar
9.Ashley, and Lartarian, . Piston Theory—A New Aerodynamic Tool for the Aeroelastician. Journal of the Institute of Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 12, December 1956.Google Scholar
10.Jones, W. P. Aerodynamic Forces on Wings in Non-Uniform Motion. R & M 2117, August 1945.Google Scholar
11.Woolston, Watkins and Cunningham, . A Systematic Kernel Function Procedure for Determining Aerodynamic Forces on Oscillating or Steady Finite Wings at Subsonic Speeds. NASA TR R-48, 1959.Google Scholar
12.Argyris, J. and Kelsey, S.Energy Theorems and Structural Analysis. Butterworth's Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
13.Davies, D. E. Generalized Air Forces on Oscillating T-Tails in Subsonic Flow (unpublished).Google Scholar
14.Reed, W. and Bland, S. An Analytical Treatment of Aircraft Propeller Precession Instability. NASA TN D-659.Google Scholar
15.Fung, Y. A Summary of the Theories and Experiments on Panel Flutter. GALCIT AFOSR TN 60-224, May 1960.Google Scholar
16.Scruton, and Windsor, . Flutter Investigations in High Speed Wind Tunnels. AGARD Report 222, October 1958.Google Scholar
17.Bishop, and Gladwell, . An Investigation into the Theory of Resonance Testing. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Series A, No. 1055, Vol. 225, pp. 241280, January 1963.Google Scholar
18.Mazet, R. Some Aspects of Ground and Flight Vibration Tests. AGARD Report 40-T, 1956.Google Scholar
19.Bellerby, P. A Note on In-Flight Flutter Testing using the Method of Decaying Oscillations. Blackburn Aircraft Ltd. Note YFT 1683, October 1959 (unpublished).Google Scholar
20.Crisp, J.The Equation of Energy Balance for Fluttering Systems with some Applications in the Supersonic Regime. Journal of the Institute of Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 11, November 1959.Google Scholar