Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T17:02:47.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling and simulation study of end around taxiway operation of Shanghai Hongqiao Airport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2024

Z. Chen
Affiliation:
College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
Z. Zhao*
Affiliation:
College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
B. Cheng
Affiliation:
Air Traffic Management Bureau of Civil Aviation Administration of China, Beijing 100000, China
*
Corresponding author: Z. Zhao; Email: zheng_zhao@nuaa.edu.cn

Abstract

With the rapid expansion of the aviation industry, an increasing number of Close Spaced Parallel Runway (CSPR) airports are either planning or constructing End Around Taxiways (EAT) to alleviate field operation pressures and enhance safety. Taking Shanghai Hongqiao Airport’s typical CSPR EAT configuration as a case study, this research integrates the airport’s current operational status with the anticipated requirements for future structural renovations and increased flight volumes. Various operational scenarios are established, and simulation research on optimising EAT operations is conducted in advance. The simulation study proceeds as follows: first, an AirTOP simulation model is constructed based on Hongqiao Airport’s actual operational construction. Subsequently, leveraging existing operational scenarios, five simulation scenarios are devised by activating EATs at the departure and approach ends of the eastern zone. The merits and drawbacks of these scenarios are thoroughly analysed. The findings indicate that, with escalating flight volumes, the utilisation of EAT for larger aircraft can curtail their holding duration by nearly 8 min, consequently reducing overall arrival holding duration by 6 min. Departures from gates proximate to T1 experience a 3-min reduction in holding duration through the adoption of EAT at the approach end. Despite an increase in taxi distance due to a higher proportion of aircraft taxiing around, the overall taxi time is diminished. Activating EATs at the departure and approach ends of the eastern zone effectively mitigates the adverse effects of heightened flight volumes on field operational efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Haibin, P. Runway incursion at Hongqiao Airport: two planes with wingtips 13m apart in near disaster, YiMagazine, 2016. https://www.yicai.com/news/5135361.html Google Scholar
Huimin, Z. Application Research of End-Around Taxiway in Multi-Runway Airport. (Master), Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2020, Available from Cnki.Google Scholar
Jiakai, G. Research of Taxiing Route Optimization for Aircraft Based on the Parallel Runway of Guangzhou Baiyun Airport, (Master), Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2017. Available from Cnki.Google Scholar
Long, L. Research on the Design of End-Around Taxiway of Civil Airport. (Master), Civil Aviation University of China, 2015. Available from Cnki.Google Scholar
Tong, W. Research of Taxiing Route Optimization for Airport Based on the Parallel Runway. (Master), Civil Aviation University of China, 2019. Available from Cnki.Google Scholar
Wei, W. and Long, L. Study on operation strategy of end-around taxiway and its application, J. Highw. Transport. Res. Develop., 2016, 33, (06), pp 119122.Google Scholar
Wenjuan, X. The Planning and Operation of End-Around Taxiway for Civil Aerodrome. (Master), Civil Aviation University of China, 2014, Available from Cnki.Google Scholar
Fala, N., Le, T.T., Marais, K. and Uday, P. Surface performance of end-around taxiways. Air Traffic Contr. Q, 2014, 22, (4), pp 327351. doi: 10.2514/atcq.22.4.327 Google Scholar
Guanghong, F. Study on Taxiing System Optimization of Multi-Runway Airport. (master), Civil Aviation University of China, 2020, Available from Cnki.Google Scholar
Le, T.T. and Marais, K. Optimization of end-around taxiway for efficient operations and environmental benefits, In 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 2013.Google Scholar
FAA. Runway Incursion Mitigation (RIM) Program, 2015. https://www.faa.gov/airports/special_programs/rim/ Google Scholar
Engelland, S. and Ruszkowski, L.M. Analysis of DFW perimeter taxiway operations, In 10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, 2010.Google Scholar
Xiong, L., Dongbin, L. and Dongxuan, W. Airport capacity analysis for typical parallel runways based on simulation method, J. Comput. Appl., 2012, 32, (09), pp 26482651.Google Scholar
Youchao, L. and Xiaowei, T. Influence of end-around taxiway on airport operation: take PVG for instance, J. Civil Aviat. Univ. China, 2019, 37, (06), pp 2933.Google Scholar
Ting, X., Minghua, H. and Zheng, Z. Analysis of end- around taxiway’s operational benefits, Aeronaut. Comput. Techniq., 2015, 45, (04), pp 112115.Google Scholar
Massidda, A., Mattingly, S.P. and Transportation Research Board Empirical Assessment of the End-Around Taxiway’s Operational Benefits at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Using ASDE-X Data, Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States. 2013, Digital: https://trid.trb.org/view/1243064 Google Scholar
Jame, C. The perimeter push. Air Transport World, 2009, 6, p 69.Google Scholar
Reisweber, M.A. Proof-of-Concept Demonstration for the Proposed 8R End Around Taxiway (EAT) at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (KATL) (DOT-FAA-AFS-440-5). P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125, 2004.Google Scholar
Skiver, M.A.R.J.H.J.H.S.S.A.E. End-Around Taxiway (EAT) Analysis—East Traffic Arrivals (Runways 17C and 17R) at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) (DOT-FAA-AFS-440-38). Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73169, 2008.Google Scholar
Uday, P., Marais, K. and Burder, D. Environmental benefits of end-around taxiway operations, In 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, 2011.Google Scholar
Heinold, M.T.M.D. The case to build end-around taxiways at George Bush Intercontinental Airport for air quality benefit. In T&DI Congress 2011, pp. 339352, 2011.Google Scholar
Tee YY, Z.Z. Modelling and simulation studies of the runway capacity of Changi Airport, Aeronaut. J., 2018, 122, (1253), pp 10221037. doi: 10.1017/aer.2018.48 Google Scholar
EUROCONTROL. Wake vortex turbulence, 2012. https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/wake-vortex Google Scholar
ICAO. 2016–2030 Global Air Navigation Plan. Montréal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2016, pp. 29–31.Google Scholar
DFW. Benefit-Cost Analysis. Dallas/Fort Worth, TX, USA, 2017.Google Scholar
Khadilkar, H. and Balakrishnan, H. Estimation of aircraft taxi fuel burn using flight data recorder archives, Transport. Res. D: Transp Environ, 2012, 17, (7), pp 532537. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2012.06.005 Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Liu, S. and Li, H. Multi-objective route planning for aircraft taxiing under different traffic conflict types, J. Aerosp. Inform. Syst., 2022, 19, (2), pp 124142. doi: 10.2514/1.I010982 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material
Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB