Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T03:35:43.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy as a Technique for Studying Surface Concentration Profiles of Heterogeneous Catalysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Eva M. Kenny
Affiliation:
Halcon Research 1 Philips Parkway, Montvale, New Jersey
Burton J. Palmer
Affiliation:
Halcon Research 1 Philips Parkway, Montvale, New Jersey
Get access

Abstract

X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy is usually not considered a surface technique in the same sense as ESCA or Auger spectroscopies. However, it can be a useful tool in studying the “surface” and bulk concentrations of elements in heterogeneous catalysts. The “surface” is defined by the effective penetration depth of the analyte line of the element of interest in a specific matrix. In the example which is presented, silver on alumina, the “surface” using the Ag KB1,3 is defined by a shell 3000 microns deep while for the Ag LAI it is 15 microns. Two methods of sample preparation are discussed and data obtained using three different calculation methods is presented. Data from the x-ray fluorescence method is compared to the silver depth profile in the alumina pellets obtained by electron microprobe analysis. The XRFS method allows rapid screening of many catalyst samples for the fraction of the cost of the microprobe technique.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Josseaux, P., et al, J. Electrochem, Soc., 132, 684 (1985).Google Scholar
2. R., Jenkins, and Devries, J.L., “Practical X-ray Spectrometry”, Springer-Verlag; New York, 1967; Chapters 1, 6, and 8.Google Scholar
3. Bertin, E.P., “Principles and Practice of X-ray Spectrometric Analysis“; Plenum; New York, 1970.Google Scholar
4. C., Cornelius, Anal. Chem., 53, 2361 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Russ, J.C., Advan. X. ray Anal. 28, 11 (1984).Google Scholar
6. J., Wernisch, X. ray Spectrom., 14, 109 (1985).Google Scholar
7. W., Worthy, C&EN. April 8, 1985, 28.Google Scholar
8. Lee, S.Y., and Aris, R., Catal. Rev. -Sci. Eng., 27, 207 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Komiyama, M., Catal. Rev. -Sci. Eng., 27, 341 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Harriott, P., J. Catalysis, 14, 43 (1969).Google Scholar
11. Alley, B.J., and Myers, R.H., Anal. Chem., 37, 1685 (1965).Google Scholar
12. Stephenson, D.A., Anal. Chem., 4 3, 310 (1971).Google Scholar
13. Plesch, R., Siemens Analytical Application Note, N.28.Google Scholar
14. Plesch, R., and Thiele, B., Siemens Analytical Application Note, N.33.Google Scholar
15. Thiele, B., and Plesch, R., Siemens Analytical, Application Note, N.41.Google Scholar
16. Criss, J.W., and Birks, L.S., Anal. Chem. 40, 1080 (1968).Google Scholar
17. Criss, J.W., Advan. X. ray Anal., 23, 93 (1980).Google Scholar
18. Jenkins, R., and De Vries, J.L., “Worked Examples in X. ray Analysis“; Springer-Verlag; NewYork, 1970; pp 7479.Google Scholar