Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:55:21.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Diffraction Study of BaNd2CuO5 at High Pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Winnie Wong-Ng
Affiliation:
Ceramics Division National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Gasper J. Piermarini
Affiliation:
Ceramics Division National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Marcia R. Gallas
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul RS Brazil
Get access

Abstract

The volume compression of BaNd2CuO5 has been measured to 8.7 GPa utilizing a diamond anvil high pressure eel and energy dispersive x-ray powder diffraction. The pressure dependence of the volume of the tetragonal unit cell is linear and follows the equation V = -1.6I5P + 260.622 determined by a least-squares fit of the data. Compression of the unit cell parameters of BaNd2CuO5 exhibit isotropic behavior within our experimental error. From the observed data, the bulk modulus of BaNd2CuO5 is determined to be 161 ± 6 GPa and the Young's modulus is estimated to be 193 ± 6 GPa. No evidence of a pressure-induced phase transformation in BaNd2CuO5 was found in the pressure range studied.

Type
X. Structural and Other Applications of Powder Diffraction
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wong-Ng, W., Cook, L.P., B. Paretzkin, Hill, M.L. and StaKck, J.K., J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 1994, to be published.Google Scholar
2. Stalick, J.K. and Wong-Ng, W. Mater. Let. 9 401 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Munro, R.G., S. Block, Piermarini, G.J., and Mauer, F.A.; pp. 783–92 in Materials Science Research, vol 17, Emergent process Methods for High Technology Ceramics. Edited by R.F. Davis, H. Palmour III, and R.L. Porter, Plenum, New York 1984.Google Scholar
4. Munro, R.G., Block, S., and Piermarini, G.J., J. Appl. Phys. 56 2174 (1984).Google Scholar
5. JCPDS-.ICDD., Newtown Square Campus, 12 Campus Blvd. PA 19073-3273.Google Scholar
6. Garvey, R., PC version of the NBSLSQ program, Chemistry Department, North Dakota State University, 1986.Google Scholar
7. Appleman, D. E. and Evans, H.T. Jr., Report PB 216188, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Technical Information Service 5285. Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22151, 1973.Google Scholar
8. Anstis, G.R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B.R., and Marshall, D.B.. J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 64 [9] (1981) 533.Google Scholar
9. Beech, F., Miraglia, S., Santoro, A., and Roth, R.S., Phys. Rev. B 35 8778 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Block, S., Piermarini, G.J. Munro, R.G., and Wong-Ng, W., Adv. Ceram, Mater, 2 [3B] 601 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Cankurtaran, M., Saunders, G.A., Goretta, K.G. and Poeppel, R.B., Phys. Rev. B 46 1157 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Rigden, S., White, O.K. and Vance, E.R. Phys. Rev. B 47 1153 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Ledbetter, H. and Lei, M., J. Mater. Res. 6 [No. 11] 2253 (1991)Google Scholar
14. Ledbetter, H., Lei, M., Hermann, A. and Sheng, Z., Physica C 225 397 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Jorgensen, J., Pei, S., Lightfoot, P., Hinks, D.G., Veal, B.W., Dabrowski, B., Paulikas, A.P. and R, Kleb, Physica C 171 93 (1990).Google Scholar
16. Ludwig, H.A., Fietz, W.H. and Wuhl, H., Physica C 197 113 (1992).Google Scholar