Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T00:36:36.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in Intensity Ratios Used to Identify Asbestos Fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

John C. Russ*
Affiliation:
EDAX Laboratories P.O. Box 135, Prairie View, IL 60069
Get access

Extract

Identification of asbestos fibers and other small particulate matter observed in TEM and STEM is often based in whole or part on the ratios of elemental intensities. The underlying principle in this method is the linear relationship between concentration ratio and intensity ratio, which has been proposed by many authors, some of whom measure the proportionality factors and others calculate them from quasi-theoretical relationships.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Beaman, D.R. and File, D.M., “Quantitative Determination of Asbestos Fiber Concentrations”, Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 1, January 1976, p. 101110.Google Scholar
2. Pooley, F.D., “The Use of an Analytical Electron Microscope in the Analysis of Mineral Dusts”, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 286, p. 625638, 1977.Google Scholar
3. Pooley, F.D., “The Identification of Asbestos Dust with an Electron Microscope Microprobe Analyzer”, Norelco Reporter, Special Issue 1976, p. 5-9.Google Scholar
4. Cliff, U. G. and Lorimer, G. W., “Quantitative Analysis of Thin Foils Using EMMA 4 - The Ratio Technique”, Proc. Fifth Europ, Congr. on Electron Microsc. Manchester, p. 140141, London: Inst, of Physics.Google Scholar
5. Russ, J.C., “The Direct Element Ratio Model for Quantitative Analysis of Thin Sections1', Microprobe Analysis as Applied to Cells and Tissues, Hall, T., Echlin, P. and Kaufmann, R., 1974, p. 269-276.Google Scholar
6. Pooley, F. D., private communication.Google Scholar