Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T17:51:32.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of X Rays Induced by Charged Particles*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Jerome L. Duggan
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tn.
William L. Beck
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tn.
Larry Albrecht
Affiliation:
ORTEC, Inc., Oak Ridge, Tn.
Lee Munz
Affiliation:
ORTEC, Inc., Oak Ridge, Tn.
James D. Spaulding
Affiliation:
Pacific Union University, Angwin, California
Get access

Abstract

Characteristic x rays have been produced for a variety of samples by bombardment with protons in the energy range from 75 keV to 5 MeV. The experiments were performed with two accelerators. For the low-energy studies (less than 150 keV), a Cockcroft-Walton accelerator was used. The higher-energy studies were done with a 5 MV Van de Graaff. The x rays were measured with high-resolution Si(Li) and Ge(Li) detectors. Yields for the cross section of characteristic K- and L-shell ionizations were measured for titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganeses iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, silver, gold, bismuth, and uranium. The experimental cross-sections have been compared to the theoretical predictions of the Born approximation for an interaction of this type.

Trace element analysis by 4-MeV proton bombardment of samples in the 10-12 gm range has also been performed. Some comments with regard to analysis with these sensitivities will be made.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

ORAU is supported in part by the USAEC.

*

Some of the measurements reported in this paper were made on the 5 MV Van de Graaffaccelerator at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory which is operated by Union Carbide Corporation for the USAEC.

*

Some of the measurements reported in this paper were made on the 5 MV Van de Graaff accelerator at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory which is operated by Union Carbide Corporation for the USAEC.

References

1. Chadwick, J., “The αRays Excited by the β Rays of Radium,” Phil. Mag. 24, 594 (1912)Google Scholar
2. Bothe, W. and Franz, H., “Products of Atomic Disintegration, Reflected α-Particles and X-Rays Excited by α-Particles”, Z. Physik 49, 126 (1928)Google Scholar
3. Barton, H. A., “Comparison of Protons and Electrons in Excitation of X-Rays by Impact”, J. Franklin Inst. 209, 119 (1930)Google Scholar
4. Gerthsen, C. and Reusse, W., “Anregumg von Charakteristischer RontgenstrahlungdurchKanalstrahlenstob” or “Stimulation of X-Radiation by Canal-Ray Impacts,” Phys. Z. 34, 478482 (1933)Google Scholar
5. Livingston, M. S., Genevese, F., and Konopinski, E. J., “The Excitation of Characteristic X-Rays by Protons,” Phys. Rev. 51, 835 (1937).Google Scholar
6. Henneberg, W., “Electron Scattering by Heavy Atoms,” Z. Physik 83, 555580 (1933)Google Scholar
7. Lewis, H. H., Simmons, B. E., and Merzbacher, E., “Production of Characteristic X-Rays by Protons of 1.7 - 3 MeV Energy,” Phys. Rev. 91, 943 (1953).Google Scholar
8. Bernstein, E. M., and Lewis, H. W., “L Shell Ionization by Protons of 1.5 - 4.25 MeV Energy,” Phys. Rev. 95, 83, (1954).Google Scholar
9. Hanstein, J. M., and Messelt, S., “Characteristic X-Ray Produced by Proton of 0.2 to 1.6 MeV Energy,” Nucl. Phys. 2, 526 (1956/57)Google Scholar
10. Messelt, S., “K-Shell Ionization by Protons,” Nucl. Phys. 5, 435, (1958).Google Scholar
11. Singh, B., “Excitation of Characteristic K X-Rays by Protons, Deuterons, and Alpha Particles,” Phys. Rev. 107, 711 (1957).Google Scholar
12. Merzbacher, E. and Lewis, H. W., “X-Ray Production by Heavy Charged Particles,” Encyclopedia of Physics, Flugge, S., Editor, Vol. 34, Berlin: Springer-Verlog, (1958).Google Scholar
13. Jopson, R. C., Mark, H., and Swift, C. D., “Production of Characteristic X-Rays by Low Energy Protons,” The Physical Review, 127, 1612 (1962).Google Scholar
14. Khan, J. M. and Potter, D. L., “Characteristic K-Shell X-Ray Production in Magnesium, Aluminum, and Copper by 60- and 500-keV Protons,” Phys. Rev. 133, A890 (1964).Google Scholar
15. Khan, J. M., Potter, D. L., and Worley, R. D., “Characteristic X-Ray Production in the LIIIShell of Copper by Low Energy (100 to 500 KeV) Protons,” Phys. Rev. 134, A316 (1964).Google Scholar
16. Khan, J. M., Potter, D. L., and Worley, R. D., “Characteristic X-Ray Production in the M Shell of Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho by 25 - 100 keV Protons,” Phys. Rev. 135, A511 (1964).Google Scholar
17. Khan, J. M., Potter, D. L., and Worley, R. D., “Characteristic X-Ray Production in the Mv Shell in Ytterbium by 30-100 keV Protons,” The Physical Review. 136, A108, (1964).Google Scholar
18. Khan, J. M., Potter, D. L., and Worley, R. D., “Studies in X-Ray Production by Proton Bombardment of C, Mg, Al, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho,” The Physical Review. 139, A1735 (1965).Google Scholar
19. Sterk, A. A., “X-Ray Production in the L Shell of Copper by 251700 eV Protons,” The Physical Review. 145, 23 (1966).Google Scholar
20. Khan, J. M., Potter, D. L., Worley, R. D., and Smith, H. P. Jr., “Characteristic X-Ray Production in Single Crystals (Al, Cu) by Proton Bombardment I. Protons of 70-100 keV.” Phys. Rev. 148, 413 (1966).Google Scholar
21. Sterk, A. A., Marks, C. L., and Saylor, W. P., “Production Efficiencies of X-Ray Emission Spectra by Proton Bombardment,” in Newkirk, J. B. and Mallett, G. R., Editors, Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 10, New York: Plenum Press, (1966).Google Scholar
22. Khan, J. M., Potter, D. L., Worley, R. D., and Smith, H. P. Jr., “Characteristic X-Ray Production in Single Crystals (Al, Cu, W) by Proton Bombardment, II, Protons of 250 to 1560 keV,” Phys. Rev. 163, 81 (1967).Google Scholar
23. Christensen, L. J., Khan, J. M., and Brunner, W. F., “Measurement of Microgram Surface Densities by Observation of Proton Produced S-RaysRev. Scien.Inst. 38, 20 (1967).Google Scholar
24. Khan, J. M., Potter, D. L., Worley, R. D. and Smith, H. P. Jr.Characteristic X-Ray Production in Single Crystals (Al, Cu, W) by Proton Bombardment II. Protons of 250 to 1560 keV.” Phys. Rev., 163, 81 (1967).Google Scholar
25. Sterk, A. A., Marks, C. L., and Saylor, W. D., “Production Efficiencies of X-Ray Emission Spectra by Proton Bombardment” Advances in X-Ray Emission Spectra by Proton BombardmentAdvances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 10, 399 (1967).Google Scholar
26. Hart, R. R., Olson, N. T., Smith, H. P. Jr., Khan, J. M., “Oxygen Surface Density Measurements Based on Characteristic X-Ray Production by 100keV ProtonsJ. of Appl. Phy. 39 5538 (1968).Google Scholar
27. Hart, R. R., Reuter, F. W. III, Smith, H. P. Jr., and Khan, J. M., “Oxygen K Shell X-Ray Production in Thin Films of Aluminum Oxide by 20 to 100-keV Protons”, Phys. Rev. 179 (1969).Google Scholar
28. Bissinger, G. A., Joyce, J. M., Ludwig, E. J., McEver, W. S., and Shafroth, S. M., “Study of the Production of K X-Rays in Ca, Ti, and Ni by 2-28 MeV Protons,” Phys. Rev. A1, 841 (1970).Google Scholar
29. Johansson, T. B., Akselsson, R., and Johansson, S. A. E., “X-Ray Analysis: Elemental Trace Analysis at the 10-12g Level,” Nucl. Inst. and Meth. 84, 141 (1970).Google Scholar
30. Spaulding, J. D., “Charged Particle Excited X-Rays,” Proceedings of the Second Oak Ridge Conference on the Use of Small Accelerators for Teaching and Research, Duggan, Jerome L., Editor, p. 113 (1970).Google Scholar
31. Sharma, R. P., Thosar, B. V., and Prasad, K. G., “X-Ray Yields From K Shell Ionization by a Particles,” Phys. Rev. 140, A1084 (1965).Google Scholar
32. Brandt, W., Laubert, R., and Sellin, IvanCharacteristic X-Ray Production in Magnesium, Aluminum, and Copper by Low-Energy Hydrogen and Helium Ions”, Phys. Rev. 151, 56 (1966).Google Scholar
33. Marks, C. L., Saylor, W. P., and Sterk, A. A., “X-Ray Analysis by Proton Bombardment” Proceedings of 2nd Symposium on Low-Energy X- and Gamma-Sources and Applications. Published as 0RNL-IIC-10, p. 587 (1967).Google Scholar
34. Sellers, B., Wilson, H. H., and Papadopoulos, J., “Heavy Particle Excitation of Low Energy Characteristic X-Radiation-Analytical and Experimental Correlations”, Proceedings of 2nd Symposium on Low-energy x- and Gamma Sources and Applications, ORNL-IIC-IO, p. 576 (1967).Google Scholar
35. Der, R. G., Kavanagh, T. M., Khan, J. M., Curry, B. P., and Fortner, R. J., “Production of Carbon Characteristic X-Rays by Heavy- Ion Bombardment”, Phys. Rev. Letters, 21, 1731 (1968).Google Scholar
36. Brandt, W., and Laubert, R., “Ionization of the Aluminum K Shell by Low Energy Hydrogen and Helium Ions”, Phys. Rev. 178, 225 (1969).Google Scholar
37. Fortner, R. J., Curry, B. P., Der, R. C., Kavanagh, T. M., and Khan, J. M., “X-Ray Production in C+-C Collisions in The Energy Range 20 keV to 1.5 MeV”, Phys. Rev. 185, 164 (1969).Google Scholar
38. Richard, P., Morgan, I. L., Furuta, T., and Burch, D., “Observed Kβ. Energy Shift in Cu and N1Phys. Rev. Lets. 23, 1009 (1969).Google Scholar
39. Brandt, W. and Laubert, R., “Pauli Excitation of Atoms in Collision”, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 1037 (1970).Google Scholar
40. Burch, D., and Richard, P.X-Ray Spectra From Oxygen-Ion Bombardments on Ca and V at 15 MeV.” Phys. Rev. Letters 25, 983 (1970).Google Scholar
41. Cunningham, M. E., Der, R. C., Fortner, R. J., Kavanagh, T. M., Khan, J. M., Layne, C. B., Zanaris, E. J., and Garcia, J. D., “X-Ray Spectra from Argon-Argon Collisions”, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 931 (1970).Google Scholar
42. Richard, P., Bonner, T. I., Furuta, T., Morgan, I. L. and Rhodes, J. R., “Cu Kα/Kβ X-Ray Production from Proton and Oxygen Bombardment,” Phys. Rev. 1A, 1044 (1970).Google Scholar
43. Stein, H. J., Lute, H. O., Mokler, P. H., Sistemich, K., and Armbruster, P., “Impact-Parameter Dependence of Inner-Shell Vacancy Production by Heavy-Ion Bombardment”, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 701 (1970).Google Scholar
44. Watson, R. L., Lewis, C. W., and Natowitz, J. B., “X-Ray Emission Induced by 30 to 80 MeV Alpha Particles,” Nucl. Phys. A154, 561 (1970).Google Scholar
45. Lewis, C. W., Natowitz, J. B., and Watson, R. L., “Precise Test of the Dependence of X-Ray Emission Induced by α Particles and Deuterons,” Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 481 (1971).Google Scholar
46. Mokler, P. H., “Energy Shift of Characteristic X-Rays Induced in Collisions Between 15 to 60 MeV I Ions and Mo, Yb, and Au Targets,” Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 811 (1971).Google Scholar
47. Lockwood, G. L., “Production of Ions of Alkali Metals, Other Metals, and Halogens in rf of Source,” Rev. Sci. Instruments Vol. 37, No. 2, p. 226.Google Scholar
48. Hall, R. S., Poole, D. B., Stagg, M. S., “Production of Metallic and Other Ions in rf Ion Source,” Review of Sci. Instr., Vol. 37, No. 7, p. 956.Google Scholar
49. Duggan, Jerome L., Editor, “Proceedings of The Second Oak Ridge Conference on The Use of Small Accelerators for Teaching and Research”, Available from the Clearinghouse for Federal and Te Technical Information, National Bureau of Standards, Springfield, Virginia 22151. Conf. No. 700322 (1970).Google Scholar
50. Duggan, Jerome L., Editor, “Proceedings of the Use of Small Accelerators for Teaching and Research,” Oak Ridge, Tenn., Available from Clearinghouse for Federal and Tech. Information, National Bureau of Standards, Springfield, Virginia 22151, Conf. No. 680411 (1968).Google Scholar
51. Dearnaley, G., “Preparation of Thin Self Supporting Carbon FoilsRev. Sci. Instr. Vol. 31, No. 2, p. 197 (1960).Google Scholar
52. Kobisk, E. H., “Targets for Nuclear Research,” Proceedings of the Conference on the Use of Small Accelerators for Teaching and Research, Duggan, Jerome L., Editor. Available from the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, National Bureau of Standards, Springfield, Virginia, Conf. No. 680411, p. 426, (1968).Google Scholar
53. Watson, R. L., Lewis, C. W., and Natowitz, J. B., Nuclear Physics A 154, p. 561575 (1970).Google Scholar
54. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna Calibrated Gamma Sources.Google Scholar
55. Grodstein, G. W., “X-Ray Attenuation Coefficients for 10 keV to 100 meV,” National Bureau of Standards Circular 583, Washington D.C. (1957).Google Scholar
56. Liebhafsky, H. A., Pfeiffer, H. G., Winslow, E. H., and Zemany, P. D., “Values of Mass Absorption Coefficients of Elements in the Region 0.1 Å.,X-Ray Absorption and Emmissions in Analytical Chemistry. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1960).Google Scholar
57. Khandelwal, G. S., Choi, B. H., and Merzbacher, E., “Tables for Born Approximation Calculations of the K and L-Shell Ionization by Proton and Other Charged Particles,” Atomic Data 1, 103 (1969)Google Scholar
58. Cairus, J. A., Holloway, D. F., and Nelson, R. S., “Heavy Ion- Induced X-Ray Generation as an Analytical Probe” Available from Solid State Division, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell Berkshire, England as Report No.AERE-R-6490.Google Scholar
59. Poole, D. M. and Show, J. L., “Microanalysis with a Proton Probe,” in Mollensteadt, G. and Gaukler, K. H., Editors, 5th International Congress on X-Ray Optics and Microanalysis, p. 319324, Springer-Verlay, Berlin (1968).Google Scholar
60. Cairns, J. A., Holloway, D. F. and Nelson, R. S., “Characteristic X-Ray Generation by Heavy Particle Irradiation of Copper,” in Palmer, D. W., Thompson, M. W., and Townsend, P. D., Editors, Atomic Collision Phenomena in Solids, p. 541552, North Holland Publishing Co. (1970).Google Scholar