Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T09:27:17.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preferred Orientation in Ceramic Materials Due to Forming Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Joseph L. Pentecost
Affiliation:
Melpar, Incorporated Falls Church, Virginia
Charles H. Wright
Affiliation:
Melpar, Incorporated Falls Church, Virginia
Get access

Abstract

Accurate measurement of the electrical and mechanical properties of polycrystalline oxide ceramics has revealed anisotropy in a number of properties. The source of this anisotropy may be attributed to a number of causes, however, with oxides having anisotropic crystals, preferred orientation of the crystallites may be suspected. Aluminum oxide and beryllium oxide ceramics samples of high purity and density were formed by slip casting, dry pressing, isostatic pressing, and extrusion. Pole figures for the (113), (110) and (030) planes in aluminum oxide and (100) and (103) planes in beryllium oxide were prepared by using a Siemens automatic pale figure goniometer.

It was found that both slip-cast oxide samples and dry-pressed aluminum oxide samples and dry-pressed beryllium oxide samples showed sufficient preferred orientation to prepare a pole figure from the data. The actual preferential orientation of the crystallites in these two oxides is discussed and the pole figure information presented. The effect of furnace atmosphere and surface contaminants on re crystallization at an exposed surface is covered briefly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sjodahl, L. H., “Orientation in Extruded BeO,” Flight Propulsion Laboratory Department, General Electric Company, Report TM 63-4-1. (Prepared for submission to the Journal of Nuclear Materials.)Google Scholar
2. Newsome, J. W., Heiser, H. W., Russell, A. S., and Stumpf, H. C., “Alumina Properties,” Aluminum Company of America, Technical Paper No. 10, Second Revision, 1960.Google Scholar
3. Neff, H., “Texture Analysis of Metallic Materials with a Counter Diffractometer,” Siemens Rev. XXXI (3): 93, 1957.Google Scholar