Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:35:00.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old Errors and New Corrections in X-Ray Line Profile Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

A. Kidron  and
R.J. De Angelis
A. Kidron
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40506
R.J. De Angelis
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40506
Get access

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increasing awareness of the errors involved in X-Ray line profile analysis which is used to calculate coherently diffracting particle size, local strains and stacking fault probabilities in materials. Here a modified version of a Least Squares Analysis (L.S.A.) of the Fourier coefficients is presented. This method gives a possibility of making new corrections in a more natural and accurate way to the errors in the line profile analysis.

The first error involves the fact that experimentally one accumulates data as a function of θ - the Bragg angle, whereas the Fourier analysis is made in terms of equidistant steps in sin θ, In the L.S.A. the data does not have to be given in equidistant steps of sin θ in order to be analyzed, so that this type of error does not exist at all.

In the L.S.A. there is also no need for the explicit separation of the Kαl component from the total doublet line profile. This type of analysis is taken here one step further and it is shown that one can calculate the Fourier coefficients of each one of two merging lines. Each of these lines may be doublets in themselves and the two series of Fourier coefficients are calculated around the centers of gravity of their Kαl components respectively.

The existence of an extra background which usually affects the Fourier coefficients when calculated by the Fourier transform method does not affect the L.S.A. except for a normalization factor. Here it is shown that this gives the possibility of calculating the strains without errors associated with the extra background.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 15: Twentieth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 11-13, 1971 , 1971 , pp. 295 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Warren, B. E., X-Ray Piffraction, p. 251, Addison Wesley Publ. Co. (1969).Google Scholar
2. Wagner, C.N. J., “Analysis of the Broadening and Changes in Position of Peaks in an X-Ray Powder Pattern,” in Cohen, J. B. and Hilliard, J. E., Editors, Local Atomic Arrangements Studied by X-Ray Diffraction, ASM Conference. Vol.36, p. 219–269, Gordon and Breach, Sc. Publ. (1965).Google Scholar
3. Kidron, A. and De Angelis, R.J., “Least Squares Analysis of Fourier Coefficients and its Application to X-Ray Diffraction Profiles,” in Gladwell, G.M.L., Editor, Symposium on Computer Aided Engineering, p. 285–297, University of Waterloo Press (1971).Google Scholar
4. Kidron, A. and De Angelis, R.J., “Direct Evaluation of Kα1 Fourier Coefficients in X-Ray Profile Analysis,” ActaCryst.A 27. (1971), in print.Google Scholar
5. Rothman, R. L. and Cohen, J. B., “A New Method for Fourier Analysis of Shapes of X-Ray Peaks and its Application to Line Broadening and Integrated Intensities Measurements,” in C.S. Barrett, Newkirk, J. B. and Mallet, G. R., Editors, Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 12, p. 208–235, Plenum Press (1969).Google Scholar