Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T16:10:08.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Escape Peaks in X-Ray Diffractometry*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

William Parrish*
Affiliation:
Philips Laboratories Briarcliff Manor, New York
Get access

Abstract

Escape peaks occur when the incident X-ray quantum, energy exceeds the absorption edge energy of the detector element and the resulting X-ray fluorescence is lost from the detector. The most common escape peaks result from 1 K-fluorescence in NaI-scintillation counters and Xe K-, Xe L-, and Kr K-fluorescence in proportional counters. The average pulse amplitude of the escape peak is proportional to the difference of the Energies of the incident and fluorescent X-rays. If the intensity of the escape peak is high as in the case of Mo Kα and a kryptoopreportional counter, and the lower level of the pulse height analyzer is raised to reject the escape peak, the quantum counting efficiency may be reduced by a factor of two. When the pulse height analyzer is set for characteristic incident radiation, escape peaks appear in powder patterns at small diffraction angles. These broad low-intensity peaks are often mistakenly identified as resulting from misalignment, scattering, etc. Each powder reflection can produce its own escape peak which occurs at an angle slightly smaller than the absorption edge of the detector element. In a silicon powder pattern the three strongest reflections produce three resolved escape peaks whose peak intensities are about 4% of their corresponding Cu Kα peaks when the X-ray tube is operated at 50 kV. The escape peak intensities decrease with decreasing X-ray tube voltage and disappear when the voltage is lower than the absorption edge energy of the detector element. Absorption edge peaks observed without the upper level of the pulse height analyzer are similar in appearance, intensity, and diffraction angle to the escape peaks. In complex powder patterns the escape peak pattern is unresolved and may produce a number of very broad peaks.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency and was technically monitored by Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Contract No. AF49 (638)-1234.

References

1. Parrish, W. and Kohler, T. R., “Use of Counter Tubes in X-Ray Analysis,” Rev. Sci. Instr. 27: 795, 1956.Google Scholar
2. Parrish, W. and Lowitzsch, K., “Geometry, Alignment and Angular Calibration of X-Ray Diffractometers,” Am. Mineralogist 44: 765, 1959.Google Scholar
3. Parrish, W., “Geiger, Proportional and Scintillation Counters,” International Tables for X-Ray Crystallography, Vol. III, The Kynoch Press, Birmingham, England, 1962, p. 144.Google Scholar
4. Hendee, C. F. and Fine, S., “Moseley's Law Applied to Proportional Counter Resolution of Adjacent Elements,” Phys. Rev. 95: 281, 1954.Google Scholar
5. Fine, S. and Hendee, C. F., “X-Ray Critical-Absorption and Emission Energies in keV,” Nucleonics, 13(3):36, 1955.Google Scholar
6. Taylor, J. and Parrish, W., “Absorption and Counting-Efficiency Data for X-Ray Detectors,” Rev. Sci. Instr. 26: 367, 1955; Addendum, ibid. 27: 108, 1956.Google Scholar