Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T17:55:28.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Depth Profiling Biaxial Stresses in Sputter Deposited Molybdenum Films; Use of the Cos2φ Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

B. L. Ballard*
Affiliation:
University of Denver, Engineering Department, Denver, CO
P. K. Predecki
Affiliation:
University of Denver, Engineering Department, Denver, CO
T. R. Watkins
Affiliation:
HTML, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
K. J. Kozaczek
Affiliation:
HTML, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
D. N. Braski
Affiliation:
HTML, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
C. R. Hubbard
Affiliation:
HTML, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
*
*Present address: Rigaku/USA, 199 Rosewood Dr., Danvers, MA
Get access

Abstract

Depth profiles of intrinsic in-plane, biaxial stresses were obtained as a function of τ, the 1/e penetration depth, in a 1.0 um thick planar d. c. magentron sputter deposited molybdenum film using asymmetric grazing incidence x-ray diffraction (GIXD). τ was varied between 20 and 276 Å. The stresses σ11 and σ22 were characterized in the directions parallel and perpendicular to the long axis of the cathode respectively using a cos2φ method. The results show that starting from τ=17Å, σ11 and σ22 are compressive and become rapidly more compressive with a minimum at τ ∼ 20 - 40 Å thereafter increasing gradually toward tensile values. The reasons for the shape of the stress gradient are not well understood but may be related to the relaxation of the stresses at the tops of the columnar Zone T-type microstructure and to the oxygen gradient in the film.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Windischmann, H., Critical Reviews in Solid St. and Mat. Sci., 17 (6), 547, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Hoffman, D. W., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A, 12 (4), 953-961, 1994.Google Scholar
3. Lecontellec, J., et. al., J. Phys. 32, 553559, 1971.Google Scholar
4. Thureau, P., et. Al., Thin Solid Films, 34, 201203, 1976.Google Scholar
5. Murakami, M. and Chaudhari, P., Thin Solid Films, 55, 101111, 1978.Google Scholar
6. Murakami, M. and Chaudhari, P., Thin Solid Films, 59, 105116, 1979. 369.Google Scholar
7. Murakami, M. and Kaun, T. S., Thin Solid Films, 66, 381394, 1980.Google Scholar
8. Ballard, B. L., Predecki, P. K., and Braski, D. N., Adv. X-ray Analy. 37, 189–96, 1994.Google Scholar
9. Scofield, J. H., Duda, A., Albin, D., Ballard, B. L., and Predecki, P. K., Thin Sold Films, 260, 2631, 1995.Google Scholar
10. Vink, T. J., et. al., J. Appl. Phys., 70 (8), 4301-08, 1991.Google Scholar
11. Noyan and Cohen, J. B., Residual Stress: Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation; Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
12. Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Techno. 1, 11, 666 (1974).Google Scholar
13. Scofield, J. H., et. al., Proceedings of 1st World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Waikoloa, Hawaii, Dec. 9, 1994.Google Scholar
14. Sasaki, T., Kuramoto, M. and Yoshioka, Y., Adv. X-Ray Analy. 28, 265–74, 1984.Google Scholar
15. Zhu, X., Ph. D. Thesis, University of Denver, Denver, CO, 1995.Google Scholar
16. Parratt, L. G., Phys. Rev., 95, 359 1954.Google Scholar
17. Lim, G., et. al., J. Mater. Res., 2, (4), 471, 1987.Google Scholar
18. d'Heurle, F. M., International Mater. Review, 34, 53 (1989).Google Scholar
19. Hoffman, D. W., and Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. TechnoL, 20, 355 (1982).Google Scholar
20. Hoffman, D. W., and Thornton, J. A. Thin Solid Films, . 40, 355 (1977).Google Scholar
21. Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol, A4, 3059, 1988.Google Scholar