Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T11:02:26.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the Unit Cell Dimensions of ZSM-5 Produced by the Adsorption of Organic Liquids*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

S. S. Pollack ,
R.J. Gormley  and
E. L. Wetzel
S. S. Pollack
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Energy Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center P.O. Box 10940 Pittsburgh, PA 15236
R.J. Gormley
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Energy Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center P.O. Box 10940 Pittsburgh, PA 15236
E. L. Wetzel
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Energy Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center P.O. Box 10940 Pittsburgh, PA 15236
Get access

Extract

The adsorption of liquids in 2eolites has been a widely studied phenomenon, and with the development of ZSM-5, considerable work has been carried out on this zeolite, However, few articles have been published dealing with changes in the X-ray diffraction patterns when the zeolite pores contain adsorbed molecules. The purpose of this paper is to report changes in the X-ray diffraction pattern of ZSM-5 after mixing it with various organic solvents.

This work began after studies of both deactivated and partially deactivated ZSM-5 catalysts showed that their X-ray diffraction patterns changed in intensities and peak positions after use in microreactor studies. If coke or hydrocarbons were causing the above changes, as postulated, would hydrocarbons adsorbed in ZSM-5 produce the same changes? Simpson and Steinfink showed that the low-angle lines of faujasite decreased in intensity after the adsorption of m-dichlorobenzene.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 29: Thirty-Fourth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 5-9, 1985 , 1985 , pp. 257 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The U.S. Government's right to retain a non-exclusive royalty-free license in and to the copyright covering of this paper, for governmental purposes, is acknowledged.

References

1. Breck, D.W., Zeolite Molecular Sieves, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974 (p. 493).Google Scholar
2. Anderson, J.R., Foger, K., T., Mole, Rajadhyaksha, R.A., and Sanders, J.V., J. Catal., 1979, 58, 114.Google Scholar
3. Gabelica, Z., Gilson, J.P., Debras, G., and Derouane, E., Therm. final., Proc. Int. Conf., 7th, 1983, Vol. 2, 1203.Google Scholar
4. Kulkarni, S.J., Kulkarni, S.B., Ratnasamy, P., Hattori, H., and Tanabe, K., Appl. Catal., 1983, 8, 43.Google Scholar
5. Pollack, S.S., Newbury, D.E., Wetzel, E.L., and Adkins, J., Zeolites, 1984, 4, 181.Google Scholar
6. Simpson, H.D., and Steinfink, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 23.Google Scholar
7. Wu, E.L., Lawton, S.L., Olsen, D.H., Rohrman, A.C., and Kokotailo, G.T., J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 2777.Google Scholar
8. Haag, W.O., and Lago, R.M., European Patent Applications, 34444 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Grose, R.M., and Flanigen, E.M., U. S. Patent 4 061 724 (1977).Google Scholar
10. Grose, R.W., and Flanigen, E.M., U. S. Patent No. 4 257 885 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Kokotailo, G.T., and Meier, W.M., Chem. Soc. Special Pub., 1980, 33, 133.Google Scholar
12. Main, P., and Wolfson, M.M., Acta Crystallogr., 1963, 16, 731.Google Scholar
13. Olson, D.H., Kokotailo, G.T., Lawton, S.C., and Meier, W.M., Phys. Chem., 1981, 85, 2238.Google Scholar
14. Flanigen, E.M., Bennett, J.M., Grose, R.W., Cohen, J.P., Patton, R.L., Kirohner, R.M., and Smith, J.V., Nature, 1978, 217, 512.Google Scholar
15. Chen, N.Y., and Weisz, P.B. Chem. Eng. Frog.. Symp. Ser., 1967, 63, 86.Google Scholar