Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:32:31.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Applicability of Theoretically Calculated Intensity Corrections to Practical Metallurgical Problems in the Electron Probe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Sheldon H. Moll*
Affiliation:
Advanced Metals Research Corporation Somerwlle, Massachusetts
Get access

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated only limited agreement between theoretically calculated X-ray absorption, fluorescence, and electron penetration correction factors and calibration curves obtained from alloy standards in binary systems. For some practical metallurgical problems, including diffusion gradient studies, intermediate phase identifications, etc., where analytical precision is required, alloy standards must be employed.

Most metallurgical investigations, however, are concerned with alloys containing a variety of elements. The use of theoretical calculations in these analyses is severely limited. At present, the precision of analyzed chemistries in such systems is somewhat poorer than the precision of the measured X-ray intensity values. Methods for applying combinations of theoretically calculated corrections, extrapolations from nominal alloy chemistries, etc. have been employed which yield reasonable analytical precisions but at best are first-order approximations. Approximate calculations for use in determining the chemistries of fine precipitates or inclusions where matrix excitation is unavoidable are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Castaing, R., “Electron Probe Microanalysis,” Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics 13: 317, Academic Press, 1960.Google Scholar
2. Birks, L. S., “Calculation of X-Ray Intensities from Electron Probe Specimens,” J. Appl. Phys, 32: 387, 1961.Google Scholar
3. Wittry, D. B., USCEC Report 84-204, University of Southern California, 1962.Google Scholar
4. Philibert, J., “The Castaing ‘Microsonde’ in Metallurgical and Mineraiogical Research,“J. Inst. Metals 90: 241, 1962.Google Scholar
5. Poole, D. M. and Thomas, P. M., “Quantitative Electron-Probe Microanalysis,” ibid., 90: 228, 1962.Google Scholar
6. Liebhafsky, H. A., Pfieffer, H. G., Winslow, H. E., and Zemany, P. D., X-Ray Absorption and Emission in Analytical Cheymstry, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1960.Google Scholar
7. Ziebold, T. O. and Ogilvie, R. E., “Quantitative Analysis with the Electron Beam Microanalyzer,” Eastern Analytical Symposium, New York, 1962.Google Scholar