Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T23:37:32.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Photogrammetry-Assisted Methodology for the Documentation of Complex Stratigraphic Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2022

Brent Whitford Open the ORCID record for Brent Whitford [Opens in a new window] ,
Kamen Boyadzhiev ,
Miroslav Ivanov ,
Konstantin Tyufekchiev  and
Yavor Boyadzhiev
Brent Whitford*
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo SUNY, Buffalo, NY, USA
Kamen Boyadzhiev
Affiliation:
National Archaeological Institute with Museum - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
Miroslav Ivanov
Affiliation:
Southwest University “Neofit Rilski,” Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
Konstantin Tyufekchiev
Affiliation:
Southwest University “Neofit Rilski,” Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
Yavor Boyadzhiev
Affiliation:
National Archaeological Institute with Museum - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
*
(brentwhi@buffalo.edu, corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At Tell Yunatsite, a prehistoric settlement mound located in the Upper Thracian plain of Bulgaria, stratigraphic relationships between archaeological deposits are incredibly complex. Such complexity then prompted our exploration into developing a new methodology for the documentation of complex stratigraphic relationships. Here, we present the results of a new photogrammetry-assisted methodology that was developed to compensate for the shortcomings of currently utilized stratigraphic documentation methods, such as the Wheeler-Kenyon box grid and the Harris Matrix. First, using a UAV drone, we produce a high-resolution photogrammetric model of the entire site. Second, with structure from motion photogrammetry, we produce 2.5D models of excavation units in stratigraphic succession. Finally, utilizing GIS and Blender (a 3D computer graphics software application), we digitize the horizontal extents of each archaeological deposit and “fill” the space between their successive surfaces (from top to bottom) until a faithful 3D model of each deposit is generated. These deposit models are then combined and rendered simultaneously to form 3D block models of the excavation units that may, in turn, be cross-sectioned in any direction to view stratigraphic relationships in virtual profile.

En el montículo de Tell Yunatsite, un asentamiento prehistórico ubicado en la llanura tracia superior de Bulgaria, las relaciones estratigráficas entre depósitos arqueológicos son increíblemente complejas. Lo anterior nos impulsó a explorar el desarrollo de una nueva metodología para la documentación de relaciones estratigráficas complejas. A continuación presentamos los resultados para una nueva metodología asistida por fotogrametría, la cual busca compensar deficiencias en otros métodos de documentación estratigráfica ampliamente utilizados—como la cuadrícula de caja de Wheeler-Kenyon y la matriz de Harris. Primero, mediante un dron VANT, producimos un modelo fotogramétrico de alta resolución del sitio. Segundo, usando la estructura de fotogrametría de movimiento, producimos modelos 2.5D de unidades de excavación en sucesión estratigráfica. Finalmente, utilizando GIS y Blender, digitalizamos las extensiones horizontales de cada depósito arqueológico y “rellenamos” el espacio entre sus superficies sucesivas (de arriba a abajo) hasta generar un modelo 3D fiel de cada depósito. Estos modelos fueron combinados y renderizados simultáneamente para formar modelos de bloques 3D de las unidades de excavación que, a su vez, se pudieran seccionar transversalmente en cualquier dirección para visualizar las relaciones estratigráficas en un perfil virtual.

Keywords

archaeological excavationstratigraphyphotogrammetrygeographic information systemsmound settlementsChalcolithic periodexcavación arqueológicaestratigrafíafotogrametríasistemas de información geográficaasentamiento prehistórico ubicadoperíodo Calcolítico
Type
Article
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 2022 , pp. 428 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Barceló, Juan A., and Vicente, Oriol 2004 Some Problems in Archaeological Excavation 3D Modelling. In Enter the Past: The E-Way into the Four Dimensions of Cultural Heritage, edited by Stadt Wien, Magistrat der - Erbe, Referat Kulturelles - Wien, Stadtarchäologie, pp. 400–405. BAR International Series 1227. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Beale, Gareth, and Reilly, Paul 2017 After Virtual Archaeology: Rethinking Archaeological Approaches to the Adoption of Digital Technology. Internet Archaeology 44. DOI:10.11141/ia.44.1.Google Scholar
Boric, Dusan 2009 Absolute Dating of Metallurgical Innovations in the Vinča Culture of the Balkans. In Metals and Societies: Studies in Honour of Barbara S. Ottaway, edited by Kienlin, Tobias L. and Roberts, Ben W., pp. 191–245. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie. Habelt, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Boyadzhiev, Yavor D. 1995 Chronology of Prehistoric Cultures in Bulgaria. In Prehistoric Bulgaria, edited by Bailey, Douglass W., Panayotov, Ivan, and Alexandrov, Stefan, pp. 149–191. Monographs in World Archaeology 22. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Boyadzhiev, Yavor, and Aslanis, Ioannis 2016 Radiocarbon Dates from Tell Yunatsite: In The Human Face of Radiocarbon: Reassessing Chronology in Prehistoric Greece and Bulgaria, 5000–3000 cal BC, edited by Tsirtsoni, Zoï, pp. 157–166. Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée - Jean Pouilloux, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Boyadzhiev, Yavor, Boyadzhiev, Kamen, Brandtstätter, Lennart, and Krauß, Raiko 2021 Chronological Modelling of the Chalcolithic Settlement Layers at Tell Yunatsite, Southern Bulgaria. Documenta Praehistorica 48:252–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiabrando, Filiberto, D'Andria, Francesco, Sammartano, Giulia, and Spanò, Antonia 2018 UAV Photogrammetry for Archaeological Site Survey. 3D Models at the Hierapolis in Phrygia (Turkey). Virtual Archaeology Review 9(18):28–43. DOI:10.4995/var.2018.5958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chibunichev, A. G., Knyaz, V. A., Zhuravlev, D. V., and Kurkov, V. M. 2018 Photogrammetry for Archaeology: Collecting Pieces Together. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42-2:235–240. DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-235-2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amore, Leandro 2014 Stratigraphy in Archaeology: A Brief History. In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, edited by Smith, Claire, pp. 7085–7094. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell'Unto, Nicoló, Landeschi, Giacomo, Apel, Jan, and Poggi, Giulio 2017 4D Recording at the Trowel's Edge: Using Three-Dimensional Simulation Platforms to Support Field Interpretation. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 12:632–645. DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.03.011.Google Scholar
Demetrescu, Emanuel 2015 Archaeological Stratigraphy as a Formal Language for Virtual Reconstruction: Theory and Practice. Journal of Archaeological Science 57:42–55. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, Matthew, Lin, Sam, and Chodoronek, Michael 2015 The Application of 3D Photogrammetry for In-Field Documentation of Archaeological Features. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3:136–152. DOI:10.7183/2326-3768.3.2.136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmitt, Joshua, Pillay, Patricia, Barrett, Matthew, Middleton, Stacey, Mackrell, Timothy, Floyd, Bruce, and Ladefoged, Thegn N. 2021 A Comparison of Volumetric Reconstruction Methods of Archaeological Deposits Using Point-Cloud Data from Ahuahu, Aotearoa New Zealand. Remote Sensing 13(19):4015. DOI:10.3390/rs13194015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabio, Remondino 2004 From Point Cloud to Surface: The Modeling and Visualization Problem. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 34-5(W10). https://www.isprs.org/proceedings/xxxiv/5-W10/papers/remondin.pdf, accessed August 25, 2022.Google Scholar
Forte, M., Dell'Unto, N., Issavi, J., Onsurez, L., and Lercari, N. 2012 3D Archaeology at Çatalhöyük. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 1(3):351–378. DOI:10.1260/2047-4970.1.3.351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gajski, D., Solter, A., and Gašparovic, M. 2016 Applications of Macro Photogrammetry in Archaeology. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 41-B5:263–266. DOI:10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B5-263-2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galeazzi, Fabrizio 2016 Towards the Definition of Best 3D Practices in Archaeology: Assessing 3D Documentation Techniques for Intra-Site Data Recording. Journal of Cultural Heritage 17:159–169. DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2015.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galeazzi, Fabrizio 2018 3-D Virtual Replicas and Simulations of the Past: “Real” or “Fake” Representations? Current Anthropology 59:268–286. DOI:10.1086/697489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galeazzi, Fabrizio, and Di Franco, Paola Di Giuseppantonio 2017 Theorising 3D Visualisation Systems in Archaeology: Towards More Effective Design, Evaluations and Life Cycles. Internet Archaeology 44. DOI:10.11141/ia.44.5.Google Scholar
Gavryushkina, Marina 2021 The Potential and Problems of Volumetric 3D Modeling in Archaeological Stratigraphic Analysis: A Case Study from Chlorakas-Palloures, Cyprus. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 21:e00184. DOI:10.1016/j.daach.2021.e00184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Scott, and Stephenson, Jason 2016 Testing UAV (Drone) Aerial Photography and Photogrammetry for Archaeology. Lakehead University Technical Report. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.1.4306.3443.Google Scholar
Harris, Edward C. 1975 The Stratigraphic Sequence: A Question of Time. World Archaeology 7:109–121. DOI:10.1080/00438243.1975.9979624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Edward C. 1977 Units of Archaeological Stratification. Norwegian Archaeological Review 10:84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Edward C. 1979 The Laws of Archaeological Stratigraphy. World Archaeology 11:111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Edward C. 1984 The Analysis of Multilinear Stratigraphic Sequences. Scottish Archaeological Review 3(2):127–133.Google Scholar
Harris, Edward C. 2014 Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. Elsevier, London.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, Edward 1985 Excavation Techniques in Historical Archaeology. Australian Historical Archaeology 3:7.Google Scholar
Huvila, Isto 2009 My Stratigraphy? Your Stratigraphy? Stratigraphic Documentation as Record and Information. SKAS 4:15–21.Google Scholar
Katsianis, Markos, Tsipidis, Spyros, Kotsakis, Kostas, and Koussoulakou, Alexandra 2008 A 3D Digital Workflow for Archaeological Intra-Site Research Using GIS. Journal of Archaeological Science 35:655–667. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2007.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Kathleen 1971 An Essay on Archaeological Technique: The Publication of Results from the Excavation of a Tell. Harvard Theological Review 64:271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikov, V. 1940 Selishtna mogila pri s. Yunatsite (Pazarzhishko). Godishnik na Plovdivskata narodna biblioteka i muzei 1937–1939:55–84.Google Scholar
Moya-Maleno, Pedro R., Valdelomar, Juan Tormejón, Madrid, David Vacas, and Sánchez, Rocío Losa 2015 Interoperability of Photogrammetry in 3D Modeling: Documentation, Research and Dissemination in the Archaeological Site of Jamila. Virtual Archaeology Review 6(13):51–64. DOI:10.4995/var.2015.4377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolakopoulos, Konstantinos G., Soura, Konstantina, Koukouvelas, Ioannis K., and Argyropoulos, Nikolaos G. 2017 UAV vs Classical Aerial Photogrammetry for Archaeological Studies. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 14:758–773. DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.09.004.Google Scholar
Nobles, Gary R., and Roosevelt, Christopher H. 2021 Filling the Void in Archaeological Excavations: 2D Point Clouds to 3D Volumes. Open Archaeology 7:589–614. DOI:10.1515/opar-2020-0149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Fei, Lin, Sam C., Guo, Jialong, Wang, Huimin, and Gao, Xing 2017 The Application of SfM Photogrammetry Software for Extracting Artifact Provenience from Palaeolithic Excavation Surfaces. Journal of Field Archaeology 42:326–336. DOI:10.1080/00934690.2017.1338118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reingruber, Agathe, and Thissen, Laurens 2009 Depending on 14C Data: Chronological Frameworks in the Neolithic and Chalcolithic of Southeastern Europe. Radiocarbon 51:751–770. DOI:10.1017/S0033822200056071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin, and Bahn, Paul G. 2016 Archaeology: Theories, Methods, and Practice. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Tsirtsoni, Zoï 2017 Let's Stop Speaking “Cultures”!: Alternative Means to Assess Historical Developments in the Prehistoric Balkans. In Balkan Dialogues: Negotiating Identity between Prehistory and the Present, edited by Gori, Maja and Ivanova, Maria, pp. 64–84. Routledge, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcek Averett, Erin, Gordon, Jody Michael, and Counts, Derek B. (editors) 2016 Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology. Digital Press at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Mortimer 1956 Archaeology from the Earth. Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar