Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T05:37:57.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The asymptotic final size distribution of multitype chain-binomial epidemic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Mikael Andersson*
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology
*
Postal address: Epidemiologi, Smittskyddsinstitutet, SE-171 82, Solna, Sweden. Email address: Mikael.Andersson@mte.ki.se

Abstract

A multitype chain-binomial epidemic process is defined for a closed finite population by sampling a simple multidimensional counting process at certain points. The final size of the epidemic is then characterized, given the counting process, as the smallest root of a non-linear system of equations. By letting the population grow, this characterization is used, in combination with a branching process approximation and a weak convergence result for the counting process, to derive the asymptotic distribution of the final size. This is done for processes with an irreducible contact structure both when the initial infection increases at the same rate as the population and when it stays fixed.

Type
General Applied Probability
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, H. (1993). A threshold limit theorem for a multitype epidemic model. Math. Biosci. 117, 318.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. (1995). The final size of multitype chain-binomial epidemic processes. , Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Bailey, N. T. J. (1975). The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its Applications. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
Ball, F. and Clancy, D. (1993). The final size and severity of a generalised stochastic multitype epidemic model. Adv. Appl. Prob. 25, 721736.Google Scholar
Ball, F. and Donnelly, P. (1995). Strong approximations for epidemic models. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 55, 121.Google Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1968). Convergence of Probability Measures. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, C. and Picard, P. (1990). A non-standard family of polynomials and the final size distribution of Reed–Frost epidemic processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 22, 2548.Google Scholar
Ludwig, D. (1975). Final size distributions for epidemics. Math. Biosci. 23, 3346.Google Scholar
Martin-Löf, A., (1986). Symmetric sampling procedures, general epidemic processes and their threshold limit theorems. J. Appl. Prob. 23, 265282.Google Scholar
Scalia-Tomba, G. (1985). Asymptotic final size distribution for some chain-binomial processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 17, 477495.Google Scholar
Scalia-Tomba, G. (1986). Asymptotic final size distribution of the multitype Reed–Frost process. J. Appl. Prob. 23, 563584.Google Scholar
Scalia-Tomba, G. (1986). The asymptotic final size distribution of reducible multitype Reed–Frost processes. J. Math. Biol. 23, 381392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scalia-Tomba, G. (1990). On the asymptotic final size distribution of epidemics in heterogeneous populations. In Stochastic Processes in Epidemic Theory, ed. Gabriel, J. P., Lefèvre, C and Picard, P. (Lecture Notes in Biomath. 86). Springer, New York, pp. 189196.Google Scholar
Sellke, T. (1983). On the asymptotic distribution of the size of a stochastic epidemic. J. Appl. Prob. 20, 390394.Google Scholar
Sewastjanow, B. A. (1974). Verzweigungsprozesse. Akademie, Berlin.Google Scholar
von Bahr, B. and Martin-Löf, A. (1980). Threshold limit theorems for some epidemic processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 12, 319349.Google Scholar