Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T18:24:39.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assortative mating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Cedric A. B. Smith  and
Atam Vetta
Cedric A. B. Smith
Affiliation:
Galton Laboratory, University College London
Atam Vetta
Affiliation:
Galton Laboratory, University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Various attempts have been made to develop a theory of the genetical effects of assortative mating, using various models. The earliest and most famous is that of Fisher (1918). However, this has run into a difficulty in that his paper is far from easy to understand even despite the efforts of Kempthorne (1957) and Moran and Smith (1966) to simplify his presentation. A key paragraph is the following (which we give in abbreviated form).

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 16 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1975 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Damon, A. and Thomas, R. B. (1967) Fertility and physique-height, weight and ponderal index. Human Biology 39, 5–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 52, 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempthorne, O. (1957) An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Moran, P. A. P. and Smith, C. A. B. (1966) Commentary on R. A. Fisher's Paper on the Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. (1973) The correlation between relatives under the multifactorial model with assortative mating. I and II. Ann. Human Genetics, 37, 189–215.Google Scholar