Element contents
Series: Elements in Language Teaching
Peer Assessment in Writing Instruction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 January 2024
Summary
This Element traces the evolution of peer assessment in writing instruction and illustrates how peer assessment can be used to promote the teaching and learning of writing in various sociocultural and educational contexts. Specifically, this Element aims to present a critical discussion of the major themes and research findings in the existing studies on peer assessment regarding the three assessment paradigms (assessment of, for, and as learning), and to identify whether and how peer assessment has served the purposes of assessment of, for, and as learning, respectively in writing instruction. This Element highlights the contextual factors that shape the effect of peer assessment in writing instruction and concludes with directions for future research and implications regarding how peer assessment can be successfully used to improve students' writing development.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Language TeachingOnline ISBN: 9781009429979Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 04 April 2024
References
Ahmed, R., & Abdu, A. K. (2021). Online and face-to-face peer review in academic writing: Frequency and preferences. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 169–201. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911245.Google Scholar
Allaei, S. K., & Connor, U. (1990). Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms. The Writing Instructor, 10(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
Allen, D., & Katayama, A. (2016). Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback. System, 56, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.12.002.Google Scholar
Almahasneh, A. M. S., & Abdul-Hamid, S. (2019). The effect of using peer assessment training on writing performance among Arab EFL high school students in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal, 10(1), 105–115. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.10.Google Scholar
Althauser, R., & Darnall, K. (2001). Enhancing critical reading and writing through peer reviews: An exploration of assisted performance. Teaching Sociology, 29(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318780.Google Scholar
Altstaedter, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of peer feedback in foreign language writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1115052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amalia, N. R. (2021). The implementation of peer assessment in online writing class at senior high school in Bawean. Research on English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 9(1), 179–186.Google Scholar
Anson, I. G., & Anson, C. M. (2017). Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey. Assessing Writing, 33, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, K. M. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654794.Google Scholar
Bauer, C., Figl, K., Derntl, M., Beran, P. P., & Kabicher, S. (2009). The student view on online peer reviews. SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(3), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1562877.1562892.Google Scholar
Becker, A. (2016). Student-generated scoring rubrics: Examining their formative value for improving ESL students’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 29, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002.Google Scholar
Berggren, J. (2015). Learning from giving feedback: A study of secondary-level students. ELT Journal, 69(1), 58–70.Google Scholar
Berggren, J. (2019). Writing, reviewing, and revising: Peer feedback in lower secondary EFL classrooms [Doctoral dissertation, Department of English, Stockholm University].Google Scholar
Bhowmik, S. K., Hilman, B., & Roy, S. (2019). Peer collaborative writing in the EAP classroom: Insights from a Canadian postsecondary context. TESOL Journal, 10(2), e00393. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.393.Google Scholar
Birjandi, P., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2012). The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.549204.Google Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.Google Scholar
Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.Google Scholar
Blain, S. (2001). Study of verbal peer feedback on the improvement of the quality of writing and the transfer of knowledge in francophone students in grade 4 living in a minority situation in Canada. Language Culture and Curriculum, 14(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310108666619.Google Scholar
Boon, S. I. (2016). Increasing the uptake of peer feedback in primary school writing: Findings from an action research enquiry. Education 3-13, 44(2), 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouziane, A., & Zyad, H. (2018). The impact of self and peer assessment on L2 writing: The case of Moodle workshops. In Ahmed, A. & Abouabdelkader, H. (Eds.), Assessing EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world (pp. 111–135). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64104-1_5.Google Scholar
Jager, S., Bradley, , Meima, E. J., & Thouësny, S. (Eds.) (2014). CALL design: Principles and practice. In Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference (pp. 368–373), Groningen, The Netherlands. Research-publishing.net.Google Scholar
Bueno‐Alastuey, M. C., Vasseur, R., & Elola, I. (2022). Effects of collaborative writing and peer feedback on Spanish as a foreign language writing performance. Foreign Language Annals, 55, 517–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12611.Google Scholar
Bui, G., & Kong, A. (2019). Metacognitive instruction for peer review interaction in L2 writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11(2), 357–392. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05.Google Scholar
Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116000.Google Scholar
Cao, S. Y., Zhou, S. R., Luo, Y., et al. (2022). A review of the ESL/EFL learners’ gains from online peer feedback on English writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, Z. H., Yu, S. L., & Huang, J. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2007). Conceptualizing pre‐emptive formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478412.Google Scholar
Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90003-5.Google Scholar
Chang, C. Y. H. (2016). Two decades of research in L2 peer review. Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), 81–117. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.03.Google Scholar
Chen, C. H. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008.Google Scholar
Chen, M., & Cui, Y. Q. (2022). The effects of AWE and peer feedback on cohesion and coherence in continuation writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100915.Google Scholar
Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students’ writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001.Google Scholar
Chin, C. K., Gong, C., & Tay, B. P. (2015). The effects of wiki-based recursive process writing on Chinese narrative essays for Chinese as a Second Language (CSL) students in Singapore. IAFOR Journal of Education, 3(1), 45–59.Google Scholar
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006.Google Scholar
Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23(3), 260–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088306289261.Google Scholar
Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1.Google Scholar
Chong, S. W. (2018). Three paradigms of classroom assessment: Implications for written feedback research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1405423.Google Scholar
Ciampa, K., & Wolfe, Z. M. (2023). From isolation to collaboration: Creating an intentional community of practice within the doctoral dissertation proposal writing process. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1822313Google Scholar
Covill, A. E. (2010). Comparing peer review and self-review as ways to improve college students’ writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 42(2), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862961003796207.Google Scholar
Crinon, J. (2012). The dynamics of writing and peer review at primary school. Journal of Writing Research, 4(2), 121–154.Google Scholar
Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., Gai, X. S., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2022). Effects of trained peer vs. teacher feedback on EFL students’ writing performance, self-efficacy, and internalization of motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 788474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.878147.Google ScholarPubMed
Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and Practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2014.898128.Google Scholar
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 481–509.Google Scholar
Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Egan, A., & Costello, L. (2016). Peer assessment of, for and as learning: A core component of an accredited professional development course for Higher Education teachers. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 2931–29313. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/293.Google Scholar
Esfandiari, R., & Myford, C. M. (2013). Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays. Assessing Writing, 18(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.002.Google Scholar
Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. (2009). The “write” skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctoral students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260902734968.Google Scholar
Franco Ponce, R. M., Córdova Reyes, W. M., & Maloney, D. (2021). Effectiveness of integrating ICTs in trained peer-review techniques: Improvement in ecuadorian secondary efl learners’ quality of writing [Doctoral dissertation, ESPOL. FCNM].Google Scholar
Gao, X., Asmawi, A., & Samuel, M. (2017). Critical peer feedback for business English writing through Qzone blogs: A mechanism among Chinese undergraduates. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(1), 39–54. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1701-03.Google Scholar
Geithner, C. A., & Pollastro, A. N. (2016). Doing peer review and receiving feedback: Impact on scientific literacy and writing skills. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00071.2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44.Google Scholar
Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T., & Harnett, J. A. (2015). Analysis of New Zealand primary and secondary student peer-and self-assessment comments: Applying Hattie and Timperley’s feedback model. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(2), 265–281.Google Scholar
Heift, T., & Caws, C. (2000). Peer feedback in synchronous writing environments: A case study in French. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 208–214. www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.3.3.208.Google Scholar
Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr169oa.Google Scholar
Huang, S. C. (2015). Setting writing revision goals after assessment for learning. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(4), 363–385.Google Scholar
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2017). Peer feedback on college students’ writing: Exploring the relation between students’ ability match, feedback quality and essay performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1433–1447. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1325854.Google Scholar
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318.Google Scholar
Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33–54.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399.Google Scholar
Illana-Mahiques, E. (2021). Re-thinking peer reviewing in the virtual context: The roles of giving and receiving online feedback in L2 Spanish classrooms. Languages, 6(3), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030151.Google Scholar
Jogan, M. K., Ana, H. H., & Gladys, A. M. (2001). Cross‐cultural e‐mail: Providing cultural input for the advanced foreign language student. Foreign Language Annals, 34(4), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02066.x.Google Scholar
Kim, H. (2012). Writing, peer feedback, and revision : A comparison of L1 and L2 college freshmen with longitudinal analyses [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/28468.Google Scholar
Kinginger, C., & Belz, J. (2005). Socio-cultural perspectives on pragmatic development in foreign language learning: Microgenetic case studies from telecollaboration and residence abroad. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 369–421. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.4.369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2011). Examiners’ reports on theses: Feedback or assessment?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.06.001.Google Scholar
Lam, R. (2013). The relationship between assessment types and text revision. ELT Journal, 67(4), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, R. (2016). Assessment as learning: Examining a cycle of teaching, learning, and assessment of writing in the portfolio-based classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1900–1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.999317.Google Scholar
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. (2021). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 195–206.Google Scholar
Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning?. Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003.Google Scholar
Lee, I. (2011). Formative assessment in EFL writing: An exploratory case study. Changing English, 18(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2011.543516.Google Scholar
Lee, I. (2017). Classroom assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.003.Google Scholar
Lee, I., Mak, P., & Yuan, R. (2019). Assessment as learning in primary writing classrooms: An exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62, 72–81.Google Scholar
Lee, M. K. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback. System, 55, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003.Google Scholar
Lee, M., & Evans, M. (2019). Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12598.Google Scholar
Leung, K., Chan, M., Maxwell, G., & Poon, T. (2010). A qualitative analysis of sub-degree students commentary styles and patterns in the context of gender and peer e-feedback. In Hybrid Learning: Third International Conference, ICHL 2010, Beijing, China, August 16–18, 2010. Proceedings 3 (pp. 149–159). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x.Google Scholar
Li, X., Xia, Q., Chu, S. K. W., & Yang, Y. (2022). Using gamification to facilitate students’ self-regulation in e-learning: A case study on students’ L2 English learning. Sustainability, 14(12), 7008.Google Scholar
Lin, C.-J. (2019). An online peer assessment approach to supporting mind-mapping flipped learning activities for college English writing courses. Journal of Computers in Education, 6, 385–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00144-6.Google Scholar
Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web‐based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking‐styles. Journal of Computer assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.Google Scholar
Lindgren, R. (2018). “The main thing with peer review, if we help each other out, that is a quicker way to get a better result”: Teachers’ experience of using peer review in the English classroom. Malmö University.Google Scholar
Liu, J., & Hansen Edwards, , J. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X., Li, L., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1324018.Google Scholar
López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N., & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2020). Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1293–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2.Google Scholar
Lu, Q., Zhu, X. H., & Cheong, C. M. (2021). Understanding the difference between self-feedback and peer feedback: A comparative study of their effects on undergraduate students’ writing improvement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739962.Google Scholar
Ludemann, P. M., & McMakin, D. (2014). Perceived helpfulness of peer editing activities: First-year students’ views and writing performance outcomes. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 13(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2014.13.2.129.Google Scholar
Ma, Q. (2020). Examining the role of inter-group peer online feedback on wiki writing in an EAP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1556703.Google Scholar
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2022). Researching L2 student engagement with written feedback: Insights from sociocultural theory. TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 788–798.Google Scholar
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2023). Student engagement with written feedback: Critical issues and way forward. RELC Journal, 00336882221150811.Google Scholar
Man, D., Xu, Y., & O’Toole, J. M. (2018). Understanding autonomous peer feedback practices among postgraduate students: A case study in a Chinese university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(4), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1376310.Google Scholar
McConlogue, T. (2015). Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 1495–1506.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., Ammar, A., & Michaud, G. (2022). L2 peer interaction before and after writing: How does each one promote writing development? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 78(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr-2020-0073.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., Ammar, A., & Sellami, A. (2021). L2 French students’ conversations during interactive writing tasks and their interaction mindset. Foreign Language Annuals, 55(1), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12594.Google Scholar
McIsaac, C. M., & Sepe, J. F. (1996). Improving the writing of accounting students: A cooperative venture. Journal of Accounting Education, 14(4), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-5751(96)00027-9.Google Scholar
Meek, S. E., Blakemore, L., & Marks, L. (2017). Is peer review an appropriate form of assessment in a MOOC? Student participation and performance in formative peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052.Google Scholar
Meletiadou, E. (2021a). Exploring the impact of peer assessment on EFL students’ writing performance. IAFOR Journal of Education: Language Learning in Education, 9(3), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.3.05.Google Scholar
Meletiadou, E. (2021b). Opening Pandora’s box: How does peer assessment affect EFL students’ writing quality? Languages, 6(115), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030115.Google Scholar
Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.Google Scholar
Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003.Google Scholar
Min, H. T. (2018). Trained peer written feedback and teacher written feedback: Similar or different? English Teaching & Learning, 42(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-018-0009-1.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2008). Modifying L2 criticisms: How learners do it?. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 768–791.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. T. L. (2018). The effect of combined peer-teacher feedback on Thai students’ writing accuracy. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(2), 117–132.Google Scholar
Nicolaidou, . (2013). E-portfolios supporting primary students’ writing performance and peer feedback. Computers and Education, 68, 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.004Google Scholar
O’Donnell, M. E. (2014). Peer response with process-oriented, standards-based writing for beginning-level, second language learners of Spanish. Hispania, 97(3), 413–429. www.jstor.org/stable/24368817.Google Scholar
Ozkul, A. (2017). Peer response in L1 writing: Impact on revisons and student perceptions. [Master’s thesis, Iowa State University]. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15394.Google Scholar
Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222.Google Scholar
Panadero, , E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186.Google Scholar
Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). A validation study of students’ end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor. Journal of Writing Research, 1(2), 124–152. www.jowr.org/pkp/ojs/index.php/jowr/article/view/753.Google Scholar
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Clark, R. J. (2011). Writing in the natural sciences: Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process. Journal of Writing Research, 2(3), 365–393.Google Scholar
Peterson, S. S., & McClay, J. (2010). Assessing and providing feedback for student writing in Canadian classrooms. Assessing Writing, 15(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.003.Google Scholar
Peterson, , S. S., & Portier, C. (2014). Grade one peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Education 3–13, 42(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.670256.Google Scholar
Pham, H. T. P. (2022). Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: Student feedback and revision in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2112–2147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530.Google Scholar
Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Bui, L. T. P. (2020). Electronic peer feedback, EFL academic writing and reflective thinking: Evidence from a Confucian context. Sage Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914554.Google Scholar
Pope, N. (2001). An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120052396.Google Scholar
Ramon-Casas, M., Nuño, N., Pons, F., & Cunillera, T. (2019). The different impact of a structured peer-assessment task in relation to university undergraduates’ initial writing skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1525337.Google Scholar
Rezai, A., Rahul, D. R., Asif, M., Omar, A., & Reshad Jamalyar, A. (2022). Contributions of E-portfolios assessment to developing EFL learners’ vocabulary, motivation, and attitudes. Education Research International, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5713278.Google Scholar
Roux-Rodriguez, R. (2003). Computer-mediated peer response and its impact on revision in the college Spanish classroom: A case study. University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Ruecker, T. (2010). The potential of dual-language cross-cultural peer review. ELT Journal, 65(4), 398-407. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq067.Google Scholar
Ruegg, R. (2015). The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students’ writing ability. Linguistics and Education, 29, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.12.001.Google Scholar
Ruegg, R. (2010). Aspects affecting confidence in writing. Studies in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 21, 123–135.Google Scholar
Ruegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.958190.Google Scholar
Sadeghi, K., & Rahmati, T. (2017). Integrating assessment as, for, and of learning in a large-scale exam preparation course. Assessing Writing, 34, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.003.Google Scholar
Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Saeed, M. A., Ghazali, K., & Aljaberi, M. A. (2018). A review of previous studies on ESL/EFL learners’ interactional feedback exchanges in face-to-face and computer-assisted peer review of writing. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0084-8.Google Scholar
Saeed, M. A., Ghazali, K., Sahuri, S. S., & Abdulrab, M. (2018). Engaging EFL learners in online peer feedback on writing: What does it tell us? Journal of Information Technology Education-Research, 17, 39–61. https://doi.org/10.28945/3980.Google Scholar
Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr133o.Google Scholar
Sánchez‐Naranjo, J. (2019). Peer review and training: Pathways to quality and value in second language writing. Foreign Language Annuals, 52(3), 612–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12414.Google Scholar
Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., de Jong, L. H., et al. (2021). A scoping review on the notions of assessment as learning (AAL), assessment for learning (AFL), and assessment of learning (AOL). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Writing strategy instruction with gifted students: Effects of goals and feedback on self-efficacy and skills. Roeper Review, 15(4), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553512.Google Scholar
Schunn, C., Godley, A., & DeMartino, S. (2016). The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.525.Google Scholar
Serafini, F. (2001). Three paradigms of assessment: Measurement, procedure, and inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 384–393.Google Scholar
Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601.Google Scholar
Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020). The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 1–10.Google Scholar
Snyder, D. W., Nielson, R. P., & Kurzer, K. (2016). Foreign language writing fellows programs: A model for improving advanced writing skills. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 750–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12231.Google Scholar
Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.Google Scholar
Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. Calico Journal, 31(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Sun, H. Y., & Wang, M. C. (2022). Effects of teacher intervention and type of peer feedback on student writing revision. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221080507.Google Scholar
Sun, P. P., & Jun Zhang, L. (2022). Effects of translanguaging in online peer feedback on Chinese University English-as-a-foreign-language students’ writing performance. RELC Journal, 53(2), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221089051.Google Scholar
Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40.Google Scholar
Tai, H. C., Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2015). Exploring the effects of peer review and teachers’ corrective feedback on EFL students’ online writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 284–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115597490.Google Scholar
Tan, S. X., Cho, Y. W., & Xu, W. S. (2022). Exploring the effects of automated written corrective feedback, computer-mediated peer feedback and their combination mode on EFL learner’s writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2066137.Google Scholar
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tian, J. (2011). The effects of peer editing versus co-writing on writing in Chinese-as-a-foreign language [Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria].Google Scholar
Tian, L. L., Liu, Q. S., & Zhang, X. X. (2022). Self-regulated writing strategy use when revising upon automated, peer, and teacher feedback in an online English as a foreign language writing course. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873170.Google Scholar
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249.Google Scholar
Topping, K. J. (2017). Peer assessment: Learning by judging and discussing the work of other learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.31532/interdiscipeducpsychol.1.1.007.Google Scholar
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611428.Google Scholar
Tran, O. T. T., & Pham, V. P. H. (2023). The effects of online peer feedback on students’ writing skills during corona virus pandemic. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16149a.Google Scholar
Tsagari, D., & Meletiadou, E. (2015). Peer assessment of adolescent learners’ writing performance. Writing & Pedagogy, 7. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v7i2-3.26457.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. B., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9.Google Scholar
Tunagür, , M. (2021). The effect of peer assessment application on writing anxiety and writing motivation of 6th grade students. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i1.4352.Google Scholar
Venables, A., & Summit, R. (2003). Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000103816.Google Scholar
Vorobel, O. (2013). A case study of peer review practices of four adolescent English language learners in face-to-face and online contexts. [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida].Google Scholar
Vougan, A., & Li, S. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of peer feedback in second language writing: A meta-analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1115–1138.Google Scholar
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: The crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698.Google Scholar
Ware, P., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 43–63. http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num1/wareodowd/.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070013.Google Scholar
Wei, W., Cheong, C. M., Zhu, X. H., & Lu, Q. (2022). Comparing self-reflection and peer feedback practices in an academic writing task: A student self-efficacy perspective. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2042242.Google Scholar
Wichmann, A., Funk, A., & Rummel, N. (2018). Leveraging the potential of peer feedback in an academic writing activity through sense-making support. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0348-7.Google Scholar
Wiliam, D. (2006). Formative assessment: Getting the focus right. Educational Assessment, 11(3–4), 283–289.Google Scholar
Woo, M. M., Chu, S. K. W., & Li, X. (2013). Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 279–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9285-y.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, J., & Wood, P. (2022). Creating dialogic spaces: Developing doctoral students’ critical writing skills through peer assessment and review Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779686.Google Scholar
Wooley, R. S. (2007). The effects of web-based peer review on student writing [Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University].Google Scholar
Wu, L. (2009). Understanding SLA through peer interactions in a Chinese classroom: A sociocultural perspective [Doctoral dissertation, University of New Hampshire].Google Scholar
Wu, W. Y., Huang, J. Y., Han, C. W., & Zhang, J. (2022). Evaluating peer feedback as a reliable and valid complementary aid to teacher feedback in EFL writing classrooms: A feedback giver perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101140.Google Scholar
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023). Passive, active, and constructive engagement with peer feedback: A revised model of learning from peer feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 102160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160.Google Scholar
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students’ performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. F. (2016). Transforming and constructing academic knowledge through online peer feedback in summary writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016440.Google Scholar
Yu, S. (2019). Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from Master’s students in the Macau EFL context. Assessing Writing, 40, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004.Google Scholar
Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partners in peer feedback?. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 178–192.Google Scholar
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014). An analysis of Chinese EFL students’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing. System, 47, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007.Google Scholar
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016a). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000161.Google Scholar
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016b). Understanding the role of learners with low English language proficiency in peer feedback of second language writing. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 483–494. www.jstor.org/stable/43893831.Google Scholar
Yu, S., & Liu, C. (2021). Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework. Assessing Writing, 48, 100525.Google Scholar
Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Yuan, K., & Zhang, L. (2019). Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: A Macau study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467879.Google Scholar
Zaccaron, R., & Xhafaj, D. C. (2020). Knowing me, knowing you: A comparative study on the effects of anonymous and conference peer feedback on the writing of learners of English as an additional language. System, 95(4), 102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102367.Google Scholar
Zhang, M., He, Q., Du, J., Liu, F., & Huang, B. (2022). Learners’ perceived advantages and social-affective dispositions toward online peer feedback in academic writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 973478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973478.Google Scholar
Zhang, R. F., & Zou, D. (2022). A review of research on technology-enhanced peer feedback for second language writing based on the activity theory framework. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11469-8.Google Scholar
Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209–222.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., & McEneaney, J. E. (2020). What is the influence of peer feedback and author response on Chinese university students’ English writing performance? Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.259.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. D., & Yu, S. L. (2022). Training student writers in conducting peer feedback in L2 writing: A meaning-making perspective. Applied Linguistics Review, 13(4), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0045.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2017). Student engagement with computer-generated feedback: A case study. ELT Journal, 71(3), 317–328.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102.Google Scholar
Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13–24.Google Scholar
Zhao, H. (2018). Exploring tertiary English as a Foreign Language writing tutors’ perceptions of the appropriateness of peer assessment for writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434610.Google Scholar
Zheng, L. Q., Cui, P. P., Li, X., & Huang, R. H. (2018). Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Zheng, Y., & Tai, J. H.-M. (2020). Grudges and gratitude: The social-affective impacts of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1643449.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Zou, D., Xie, H. R., & Wang, F. L. (2022). Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09337.Google Scholar
Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y., & Zhang, F. (2018). Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 800–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by