Element contents
Mary Wollstonecraft
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 September 2022
Summary
Mary Wollstonecraft is recognized as an important early feminist. This Element argues that she is also an ingenious moral philosopher, who showed that true virtue and the liberty of women are necessarily interdependent. The Element consists of eight sections. After an introduction, Section 2 discusses Wollstonecraft's concept of reason by examining its metaphysical foundation and its role as moral capacity. According to Wollstonecraft, reason interacts closely with the passions. Then, Sections 3 and 4 discuss the roles of the passions and the imagination. Reason, passion and imagination all come together in Wollstonecraft's discussions of love and friendship, which are the topic of Section 5. Wollstonecraft values education and knowledge, but discussions of her epistemology have been rare. Section 6 analyses some aspects of her views on knowledge. Finally, Section 7 discusses Wollstonecraft's notion of virtue, including its relations to liberty and duty. Section 8 makes some general conclusions.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009023924Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 13 October 2022
References
Abbey, R. (1999). Back to the Future: Marriage as Friendship in the Thought of Mary Wollstonecraft. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 14(3), 78–95.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1984a). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. W. D. Ross, rev. J. O. Urmson. In Barnes, J., ed., The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1729–1867.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1984b). Politics, trans. B. Jowett. In Barnes, J., ed., The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1986–2129.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2013). The Routledge Guidebook to Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2015). A Feminist Perspective on Virtue Ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bergès, S. (2016). Wet-Nursing and Political Participation: The Republican Approaches to Motherhood of Mary Wollstonecraft and Sophie de Grouchy. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A., eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergès, S. and Coffee, A. (2016). Introduction. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A., eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Botting, E. H. (2016). Mary Wollstonecraft, Children’s Human Rights, and Animal Ethics. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A., eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bour, I. (2019). Epistemology. In Bergès, S., Botting, E. H. and Coffee, A., eds., The Wollstonecraftian Mind. London: Routledge, pp. 311–22.Google Scholar
Coffee, A. (2013). Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination. European Journal of Political Theory 12(2), 116–35.Google Scholar
Coffee, A. (2014). Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 29(4), 908–24.Google Scholar
Coffee, A. (2016). Mary Wollstonecraft, Public Reason, and the Virtuous Republic. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A., eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–200.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, M. (2009). Sexual Difference in Aristotle’s Politics and His Biology. Classical World 102(3), 215–31.Google Scholar
Dumler-Winckler, E. (2019). Theology and Religion. In Bergès, S., Botting, E. H. and Coffee, A., eds., The Wollstonecraftian Mind. London: Routledge, pp. 297–310.Google Scholar
Frazer, E. (2008). Mary Wollstonecraft on Politics and Friendship. Political Studies 56, 237–56.Google Scholar
Gatens, M. (1991). ‘The Oppressed State of My Sex’: Wollstonecraft on Reason, Feeling and Equality. In Shanley, M. L. and Pateman, C., eds., Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 112–28.Google Scholar
Godwin, W. (1987). Memoirs of the Author of ‘The Rights of Woman’. In Wollstonecraft, M. and Godwin, W., A Short Residence in Sweden, Norway and Denmark and Memoirs of the Author of ‘Rights of Woman’, ed. Holmes, R.. London: Penguin Books, pp. 204–73.Google Scholar
Goldman, E. (1981). Mary Wollstonecraft, Her Tragic Life and Her Passionate Struggle for Freedom. Feminist Studies 7(1), 114–21.Google Scholar
Gouges, O. de (2011). The Rights of Woman. To the Queen. In Cole, J., ed., Between the Queen and the Cabby: Olympe de Gouges’s Rights of Woman. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 28–41.Google Scholar
Green, K. (1997). The Passions and the Imagination in Wollstonecraft’s Theory of Moral Judgement. Utilitas 9(3), 271–90.Google Scholar
Green, K. (2019). Book Review of Sandrine Bergès and Alan Coffee, eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Philosophical Review 128(2), 228–32.Google Scholar
Greenberg, S. (2013). Liberty and Necessity. In Harris, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 248–69.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, W. (2001). Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, W. (2003). Cultivating Virtue: Catharine Macaulay and Mary Wollstonecraft on Civic Education. Women and Politics 25(3), 47–70.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. (2013). The Pleasures of the Imagination and the Objects of Taste. In Harris, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 393–429.Google Scholar
Halldenius, L. (2007). The Primacy of Right: On the Triad of Liberty, Equality and Virtue in Wollstonecraft’s Political Thought. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15(1), 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldenius, L. (2014). Mary Wollstonecraft’s Feminist Critique of Property: On Becoming a Thief from Principle. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 29(4), 942–57.Google Scholar
Halldenius, L. (2015). Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights and Experience of Unfreedom. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Halldenius, L. (2016). Representation in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Political Philosophy. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A., eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–82.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A. (2005). Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A. (2013). The Government of the Passions. In Harris, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 270–88.Google Scholar
Helm, B. (2021). Love. In E. N. Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2021 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/love.Google Scholar
Hickman, L. (2019). Mixing Politics with the Pulpit: Eternal Immutable Morality and Richard Price’s Political Radicalism. In Hedley, D. and Leech, D., eds., Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy. Cham: Springer, pp. 159–73.Google Scholar
Hutton, S. (2007). Virtue, God and Stoicism in the Thought of Elizabeth Carter and Catharine Macaulay. In J. Broad and Green, K., eds., Virtue, Liberty, and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women, 1400–1800. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 137–48.Google Scholar
Hutton, S. (2021). Radicalism, Religion and Mary Wollstonecraft. Intellectual History Review 31(1), 181–98.Google Scholar
Kendrick, N. (2016). Wollstonecraft on Marriage as Virtue Friendship. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A., eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 34–49.Google Scholar
Kendrick, N. (2019). Marriage, Love, and Friendship. In Bergès, S., Botting, E. H. and Coffee, A., eds., The Wollstonecraftian Mind. London: Routledge, pp. 381–90.Google Scholar
Khin Zaw, S. (1998). The Reasonable Heart: Mary Wollstonecraft’s View of the Relation between Reason and Feeling in Morality, Moral Psychology, and Moral Development. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 13(1), 78–117.Google Scholar
Kivy, P. (2013). Genius and the Creative Imagination. In Harris, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 468–87.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1964). Some Thoughts Concerning Education. In Grey, P., ed., John Locke on Education. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 19–176.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, C. (1996). Letters on Education. Facsimile of the 1790 edition. London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Macaulay Graham, C. (1783). A Treatise on the Immutability of Moral Truth. London: A. Hamilton.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. (1993). Reason and Sensibility: The Ideal of Women’s Self-Governance in the Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 8(4), 181–203.Google Scholar
O’Brien, K. (2009). Women and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perinetti, D. (2013). The Nature of Virtue. In Harris, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 333–68.Google Scholar
Plato (1767). The Banquet, a Dialogue of Plato Concerning Love: The Second Part, trans. F. Sydenham. London: W. Sandby.Google Scholar
Plato (1777). Phedon: or, a Dialogue of the Immortality of the Soul: From Plato the Divine Philosopher, trans. anonymous. London: J. Davidson.Google Scholar
Plato (1993). The Symposium, ed. and trans. W. S. Cobb. In The Symposium and the Phaedrus: Plato’s Erotic Dialogues. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 15–59.Google Scholar
Plato (1998). Republic, ed. and trans. R. Waterfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plato (2005). Meno, ed. and trans. R. Waterfield. In Meno and Other Dialogues: Charmides, Laches, Lysis, Meno. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 97–143.Google Scholar
Price, R. (1758). A Review of the Principal Questions and Difficulties in Morals; Particularly Those Relating to the Original of Our Ideas of Virtue, Its Nature, Foundation, Reference to the Deity, Obligation, Subject-Matter, and Sanctions. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Price, R. (1991). Political Writings, ed. Thomas, D. O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reuter, M. (2005). Mary Wollstonecraft on Love and Friendship. In Carlson, Å., ed., Philosophical Aspects on Emotions. Stockholm: Thales, pp. 119–39.Google Scholar
Reuter, M. (2007). Catharine Macaulay and Mary Wollstonecraft on the Will. In Broad, J. and Green, K., eds., Virtue, Liberty, and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women, 1400–1800. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 149–69.Google Scholar
Reuter, M. (2010). Revolution, Virtue and Duty: Aspects of Politics, Religion and Morality in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Thought. In Mjaaland, M. T., Sigurdson, O. and Thorgeirsdottir, S., eds., The Body Unbound: Philosophical Perspectives on Politics, Embodiment and Religion. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 107–22.Google Scholar
Reuter, M. (2014). ‘Like a Fanciful Kind of Half Being’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Criticism of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 29(4), 925–41.Google Scholar
Reuter, M. (2016). The Role of the Passions in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Notion of Virtue. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A., eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 50–66.Google Scholar
Reuter, M. (2017). Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the Imagination. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25(6), 1116–36.Google Scholar
Reuter, M. (2018). Mary Wollstonecraft’s Contribution to the ‘Invention of Autonomy’. In Bergès, S. and Siani, A. L., eds., Women Philosophers on Autonomy: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 112–30.Google Scholar
Reuter, M. (2019). Equality and Difference in Olympe de Gouges’ Les droits de la femme: A La Reine. Australasian Philosophical Review 3(4), 422–31.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J-J. (1763). Emilius and Sophia: or, a New System of Education. Translated from the French of Mr. J. J. Rousseau, Citizen of Geneva. By the Translator of Eloisa, trans. W. Kenrick, vol. 4. London: T. Becket & P. A. de Hondt.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J-J. (2002). The Social Contract and The First and Second Discourses, trans. and ed. S. Dunn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sapiro, V. (1992). A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, A. M. (2013). Passions, Affections, Sentiments: Taxonomy and Terminology. In Harris, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197–225.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1998). The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2002). The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. Haakonssen, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, O. (2019). Rational Dissent. In Bergès, S., Botting, E.H., and Coffee, A., eds., The Wollstonecraftian Mind. London: Routledge, pp. 49–62.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. (2012). ‘The Link Which Unites Man with Brutes’: Enlightenment Feminism, Women and Animals. Intellectual History Review 22(3), 427–44.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. (2013). Locke and His Influence. In Harris, J. A., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
Swift, J. (2005). Gulliver’s Travels, eds. Rawson, C. and Higgins, I.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talleyrand-Périgordin, C. M. de (1791). Rapport sur l’instruction publique. Paris: Baudouin & Du Point.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. (2003). Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, N. F. (2007). The Rights of Woman as Chimera: The Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor Mill, H. (1983). Enfranchisement of Women. In John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor Mill, The Subjection of Women & Enfranchisement of Women. London: Virago, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
Todd, J. (2000). Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, S. (2019). ‘Have Ye Not Heard That We Cannot Serve Two Masters?’: The Platonism of Mary Wollstonecraft. In Hedley, D. and Leech, D., eds., Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy. Cham: Springer, pp. 175–89.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, S. (2021). Wollstonecraft: Philosophy, Passion, and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. (2005). Friends, Citizens, Strangers: Essays on Where We Belong. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Whale, J. (2000). Imagination under Pressure, 1789–1832. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. (2001). Mary Wollstonecraft. In On Women and Writing: Her Essays, Assessments and Arguments, ed. Barrett, M.. London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by