Element contents
Series: Elements in Philosophy of Law
The Differentiation and Autonomy of Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 September 2023
Summary
This Element looks first at the fundamental principle of modernity that is the functional differentiation of society, and the emergence of autonomous, positive law. The careful architecture of differentiation, balance, and mutual performance between the legal, political and economic systems is jeopardised with the hypertrophy of any one of the structurally coupled systems at the expense of the others. The pathologies are described in the second section of the Element. It explores how, under conditions of globalisation, market thinking came to hoist itself to the position of privileged site of societal rationality. In the third section we look at what sustains law's own 'reflexive intelligence' under conditions of globalisation, and whether we can still rely today on the constitutional achievement to guarantee law's autonomy, its democratic credentials and its ability to reproduce normative expectations today.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Philosophy of LawOnline ISBN: 9781009004619Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 05 October 2023
References
Alexy, R (1989) A Theory of Legal Argumentation (trans. R Adler and DN MacCormick). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexy, R (2002) A Theory of Constitutional Rights (trans. J Rivers). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, HJ (2003) Law and Revolution. Vol. II, The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, H (2011) ‘The Return of Crisis’ in Kjaer, P, Teubner, G and Febbrajo, A (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective. Oxford: Hart, pp. 133–72.Google Scholar
Choudry, S (ed.) (2007) The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christodoulidis, E (2020) ‘The Myth of Democratic Governance’ in Kjaer, PF (ed.), The Law of Political Economy: Transformation in the Function of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–88.Google Scholar
Christodoulidis, E (2021) The Redress of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christodoulidis, E, Dukes, R and Goldoni, M (2019) Research Handbook in Critical Legal Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, B (2015) Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, J (1992) ’Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundations of Authority”’ in Cornell, D, Rosenfeld, M and Gray Carson, D (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–67.Google Scholar
Dobner, P and Loughlin, M (eds.) (2010) The Twilight of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E (1893/1965) De la division du travail social (trans. G Simpson). London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A and Teubner, G (2003) ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25(4), 999–1046.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (2000) ‘Governmentality’ in Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984. Vol. III, Power. New York: New Press, pp. 201–22.Google Scholar
Galbraith, JK (1987) A History of Economics: The Past as the Present. London: H. Hamilton.Google Scholar
Golia, A and Teubner, G (2021) ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Background, Theory, Debates’. Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, 1–55.Google Scholar
Guibentif, P (2016) ‘Rights in Niklas Luhmann’s Systems Theory’ in Harste, G (ed.), Law and Intersystemic Communication: Understanding ‘Structural Coupling’. New York: Routledge, pp. 255–88.Google Scholar
Habermas, J (2001) ‘Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’ Political Theory, 29(6), 766–81.Google Scholar
Joerges, C, Kjaer, PF and Ralli, T (2011) ‘A New Type of Conflicts Law as Constitutional Form in the Postnational Constellation’. Transnational Legal Theory, 2(2), 153–65.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O (1954) ‘The Legal Framework’ in Flanders, A. and Clegg, H. (eds.), The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain. Oxford, Blackwell, p. 1.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B (2009) ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law’. European Journal of International Law, 20(1), 3–57.Google Scholar
Kjaer, PF (2014) Constitutionalism in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kumm, M (2013) ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 605–28.Google Scholar
Laclau, E (1996) ‘Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?’ in Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lindahl, H (2013) Fault Fines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-legality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M and Walker, N (eds.) (2007) The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1971) ‘Die Weltgesellschaft’. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie/Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 57(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1972) The Sociological Theory of Law (trans. E King-Utz and M Albrow). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1982) The Differentiation of Society (trans. S Holmes and C Larmore). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1986a) Ecological Communication (trans. J Bednarz). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1986b) ‘The Self-Reproduction of Law and Its Limits’ in Teubner, G (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 60–81.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1990b) ‘Verfassung als evolutionare Errungenschaft’.Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9, 176–220.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1995a/1984) Social Systems (trans. J Bednarz, Jr., with D Baecker). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1995b) ‘Inklusion und Exklusion’ in Soziologische Aufklärung. Vol. 6. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 237–64.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1997) ‘Globalization or World Society: How to Conceive of Modern Society?’ International Review of Sociology, 7(1), 67–79.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (2004) Law as a Social System (trans. K Ziegert). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, G (1923/1971) History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics (trans. R Livingstone). London: Merlin.Google Scholar
Malthus, T (1992/1798) Malthus: ‘An Essay on the Principle of Population’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K (1843/2000) ‘On the Jewish Question’ in MacLellan, D. (ed.), Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–63.Google Scholar
Möller, K (2012) The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T (2005) ‘The Problem of Global Justice’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(2), 113–47.Google Scholar
Neves, M (2001) ‘From the Autopoiesis to the Allopoiesis of Law’. Journal of Law and Society, 28(2), 242–64.Google Scholar
Rawls, J (1997) ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 766–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, H (2005) ‘The Speed of Global Flows and the Pace of Democratic Politics’. New Political Science, 27(4), 445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosanvallon, P (2000) The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simitis, S (1986) ‘Juridification of Labor Relations’. Comparative Labor Law, 7(2), 93–142.Google Scholar
Stone-Sweet, A (2012) ‘A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe’. Global Constitutionalism, 1(1), 53–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W (2014) Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Supiot, A (2007) Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law (trans. S Brown). London: Verso. (Originally Seuil, 2005.)Google Scholar
Supiot, A (2017) Governance by Numbers: The Making of a Legal Model of Allegiance. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Teubner, G (1983) ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’. Law & Society Review, 17, 239–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G (1987) ‘Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions’ in Teubner, G (ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
Teubner, G (2006) ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’. Modern Law Review, 69, 327–46.Google Scholar
Teubner, G (2011a) ‘Constitutionalising Polycontexturality’. Social and Legal Studies, 20, 209–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G (2011b) ‘A Constitutional Moment? The Logics of “Hitting the Bottom”’ in Kjaer, P, Teubner, G and Febbrajo, A (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–51.Google Scholar
Teubner, G (2012) Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C (2006) ‘Luhmann’s Political Theory: Politics after Metaphysics?’ in King, M and Thornhill, C (eds.), Luhmann on Law and Politics. Oxford: Hart, 75–100.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C (2012) ‘Sociological Enlightenments and the Sociology of Political Philosophy’. Revue internationale de philosophie, 1, 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, C (2016) ‘On Norms as Social Facts: A View from Historical Political Science’ in Rasch, W. (ed.), ‘Tragic Choices’: Luhmann on Law and States of Exception. Oldenbourg: De Gruyter, pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C (2018) The Sociology of Law and the Global Transformation of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, K (2011) Ratio and Voluntas: The Tension between Reason and Will in Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tuori, K and Tuori, K (2014) The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, RM (1996) ‘Legal Analysis as Institutional Imagination’. Modern Law Review, 59(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Veitch, S (2007) Law and Irresponsibility: On the Legitimation of Human Suffering. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Verschraegen, G (2006) ‘Systems Theory and the Paradox of Human Rights’ in King, M and Thornhill, C (eds.), Luhmann on Law and Politics. Oxford: Hart, pp. 101–25.Google Scholar
Verschraegen, G (2002). ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory’. Journal of Law and Society, 29(2), 258–81.Google Scholar
Walker, N (2002) ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’. Modern Law Review, 65(3), 317–59.Google Scholar
Walker, N (2010) ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism: Looking beyond the German Debate’ in Tuori, K and Sankari, S. (eds.), The Many Constitutions of Europe. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 143–68.Google Scholar
Walzer, M (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weber, M (1946) ‘Science as a Vocation’. In Tauber, AI (ed.), Science and the Quest for Reality: Main Trends of the Modern World. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 382–94.Google Scholar
Weber, M (2002/1905) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wood, EM (1981) ‘The Separation of the Economic and the Political in Capitalism’. New Left Review, 127, 65–95.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by