Element contents
Stoicism as Performance in Much Ado about Nothing
Acting Indifferently
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2019
Summary
This Element demonstrates how Shakespeare's Much Ado about Nothing models an understanding of the philosophy of Stoicism as performance, rather than as intellectual doctrine. To do this, it explores how, despite many early modern cultural institutions' suppression of Stoicism's theatrical capacity, a performative understanding lived on in one of the most influential texts of the era, Baldassare Castiglione's The Book of the Courtier, and that this performativity was itself inherited from one of Castiglione's sources, Cicero's De Oratore. The books concludes with a sustained reading of Much Ado to demonstrate how the play, in performance, itself acts as a Stoic exercise.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108751797Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 22 August 2019
References
Aristotle, . The Poetics. Translated by Hippocrates G. Apostle, Elizabeth A. Dobbs, and Morris A. Parslow. The Peripatetic Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold. “An ‘Emotional’ Jesus and Stoic Tradition.” Stoicism in Early Christianity, edited by Rasimus, Tuomas, Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, and Dunderberg, Ismo. Baker, 2010, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
Barbour, Reid. English Epicures and Stoics: Ancient Legacies in Early Stuart Culture. University of Massachusetts Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Sarah. Shakespeare and the Grammar of Forgiveness. Cornell University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Behrent, Michael, and Zamora, Daniel, editors. Foucault and Neoliberalism. Polity, 2016.Google Scholar
BergerJr., Harry. “Against the Sink-a-Pace: Sexual and Family Politics in Much Ado About Nothing.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 3, 1992, pp. 302–13.Google Scholar
Berry, Ralph. “Much Ado About Nothing: Structure and Texture.” English Studies, vol. 52, no. 1–6, 1971, pp. 211–33.Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon. Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition: Anger’s Privilege. Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. “A Short Organum for the Theatre.” Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. Translated by John Willet. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1964. 179–205Google Scholar
Campbell, Timothy, and Sitze, Adam, editors. Biopolitics: A Reader. Duke University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. The Book of the Courtier, edited by Cox, Virginia. Translated by Thomas Hoby. Everyman, 1994.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Cicero (Marcus Tullius Cicero). The Booke of Marcus Tullius Cicero entitled Paradoxa Stoicorum. Translated by Thomas Newton. [T. Marsh], 1569.Google Scholar
Cicero (Marcus Tullius Cicero) On the Ideal Orator (De Oratore). Translated by James M. May and Jakob Wisse. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Collington, Philip D. “‘Stuffed with all Honourable Virtues’: Much Ado About Nothing and The Book of the Courtier.” Studies in Philology, vol. 103, no. 3, 2006, pp. 281–312.Google Scholar
Cook, Carol. “‘The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor’: Reading Gender Difference in Much Ado About Nothing.” PMLA, vol. 101, no. 2, 1986, pp. 186–202.Google Scholar
Dealy, Ross. The Stoic Origins of Erasmus’s Philosophy of Christ. University of Toronto Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epictetus, The Handbook (The Enchiridion). Translated by Nicholas P. White. Hackett, 1983.Google Scholar
Epictetus, The Manuell of Epictetus, Translated out of Greek and into French, and now into English. Translated by John Sanford. 1567.Google Scholar
Eskew, Doug. “Richard II and the Unforgetting Messiah.” Exemplaria, vol. 27, no. 4, 2015, pp. 307–28.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, William. “The Epistolary Tradition.” The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature, Volume 2 (1558–1660), edited by Cheney, Patrick and Hardie, Philip. Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 273–90.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom.” Translated by P. Aranov and D. McGrawth. The Essential Foucault: Selections from the Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by Rabinow, Paul and Rose, Nikolas. The New Press, 1994, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982, edited by Gros, Frédéric. Translated by Graham Burchell. Picador, 2005.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel Subjectivity and Truth: Lectures at the Collège de France 1980–1981, edited by Gros, Frédéric. Translated by Graham Burchell. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Goddard, Harold. “Much Ado About Nothing.” The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 1. University of Chicago Press, 1951, pp. 271–80.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. “Much Ado About Nothing.” The Norton Shakespeare, edited by Greenblatt, et al. Norton, 2016, pp. 337–45.Google Scholar
Grier, Miles. “Staging the Cherokee Othello: An Imperial Economy of Indian Watching.” The William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 73, no. 1, 2016, pp. 73–106.Google Scholar
Guevara, Antonio de. The Golden Boke of Marcus Aurelius. Translated by John Bourchier Berners. [Thomas Berthelet], 1545.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Translated by Frederick Lawrence. Polity, 1987.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Translated by Michael Chase. Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre Philosophy as a Way of Life, edited by Davidson, Arnold I.. Translated by Michael Chase. Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar
Hays, Janice. “Those ‘soft and delicate desires’: Much Ado and the Distrust of Women.” The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare, edited by Swift Lenz, Carolyn Ruth, Greene, Gayle, and Neely, Carol Thomas. University of Illinois Press, 1983, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar
Helfer, Rebecca. “Wit and the Art of Memory in Nashe’s Unfortunate Traveler.” English Literary Renaissance, vol. 47, no. 3, 2017, pp. 325–54.Google Scholar
Henze, Richard. “Deception in Much Ado About Nothing.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, vol. 11, no. 2, 1971, pp. 187–201.Google Scholar
Homer, . The Iliad. Translated by Robert Fitzgerald. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1974.Google Scholar
Inchbald, Elizabeth. “Remarks.” The British Theatre, or, A Collection of Plays: Much Ado About Nothing, Vol. 13. Hurst, Robinson, and Co., 1808, 2–5.Google Scholar
Irvine, William B. A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. “Bartholomew Faire.” The Alchemist and Other Plays, edited by Campbell, Gordon. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kottman, Paul. “Memory, ‘Mimesis,’ Tragedy: The Scene before Philosophy.” Theatre Journal, vol. 55, no. 1, 2003, pp. 81–97.Google Scholar
Kuzner, James. Shakespeare as a Way of Life: Skeptical Practice and the Politics of Weakness. Fordham University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Leo, Russ. “Michel Foucault and Digger Politics.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, vol. 58, no. 1, 2018, pp. 169–94.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus. Two Bookes of Constancie. Translated by John Stradling. [Richard Johnes] 1595.Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia. Citizen-Saints: Shakespeare and Political Theology. The University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter. “The Classics in Humanism, Education, and Scholarship.” The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature, Volume 2 (1558–1660), edited by Cheney, Patrick and Hardie, Philip. Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 29–56.Google Scholar
McEachern, Claire. “Introduction.” Much Ado About Nothing. Thomson Learning, 2006. 1–144.Google Scholar
Mezzatesta, Michael. “Marcus Aurelius, Fray Antonio de Guevara, and the Ideal of the Perfect Prince in the Sixteenth Century.” Art Bulletin, vol. 60, 1984, pp. 620–33.Google Scholar
“mistake, v.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, www.oed.com/view/Entry/120073. Accessed May 2, 2018.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies after Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. The University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. “That to Philosophize is to Learn to Die.” The Complete Essays of Montaigne. Translated by Donald M. Frame. Stanford University Press, 1957, pp. 56–68.Google Scholar
Munro, Ian. “Shakespeare’s Jestbook: Wit, Print, Performance.” ELH, vol. 71, no. 1, 2004, pp. 89–113.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. “Poetry and the Passions: Two Stoic Views.” Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 97–149.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Richards, Jennifer. “Assumed Simplicity and the Critique of Nobility: Or, How Castiglione Read Cicero.” Renaissance Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 2, 2001, pp. 460–84.Google Scholar
Rossiter, A.P. “Much Ado About Nothing.” Angel with Horns and Other Shakespeare Lectures, edited by Storey, Graham. Longmans, 1961, pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
Scott, Mary Augusta. “The Book of the Courtyer: A Possible Source of Benedick and Beatrice.” PMLA, vol. 16, no. 4, 1901, pp. 475–502.Google Scholar
Seneca, . Letters on Ethics. Translated by Graver, Margaret and Long, A.A.. University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Seneca, . The Works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca, both Morall and Naturall. Translated by Thomas Lodge. 1614.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, edited by Jenkins, Harold. Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1997 [1982].Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William Much Ado About Nothing, edited by Claire, McEachern. Thomson Learning, 2006.Google Scholar
Sherman, Donovan. “Embodied Stoicism in Marston’s Antonio Plays.” English Literary Renaissance, vol. 48, no. 3, 2018, pp. 291–313.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. “The Defence of Poesy.” The Major Works, edited by Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 212–51.Google Scholar
Sims, Gregory. “Stoic Virtues/Stoic Vices: Montaigne’s Pyrrhic Rhetoric.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, 1993, pp. 235–66.Google Scholar
Sofer, Andrew. Dark Matter: Invisibility in Drama, Theater, and Performance. University of Michigan Press, 2013.Google Scholar
“stock, n.1 and adj.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, www.oed.com/view/Entry/190595. Accessed May 2, 2018.Google Scholar
Taylor, Diana. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ulrici, Hermann. “Much Ado About Nothing—Taming of the Shrew.” Shakespeare’s Dramatic Art and His Relation to Calderon and Goethe. Chapman Brothers, 1846, pp. 289–99.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by