Book contents
- Why Gender?
- Why Gender?
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- A Prefatory Note
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Gender in Translation: Beyond Monolingualism
- Chapter 2 Gender and the Queer/Trans* Undercommons
- Chapter 3 Gender and the End of Biological Determinism
- Chapter 4 Gender, Sexuality, Race, and Colonialism
- Chapter 5 Posthuman Feminism and Gender Methodology
- Chapter 6 Gender, Sperm Troubles, and Assisted Reproductive Technologies
- Chapter 7 Gender, Capital, and Care
- Chapter 8 Aspiration Management: Gender, Race, Class, and the Child as Waste
- Chapter 9 Gender, Race and American National Identity: The First Black First Family
- Chapter 10 Gender and the Collective
- Chapter 11 Willfulness, Feminism, and the Gendering of Will
- Chapter 12 Gender and Emigré Political Thought: Hannah Arendt and Judith Shklar
- Chapter 13 Feminism and the Abomination of Violence: Gender Thought and Unthought
- Chapter 14 Trafficking, Prostitution, and Inequality: The Centrality of Gender
- Chapter 15 Gender, Revenge, Mutation, and War
- Chapter 16 Bed Peace and Gender Abnorms
- Index
- References
Chapter 6 - Gender, Sperm Troubles, and Assisted Reproductive Technologies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- Why Gender?
- Why Gender?
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- A Prefatory Note
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Gender in Translation: Beyond Monolingualism
- Chapter 2 Gender and the Queer/Trans* Undercommons
- Chapter 3 Gender and the End of Biological Determinism
- Chapter 4 Gender, Sexuality, Race, and Colonialism
- Chapter 5 Posthuman Feminism and Gender Methodology
- Chapter 6 Gender, Sperm Troubles, and Assisted Reproductive Technologies
- Chapter 7 Gender, Capital, and Care
- Chapter 8 Aspiration Management: Gender, Race, Class, and the Child as Waste
- Chapter 9 Gender, Race and American National Identity: The First Black First Family
- Chapter 10 Gender and the Collective
- Chapter 11 Willfulness, Feminism, and the Gendering of Will
- Chapter 12 Gender and Emigré Political Thought: Hannah Arendt and Judith Shklar
- Chapter 13 Feminism and the Abomination of Violence: Gender Thought and Unthought
- Chapter 14 Trafficking, Prostitution, and Inequality: The Centrality of Gender
- Chapter 15 Gender, Revenge, Mutation, and War
- Chapter 16 Bed Peace and Gender Abnorms
- Index
- References
Summary
Louise Brown, the world’s first test-tube baby, was born more than forty years ago in England. For Louise Brown’s infertile mother, Lesley, in vitro fertilization (IVF), developed at the University of Cambridge, was a “hope technology” (Franklin, 1997), allowing Lesley to overcome her tubal-factor infertility and nine years of heart-breaking involuntary childlessness. Lesley’s story involved a complex reproductive quest, in which she traveled with her working-class husband, John, from their home in Bristol to Bourn Hall Clinic in Cambridge to undergo the IVF procedures. Then, due to intense media scrutiny and religious opposition, Lesley and John were forced to travel to yet a third location, Oldham General Hospital in the North of England, for the secret delivery of baby Louise by Cesarean section on July 25, 1978.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Why Gender? , pp. 126 - 143Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Almeling, R. 2011. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, C. L. R., Anderson, R. A. and De Jonge, C. 2019. Male Fertility: A Window on the Health of This Generation and the Next. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 39, 721–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, G. 2002. Deciding Whether to Tell Children about Donor Insemination: An Unresolved Question in the United States. In Inhorn, M. C. and van Balen, F., eds., Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 119–33.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. and Matson, P. L. 2000. Genetic Influences on Human Infertility. In Bentley, R. and Mascie-Taylor Gillian, C. G. N., eds., Infertility in the Modern World: Present and Future Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–81.Google Scholar
Cui, W. 2010. Mother or Nothing: The Agony of Infertility. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 881–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dancet, E. A. F. et al. 2011. Patient-Centred Infertility Care: A Qualitative Study to Listen to the Patient’s Voice. Human Reproduction, 26, 827–33.Google Scholar
De Sutter, P. 2011. Considerations for Clinics and Practitioners Treating Foreign Patients with Assisted Reproductive Technology: Lessons from Experiences at Ghent University Hospital. Belgium Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23, 652–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Djerassi, C. 2014. In Retrospect: From the Pill to the Pen. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). 2018. More than 8 Million Babies Born from IVF since the World’s First in 1978. www.eshre.eu/ESHRE2018/Media/ESHRE-2018-Press-releases/De-Geyter.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Reproduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gürtin, Z. B. and Inhorn, M. C. 2011. Introduction: Travelling for Conception and the Global Assisted Reproduction Market. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23, 535–37.Google Scholar
Hudson, N. and Culley, L. 2011. Assisted Reproductive Travel: UK Patient Trajectories. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23, 573–81.Google Scholar
Hudson, N. et al. 2011. Cross-Border Reproductive Care: A Review of the Literature. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 22, 673–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 1994. Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility, and Egyptian Medical Traditions. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 1996. Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life in Egypt. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and in Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2006. “He Won’t Be My Son”: Middle Eastern Muslim Men’s Discourses of Adoption and Gamete Donation. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20, 94–120.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2015. Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2018. America’s Arab Refugees: Vulnerability and Health on the Margins. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Inhorn, M. C. and Patrizio, P. 2015. Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Gender, Reproductive Technologies, and Global Movements in the 21st Century. Human Reproduction Update, 21, 411–26.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. and Tremayne, S., eds. 2012. Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. et al., eds. 2009. Reconceiving the Second Sex: Men, Masculinity, and Reproduction. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Jones, H. W. et al. 2010. International Federation of Fertility Societies: Surveillance 2010. www.iffs-reproduction.org/documents/IFFS_Surveillance_2010.pdf (accessed January 15, 2016).Google Scholar
Mohr, S. 2018. Being a Sperm Donor: Masculinity, Sexuality, and Biosociality in Denmark. New York: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennings, G. 2002. Reproductive Tourism as Moral Pluralism in Motion. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 337–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G. 2004. Legal Harmonization and Reproductive Tourism in Europe. Human Reproduction, 19, 2689–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G. 2009. International Evolution of Legislation and Guidelines in Medically Assisted Reproduction. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 18(Suppl. 2), 15–18.Google Scholar
Pennings, G. 2010. The Rough Guide to Insemination: Cross-Border Travelling for Donor Semen due to Different Regulations. Facts, Views and Vision in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1, 55–60.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 2001. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, S. 2005. The Global City: Introducing a Concept. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11, 27–43.Google Scholar
Spar, D. L. 2006. The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Wahlberg, A. 2018. Good Quality: The Routinization of Sperm Banking in China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Wentzell, E. A. and Inhorn, M.C. 2014. Reconceiving Masculinity and “Men as Partners” in ICPD Beyond 2014: Insights from a Mexican HPV Study. Global Public Health, 9, 691–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed