Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T17:31:18.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2023

Ewa Atanassow
Affiliation:
Bard College, Berlin
Thomas Bartscherer
Affiliation:
Bard College, New York
David A. Bateman
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Type
Chapter
Information
When the People Rule
Popular Sovereignty in Theory and Practice
, pp. 335 - 370
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Select Bibliography

“2012–2016 Border Patrol Strategic Plan.” US Customs and Border Patrol, 2012. www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/documents/bp_strategic_plan.pdfGoogle Scholar
Aaron, Rhodes. Debasement of Human Rights: How Politics Sabotage the Ideal of Freedom New York, NY: Encounter Books, 2018.Google Scholar
Abts, Koen, and Rummens, Stefan. “Populism versus Democracy.” Political Studies 55, no. 2 (2016): 405–24.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. “The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution.” Yale Law Journal 93, no. 6 (1984): 1013–72.Google Scholar
Afonso, Alexandre, and Rennwald, Line. “Social Class and the Changing Welfare State Agenda of Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe.” In Electoral Realignments and Welfare Transformations in Europe, edited by Manow, Philip, Palier, Bruno, and Schwander, Hanna, 171–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Agg, John. Proceedings and debates of the Convention of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1837–1838. Harrisburg, PA: Packer, Barrett, and Parke, 1838.Google Scholar
Ahrensdorf, Peter J.The Limits of Political Rationalism: Enlightenment and Religion in Oedipus the Tyrant.” The Journal of Politics 66, no. 3 (2004): 773–99.Google Scholar
Albertus, Michael, and Menaldo, Victor. Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Alfano, Mark, Lynch, Michael P., and Tanesini, Alessandra. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Humility. New York: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle. Our Declaration: A Reading of the Declaration of Independence in Defense of Equality. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co., 2014.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle. Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship Since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle, and Pottle, Justin. “Democratic Knowledge and the Problem of Faction.” White Paper. Knight Foundation, 2017.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. Politics and History: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx. London: NLB, 1972.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Original Edition. New York, NY: Verso, 1983.Google Scholar
Anderson, Greg. “Before Turannoi Were Tyrants: Rethinking a Chapter of Early Greek History.” Classical Antiquity 24, no. 2 (2005).Google Scholar
Anderson, Fred. ed. George Washington Remembers: Reflections on the French and Indian War. Lanham, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.Google Scholar
Anker, Elisabeth. Orgies of Feeling: Melodrama and the Politics of Freedom. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
“Annenberg Civics Knowledge Survey.” Reported PRNewswire, August 2019. www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/political-communication/civics-knowledge-survey/Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Schaffner, Brian F.. “Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison.” Political Analysis 22, no. 3 (2014): 285303.Google Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The Lies That Bind: Rethinking Identity. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2018.Google Scholar
Applebaum, Anne. “Illiberal Democracy Comes to Poland.” The Washington Post, December 16, 2016. www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2016/12/22/illiberal-democracy-comes-to-poland/Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew. “Populism, Constitutional Courts, and Civil Society.” In Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations, edited by Landfried, Christine, 331–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York, NY: Harcourt, 1976.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Politics. Tr. by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy: As Essay in Political and Social Criticism. London: Smith, Elder, & Co., 1869.Google Scholar
Arpey, Conor. “The Business Implications of Disparate Impact’s Uncertain Future.” BLR Buzz Blog, American University Business Law Review, April 17, 2017. www.aublr.org/2017/04/business-implications-disparate-impacts-uncertain-future/Google Scholar
Aslam, Ali. Ordinary Democracy: Sovereignty & Citizenship Beyond the Neoliberal Impasse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Atanassow, Ewa. Tocqueville’s Dilemmas and Ours: Sovereignty, Nationalism, Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Augustine, . “Against Faustus the Manichean, XXII, 73–79.” In Political Writings, edited by Tkacz, Michael W. and Kries, Douglas, 220–22. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
Ausland, Hayden W.On Reading Plato Mimetically.” American Journal of Philology 118 (1997): 371416.Google Scholar
Azari, Julia R. Delivering the People’s Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain, Butler, Judith, Didi-Huberman, Georges, Khiari, Sadri, Rancière, Jacques, and Bourdieu, Pierre. What Is a People? New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard. The Peopling of British North America: An Introduction. New York: Alfred. A, Knopf, 1986.Google Scholar
Baker, Peter. “Trump Supports Plan That Would Cut Legal Immigration by Half.” The New York Times, August 3, 2017, A1.Google Scholar
Balakrishnan, Gopal. “The Age of Carl Schmitt.” In Man and His Enemies: Essays on Carl Schmitt, edited by Minkov, Svetozar and Nowak, Piotr, 1124. Bialystok: University of Bialystok Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Ball, Sam. American Creed. Citizen Film, 2018. www.americancreed.org/watchGoogle Scholar
Bancroft, George. History of the United States, From the Discovery of the American Continent. Boston, MA: Charles Bowen, 1834.Google Scholar
Bancroft, George. Oration Delivered on the Fourth of July 1826 at Northampton, Mass. Northampton: T. Watson Shephard, 1826.Google Scholar
Bassier, Roy P. The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Volume 2, 1848–1858. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bateman, David A. Disenfranchising Democracy: Constructing the Electorate in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Bateman, David A. “Partisan Polarization on Black Suffrage.” Perspectives on Politics 18, no.2 (2020): 470–91.Google Scholar
Bateman, David A. “Transatlantic Anxieties: Democracy and Diversity in Nineteenth-Century Discourse.” Studies in American Political Development 33, no.2 (2019): 139–77.Google Scholar
Batuman, Bülent. “Architectural Mimicry and the Politics of Mosque Building: Negotiating Islam and Nation in Turkey.” The Journal of Architecture 21, no. 3 (2016): 321–47.Google Scholar
Bazelon, Emily. “Department of Justification.” The New York Times, February 8, 2017. www.nytimes.com/2017/02/28/magazine/jeff-sessions-stephen-bannon-justice-department.html?_r=0Google Scholar
Beiler, Rosalind J.Dissenting Religious Communication Networks and European Migration, 1660–1710.” In Soundings in Atlantic History: Latent Structures and Intellectual Currents, 1500–1830, edited by Bailyn, Bernard and Denault, Patricia, 210–3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bender, Michael C. “Trump Strikes Nationalistic Tone in Inaugural Address.” The Wall Street Journal. January 20, 2017. www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-strikes-nationalistic-tone-in-inaugural-speech-1484957527?tesla=y&mod=e2twGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, William H. The American National State and the Early West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49, no. 3 (1997): 401–29.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. Democracy and Dictatorship in Europe: From the Ancien Régime to the Present Day. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27, no. 1 (2016): 519.Google Scholar
Bernard, Phillipe, and Dubief, Henri. The Decline of the Third Republic, 1914–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Berstein, Gisèle, and Berstein, Serge. Dictionnaire Historique de La France Contemporaine. Paris: Editions Complexe, 1995.Google Scholar
Best, GFA.The Protestant Constitution and Its Supporters, 1800–1829.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5, no. 8 (1958).Google Scholar
Betz, Hans-Georg, and Johnson, Carol. “Against the Current – Stemming the Tide: The Nostalgic Ideology of the Contemporary Radical Populist Right.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9, no. 3 (2004): 311–27.Google Scholar
Bhargava, R. P. The Chamber of Princes. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre, 1991.Google Scholar
Biagini, Eugenio. Liberty, Retrenchment, and Reform: Popular Liberalism in the Age of Gladstone, 1860–1880. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.Google Scholar
Billings, Warren M. ed. The Old Dominion in the Seventeenth Century: A Documentary History of Virginia, 1606–1700. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Bimes, Terri, and Mulroy, Quinn. “The Rise and Decline of Presidential Populism.” Studies in American Political Development 18, no. 2 (2004): 136–59.Google Scholar
Bishop, Bill. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Indianapolis, IN: Houghton Mifflin, 2008.Google Scholar
Bishop, William G., and Attree, William H.. Report of the Debates and Proceedings of the Convention for the Revising of the Constitution of the State of New York, 1846. Albany, NY: Evening Atlas, 1846.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. Exchange and Power in Social Life. Routledge, 1986.Google Scholar
Blondell, Ruby. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge, and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean. Les Six Livres de La République. Translated by Ioannis D. Evrigenis. Paris: Jacques du Puys, 1576.Google Scholar
Bonikowski, Bart, and Gidron, Noam. “The Populist Style in American Politics: Presidential Campaign Discourse, 1952–1996.” Social Forces 94, no. 4 (2016): 1593–621.Google Scholar
Bonilla, Yarimar, and Rosa, Jonathan. “#Ferguson: Digital Protest, Hashtag Ethnography, and the Racial Politics of Social Media in the United States.” American Ethnologist 42, no. 1 (2015): 417.Google Scholar
Bositis, David A. The Congressional Black Caucus in the 103rd Congress. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, 1994.Google Scholar
Bourke, Richard, and Skinner, Quentin, eds. Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard. “The Early Modern Origins of Behavioral Economics.” Social Philosophy & Policy 37, no. 1 (2020): 3054.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard. “Thomas Hobbes and the Perils of Pluralism.” Journal of Politics 63 (2001): 392413.Google Scholar
Bradford, William. Of Plimouth Plantation, 1620–1647. New York, NY: Modern Library, 1981.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jason. Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Brewer, Holly. “Slavery, Sovereignty, and ‘Inheritable Blood: Reconsidering John Locke and the Origins of American Slavery.” American Historical Review 122, no.4 (2017): 1038–78.Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen. Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View. New York, NY: Knopf, 2010.Google Scholar
Brock, André Brock. “From the Blackhand Side: Twitter as a Cultural Conversation.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 56, no. 4 (2012): 529–49.Google Scholar
Brosseau, Laurence, and Roy, Marc-André. “The Notwithstanding Clause of the Charter.” Library of Parliament, 2018. https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West. New York: Columbia University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Brown, R. A., and Shaw, T. C.. “Separate Nations: Two Attitudinal Dimensions of Black Nationalism.” Journal of Politics 64, no. 1 (2002): 2244.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. “Populism and Nationalism.” Nations and Nationalism 26, no. 1 (2020): 4466.Google Scholar
Bugaric, Bojan. “Could Populism Be Good for Constitutional Democracy?Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15, no. 1 (2019): 4158.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. “The Struggle for Liberal Democracy in Eastern Europe.” World Policy Journal 7, no. 3 (1990): 395430.Google Scholar
Bunyasi, T. L., and Smith, C. W.. “Do All Black Lives Matter Equally to Black People? Respectability Politics and the Limitations of Linked Fate.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 4, no. 1 (2019): 180215.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. “‘We the People’: Thoughts on Freedom of Assembly.” In What Is a People?, edited by Badiou, Alain, Butler, Judith, Didi-Huberman, Georges, Khiari, Sadri, Rancière, Jacques, and Bourdieu, Pierre, 4964. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Brands, H. W. What America Owes the World: The Struggle for the Soul of Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Calhoun, John C. A Disquisition on Government and A Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1853.Google Scholar
Calhoun, John C. The Works of John C. Calhoun. Volume 1. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1853.Google Scholar
Calloway, Colin G. The Indian World of George Washington: The First President, the First Americans and the Birth of the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea L. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Camus, Anaïs, and Storme, Tristan. “Carl Schmitt, Lecteur de Tocqueville.” Revue européenne des sciences sociales 49, no. 1 (2011): 734.Google Scholar
Camus, Anaïs, and Storme, Tristan. “Schmitt and Tocqueville on the Future of the Political in Democratic Times.” The Review of Politics 74 (2012): 659–84.Google Scholar
Canon, David T. Race, Redistricting, and Representation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. The People. Cambridge: Polity, 2005.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. “The People.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, edited by Dryzek, John S., Honig, Bonnie, and Phillips, Anne, 349–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. Populism. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47, no. 1 (1999): 216.Google Scholar
Carney, Nikita. “All Lives Matter, but so Does Race: Black Lives Matter and the Evolving Role of Social Media.” Humanity and Society 40, no. 2 (2016): 180–99.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan. “The Disempowerment of the Gender Gap: Soccer Moms and the 1996 Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics 32, no. 1 (1999): 712.Google Scholar
Carter, Clarence Edward, ed. The Territorial Papers of the United States: Volume X. The Territory of Michigan, 1805–1820. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1942.Google Scholar
Carter, Dan. The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservatism, and the Transformation of American Politics. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Center for the Study of Diversity and Democracy Poll. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. www.csdd.northwestern.edu/research/. Accessed December 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Chafetz, Josh Congress’s Constitution: Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Che, Chang. “The Nazi Inspiring China’s Communists.” The Atlantic, December 1, 2020. www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/12/nazi-china-communists-carl-schmitt/617237/. Accessed January 28, 2022.Google Scholar
Childers, Christopher. The Failure of Popular Sovereignty: Slavery, Manifest Destiny, and the Radicalization of Southern Politics. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Chung, Heera. “From a Protectionist Party to a Church Party, 1846–48: Identity Crisis of the Conservative Party and the Jew Bill of 1847.” Albion 36, no. 2 (2004): 256–78.Google Scholar
Çinar, Ipek, Stokes, Susan, and Uribe, Andres. “Presidential Rhetoric and Populism.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 50, no. 2 (2020): 240–63.Google Scholar
Clark, Meredith D.White Folks’ Work: Digital Allyship Praxis in the #BlackLivesMatter Movement.” Social Movement Studies 18, no. 5 (2019): 519–34.Google Scholar
Cleen, Benjamin De, and Stavrakakis, Yannis. “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost – The Public 24, no. 4 (2017): 301–19.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth. The People’s Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Clinton, R. L. Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1989.Google Scholar
Cocks, Joan. On Sovereignty and Other Political Delusions. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Cohen, Elizabeth F.Dilemmas of Representation, Citizenship, and Semi-Citizenship.” Saint Louis University Law Journal 58 (2014): 1047–70.Google Scholar
Cohen, Elizabeth F. Semi-Citizenship in Democratic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy, edited by Estlund, David, 87106. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar
Cohen, Lizabeth. A Consumers’ Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Post-war America. New York: Vintage, 2003.Google Scholar
Cohen, Roger. “Trump’s Road to 2024.” The New York Times, 2017. www.nytimes.com/2017/10/20/opinion/trumps-road-to-2024.htmlGoogle Scholar
Colley, Linda. Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Conlin, Michael F. The Constitutional Origins of the American Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns.” In Political Writings, edited by Biancamaria Fontana, 308–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Conti, Gregory. Parliament the Mirror of the Nation: Representation, Deliberation and Democracy in Victorian Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Copland, Ian. The Princes of India in the Endgame of Empire, 1917–1947. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Copland, Ian. State, Community and Neighbourhood in Princely North India, c. 1900–1950. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Corduwener, Pepijn. “The Populist Conception of Democracy beyond Popular Sovereignty.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 10, no. 4 (2014): 423–37.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Charles H.The Declaration of Independence in Constitutional Interpretation: A Selective History and Analysis.” University of Richmond Law Review 32, no. 4 (1998): 107–64.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Coulter, Ann. “If Rubio’s Amnesty Is So Great, Why Is He Lying?” 2013. www.anncoulter.com/columns/2013-04-17.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cowling, Maurice. 1867: Disraeli, Gladstone and Revolution: The Passing of the Second Reform Bill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian. “Tocqueville’s Paradoxical Moderation.” Review of Politics 67, no. 4 (2005): 599630.Google Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Critchlow, Donald T. In Defense of Populism: Protest and American Democracy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Cutler III, William W.Status, Values, and the Education of the Poor: The Trustees of the New York Public School Society, 1805–1853.” American Quarterly 24, no. 1 (1972): 6985.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (1957): 279–95.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. How Democratic Is the American Constitution? 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Daly, Tom Gerald. “Democratic Decay: Conceptualising an Emerging Research Field.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11, no. 1 (2019): 936.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
de Gouges, Olympe. “The Declaration of the Rights of Woman.” In The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History, Translated, Edited, and with an Introduction by Lynn Hunt. Boston, New York: Bedford, St. Martin’s, 1996.Google Scholar
Dean, Eric T. Jr., “Stephen A. Douglas and Popular Sovereignty.” The Historian 57, no. 4 (1995): 733–48.Google Scholar
Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen.” In The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History, translated, edited, and with an introduction by Lynn Hunt. Boston, New York: Bedford, St. Martin’s, 1996.Google Scholar
“Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776.” www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcriptGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “On Forgiveness.” In On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. Translated by M. Dooley and M. Hughes. Edited by Critchley, S. and Kearney, R.. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. Translated by Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Dewald, Carolyn. “Form and Content: The Question of Tyranny in Herodotus.” In Popular Tyranny, edited by Morgan, Kathryn A.. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. “Creative Democracy: The Task before Us.” In John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 22429. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. New York, NY: Holt Publishers, 1927.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. Reconstruction in Philosophy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1920, enlarged ed. 1948).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. “Are People Losing Faith in Democracy.” The American Interest. March 16, 2018. www.the-american-interest.com/2018/03/16/people-losing-faith-democracy/Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Mark F.. “Why the Journal of Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 1, no. 1 (1990): 35.Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, Jane. “Evading Indian Removal in the American South.” Journal of American History 108, no. 1 (2021): 1741.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert G., Jr. “Electoral College Procedure.” The Western Political Quarterly 3, no. 2 (1950): 214–24.Google Scholar
Dotti, Jorge E.From Karl to Carl: Schmitt as a reader of Marx.” In The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, edited by Mouffe, Chantal. London/New York: Verso, 1999.Google Scholar
Douglass, Frederick “The Constitution of the United States: Is it Pro-Slavery or Anti-Slavery?” March 26, 1860. BlackPast.org. https://blackpast.org/1860-frederick-douglass-constitution-united-states-it-pro-slavery-or-anti-slaveryGoogle Scholar
Downs, Gregory. After Appomattox: Military Occupation and the Ends of War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. Black Reconstruction in America. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1935.Google Scholar
DuVal, Kathleen. Independence Lost: Lives on the Edge of the American Revolution. New York: Random House, 2015.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “Austin, Hobbes and Dicey.” Canadian Journal of Laws and Jurisprudence 24 no. 2 (2011): 409–30.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “Carl Schmitt in America.” In State of Exception in American History, edited by Gerstle, Gary and Isaac, Joel. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Herman Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “Schmitten in the USA.” Verfassungsblog (blog), 2020. https://verfassungsblog.de/schmitten-in-the-usa. Accessed January 6, 2022.Google Scholar
Eckholm, Cara. “Hungary’s Identity Crisis Fought in Concrete and Bronze.” Failed Architecture (blog), May 14, 2014. https://failedarchitecture.com/budapest-freedom-square/Google Scholar
Edinburgh Magazine, “View of Society and Manners in America, During the Years 1818, 1819, and 1820.” The Edinburgh Magazine, and Literary Miscellany 89 (1822): 719–28.Google Scholar
Editors’ Introduction. “Democracy in the World: Tocqueville Reconsidered.” Journal of Democracy 11, no. 1 (2000): 510.Google Scholar
Edling, Max. “A More Perfect Union: The Framing and Ratification of the Constitution.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Revolution, edited by Kamensky, Jane and Gray, Edward G.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Edling, Max. “Peace Pact and Nation: An International Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States.” Past and Present 240, no. 1 (2018): 267303.Google Scholar
Edling, Max. “United States Expansion and Incorporation in the Long Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 49, no. 3 (2021): 431–58.Google Scholar
Edwards, Bob, Folley, Michael, and Diani, Mario, eds. Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective. Boston, MA: Tufts University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Steven. “The Myth of ‘Security Moms’ and ‘NASCAR Dads’: Parenthood, Political Stereotypes, and the 2004 Election.” Social Science Quarterly 88, no. 1 (2007): 119.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard J., and Kirk, Stephen. “Presidential Mandates in the Nineteenth Century: Conceptual Change and Institutional Development.” Studies in American Political Development 9, no. 1 (1995): 117–86.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. Anti-Dühring. Translated by Austin Lewis. Chicago, IL: Charles H. Kerr, 1907.Google Scholar
Epstein, James. “Rethinking the Categories of Working-Class History.” Labour/Le Travail 18 (1986): 195208.Google Scholar
Epstein, Joseph. Alexis de Tocqueville: Democracy’s Guide. New York: Harper Collins, 2009.Google Scholar
Espejo, Paulina Ochoa. “Paradoxes of Popular Sovereignty: A View from Spanish America.” The Journal of Politics 74, no. 4 (2012): 1053–65.Google Scholar
Espejo, Paulina Ochoa. The Time of Popular Sovereignty: Process and the Democratic State. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Estlund, David. “Why Not Epistocracy?” In Desire, Identity and Existence: Essays in Honor of T. M. Penner. Edited by Reshotko, Naomi, 53–69. Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Euben, J. Peter. The Tragedy of Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
EURACTIV. “Controversial Monument Divides Hungarians, Angers Jewish Community.” www.Euractiv.Com (blog), July 23, 2014. www.euractiv.com/section/central-europe/news/controversial-monument-divides-hungarians-angers-jewish-community/Google Scholar
Evans, Eric J. Parliamentary Reform in Britain, c. 1770–1918. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Evrigenis, Ioannis D. Fear of Enemies and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Evrigenis, Ioannis D. Images of Anarchy: The Rhetoric and Science in Hobbes’s State of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Evrigenis, Ioannis D.Sovereignty, Rebellion, and Golden Age: Hesiod’s Legacy.” In The Brill Companion to the Legacy of Greek Political Thought, edited by Carter, David Matthew, Foxley, Rachel, and Sawyer, Liz. Leiden: Brill, in press.Google Scholar
Ezrahi, Yaron. Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard J., Jr. “Judicially Manageable Standards and Constitutional Meaning.” Harvard Law Review 119 (2006): 1275–332.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. New York, NY: Grove Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Farrand, Max. Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1923.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Maura Jane. Anti-Catholicism in America, 1620–1860. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Fehrenbacher, Don E. The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Law and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Fehrenbacher, Don E. The Slaveholding Republic: An Account of the United States Government’s Relations to Slavery. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Armesto, Felipe. The Americas: The History of a Hemisphere. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2003.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R F.Plato the Writer.” Epoché 19, no. 2 (2015): 191203.Google Scholar
Filmer, Sir Robert. “Observations Concerning the Originall of Government, Etc.” In Patriarcha and Other Political Writings, edited by Sommerville, Johann P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, Maurice. Beyond Right and Left: Democratic Elitism in Mosca and Gramsci. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Fischer, David Hackett. The Revolution of American Conservatism. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1965.Google Scholar
Fisher, Max, and Taub, Amanda. “A Second Brexit Vote Could Worsen the Chaos Created by the First.” The New York Times. January 22, 2019, sec. World. www.nytimes.com/2019/01/22/world/europe/brexit-referendum.htmlGoogle Scholar
Fitz, Caitlin. Our Sister Republics: The United States in an Age of American Revolutions. New York: Liveright, 2016.Google Scholar
Fitz, Caitlin. “The People Who Profited Off the Trail of Tears.” The Atlantic. May 2020: www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/05/claudio-sant-unworthy-republic-trail-of-tears/609097/Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard. Thomas Hobbes: Skepticism, Individuality, and Chastened Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Fleck, Robert K., and Hanssen, F. Andrew. “How Tyranny Paved the Way to Democracy: The Democratic Transition in Ancient Greece.” The Journal of Law & Economics 56, no. 2 (2013): 389416.Google Scholar
Foa, Robert, and Mounk, Yascha. “Are Americans Losing Faith in Democracy.” Vox. December 8, 2015. www.vox.com/polyarchy/2015/12/18/9360663/is-democracy-in-troubleGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. “Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no. 3 (2006): 533–62.Google Scholar
Foreman, Grant. Indian Removal: The Emigration of the Five Civilized Tribes of Indians. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Ford, Robert, and Jennings, Will. “The Changing Cleavage Politics of Western Europe.” Annual Review of Political Science 23, no. 1 (2020): 295314.Google Scholar
Forgery, Quint. “Trump Immigration Official Offers Rewrite Statue of Liberty Poem.” Politico, August 2019. www.politico.com/story/2019/08/13/statue-of-liberty-poem-immigration-ken-cuccinelli-1459824Google Scholar
Frank, Jason. Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Postrevolutionary America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Frank, Jason. “Populism and Praxis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre, 629–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Frank, StephaniePolitical Idolatry: The Relation of Schmitt’s Two Claims in Political Theology.” In Sovereignty in Action, edited by Bas Leijssenaar and Neil Walker, 20726. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Franklin, Benjamin. “Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, 1751,” n.d. National Archives. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-04-02-0080Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. “Plato’s Arguments and the Dialogue Form.” In Supplemental Volume of the Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, edited by Annas, J., 201–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Freelon, Deen, McIlwain, Charlton D., and Clark, Meredith D.. “Beyond the Hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the Online Struggle for Offline Justice.” Washington, DC: Center for Media and Social Impact, 2016. https://cmsimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/beyond_the_hashtags_2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Freelon, Deen, McIlwain, Charlton D., and Clark, Meredith D.. “Quantifying the Power and Consequences of Social Media Protest.” New Media and Society 20, no. 3 (2016): 9901011.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. “The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part V.” Yale Law Journal 112, no. 2 (2002): 153259.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. “The End of History?The National Interest 16 (1989): 318.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. Liberalism and Its Discontents. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2022.Google Scholar
Furet, François. “Jacobinism.” In A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution, edited by Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer, 705–12. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Furet, François. The Workshop of History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, François. “Beyond Freedom and Slavery: Autonomy, Virtue, and Resistance in Early American Political Discourse.” Journal of American History 89 (2003): 1295330.Google Scholar
Gallup. “Americans’ Confidence in Major Institutions.” Accessed April 19, 2022. https://news.gallup.com/poll/352316/americans-confidence-major-institutions-dips.aspxGoogle Scholar
Gallup. “Confidence in Institutions.” Accessed June 11, 2020. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1597/confidence-institutions.aspxGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A.The 2016 U.S. Election: The Populist Moment.” Journal of Democracy 28, no. 2 (2017): 2133.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Galston, William A.The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 29, no. 2 (2018): 519. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0020Google Scholar
Gamble, Katrina L.Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within U. S. House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32, no. 3 (2007): 421–47.Google Scholar
Ganz, Marshall. “Leading Change: Leadership, Organization, and Social Movements.” In Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice, edited by Nohria, Nitin and Khurana, Rakesh, 50950. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Garza, Alicia. “A Herstory of the #BlackLivesMatter Movement.” The Feminist Wire (blog), 2014. https://thefeministwire.com/2014/10/blacklivesmatter-2/Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine. “Putting Race in Context: Identifying the Environmental Determinants of Black Racial Attitudes.” American Political Science Review 98, no. 4 (2004): 547–62.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine, Hochschild, Jennifer, and White, Ariel. “Americans’ Belief in Linked Fate: Does the Measure Capture the Concept?Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 1, no. 1 (2016): 117–44.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, Paolo, and Screti, Francesco. “Reclaiming Popular Sovereignty: The Vision of the State in the Discourse of Podemos and the Movimento 5 Stelle.” Javnost – The Public 24, no. 4 (2017): 320–35.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto. Political Theories of the Middle Age. Translated by F. W. Maitland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Gilhooley, Simon J. The Antebellum Origins of the Modern Constitution: Slavery and the Spirit of the American Founding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Gilliam, Franklin D.Black America: Divided by Class?Public Opinion 8 (1986): 5357.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Huq, Aziz Z.. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Golshan, Tara. “Trump Keeps Highlighting ‘Angel Moms’ to Make the Case for His Immigration Agenda.” Vox, 2019. www.vox.com/2019/2/5/18213132/trump-angel-momsGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E.Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 25, no. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
Goodley, Dan, and Lawthom, Rebecca. “Critical Disability Studies, Brexit, and Trump: A Time of Neoliberal-Abelism.” Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice 23, no. 2 (2019): 233–51.Google Scholar
Gorup, Michael. “The Strange Fruit of the Tree of Liberty: Lynch Law and Popular Sovereignty in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 18, no. 3 (2020): 819–34.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. “The Non-Majoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7, no. 1 (1993): 3573.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark, Levinson, Sanford V., and Tushnet, Mark, eds. Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Grayling, A. C. Democracy and Its Crisis. London: Oneworld Publications, 2018.Google Scholar
Greene, Jack. Peripheries and Center: Constitutional Development in the Extended Polities of the British Empire and the United States, 1607–17. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Greenstone, J. David. The Lincoln Persuasion: Remaking American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Greiman, Jennifer. Democracy’s Spectacle: Sovereignty and Public Life in Antebellum American Writing. New York: Fordham University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “The Various Faces of Fundamental Rights.” In The Double-Facing Constitution, edited by Bomhoff, Jacco, Dyzenhaus, David, and Poole, Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Griswold, Charles. Platonic Writings/Platonic Readings. New York and London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Groenhout, Fiona. “The History of the Indian Princely States: Bringing the Puppets Back onto Centre Stage.” History Compass 4, no. 4 (2006): 629–44.Google Scholar
Grose, Christian R. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Grossman, Lawrence. The Democratic Party and the Negro: National and Northern Politics, 1868–92. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Matt, and Hopkins, David A.. “Placing Media in Conservative Culture.” In UT Austin New Agendas Conference. Austin, TX, 2018.Google Scholar
Groth, Michael. Slavery and Freedom in the Mid-Hudson Valley. Albany: SUNY Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. “Foreword.” In When Democracy Trumps Populism, edited by Weyland, Kurt and Madrid, Raúl L., xv–xxiv. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. “How Populists Rule: The Consequences for Democratic Governance.” Polity 51, no. 4 (2019): 707–17.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. “Introduction to a Forum on Global Populisms.” Slavic Review 76, no. 1 (2017).Google Scholar
Gustini, Ray. “The Today Show Gives Donald Trump a Birther Platform.” The Atlantic, April 2011. www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2011/04/today-show-gives-donald-trump-birther-platform/349410/Google Scholar
Guyatt, Nicholas. Bind Us Apart: How Enlightened Americans Invented Racial Segregation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. David. “A Census-Based Count of the Civil War Dead.” Civil War History 57 (2011): 307–48.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. David. “The Human Cost of War: White Population in the United States, 1850–1880.” Journal of Economic History 61 (2001): 486–89.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. “When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism.” American Interest, July 2016. www.the-american-interest.com/2016/07/10/when-and-why-nationalism-beats-globalism/Google Scholar
Hailbronner, Michaela, and Landau, David. Introduction: Constitutional Courts and Populism.” A Mini Symposium, 2017. www.iconnectblog.com/2017/04/introduction-constitutional-courts-and-populism/Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan L.Black Class Exceptionalism: Insights from Direct Democracy on the Race Versus Class Debate.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71, no. 4 (2007): 560–87.Google Scholar
Hall, Kermit. The Magic Mirror: Law in American History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., and Jay, J., The Federalist Papers. Edited by Rossiter, C.. New York, NY: Signet Classics, 2003.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. “Federalist 24.” In The Federalist: A Commentary on the Constitution of the United States. Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. The Political Writings of Alexander Hamilton. Volume I, 1769–1789. Edited by Holloway, Carson and Wilson, Bradford P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Craig. “‘The High Road to a Slave Empire’: Conflict and the Growth and Expansion of Slavery in the North American Continent.” In The World of the Revolutionary American Republic: Land, Labor, and the Conflict for a Continent, edited by Shankman, Andrew. New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Han, Hahrie, Campbell, Andrea, and McKenna, Elizabeth. “Civic Feedbacks: Linking Collective Action, Organizational Strategy, and Influence over Public Policy.” Perspectives on Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722000986.Google Scholar
Han, Hahrie, McKenna, Elizabeth, and Oyakawa, Michelle. Prisms of the People: Power & Organizing in Twenty-First-Century America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie.Contemporary Welfare Reform and the Public Identity of the ‘Welfare Queen.’Race, Gender, & Class 10, no. 1 (2003): 3159.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York, NY: New York University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates. 3rd series, multiple volumes. London : T.C. Hansard.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principles, and Ideology. Translated by J. A. Cook. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Harari, Yuval Noah. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York: Harper Perennial, 2015.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin, 2005.Google Scholar
Harris, Frederick C.The Next Civil Rights Movement?Dissent 62, no. 3 (2015): 3440.Google Scholar
Harrison, Brian. “Teetotal Chartism.” History 58, no. 193 (1973): 193217.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1955.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. “A Theory of the Development of the New Societies.” In The Founding of New Societies: Studies in the History of the United States, edited by Hartz, Louis. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1964.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan. Captives of Sovereignty. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk, Read, Madeline, and Pauwels, Teun. “Populism and Its Causes.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre, 267–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Heller, Karen. “He Once Told Philadelphia to ‘Vote White.’ Now the Protests Have Brought His Statue Down.” The Washington Post. June 4, 2020. www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/statue-frank-rizzo-philadelphia-confederate-protests/2020/06/03/f948ce5c-a5a6-11ea-bb20-ebf0921f3bbd_story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Lisa, and Zacka, Bernardo. “Fieldwork in Political Theory: Five Arguments for an Ethnographic Sensibility.” British Journal of Political Science 49, no. 2 (2017): 763–84.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. God’s Englishman: Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen. Edited and translated by Richard Tuck and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1994.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, or, the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. London: Andrew Crooke, 1651.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Ranger, Terence, eds. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russel. Strangers in Their Own Land. New York, NY: The New Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer L. Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hockin, Sara M., and Brunson, Rod K.. “The Revolution Might Not Be Televised (But It Will Be Lived Streamed) Future Directions for Research on Police–Minority Relations.” Race and Justice 8, no. 3 (2016): 199215.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch. “Athenian Democracy and Popular Tyranny.” In Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. America at 1750: A Social Portrait. New York, NY: Random House, 1973.Google Scholar
Homer, , The Odyssey. Translated by Emily Wilson. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2018.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hopkins, David A. Red Fighting Blue: How Geography and Electoral Rules Polarize American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Juliana, and Livingston, Gretchen. “How Americans View the Black Lives Matter Movement.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Fact Tank, 2016. www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/08/how-americans-view-the-black-lives-matter-movement/Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Weitzel Kohfeld, Carol. Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hume, David. “Of the First Principles of Government.” In Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects, edited by Morgan, Edmund S.. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1988.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Hussain, Shahla. Kashmir in the Aftermath of Partition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Hutson, James H. Church and State in America: The First Two Centuries. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hutson, James H., and Rappaport, Leonard. Supplement to Max Farrand’s Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hyde, Edward. A Brief View and Survey of the Dangerous and Pernicious Errors to Church and State, in Mr. Hobbes’s Book, Entitled Leviathan by Edward Earl of Clarendon. Oxford, 1676.Google Scholar
Ignazi, Piero. “The Silent Counter‐Revolution: Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme Right‐Wing Parties in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 22, no. 1 (1992): 334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00303.xGoogle Scholar
Ince, Jelani, Rojas, Fabio, and Davis, Clayton. “The Social Media Response to Black Lives Matter: How Twitter Users Interact with Black Lives Matter through Hashtag Use.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40, no. 11 (2017): 1814–30.Google Scholar
Ingraham, Christopher “Here Are the First 10 Members of Trump’s Voting Commission.” The Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/07/06/here-are-the-first-10-members-of-trumps-voter-fraud-commission/?utm_term=.abadedb44f38, July 6, 2016.Google Scholar
Ingram, Helen, and Schneider, Anne. “Social Construction: Response.” American Political Science Review 89, no. 2 (1995): 441–46.Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury, and Health and Human Services, “Moral Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage of Certain Preventive Services under the Affordable Care Act.” https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2017-21852.pdf, October 7, 2017Google Scholar
Ionescu, Ghita, and Gellner, Ernest, eds. Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics. New York: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar
Irvine, William. “Fascism in France: the Strange Case of the Croix de Feu.” Journal of Modern History 63 (1991).Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C.Is There Illiberal Democracy?: A Problem with No Semantic Solution.” Public Seminar, July 12, 2017. https://publicseminar.org/2017/07/is-there-illiberal-democracy/Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. The Expanding Blaze: How the American Revolution Ignited the World. 1775 to 1948. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Israel: Basic Law of 1994, Freedom of Occupation, March 10, 1994. www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b52610.html. Accessed October 15, 2022.Google Scholar
Jackson, Sarah J., and Welles, Brooke Foucault. “#Ferguson Is Everywhere: Initiators in Emerging Counterpublic Networks.” Information, Communication & Society 19, no. 3 (2015): 397418.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jaap and Roper, L. H., eds. The Worlds of the Seventeenth-Century Hudson Valley. Albany: SUNY Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Jamaleddine, Ziad. “Hagia Sophia Past and Future.” Places Journal, August 11, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22269/200811Google Scholar
James VI of Scotland. The Trve Lawe of Free Monarchies. In Political Writings, edited by Sommerville, Johann P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Jayal, Niraja Gopal. Citizenship and Its Discontents: An Indian History. New Delhi: Permanent Black, 2015.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. Political Writings. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. “To James Madison,” December 20, 1787. postscript. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Robin, ed. People, Princes and Paramount Power. Society and Politics in the Indian Princely States. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Jensen, Merrill. “The Articles of Confederation: A Re-Interpretation.” Pacific Historical Review 6, no. 2 (1937): 121–40.Google Scholar
Jóhannesson, Sveinn‘Securing the State’: James Madison, Federal Emergency Powers, and the Rise of the Liberal State in Postrevolutionary America.” Journal of American History 104 (2017): 363–85.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury, Policraticus. Edited and translated by Cary J. Nederman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Jones, Colin, and Cobb, Richard, eds. The French Revolution: Voices from a Momentous Epoch. Simon & Schuster, 1988.Google Scholar
Jones, Martha S. Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kahan, Alan S. Liberalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe: The Political Culture of Limited Suffrage. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Kahan, Alan S. Tocqueville, Religion, and Democracy: Checks and Balances for Democratic Souls. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. June 8–14, 2020. “Health Tracking Poll.”Google Scholar
Kalmo, Hent, and Skinner, Quentin. Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. “The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy.” Democratization 19, no. 2 (2012): 184208.Google Scholar
Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Ochoa Espejo, Paulina, and Ostiguy, Pierre, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas. “Constituent Power.” In Political Concepts: A Critical Lexicon, edited by Ophir, Adi and Stoler, Ann Laura. New York: Fordham University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas. “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power.” Constellations 12, no. 2 (2005): 223–44.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas, and Katznelson, Ira, Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D., and Kinder, Donald R.. “Ethnocentrism as a Short-Term Force in the 2008 American Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 56, no. 2 (2012): 326–40.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Intent.” In Perpetual Peace and Other Essays, edited by Humphrey, Ted. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
Kantorowitz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Kazin, Michael. The Populist Persuasion: An American History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Keenan, Alan. Democracy in Question: Democratic Openness in a Time of Political Closure. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel. “Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union.” Government and Opposition 52, no. 2 (2017): 211–38.Google Scholar
Kelley, FlorenceAims and Principles of the Consumers’ League.” American Journal of Sociology 5, no. 3 (1899): 289304.Google Scholar
Kelly, Duncan. “Populism and the History of Popular Sovereignty.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre, 511–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Kennedy, EllenIntroduction: Parlamentarismus in Its Historical Context.” In The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, Carl Schmitt. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
KeyJr, V. O. Public Opinion and American Democracy. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Keyes, Elizabeth. “Defining American: The Dream Act, Immigration Reform, and Citizenship.” Nevada Law Journal 14, no. 1 (2013): 101–55.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Kilberg, Andrew G. I.We the People: The Original Meaning of Popular Sovereignty.” Virginia Law Review 100 (2014): 1072.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Dale-Riddle, Allison. The End of Race? Obama, 2008, and Racial Politics in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
King, Desmond S. In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the USA and Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert P., with McGann, Anthony J.. The Radical Right in Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Klagge, James C., and Smith, Nicholas D.. Methods of Interpreting Plato and His Dialogues. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J.Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions.” Virginia Law Review 82, no. 1 (1996): 168.Google Scholar
Klinghard, Daniel P.Grover Cleveland. “William McKinley, and the Emergence of the President as Party Leader.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35, no. 4 (2005): 736–60.Google Scholar
Koelle, Peter Brampton. “Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Use of Symbols in Reclaiming the Hagia Sophia as an Imperial Mosque.” International Policy Digest (blog), October 22, 2020. https://intpolicydigest.org/2020/10/22/recep-tayyip-erdogan-s-use-of-symbols-in-reclaiming-the-hagia-sophia-as-an-imperial-mosque/Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans. Nationalism: Its Meaning and History. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company, 1982.Google Scholar
Kotkin, Stephen, and Kramer, Larry D.. “A Layman’s Document, Not a Lawyer’s Contract: The Continuing Struggle for Popular Constitutionalism.” In Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Krastev, Ivan, and Holmes, Stephen. The Light That Failed: A Reckoning. London: Penguin, 2019.Google Scholar
Kubal, Timothy. Cultural Movements and Collective Memory: Christopher Columbus and the Rewriting of the National Origin Myth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Kurylo, Bohdana. “Russia and Carl Schmitt: The Hybridity of Resistance in the Globalised World.” Palgrave Communications 2, 16096 (2016).Google Scholar
Lamont, Michele. “Addressing Recognition Gaps: Destigmatization and the Reduction of Inequality.” American Sociological Review 83, no. 3 (2018): 419–44.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michele, Park, Bo Yum, and Ayala-Hurtado, Elena. “Trump’s Electoral Speeches and His Appeal to the American White Working Class.” British Journal of Sociology 68, no. 1 (2017): 153–80.Google Scholar
Landauer, Matthew. Dangerous Counsel: Accountability and Advice in Ancient Greece. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Lane, Melissa. “Popular Sovereignty as Control of Office-Holders.” In Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective, edited by Bourke, Richard and Skinner, Quentin, 5272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold. Authority in the Modern State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1919.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold. Studies in the Problems of Sovereignty. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1917.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold. “Theory of Popular Sovereignty.” Michigan Law Review 17, no. 3 (1919): 201–15.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen. Inner Asian Frontiers of China. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lavin, Lucianne, ed. Dutch and Indigenous Communities in Seventeenth-Century Northeast America. Albany: SUNY Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Lebron, Christopher J. The Making of Black Lives Matter: A Brief History of an Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E., and McCarty, Nolan. Can America Govern Itself? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel Popular Sovereignty in Early Constitutional Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016Google Scholar
Lee, RobertAccounting for Conquest: The Price of the Louisiana Purchase of Indian Country.” Journal of American History, 103 (2017).Google Scholar
Leggiere, Philip. “Beyond the One-Way Alert.” Homeland Security Today (blog), March 2012.Google Scholar
Leijssenaar, Bas, and Walker, Neil. Sovereignty in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, David, and Philbrick, Ian Prasad, “Donald Trump’s Racism: The Definitive List,” The New York Times, January 15, 2018. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/01/15/opinion/leonhardt-trump-racist.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lepore, Jill. This America: The Case for the Nation. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2019.Google Scholar
Levine, Peter. What Should We Do? A Theory of Civic Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford V. Our Undemocratic Constitution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. How Democracies Die. New York, NY: Crown Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob T. Rationalism, Pluralism and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Liao, Rebecca. “Tocqueville in China.” Dissent, May 22, 2013. www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/tocqueville-in-china. Accessed January 6, 2022.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert. “The Freedmen’s Bureau and the Politics of Institutional Structure.” Social Science History 18, no. 3 (1994): 405–37.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, and Roberts, Kenneth M.. Democratic Resilience: Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, Pepinsky, Thomas B., Roberts, Kenneth M., and Valelly, Richard. “Trumpism and American Democracy: History, Comparison, and the Predicament of Liberal Democracy in the United States.” Working paper. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3028990, 2017.Google Scholar
Liebeschütz, H.John of Salisbury and Pseudo-Plutarch.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 6 (1943): 3339.Google Scholar
Limbaugh, Rush. “We’ve Been Played on Immigration.” 2013. www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/06/13/we_ve_been_played_on_immigration/Google Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham “Letter to Joshua Speed.” August 24, 1855. www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/speed.htmGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, Treva B.Post-Ferguson: A ‘Herstorical’ Approach to Black Violability.” Feminist Studies 41, no. 1 (2015): 232–37.Google Scholar
Lipman, Andrew. The Saltwater Frontier: Indians and the Contest for the American Coast. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. Essays on the Public Philosophy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1955.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. The Phantom Public. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1925.Google Scholar
Locke, John. A Letter Concerning Toleration. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1983.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1952.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1980.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Longo, Matthew. The Politics of Borders: Sovereignty, Security, and the Citizen after 9/11. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Longo, Matthew, and Zacka, Bernardo. “Political Theory in an Ethnographic Key.” American Political Science 113, no. 4 (2019): 1066–70.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. Political Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, and Walker, Neil. The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. “The Public Philosophy: Interest Group Liberalism.” American Political Science Review 61, no. 1 (1967): 524.Google Scholar
Lowndes, Joseph. “From Founding Violence to Political Hegemony: The Conservative Populism of George Wallace.” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by Panizza, Francisco and Arditi, Benjamin. New York, NY: Verso Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Lupel, Adam. Globalization and Popular Sovereignty: Democracy’s Transnational Dilemma. New York: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Discourses on Livy. Translated by Harvey C. Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962.Google Scholar
Madison, James. “No. 51: The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances between the Different Departments.” In The Federalist Papers, edited by Rossiter, Clinton. New York: Signet Classics, 2003.Google Scholar
Madison, James. “Debate in the Virginia Convention, June 17. 1788.” In Debates and Other Proceedings of the Convention of Virginia. 2nd Edition. Richmond: Ritchie & Worsley and Augustine Davis, 1805.Google Scholar
Madison, James. “Federalist No. 10.” In The Federalist Papers, edited by Shapiro, Ian. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Madison, James. “General Defense of the Constitution.” June 6, 1788 at Virginia’s ratifying convention: https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-11-02-0062Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. “Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards.” European Law Journal 4, no. 1 (1998): 528.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon, 2002.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. “Thomas Hobbes: Liberal Illiberal.” Journal of the British Academy 4 (2016): 113–36.Google Scholar
Maletz, Donald J.Tocqueville on Mores and the Preservation of Republics.” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 1 (2005): 115.Google Scholar
Malvin, John. The Autobiography of John Malvin: A Narrative. Cleveland, OH: Leader Printing Co., 1879.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. Tocqueville and the Nature of Democracy. Translated by John Waggoner. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996.Google Scholar
Mann, Barbara Alice. George Washington’s War on Native America. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2005.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey and Winthrop, Delba. “Tocqueville’s New Political Science.” In Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville, edited by Welch, Cheryl B., 81107. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. “Popular Sovereignty and Anti-Colonialism.” In Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective, 297319. Burke, R. and Skinner, Q.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Marable, Manning. “Beyond Racial Identity Politics: Towards a Liberation Theory for Multicultural Democracy.” Race and Class 35, no. 1 (1993): 113–30.Google Scholar
Markell, Parchen. “The Rule of the People: Arendt, Archê, and Democracy.” The American Political Science Review 100, no. 1 (2006): 114.Google Scholar
Markovits, Elizabeth. The Politics of Sincerity : Plato, Frank Speech, and Democratic Judgment. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Marks, Arthur S.The Statue of King George III in New York and the Iconography of Regicide.” The American Art Journal 13, no. 3 (1981): 6182.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. “On the Jewish Question.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, edited by Tucker, Robert C.. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1978.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Mason, Robert. Richard Nixon and the Quest for a New Republican Majority. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2008.Google Scholar
McCarter, Mickey. “287(G) Vital to Immigration Reform: Ex-Chief of ICE Calls for More Flexibility to Enforce Law.” Homeland Security Today (blog), November 12, 2009.Google Scholar
McCarter, Mickey. “Napolitano Outlines DHS Priorities for 2010: At Top: Aviation, Borders, Information Sharing, Immigration Reform.” Homeland Security Today (blog), January 27, 2010.Google Scholar
McClain, Paula, and Stewart, Joseph, Jr. Can We All Get Along? Racial and Ethnic Minorities in American Politics. 6th Edition. New York, NY: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
McClelland, Keith. “‘England’s Greatness, the Working Man.’” In Defining the Victorian Nation: Class, Race, Gender and the British Reform Act of 1867, edited by Hall, Catherine, McClelland, Keith, and Randall, Jane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
McCormick, John. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
McCormick, John. “The Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers.” In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism, edited by Dyzenhaus, D., 236–37. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
McGlew, James F.The Comic Pericles.” In Ancient Tyranny, edited by Lewis, Sian, 164. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
McGlew, James F. Tyranny and Political Culture in Ancient Greece. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
McKevitt, Gerald. “Christopher Columbus as a Civic Saint: Angelo Noce and Italian American Assimilation.” California History 71, no. 4 (1992): 516–33.Google Scholar
McNeill, David N. An Image of the Soul in Speech: Plato and the Problem of Socrates. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
McPherson, James M.Abolitionists and the Civil Rights Act of 1875.” Journal of American History 52, no. 3 (1965): 493510.Google Scholar
Mehta, Uday. “Liberal Strategies of Exclusion.” Politics & Society 18, no. 4 (1990): 427–54.Google Scholar
Meier, Heinrich. The Lesson of Carl Schmitt: Four Chapters on the Distinction between Political Theology and Political Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mellow, Nicole. The State of Disunion: Regional Sources of Modern American Partisanship. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Menon, V. P. The Story of the Integration of the Indian States. 2nd ed. Bombay: Orient Longmans, 1961.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. “The Stratification of Social Citizenship: Gender and Federalism in the Formation of Old Age Insurance and Aid to Dependent Children.” Journal of Policy History 11, no. 1 (1999): 3158.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne, and Stonecash, Jeffrey. “Government Program Usage and Political Voice.” Social Science Quarterly 89, no. 2 (2008): 273–93.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. J. S. Mill: “On Liberty” and Other Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Milza, Pierre. Fascisme Français – Passé et Présent. Paris: Flammarion, 1987.Google Scholar
Milza, Pierre. “Ultra-Droite Des Années Trente.” In Histoire de l’extrême Droite En France. Paris: Editions deSeuil, 1993.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D. Oversight: Representing Black and Latino Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D., and Brown, Nadia E.. “Intersecting Interests: Gender, Race, and Congressional Attention to Women’s Issues.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 11, no. 2 (2014): 253–72.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D., and Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. “Diversity in Political Institutions and Congressional Responsiveness to Minority Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 66, no. 1 (2013): 127–40.Google Scholar
Miranda, Luis. “Get the Facts on the DREAM Act.” 2010. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2010/12/01/get-facts-dream-actGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Joshua. “Hobbes and the Equality of All under the One.” Political Theory 21, no. 1 (1993): 78100.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Lynette. “Tyrannical Oligarchs at Athens.” In Ancient Tyranny, edited by Lewis, Sian. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Moore, Robin J. Sir Charles Wood’s Indian Policy, 1853–66. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. “Is There a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis.” Government and Opposition 39, no. 2 (2004): 336–63.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. “Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 4 (2002): 603–24.Google Scholar
Morgan, Edmund S. Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co., 1988.Google Scholar
Morgan, Edmund S.The Problem of Popular Sovereignty.” In Aspects of American Liberty, 95–113. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1977.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kathryn A., ed. “Introduction.” In Popular Tyranny, edited by Morgan, Kathryn A.. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kathryn A., ed. Popular Tyranny. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Morley, John. The Life of Ewart Gladstone. Vol. 3. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company, 1903.Google Scholar
Morris, Sarah. “Imaginary Kings: Alternatives to Monarchy in Early Greece.” In Popular Tyranny, edited by Morgan, Kathryn A.. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Mosca, Gaetano. The Ruling Class. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 1939.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy.” In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism, edited by Dyzenhaus, David. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. “The Controversy over Left-Wing Populism.” Le Monde diplomatique, 2020. https://mondediplo.com/2020/05/14populismGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. For a Left Populism. London: Verso Books, 2018.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. “Populism in the Twenty-First Century: An Illiberal Democratic Response to Undemocratic Liberalism.” Blog. The Andrea Mitchell Center for the Study of Democracy, 2018. https://amc.sas.upenn.edu/cas-mudde-populism-twenty-first-centuryGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas. “Populism: An Ideational Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by Kaltwasser, Cristobal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Vol. 22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39, no. 4 (2004): 542–63.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristobal Rovira. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristobal Rovira. “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51, no. 13 (2018): 1667–93.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. “The Problem With ‘Illiberal Democracy.’” Project Syndicate, January 21, 2016. www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-problem-with-illiberal-democracy-by-jan-werner-mueller-2016-01Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Muller, Hannah Weiss. “Bonds of Belonging: Subjecthood and the British Empire.” Journal of British Studies 53 (2014): 2958.Google Scholar
Nabors, Forrest. From Oligarchy to Republicanism: The Great Task of Reconstruction. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Nackenoff, Carol. “Constitutionalizing Terms of Inclusion and Citizenship for Native Americans, 1880s–1930s.” In The Supreme Court and American Political Development, edited by Kahn, Ronald and Kersch, Ken I., 366413. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2006.Google Scholar
Nackenoff, Carol, and Diebold, Abigail. “Rucho v. Common Cause on Partisan Gerrymandering and the Political Questions Doctrine.” In SCOTUS 2019: Major Decisions and Developments in the US Supreme Court, edited by Klein, D. and Marietta, M., 11121. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.Google Scholar
Nackenoff, Carol, and Novkov, Julie. “Building the Administrative State: Courts and the Admission of Chinese Persons to the United States, 1870s–1920s.” In Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics, edited by Novkov, Julie and Nackenoff, Carol, 197239. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2020.Google Scholar
Nackenoff, Carol and Markov-Riss, Natasha. “McGirt v. Oklahoma on Native Rights.” In SCOTUS 2020: Major Decisions and Developments of the U.S. Supreme Court, edited by Marietta, M.. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.Google Scholar
Nash, Gary The Unknown American Revolution: The Unruly Birth of Democracy and the Struggle to Create America. New York: Penguin, 2006.Google Scholar
Neal, Samantha. “Views of Racism as a Major Problem Increase Sharply, Especially among Democrats.” Pew Research Fact Tank (2017). www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/29/views-of-racism-as-a-major-problem-increase-sharply-especially-among-democrats/. Accessed December 15, 2017Google Scholar
Neblo, Michael A. and Israelson, Emily Ann. “A Humble Form of Government: Democracy as the Politics of Collective Experience.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Humility. New York: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Neem, Johann N.Taking Modernity’s Wager: Tocqueville, Social Capital, and the American Civil War.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 41, no. 4 (2011): 591618.Google Scholar
Nehru, Moti Lal. Report of the All Parties Conference (Together with a Summary of the Proceedings of the Conference Held at Lucknow). Allahabad: All India Congress Committee, 1928.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. The Royalist Revolution: Monarchy and the American Founding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. Revised Edition. New York: Free Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Nicholls, Walter. The DREAMers: How the Undocumented Youth Movement Transformed the Immigrant Rights Debate. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda. Identity before Identity Politics. Cambridge Cultural Social Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Nowrasteh, Alex, and Eddington, Patrick G.. “How Effective Is Border Security?” Cato Institute Online (blog), March 19, 2016. www.cato.org/publications/commentary/how-effective-border-securityGoogle Scholar
Nyquist, Mary. Arbitrary Rule: Slavery, Tyranny, and the Power of Life and Death. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. Hobbes on Civil Association. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. Demopolis: Democracy before Liberalism in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. “Tyrant Killing As Therapeutic Stasis: A Political Debate in Images And Texts.” In Popular Tyranny, edited by Morgan, Kathryn A.. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Odio, Catalina. “Latinx Populations and Jus Nexi Claims: A Renegotiation of U.S. Citizenship and Identity.” 2018. Kenyon College, Undergraduate honors thesis.Google Scholar
Oliver, Eric J., and Rahn, Wendy M.. “Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667, no. 1 (2016): 189206.Google Scholar
Olmsted, Frederick Law. A Journey in the Seaboard Slave States in the Years 1853–1854. New York: J.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904 [1856].Google Scholar
Olson, Joel. “Whiteness and the Polarization of American Politics.” Political Research Quarterly 61, no. 4 (2008): 704–18.Google Scholar
Opal, J. M.General Jackson’s Passports: Natural Rights and Sovereign Citizens in the Political Thought of Andrew Jackson, 1780s–1820s.” Studies in American Political Development 27 (2013).Google Scholar
“Oregon Humanities.” Accessed May 26, 2020. https://oregonhumanities.org/Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review 58, no. 3 (1993): 30328.Google Scholar
Ostwald, Martin. “The Athenian Legislation against Tyranny and Subversion.” In Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 86 (1955): 103–28.Google Scholar
Padilla, Sonia. Investing in Proven Technologies: Integrated Fixed Towers and Mobile Surveillance Systems. El Paso, TX: Border Management Conference & Technology Expo, 2012.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. R. The Age of the Democratic Revolution: A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800 – Updated Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Pangle Wilford, Heather. “Like a God on Earth: Popular Sovereignty in Tocqueville’s Democracy in America.” In People Power: Popular Sovereignty from Machiavelli to Modernity, edited by Ingram, Robert G. and Barker, Christopher, 160–81. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Panizza, Francisco. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Parent, Wayne, and Steckler, Paul. “The Political Implications of Economic Stratification in the Black Community.” Western Political Quarterly 38, no. 4 (1985): 521–38.Google Scholar
Parker, Victor. “Τύραννος. The Semantics of a Political Concept from Archilochus to Aristotle.” Hermes 126, no. 2 (1998): 154.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Robert G. Common Cause: Creating Race and Nation in the American Revolution. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Parry, Jonathan. The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale. “Popular Sovereignty: The People’s Two Bodies.” In Sovereignty in Action, edited by Leijssenaar, Bas and Walker, Neil, 14458. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Passmore, Kevin. “The Construction of Crisis in Interwar France.” In France in the Era of Fascism: Essay on the French Authoritarian Right, edited by Jenkins, Brian. New York: Berghahn Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Pestana, Carla Gardina. Protestant Empire: Religion and the Making of the British Atlantic World. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. Capital and Ideology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Plato. The Republic of Plato. Translated by Allan Bloom. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1991.Google Scholar
Plattner, Marc. “Illiberal Democracy and the Struggle on the Right.” Journal of Democracy 30, no. 1 (2019): 519.Google Scholar
Plotica, Luke Philip. “The Return of the ‘Forgotten Man’: Refurbishing Symbols of the Gilded Age.” Public Seminar, November 2017. www.publicseminar.org/2017/11/the-return-of-the-forgotten-man/Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Pollvogt, Susannah W. Thought Experiment: What If Justice Kennedy Had Approached Romer v. Evans the Way He Approached Schuette v. BAMM?, 2014. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2436616Google Scholar
Pope, Maurice. “Addressing Oedipus.” Greece & Rome 38, no. 2 (1991): 157.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge, 1945.Google Scholar
Posen, Adam S. “The End of Globalization? What Russia’s War in Ukraine Means for the World Economy.” Foreign Affairs, March 2022. www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2022-03-17/end-globalizationGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Postel, Charles. The Populist Vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Press, Gerald A. Who Speaks for Plato? Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar
Prucha, Francis Paul. American Indian Policy in the Formative Years: The Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts, 1780–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Raghavan, Srinath. War and Peach in Modern India. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Ramusack, Barbara. The Indian Princes and Their States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Ransby, Barbara. “The Class Politics of Black Lives Matter.” Dissent 62, no. 4 (2015): 3134.Google Scholar
Rao, B. Shiva. The Framing of India’s Constitution. New Delhi: Government of India Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Rastogi, S., Johnson, T. D., Hoeffel, E. M., and Drewery, M. P. Jr. The Black Population: 2010. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, 2011.Google Scholar
Rawls, John Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Raymond, Laurel “Trump Administration Eliminates Funding for Group Countering White Nationalism.” ThinkProgress, https://thinkprogress.org/white-nationalism-group-funding-f1d35fb5604e/, June 23, 2017.Google Scholar
RECONYX. “Wireless Remote Trigger & Illuminator.” Advertisement, 2012.Google Scholar
Remini, Robert. The Life of Andrew Jackson. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2010.Google Scholar
“Rendre a La France Sa Souverainte Nationale. Vers Une Europe Des Nations Independantes, Au Service Des Peoples,” n.d. www.rassemblementnational.comGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Heather Cox. The Death of Reconstruction: Race, Labor, and Politics in the Post-Civil War North, 1865–1901. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Rickford, Russell. “Black Lives Matter: Toward a Modern Practice of Mass Struggle.” New Labor Forum 25, no. 1 (2016): 3442.Google Scholar
Riofrancos, Thea. “Populism Without the People.” N+1 (blog), 2018. https://nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/populism-without-the-people/Google Scholar
Riofrancos, Thea. “Reclaiming Populism: The View from Latin America.” Boston Review, 2020. http://bostonreview.net/forum/reclaiming-populism/thea-riofrancos-view-latin-americaGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Gretchen. The Constitution as Social Design: Gender and Civic Membership in the American Constitutional Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M.Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case.” World Politics 48, no. 1 (1995): 82116.Google Scholar
Robinson, James A., and Acemoglu, Daron. “Democratization or Repression?European Economic Review 44 (2000): 683–93.Google Scholar
Robinson, Russell K.Unequal Protection.” Stanford Law Review 68, no. 1 (2016): 151233.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. “The Past, Present, and Future of Economic Growth.” In Towards a Better Global Economy: Policy Implications for Citizens Worldwide in the 21st Century, edited by Allen, Franklin, Berhman, Jere R., Birdsall, Nancy, Fardoust, Shahrokh, Rodrik, Dani, Steer, Andrew, and Subramanian, Arvind, 70119. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Rogers, Melvin. “Democracy Is a Habit: Practice It.” Boston Review, 2018. https://bostonreview.net/politics/melvin-rogers-democracy-habit-practice-itGoogle Scholar
Roochnik, David. The Tragedy of Reason: Towards a Platonic Conception of Logos. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Franklin D.Commonwealth Club Address.” In American Political Thought: Readings and Materials, edited by Whittington, Keith E., 510. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. “Inaugural Lecture, Collège de Franace.” In Democracy Past and Future, edited by Moyn, Samuel. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le Siècle Du Populisme: Histoire, Théorie, Critique. Paris: Seuil, 2020.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall and Shapiro, Ian, Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Sam. The Polarizers: Postwar Architects of Our Partisan Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Ross, William. A Muted Fury: Populists, Progressives, and Labor Confront the Court, 1890–1937. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rostow, Eugene V.The Democratic Character of Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 66, no. 2 (1952): 193224.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.Abstract and Judgment of Saint-Pierre’s Project.” In Rousseau on International Relations, edited by Hoffman, Stanley and Fidler, David P., 94. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Basic Political Writings. Edited by Gay, Peter and translated by Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.Discourse on Political Economy.” In The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, edited by Gourevitch, Victor, 212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.Discourse on the Origins of Inequality.” In The First and Second Discourses, edited by Masters, Judith R. and translated by Roger D. Masters and Judith R. Masters, 132. New York, NY: St. Martin’s, 1964.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Emile or On Education. Edited by Bloom, Alan. Vol. IV. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.Geneva Manuscript.” In The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, edited by Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Government of Poland. Edited by Kendall, Willmoore. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1985.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.Of the Social Contract.” In The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Edited by Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.The Social Contract.” In The Major Political Writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, edited by Scott, John T., II, 8:194–95. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Russel, Robert R. “The Issues in the Congressional Struggle over the Kansas-Nebraska Bill.” 29 (1963): 187210.Google Scholar
Russel, Robert R.What Was the Compromise of 1850?Journal of Southern History 22 (1956): 292309.Google Scholar
Ryan, Mary P. Civic Wars: Democracy and Public Life in the American City during the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Peter. Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Sumit. “Indian Democracy: The Historical Inheritance.” In The Success of India’s Democracy, edited by Kohli, Atul, 2930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. Losing Control?: Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Saunt, Claudio. Unworthy Republic: The Dispossession of Native Americans and the Road to Indian Territory. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2020.Google Scholar
Savage, Charlie. “Justice Dept. to Take on Affirmative Action in College Admissions.” The New York Times, August 2, 2017, A1.Google Scholar
Saville, John. 1848: The British State and the Chartist Movement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.The Tyranny of Reason in the World of the Polis.” The American Political Science Review 82, no. 4 (1988): 1261–75.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward. “Ethnographic Immersion and the Study of Politics.” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, edited by Schatz, Edward, 122. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur Meier. “The American Revolution Reconsidered.” Political Science Quarterly 34 (1919): 61–78.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ethan A. Native Americans in the American Revolution. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2014.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Translated and edited by George Schwab. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Translated and edited by Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Translated and edited by Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “Historiographia in Nuce: Alexis de Tocqueville.” In Ex Captivitate Salus, edited by Kalyvas, Andreas and Finchelstein, Federico, 2531. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Translated and edited by George Schwab. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated and edited by George Schwab. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87, no. 2 (1993): 334–47.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philipp C. and Karl, T. L.. “What Democracy Is … and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy 2, no. 3 (1991): 7588.Google Scholar
Schroedel, Jean R. Voting in Indian Country: The View from the Trenches. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey. “Why We Have the Most Polarized Supreme Court in History.” The Conversation, March 14, 2016. https://theconversation.com/why-we-have-the-most-polarized-supreme-court-in-history-55015Google Scholar
Selby, David. Tocqueville, Jansenism, and the Necessity of the Political in a Democratic Age. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2015Google Scholar
Selby, David. “Towards a Political Theology of Republicanism: The Contours of a Natural Contrast between Carl Schmitt and Alexis de Tocqueville.” History of Political Thought 39, no. 4 (2018): 749–74.Google Scholar
Senstar. “Senstar: The Trusted Choice for Perimeter Security Technology & Products.” Advertisement, 2011.Google Scholar
Shani, Ornit. How India Became Democratic: Citizenship and the Making of the Universal Franchise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Sherman, Taylor C. Muslim Belonging in Secular India. Negotiating Citizenship in Postcolonial Hyderabad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Sides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Abbé. “What Is the Third Estate.” In The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History, edited and translated by Lynn Hunt, 6370. London: Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press, 1789.Google Scholar
Silver, Nate. “‘Real’ America Looks Different to Palin, Obama.” FiveThirtyEight (blog), 2008. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/real-america-looks-different-to-palin/Google Scholar
Sinha, Manisha. The Slave’s Cause: A History of Abolition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Singh, Robert. The Congressional Black Caucus: Racial Politics in the US Congress. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1998.Google Scholar
Sirriyeh, Ala. “‘Felons Are Also Our Family’: Citizenship and Solidarity in the Undocumented Youth Movement in the United States.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45, no. 1 (2019): 133–50.Google Scholar
Skinner, Gwynne. “Misunderstood, Misconstrued, and Now Clearly Dead: The ‘Political Questions Doctrine’ as a Justiciability Doctrine.” Journal of Law and Politics 29, no. 427 (2014).Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Liazos, Ariane, and Ganz, Marshall. What a Mighty Power We Can Be: African American Fraternal Groups and the Struggle for Racial Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Ganz, Marshall, and Munson, Ziad. “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 3 (2000): 527–46.Google Scholar
Smith, Anna Marie. Welfare Reform and Sexual Regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert C. We Have No Leaders: African Americans in the Post-Civil Rights Era. Albany: SUNY Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in US History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M.Judicial Power and Democracy: A Machiavellian View.” In The Supreme Court and the Idea of Constitutionalism, edited by Kautz, Steven, Melzer, Arthur, Weinberger, Jerry, and Zinman, M. Richard, 199220. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M.Lincoln and Obama: Two Visions of American Civic Union.” In Representing Citizenship, edited by Marback, Richard, 1751. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. Political Peoplehood. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. That Is Not Who We Are!: Populism and Peoplehood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven B. Modernity and Its Discontents. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Sorel, Georges. Reflections on Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93, no. 2 (1999): 363–80.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, Fording, Richard C., and Schram, Sanford F.. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Soucy, Robert. French Fascism: The First Wave, 1924–1933. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Soucy, Robert. French Fascism: The Second Wave, 1933–1939. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
South Carolina. Constitution of the Commonwealth of South Carolina: Ratified April 16, 1868: Together with the Constitution of the United States of America. Charleston, SC: C. A. Calvo, 1883.Google Scholar
Southwest Microwave. “Integrated Perimeter Security Solutions.” Advertisement, 2012.Google Scholar
Spectator. “The Old Parish Constables and the New Rural Police.” The Spectator. (April 9, 1842): 14.Google Scholar
Sperber, Joseph. Europe 1850–1914: Progress, Participation, and Apprehension. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. The Evolution of American Legislatures: Colonies, Territories, and States, 1619–2009. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. The Right of Instruction and Representation in American Legislatures, 1778–1900. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Stankov, Petar. The Political Economy of Populism: An Introduction. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2021.Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis, Katsambekis, Giorgos, Nikisianis, Nikos, Kioupkiolis, Alexandros, and Siomos, Thomas. “Extreme Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Revisiting a Reified Association.” Critical Discourse Studies 14, no. 4 (2017): 420–39.Google Scholar
Stephanopoulos, Nicholas. “The Case for the Legislative Override.” UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 10 (2005): 25095.Google Scholar
Stewart, James Brewer. Holy Warriors: The Abolitionists and American Slavery. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1997.Google Scholar
Strauss, David A.Modernization and Representation Reinforcement: An Essay in Memory of John Hart Ely.” Stanford Law Review 57 (2004): 761–78.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. The City and Man. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Genesis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy B.Forward.” In Political Theology, vii–xxxv. Schmitt, Carl. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Sultan, N.Self-Rule and the Problem of Peoplehood in Colonial India.” American Political Science Review 114, no. 1 (2020): 8194.Google Scholar
Swain, Carol M. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Swift, R. E.Policing Chartism, 1839–1848: The Role of the ‘Specials’ Reconsidered.” The English Historical Review CXXII, no. 497 (2007): 669–99.Google Scholar
Tarlton, Charles D.The Despotical Doctrine of Hobbes, Part I: The Liberalization of Leviathan.” History of Political Thought 22 (Winter 2001): 587618.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the US Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. Concordance: Black Lawmaking in the U.S. Congress from Carter to Obama. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. “Identity and Democracy.” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly / עיון :רבעון פילוסופי נ"ט(2010): 1123.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. “The Dynamics of Democratic Exclusion.” Journal of Democracy 9, no. 4 (1998): 143–56.Google Scholar
Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta. From# BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Taylor, Miles. “Rethinking the Chartists: Searching for Synthesis in the Historiograpy of Chartism.” The Historical Journal 39, no. 2 (1996): 479–95.Google Scholar
Tesler, Michael. Post-Racial or Most Racial? Race and Politics in the Obama Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Thayer, James Bradley. “A People without Law.” Atlantic Monthly, October 1891.Google Scholar
“The People’s Petition, 1838.” Modern History Sourcebook. https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1838chartism.aspGoogle Scholar
Thucydides, . Historiae. Edited by Jones, Henry Stuart. Vol. II. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1900.Google Scholar
Tillery, Alvin B.Foreign Policy Activism and Power in the House of Representatives: Black Members of Congress and South Africa, 1968–1986.” Studies in American Political Development 20, no. 1 (2006): 88103.Google Scholar
Tillery, Alvin B. “How African American See the Black Lives Matter Movement. Center for the Study of Diversity and Democracy Poll.” Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, 2017. www.csdd.northwestern.edu/research/Google Scholar
Tillery, Alvin B.Reading Tocqueville Behind the Veil: African American Receptions of Democracy in America, 1835–1900.” American Political Thought 7, no. 1 (2018): 125.Google Scholar
Tillery, Alvin B.Tocqueville as Critical Race Theorist: Whiteness as Property, Interest Convergence, and the Limits of Jacksonian Democracy.” Political Research Quarterly 62, no. 4 (2009): 639–52.Google Scholar
Tillery, Alvin B.What Kind of Movement Is Black Lives Matter? The View from Twitter.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 4, no. 2 (2019): 297323.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America: Historical – Critical Edition. Edited by Nolla, Eduardo and translated by James T. Schleifer. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2010.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. New York: Library of America, 2004.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. Translated by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Tommissen, Piet. Schmittiana: Beiträge Zu Leben Und Werk Carl Schmitts. Vol. 7, 6. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Truett, Samuel. “Settler Colonialism and the Borderlands of Early America.” William and Mary Quarterly 76, no. 3 (2019): 435–42.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Tudor, Maya, and Slater, Dan. “The Content of Democracy: Nationalist Parties and Inclusive Ideologies in India and Indonesia.” In Parties, Movements, and Democracy in the Developing World, edited by Bermeo, Nancy and Deborah, J. Yashar, 2860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. “The Rise of Weak-Form Judicial Review.” In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Dixon, Rosalind, 321, 331–32. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. “New Forms of Judicial Review and the Persistence of Rights – And Democracy-Based Worries.” Wake Forest Law Review 38, no. 2 (2003): 813–38, 818.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Tycko, Sonia. “Captured Consent: Bound Service and Freedom of Contract in Early Modern England and English America.” PhD dissertation, Department of History, Harvard University, 2020.Google Scholar
United States House of Representatives. “House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law.” Testimony on the Future of Undocumented Immigration Students, 110th Cong (2007). www.aila.org/File/Related/07072463d.pdfGoogle Scholar
Valelly, Richard M.Party, Coercion, and Inclusion: The Reconstruction of the South’s Electoral Politics.” Politics & Society 21, no. 1 (1993): 3767.Google Scholar
Valelly, Richard M.Slavery, Emancipation, and the Civil War Transformation of the US State.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 1 (2014): 145–52.Google Scholar
Valelly, Richard M. The Two Reconstructions: The Struggle for Black Enfranchisement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Valelly, Rick. “Two Political Sciences or One? Liberal Arts Political Science as a Disciplinary Partner.” Polity 46, no. 1 (2014): 150–56.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P., and DuBois, Page. “Ambiguity and Reversal: On the Enigmatic Structure of Oedipus Rex.” New Literary History 9, no. 3 (1978): 475501.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P., and DuBois, Page. “From Oedipus to Periander: Lameness, Tyranny, Incest in Legend and History.” Arethusa 15, no. 1/2 (1982): 1938.Google Scholar
Vidal, Xavier Medina. “Immigration Politics in the 2016 Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 51, no. 2 (2018): 304–8.Google Scholar
Vinx, Lars. “Carl Schmitt’s Defense of Sovereignty.” In Law Liberty, and State: Oakeshott, Hayek, and Schmitt on the Rule of Law, edited by Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Vormann, Boris, and Weinman, Micheal, eds. Emergence of Illiberalism. London: Routledge, 2020.Google Scholar
Wallach, John R.Sovereignty: New and Old.” Political Theory 46, no. 4 (2017): 659–68.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Interpretation and Social Criticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Weber, Eugen. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Politics as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by Talcott Parsons. New York: Free Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, Ulrich R., and Mayer, Franz C.. “European Democracy and Its Critique.” West European Politics 18, no. 3 (1995): 439.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Combs, Michael W.. “Intra-Racial Differences in Attitudes of Blacks: Class Cleavages or Consensus?Phylon 46, no. 2 (1985): 9197.Google Scholar
Weyl, Walter E. The New Democracy: An Essay on Certain Economic and Political Tendencies in the United States. New York: Macmillan, 1912.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. “Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe.” Comparative Politics 31, no. 4 (1999): 379401.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt, and Madrid, Raúl L.. When Democracy Trumps Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick G.Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem.” In Liberal Democracy, edited by Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W., 1347. New York, NY: New York University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick G.Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem.” Nomos 25 (1983): 1347.Google Scholar
Whitby, Kenny J. The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Constituents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Whitling, Frederick. “Damnatio Memoriae and the Power of Remembrance: Reflections on Memory and History.” In A European Memory? Contested Histories and Politics of Remembrance, edited by Pakier, Malgorzata and Stråth, Bo. New York: Berghahn Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Whitman, Walt, and Kaplan, Justin. “Democratic Vistas.” In Walt Whitman: Complete Poetry and Collected Prose. New York, NY: Library of America, 1982.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99, no. 4 (2005): 583–96.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2019.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. “Revisiting Tocqueville’s America.” In Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective, edited by Edwards, Bob, Folley, Michael and Diani, Mario. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 2001.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E., and Rinderle, Amanda. “Making a Mountain Out of a Molehill? Marbury and the Construction of the Constitutional Canon.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 39, no. 4 (2012): 823–60.Google Scholar
Wiecek, William M. The Sources of Antislavery Constitutionalism in America, 1769–1860. Cornell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Wilentz, Sean. Chants Democratic: New York City and the Rise of the American Working Class, 1788–1850. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Williams, Joan C. White Working Class: Overcoming Class Cluelessness in America. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Williams, R. Hal. Realigning America: McKinley, Bryan, and the Remarkable Election of 1896. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2010.Google Scholar
Wills, Garry. Lincoln at Gettysburg: The Words that Remade America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992.Google Scholar
Wilson, William Julius. The Declining Significance of Race: Blacks and Changing American Institutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Wilson, William Julius. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Wohl, Victoria. Love among the Ruins: The Erotics of Democracy in Classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. “Fugitive Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Benhabib, Seyla, 3145. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. “Fugitive Democracy.” Constellations 1, no. 1 (1994): 1125.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. Thomas Hobbes and the Culture of Despotism. Edited by Dietz, Mary. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1990.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Vol. 262 New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co., 1969.Google Scholar
Woods, Michael E.The Compromise of 1850 and the Search for a Usable Past.” Journal of the Civil War Era 9, no. 3 (2019): 438–56.Google Scholar
Woods, Michael E.What Twenty-First-Century Historians Have Said about the Causes of Disunion: A Civil War Sesquicentennial Review of the Recent Literature.” Journal of American History 99, no. 2 (2012): 415–39.Google Scholar
Woods, Michael E. Bleeding Kansas: Slavery, Sectionalism, and Civil War on the Missouri-Kansas Border. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Woodward-Burns, Robinson. Hidden Laws: How State Constitutions Stabilize American Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Wright, Gordon. France in Modern Times. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co., 1995.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. “Popular Sovereignty and Nationalism.” Political Theory 29, no. 4 (2001): 517–36.Google Scholar
Yates, Robert. “Brutus #11, January 31, 1788.” In The Antifederalists, edited by Kenyon, Cecelia M.. Boston, MA: Northeastern Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Young, Dannagal Goldthwaite. Irony and Outrage: The Polarized Landscape of Rage, Fear, and Laughter in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Zacka, Bernardo, Ackerly, Brooke, Elster, Jacob, Gutnick-Allen, Signy, Iqtidar, Humeira, Longo, Matthew, and Sagar, Paul. “Political Theory with an Ethnographic Sensibility.” Contemporary Political Theory (Critical Exchange). 20, no. 2 (2021): 385418.Google Scholar
Zagarri, Rosemarie. “The American Revolution and a New National Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Revolution, edited by Kamensky, Jane and Gray, Edward G.. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Zagarri, Rosemarie. The Politics of Size: Representation in the United States, 1776–1850. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Zald, M. N.Looking Backward to Look Forward.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Morris, Aldon D. and McClurg, Carol, 326–49. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zeisberg, Mariah. War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Željka. “Erect a Memorial – Erase the Past. The Memorial to the Victims of the German Occupation in Budapest and the Controversy around It.” EUSTORY History Campus (blog), May 26, 2015. https://historycampus.org/2015/erect-a-memorial-erase-the-past-the-memorial-to-the-victims-of-the-german-occupation-in-budapest-and-the-controversy-around-it/Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide R.Moments of Madness.” Politics and Society 2, no. 2 (1972): 182207.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide R. A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Catherine H. Plato’s Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P.On Social State.” In Tocqueville’s Defense of Human Liberty, edited by Alulis, Joseph and Lawler, Peter, 319. New York, NY: Garland Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P. “Populism and Our Political Institutions.” National Affairs (2020). www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/populism-and-our-political-institutionsGoogle Scholar
Zweifel, Thomas D.… Who Is without Sin Cast the First Stone: The EU’s Democratic Deficit in Comparison.” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 5 (2002): 812–40.Google Scholar