Book contents
- The Well-Woman Visit
- The Well-Woman Visit
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 General Principles
- Chapter 1 The Well-Woman Task Force
- Chapter 2 Rationale for the Well-Woman Visit
- Chapter 3 Principles of Early Diagnosis and Prevention
- Chapter 4 Guidelines
- Chapter 5 Promoting Lifestyle Modification and Behavior Change in the Context of Shared Decision-Making
- Chapter 6 Practical Aspects of the Well-Woman Visit
- Chapter 7 Considerations for Medically Underserved Populations
- Chapter 8 Paying for the Well-Woman Visit
- Section 2 Components of the Well-Woman Visit
- Index
- References
Chapter 4 - Guidelines
Deciding What Belongs in the Well-Woman Visit
from Section 1 - General Principles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2017
Book contents
- The Well-Woman Visit
- The Well-Woman Visit
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 General Principles
- Chapter 1 The Well-Woman Task Force
- Chapter 2 Rationale for the Well-Woman Visit
- Chapter 3 Principles of Early Diagnosis and Prevention
- Chapter 4 Guidelines
- Chapter 5 Promoting Lifestyle Modification and Behavior Change in the Context of Shared Decision-Making
- Chapter 6 Practical Aspects of the Well-Woman Visit
- Chapter 7 Considerations for Medically Underserved Populations
- Chapter 8 Paying for the Well-Woman Visit
- Section 2 Components of the Well-Woman Visit
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Well-Woman Visit , pp. 31 - 40Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Conry, J.A., and Brown, H. Well-Woman Task Force: Components of the well-woman visit. Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 126(4):697–701.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2012.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine. Committee to advise the public health service on clinical practice guidelines. In Field, M.J. and Lohr, K.N. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwers, M.C., Kho, M.E., Browman, G.P. et al. AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2010, 182(18):E839–E42.Google Scholar
Maciosek, M.V., Coffield, A.B., Flottemesch, T.J., Edwards, N.M., and Solberg, L.I. Greater use of preventive services in US health care could save lives at little or no cost. Health Aff. 2010, 29(9):1656–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlynn, E.A., Asch, S.M., Adams, J. et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348(26):2635–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuster, M.A., McGlynn, E.A., and Brook, R.H. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 2005, 83:843–95.Google Scholar
Hirth, J.M., Tan, A., Wilkinson, G.S., and Berenson, A.B. Compliance with cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus testing guidelines among insured young women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 209(3):200. e1–e7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Preventive Services Task Force. About the USPSTF. 2016. Available at: www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/about-the-uspstf. Retrieved February 16, 2016.Google Scholar
Brawley, O., Byers, T., Chen, A. et al. New American cancer society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines. JAMA. 2011, 306(22):2495–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Preventive Services Task Force. US Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual. Rockville, MD: USPSTF Program Office, 2015.Google Scholar
Higgins, J.P. and Green, S., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0. 2009. Chapter 8: Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Retrieved March 2011.Google Scholar
GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004, 328(7454):1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Preventive Services Task Force. Grade Definitions. 2014. Available at: www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/grade-definitions. Retrieved January 7, 2016.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2011.Google Scholar
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 151(10):716–26.Google Scholar
Mandelblatt, J.S., Cronin, K.A., Bailey, S. et al. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: Model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 151(10):738–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Preventive Services Task Force. Final recommendation statement: Breast cancer: Screening. February 2016. Available at:www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/breast-cancer-screening1. Retrieved February 16, 2016.Google Scholar
Allen, J.D., Bluethmann, S.M., Sheets, M. et al. Women’s responses to changes in U.S. Preventive Task Force’s mammography screening guidelines: Results of focus groups with ethnically diverse women. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13:1169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbelli, J., Borrero, S., Bonnema, R. et al. Physician adherence to US Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines. Womens Health Issues. 2014, 24(3):e313–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrick, R.E. and Helvie, M.A. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: Science ignored. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011, 196(2):W112–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squiers, L.B., Holden, D.J., Dolina, S.E. et al. The public’s response to the US Preventive Services Task Force’s 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. Am J Prevent Med. 2011, 40(5):497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharam, J.F., Landon, B., Zhang, F. et al. Mammography rates 3 years after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines changes. J Clin Oncol. 2015, 33(9):1067–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: Breast cancer screening. 2012. Available at: www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/BreastCancerScreening.pdf. Retrieved January 7, 2016.Google Scholar
National Health Service. Breast screening: Programme overview. 2015. Available at: www.gov.uk/guidance/breast-screening-programme-overview. Retrieved January 7, 2016.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Position Paper on Mammography Screening. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2014.Google Scholar
The American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society recommendations for early breast cancer detection in women without breast symptoms. Available at: www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/moreinformation/breastcancerearlydetection/breast-cancer-early-detection-acs-recs. Retrieved January 7, 2016.Google Scholar
Murad, M., Montori, V.M., Ioannidis, J.A. et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: Users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014, 312(2):171–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Implementing US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Recommendations into Health Professions Education. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2010. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/cpi/centers/ockt/kt/tools/impuspstf/impuspstf1.html. Retrieved October 2014.Google Scholar