Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Cited by 4
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: July 2014

5 - The limits of ‘new’ multinational enterprises: institutions, systems, and ‘members-only’ location advantages

from Part II - Unique capabilities of EMNCs: do they exist?


Asiedu, E. 2006. Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: The role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. World Economy, 29: 63–77.
Beaudry, C. and Breschi, S. 2003. Are firms in clusters really more innovative?Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4): 325–42.
Beugelsdijk, S., McCann, P., and Mudambi, R. 2010. Introduction: Place, space and organization, economic geography and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Geography, 10: 485–93.
Cantwell, J. A. 1989. Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Cantwell, J. and Iammarino, S. 2003. Multinational Corporations and European Regional Systems of Innovation. London: Routledge.
Criscuolo, P. and Verspagen, B. 2008. Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor versus examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy, 37: 1892–908.
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2012. How the analysis of developing country multinational companies helps advance theory: Solving the Goldilocks debate. Global Strategy Journal, 2: 153–67.
Dunning, J. H. 1992. The competitive advantage of countries and the activities of transnational corporations. Transnational Corporations, 1: 135–68.
Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter/Cassell Academic.
Edquist, C. and Johnson, B. 1997. Institutions and organisations in systems of innovation. In C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter/Cassell Academic.
Grabher, G. (ed.). 1993. The Embedded Firm. London: Routledge.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.
Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 293–317.
Hannan, M. and Freeman, J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49: 149–64.
Iammarino, S. and McCann, P. 2006. The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy, 35: 1018–36.
Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. 1996. Flows of knowledge from universities and federal labs: Modelling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. NBER Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. 1998. International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. NBER Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. 1993. Geographical localisation of knowledge spillovers, as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 58: 577–98.
Katz, J. 2001. Structural reforms and technological behaviour. The sources and nature of technological change in Latin America in the 1990s, Research Policy, 30: 1–19.
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. 2006. Emerging giants. Harvard Business Review, 84(10): 60–9.
Lall, S. 1992. Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 2: 165–86.
Lall, S. 1996. Learning from the Asian Tigers. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Lundvall, B.-Å. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
Maurseth, P. and Verspagen, B. 2002. Knowledge spillovers in Europe: A patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104: 531–45.
Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., and Narula, R. 2011. Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 235–52.
Monteiro, F. L., Arvidsson, N., and Birkinshaw, J., 2008. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19: 90–107.
Moon, H. C., Rugman, A. M., and Verbeke, A. 1995. The generalized double diamond approach to international competitiveness. In A. Rugman, J. Van Den Broeck, and A. Verbeke (eds.), Research in Global Strategic Management. Volume 5: Beyond the Diamond: 97–114. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Morrissey, O. 2011. FDI in Sub-Saharan Africa: Few linkages, fewer spillovers. European Journal of Development Research, 24: 26–31.
Narula, R. 2002. Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in. Research Policy, 31: 795–816.
Narula, R. 2003. Globalisation and Technology: Interdependence, Innovation Systems and Industrial Policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Narula, R. 2010. Keeping the eclectic paradigm simple. Multinational Business Review, 18: 35–50.
Narula, R. 2012. Do we need different frameworks to explain infant MNEs from developing countries?Global Strategy Journal, 2: 188–204.
Narula, R. and Driffield, N. 2011. Does FDI cause development: The ambiguity of the evidence and why it matters. European Journal of Development Research, 24(1): 1–7.
Narula, R. and Dunning, J. H. 2010. Multinational enterprises, development and globalization: Some clarifications and a research agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 38: 263–87.
Narula, R. and Jormanainen, I. 2008. When a good science base is not enough to create competitive industries: Lock-in and inertia in Russian systems of innovation. MERIT-UNU Working Papers, 2008–059. Maastricht, Netherlands: United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology.
Narula, R. and Santangelo, G. D. 2009. Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry. Research Policy, 38(2): 393–403.
Narula, R. and Santangelo, G. D. 2012. New insights on the role of location advantages in international innovation. In A. Verbeke and H. Merchant (eds.), Handbook of Research on International Strategic Management: 291–309. Cheltenham: Edwards Elgar.
Neuber, A. 1993. Towards a political economy of transition in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Development, 5: 511–30.
Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of the Nations. New York: Free Press.
Rabbiosi, L. 2011. Subsidiary roles and reverse knowledge transfer: An investigation of the effects of coordination mechanisms. Journal of International Management, 17: 97–113.
Ramamurti, R. 2008. What have we learned about emerging MNEs? In R. Ramamurti and J. Singh (eds.), Emerging Multinationals from Emerging Markets, Cambridge University Press.
Rodrik, D. 1999. The new global economy and developing countries: Making openness work. Policy Essay 24, Overseas Development Council. Washington, DC: John Hopkins University Press.
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F. 2004. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9: 131–65.
Rugman, A. M. and D’Cruz, J. R. 1993. The double diamond model of international competitiveness: Canada’s experience. Management International Review, 33: 17–39.
Rugman, A. M. and Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 237–50.
Verbeke, A. 2009. International Business Strategy: Rethinking the Foundations of Global Corporate Success. Cambridge University Press.
Witt, M. and Lewin, A. 2007. Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 579–94.
Zaheer, A. and McEvily, B. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 1133–56.
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., and Perrone, V. 1998. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2): 141–59.