Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- I THE LAST PHASE OF MEDIEVAL GOVERNMENT
- II THE BUREAUCRAT MINISTER
- III THE REFORM OF THE AGENCIES OF FINANCE
- IV PRIVY SEAL, SIGNET, AND SECRETARY
- V THE PRIVY COUNCIL
- VI THE KING'S HOUSEHOLD
- VII THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVOLUTION
- Appendix I Cromwell and the mastership of the king's wards
- Appendix II Documents
- Index
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- I THE LAST PHASE OF MEDIEVAL GOVERNMENT
- II THE BUREAUCRAT MINISTER
- III THE REFORM OF THE AGENCIES OF FINANCE
- IV PRIVY SEAL, SIGNET, AND SECRETARY
- V THE PRIVY COUNCIL
- VI THE KING'S HOUSEHOLD
- VII THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVOLUTION
- Appendix I Cromwell and the mastership of the king's wards
- Appendix II Documents
- Index
Summary
It has already been shown how the small official council of Richard II developed into the magnates' council of Henry IV and Henry V, how it collapsed in the Wars of the Roses, and how Edward IV and Henry VII restored an earlier type of council—a fluid and indeterminate body of advisers and executive servants from which all elements of opposition were carefully excluded. Within that body there was an inner ring of more confidential councillors, and this inner ring assumed some permanence and institutional organization in the first years of Henry VIII. Wolsey, however, interrupted what promised to be the growth of a more restricted and more powerful council than any seen since the Lancastrian failure, and during his rule conciliar activity concentrated on the judicial business transacted in the public sessions held in the star chamber. The small council attendant on the king, the potential makers of policy and controllers of the administration, ceased to play any part in affairs; indeed, for all practical purposes they ceased to exist. On the other hand, the characteristic government of the later Tudors was the privy council, an organized board of—normally—less than twenty members, most of them leading officers of state and household, travelling with the sovereign and meeting very nearly every day. It concerned itself not only with the traditional conciliar duty of advising the crown on matters of policy, but attended in detail to executive and administrative matters which it usually debated and decided as a body and not necessarily with reference to the king (or queen) who were, in fact, potential rather than permanent heads of their privy councils.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Tudor Revolution in Government , pp. 316 - 369Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1953