Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:18:44.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

74 - 2001 Proposal by Bosnia and Herzegovina, New Zealand and Romania (Conditions, February)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Stefan Barriga
Affiliation:
United Nations, New York
Claus Kreß
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Get access

Summary

Conditions under which the Court shall exercise jurisdiction with respect to the crime of aggression

1. The Court shall exercise its jurisdiction with respect to the crime of aggression in accordance with the Statute and in a manner consistent with the Charter of the United Nations, in particular its Articles 24 and 39.

2. Where a situation involving the crime of aggression is referred to the Prosecutor pursuant to article 13 (b) of the Statute, the Prosecutor shall proceed with the case in accordance with the Statute and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.

3. Where a situation in which a crime of aggression appears to have been committed is referred to the Prosecutor pursuant to article 13 (a) of the Statute, or where the Prosecutor intends to make a request of authorization of an investigation proprio motu under article 15 of the Statute, and the Security Council has made no determination under article 39 as to the existence or otherwise of an act of aggression by the State concerned, the Court shall notify the Security Council of the situation before the Court.

4. Where the Security Council makes no such determination, or does not invoke Article 16, within 12 months from the date of notification by the Court, the Court may notify the General Assembly of the situation before the Court and invite the General Assembly to request the International Court of Justice, in accordance with Article 96 of the Charter, to give an advisory opinion on the legal question of the existence or otherwise of an act of aggression by the State concerned.

5. Where, following a request by the General Assembly, the International Court of Justice delivers an advisory opinion that there has been an act of aggression by the State concerned, and the General Assembly so recommends, the Prosecutor shall proceed with the case in accordance with the Statute and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×