Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 59
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
April 2011
Print publication year:
2011
Online ISBN:
9780511794278

Book description

While much has been written on asymmetric aspects of sentence structure, symmetric aspects have been largely ignored, or claimed to be non-existent. Does symmetry in syntax exist, and if it does, how do we account for it? In this book, Barbara Citko sets out to tackle these questions and offers a unified approach to a number of phenomena that have so far been studied only in isolation. Focusing on three core minimalist mechanisms: merge, move and labeling, she advances a new theory of these mechanisms, by showing that under certain well-defined circumstances merge can create symmetric structures, move can target either of two potentially moveable objects, and labels can be constructed symmetrically from the features of two objects. This book is aimed at researchers and graduate students interested in minimalist syntax, the structure of questions, relative clauses, coordination, double object constructions and copular sentences.

Reviews

‘… highly original and illuminating.'

Henk van Riemsdijk - Tilburg University

‘… elegant and provocative.'

Norbert Hornstein - University of Maryland

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
Abe, Jun and Hoshi, Hiroto 1999. “Directionality of movement in ellipsis resolution in English and Japanese,” in Lappin, and Benmamoun, (eds.), pp. 193–226.
Abbott, Barbara 1976. “Right node raising as a test for constituenthood,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 639–42.
Abeillé, Anne and Borsley, Robert D. 2008. “Comparative correlatives and para-meters,” Lingua 118: 1139–57.
Abeillé, Anne, Borsley, Robert D. and Espinal, Maria-Teresa 2006. “The syntax of comparative correlatives in French and Spanish,” in Müller, (ed.), pp. 6–26.
Abels, Klaus 2003. “Successive cyclicity, anti-locality and adposition stranding,” PhD thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Abels, Klaus 2004. “Right node raising: ellipsis or across the board movement?”, in Moulton, and Wolf, (eds.), pp. 45–59.
Abney, Steven 1987. “The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect,” PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Abraham, Werner 2006. “Introduction. Datives: structural vs. inherent – abstract vs. morphological – autonomous vs. combinatory – universally vs. language-specifically configured?”, in Hole, , Abraham, and Meinunger, (eds.), pp. 3–46.
Ackema, Peter and Čamdžić, Amela 2003. “LF complex predicate formation: the case of participle fronting in Serbo-Croatian,” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 131–75.
Adger, David 2003. Core Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adger, David and Ramchand, Gillian 2003. “Predication and equation,” Linguistic Inquiry 34: 325–60.
Adger, David, Cat, Cécile and Tsoulas, George (eds.) 2004. Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and Their Effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W. 2007. Serial Verb Constructions – A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Akatsuka, Noriko and Strauss, Susan (eds.) 2002. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Alderete, John, Han, Chung-hye and Kochetov, Alexei (eds.) 2005. Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Alexiadou, Artemis 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Alsina, Alex and Mchombo, Sam A. 1993. “Object asymmetries and the Chichewa applicative construction,” in Mchombo, (ed.), pp. 17–45.
An, Duk-Ho 2007. “Syntax at the PF interface: prosodic mapping, linear order, and deletion,” PhD thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena 2003. The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Anderson, Stephen R. and Kiparsky, Paul (eds.) 1973. A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Andronis, Mary, Ball, Christopher, Elston, Heidi and Neuvel, Sylvain (eds.) 2001. Chicago Linguistic Society: The Main Session 37–1. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Aoun, Joseph and Li, Yen-hui Audrey 1989. “Constituency and scope,” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 141–72.
Arnaudova, Olga, Browne, Wayles, Rivero, Maria Luisa and Stojanovic, Danijela (eds.) 2004. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics # 12: The Ottawa Meeting. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Bach, Emmon, Jelinek, Eloise, Kratzer, Angelika and Partee, Barbara H. (eds.) 1996. Quantification in Natural Languages, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 54. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bachrach, Asaf and Katzir, Roni 2009. “Right-node raising and delayed Spellout,” in Grohmann, (ed.), pp. 283–316.
Bailyn, John 1995. “A configurational approach to Russian ‘free’ word order,” PhD thesis, Cornell University.
Bailyn, John 2001. “The syntax of Slavic predicate case,” in Jäger, et al. (eds.), pp. 1–23.
Bailyn, John in press. “What”s inside VP? New (and old) evidence from Russian,” Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics # 18: The Cornell Meeting.
Bailyn, John and Citko, Barbara 1999. “Case and agreement in Slavic predicates,” in Dziwirek, , Coats, and Vakareliyska, (eds.), pp. 17–39.
Baker, Mark 1985. “The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415.
Baker, Mark 1988. “Theta theory and the syntax of applicative constructions in Chichewa,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 353–89.
Baker, Mark 1989. “Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions,” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 513–53.
Baker, Mark 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baker, Mark 1997. “Thematic roles and syntactic structure,” in Haegeman, (ed.), pp. 73–137.
Baker, Mark 2008. “The macroparameter in a microparametric world,” in Biberauer, (ed.), pp. 351–73.
Baker, Mark C. and Stewart, Osamuyimen T. 1999. “On double-headedness and the anatomy of the clause,” manuscript, Rutgers University.
Baker, Mark C., Johnson, Kyle and Roberts, Ian 1989. “Passive arguments raised,” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–51.
Baltin, Mark and Postal, Paul M. 1996. “More on the reanalysis hypothesis,” Linguistic Inquiry 27: 127–45.
Barss, Andrew 2000. “Minimalism and asymmetric wh-interpretation,” in Martin, , Michaels, and Uriagereka, (eds.), pp. 31–52.
Barss, Andrew and Lasnik, Howard 1986. “A note on anaphora and double objects,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–54.
Bayer, Josef, Schmid, Tanja and Bader, Markus 2005. “Clause union and clausal position,” in Dikken, and Tortora, (eds.) pp. 79–113.
Beck, Sigrid 1997. “On the semantics of comparative conditionals,” Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 229–71.
Beck, Sigrid and Johnson, Kyle 2004. “Double objects again,” Linguistic Inquiry 35: 97–123.
Belletti, Adriana (ed.) 2004. Structures and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana, Brandi, Luciana and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.) 1981. Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa.
Bernstein, Judy 1993. “Topics in the syntax of nominal structure across Romance,” PhD thesis, City University of New York, New York.
Bhatt, Rajesh 2002. “The raising analysis of relative clauses: evidence from adjectival modification,” Natural Language Semantics 10: 43–90.
Bhatt, Rajesh 2003The locality in correlativization,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 485–541.
Biberauer, Theresa (ed.) 2008. The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Biberauer, Theresa and Roberts, Ian (eds.) In press. Principles of Linearization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bierwisch, Manfred and Heidolph, Karl Erich (eds.) 1970. Progress in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
Billerey, Roger and Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle (eds.) 2000. Proceedings of the 19th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Bird, Sonya, Carnie, Andrew, Haugen, Jason D. and Norquest, Peter (eds.) 1999. Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Blaho, Sylvia, Vicente, Luis and Vos, Mark (eds.) 2004. Proceedings of CONSOLE XII. Leiden University.
Blevins, James 1990. “Syntactic complexity: evidence for discontinuity and multi-domination,” PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Bobaljik, Jonathan 1995. “Morphosyntax: the syntax of verbal inflection,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Boeckx, Cedric 1999. “Conflicting c-command requirements,” Studia Linguistica 53: 227–50.
Boeckx, Cedric 2006. Minimalist Essays. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Boeckx, Cedric 2008. Bare Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, Cedric 2009. “The locus of asymmetry in UG,” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 41–53.
Boeckx, Cedric (ed.) In press. Oxford Handbook of Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, Cedric and Grohmann, Kleanthes 2004. “Sub-move: Towards a unified account of scrambling and D-Linking,” in Adger, , Cat, and Tsoulas, (eds.), pp. 341–57.
Boeckx, Cedric and Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo 2005. “Language as a natural object, linguistics as a natural science,” The Linguistic Review 22: 447–466.
Borer, Hagit 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Borer, Hagit (ed.) 1986. Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. New York: Academic Press.
Borer, Hagit 2005. Structuring Sense: Volumes I and II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borsley, Robert D. 1983. “A note on the Generalized Left Branch Condition,” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 169–74.
Borsley, Robert D. 2004. “On the periphery: comparative correlatives in Polish and English,” in Arnaudova, , Browne, , Rivero, and Stojanovic, (eds.) pp. 59–90.
Bošković, Željko 2001. On the Nature of the Syntax–Phonology Interface. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Bošković, Željko 2002. “On multiple wh-fronting,” Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351–84.
Bošković, Željko and Franks, Steven 2000. “Across-the-board movement and LF,” Syntax 3: 107–28.
Bošković, Željko and Lasnik, Howard 2003. “On the distribution of null complementizers,” Linguistic Inquiry 34: 527–46.
Bošković, Željko and Takahashi, Daiko 1998. “Scrambling and last resort,” Linguistic Inquiry 29: 347–66.
Bowers, John. 1993. “The syntax of predication,” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.
Brasoveanu, Adrian 2008. “Comparative and equative correlatives as anaphora to differentials,” Proceedings of SALT XVIII, downloadable at http://hdl.handle.net/1813/13030.
Bresnan, Joan and Grimshaw, Jane 1978. “The syntax of free relatives in English,” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 331–91.
Brody, Michael 2006. “Syntax and symmetry,” manuscript, downloadable at http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000260.
Browne, Wayles 1972. “Conjoined questions and the limitation on English surface structure,” Linguistic Inquiry 3: 223–6.
Bruening, Benjamin 2001. “QR obeys superiority: frozen scope and ACD,” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 233–73.
Bunting, Jacqueline, Desai, Sapna, Peachey, Robert, Straughn, Christopher and Tomková, Zuzana (eds.) 2006. Proceedings from the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society – Main Session. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Burelle, Sophie and Somesfalean, Stanca (eds.) 2003. Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Montréal: Université de Québec.
Bury, Dirk 2003 “Phrase structure and derived heads,” PhD thesis, University College London.
Cable, Seth 2007. “The grammar of Q: Q-particles and the nature of wh-fronting, as revealed by the wh-questions of Tlingit,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Camacho, José 1997. “The syntax of NP conjunction,” PhD thesis, University of Southern California.
Camacho, José 2003. The Structure of Coordination. Conjunction and Agreement Phenomena in Spanish and Other Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Caponigro, Ivano 2003. “Free not to ask: On the semantics of free relatives and wh-words cross-linguistically,” PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
Cardinaletti, Anna, Cinque, Guglielmo and Giusti, Giuliana (eds.) 1988. Constituent Structure: Papers from the 1987 GLOW Conference. Dordrecht, Foris.
Carnie, Andrew 2008. Constituent Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, Julie, Dechaine, Rose-Marieet al. (eds.) 1986. Proceedings of the 20th Northeastern Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Chang, Charles B. and Haynie, Hannah J.et al. (eds.) 2008. Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Chen-Main, Joan 2006. “On the generation and linearization of multi-dominance structures,” PhD thesis, Johns Hopkins University.
Cheng, Lisa and Corver, Norbert (eds.) 2006. Wh-Movement. Moving on. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cheng, Lisa and Sybesma, Rint (eds.) 2003. The Second GLOT International State-of-the-Article Book. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cho, Sungeun and Zhou, Xuan 2002. “The interpretations of wh-elements in conjoined wh-questions,” in Akatsuka and Strauss (eds.), pp. 522–31.
Chomsky, Noam 1970. “Remarks on nominalization,” in Jacobs, and Rosenbaum, (eds.), pp. 184–221.
Chomsky, Noam 1973. “Conditions on transformations,” in Anderson, and Kiparsky, (eds.), pp. 232–83
Chomsky, Noam 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Chomsky, Noam 1994. “Bare phrase structure,” in Webelhuth, (ed.), pp. 383–439.
Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: the framework,” in Martin, , Michaels, and Uriagereka, (eds.), pp. 89–155.
Chomsky, Noam 2001. “Derivation by phase,” in Hale, and Keyser, (eds.), pp. 1–52.
Chomsky, Noam 2004. “Beyond explanatory adequacy,” in Belletti, (ed.), pp. 104–31.
Chomsky, Noam 2005. “Three factors in language design,” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22.
Chomsky, Noam 2008. “On phases,” in Freidin, , Otero, and Zubizaretta, (eds.), pp. 133–66.
Chukerman, Amy, Marks, Mitchell and Richardson, John F. (eds.) 1983. Papers from the 19th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Cinque, Gugliemo 1994. “On the evidence for partial N movement in the Romance DP,” in Cinque, , Koster, , Pollock, , Rizzi, and Zanuttini, (eds.), pp. 85–110.
Cinque, Gugliemo 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Gugliemo (ed.) 2002. Functional Structure in DP and IP: the Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo and Kayne, Richard (eds.) 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Gugliemo, Koster, Jan, Pollock, Jean-Yves, Rizzi, Luigi and Zanuttini, Rafaela (eds.) 1994. Paths Towards Universal Grammar. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Citko, Barbara 1998. “An ATB account of free relatives and correlatives,” in Gruber, , Higgins, , Olson, and Wysocki, (eds.), pp. 69–81.
Citko, Barbara 2000. “Parallel merge and the syntax of free relatives,” PhD thesis, Stony Brook University.
Citko, Barbara 2002. “(Anti)reconstruction effects in free relatives: a new argument against the comp account,” Linguistic Inquiry 33: 507–11.
Citko, Barbara 2003. “ATB wh-questions and the nature of Merge,” in Kadowaki, and Kawahara, (eds.), pp. 87–102.
Citko, Barbara 2005. “On the nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge,” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 475–97.
Citko, Barbara 2006. “Copula sentences reconsidered,” in Lavine, , Franks, , Tasseva-Kurktchieva, and Filip, (eds.), pp. 83–93.
Citko, Barbara 2007. “Scope disambiguation strategies in ATB wh-questions,” Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Citko, Barbara 2008a. “Small clauses reconsidered: not so small and not all alike,” Lingua 118: 261–95.
Citko, Barbara 2008b. “Missing labels,” Lingua 118: 907–44.
Citko, Barbara 2009. “A ‘new’ look at symmetric and asymmetric passives,” Proceedings of the 39th North East Linguistics Society.
Citko, Barbara In press-a. “The puzzles of wh-questions with coordinated pronouns,” in Biberauer, and Roberts, (eds.).
Citko, Barbara In press-b. “Multidominance,” in Boeckx, (ed.).
Citko, Barbara Submitted. “A multidominant solution to the Merchant/Johnson paradox,” In Uribe-Etxebarria, and Valmala, (eds.).
Citko, Barbara and Gračanin-Yüksek, Martina (submitted). “Towards a new typology of wh-questions with coordinated wh-pronouns.”
Citko, Barbara and Grohmann, Kleanthes 2001. “On the non-uniqueness of multiple wh-fronting: German = Bulgarian,” in Franks, , Holloway-King, and Yadroff, (eds.), pp. 117–37.
Collins, Chris 1997a. Local Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Collins, Chris 1997b. “Argument sharing in serial verb constructions,” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 461–97.
Collins, Chris 2002. “Eliminating labels,” in Epstein, and Seely, (eds.), pp. 42–64.
Compton, Richard, Goledzinowska, Magdalena and Savchenko, Ulyana (eds.) 2006. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics # 15: The Toronto Meeting. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Comrie, Bernard and Stone, Gerald 1978. The Russian Language since the Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Coppock, Elizabeth 2001. “Gapping: in defense of deletion,” in Andronis, , Ball, , Elston, and Neuvel, (eds.), pp. 133–48.
Cuervo, Maria Cristina 2003a. “Datives at large,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Cuervo, Maria Cristina 2003b. “A control vs. raising theory of dative experiencers,” in Pérez-Leroux, and Roberge, (eds.), pp. 111–30.
Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray 1999. “The view from the periphery,” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 543–71.
Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Culicover, Peter and Postal, Paul (eds.) 2001. Parasitic Gaps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dąbrowska, Ewa 1997. Cognitive Semantics and the Polish Dative. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dayal, Veneeta 1996. “Quantification in correlatives,” in Bach, , Jelinek, , Kratzer, and Partee, (eds.), pp. 179–205.
Dayal, Veneeta 2002. “Single-pair versus multiple-pair answers: wh-in-situ and scope,” Linguistic Inquiry 33: 512–20.
Dayal, Veneeta 2006. “Multiple wh-questions,” in Everaert, and Riemsdijk, (eds.), pp. 275–326.
Vos, Mark and Vicente, Luis 2005. “Coordination under Right Node Raising,” in Alderete, Han and Kochetov, (eds.), pp. 97–104.
DeLancey, Scott and Tomlin, Russell (eds.) 1986. Papers from the First Pacific Linguistic Conference. Eugene, OR: Dept of Linguistics.
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria 2002. Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria 2005. Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dikken, Marcel 1995. Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic and Causative Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dikken, Marcel 2005. “Comparative correlatives comparatively,” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 497–533.
Dikken, Marcel 2006. Relators and Linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dikken, Marcel 2009. “Comparative correlatives and successive cyclicity,” in Lipták, (ed.), pp. 263–306.
Dikken, Marcel and Tortora, Christina (eds.) 2005. The Function of Function Words and Functional Categories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Dimitriadis, Alexis, Siegel, Laura, Surek-Clark, Clarissa and Williams, Alexander (eds.) 1997. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers.
Doggett, Teal Bissell 2004. “All things being unequal: locality in movement,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Donati, Valentina 2006. “On wh-head movement,” in Cheng, and Corver, (eds.), pp. 21–46.
Dornisch, Ewa 1998. “Multiple wh-questions in Polish. The interactions between wh-phrases and clitics,” PhD thesis, Cornell University.
Douglas-Brown, Denise 1996. “In search of syntactic symmetry: on the parallels between clausal and nominal hierarchical structure,” PhD thesis, Univesity of Durham, UK.
Dvořák, Věra. In press. “Ditransitive verbs in Czech,” Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics # 18: The Cornell Meeting.
Dyakonova, Marina 2007. “Russian double object constructions,” ACLC Working Papers 2(1):3–30.
Dyakonova, Marina 2009. “A phase-based approach to Russian word order,” PhD thesis, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Dyła, Stefan 1984. “Across-the-board dependencies and case in Polish,” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 701–05.
Dziwirek, Katarzyna 1994. Polish Subjects. New York/London: Garland Publishing.
Dziwirek, Katarzyna 2002. “A different kind of non-canonical case marking: the Slavic verb ‘to teach’,” Slavic and East European Journal 46: 319–47.
Dziwirek, Katarzyna, Coats, Herb and Vakareliyska, Cynthia (eds.) 1999. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics #7: The Seattle Meeting. Ann Arbor: MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Embick, David and Noyer, Rolf 2001. “Movement operations after syntax,” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–95.
Emonds, Joseph 1972. “Evidence that indirect object movement is a structure-preserving rule,” Foundations of Language 8: 546–61.
Emonds, Joseph 1976. A Transformational Approach to Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Emonds, Joseph and Whitney, Rosemary 2006. “Double object constructions,” in Everaert, and Riemsdijk, (eds.), pp. 73–145.
Epstein, Samuel and Seely, Daniel (eds.) 2002. Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ernst, Thomas 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Everaert, Martin and Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.) 2006. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax: Vols I–V. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Fillmore, Charles 1965. Indirect Object Constructions in English and the Ordering of Transformations. The Hague: Mouton.
Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Hauser, Marc and Chomsky, Noam 2005. “The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications,” Cognition 97(2):179–210.
Fowler, George 1996. “Oblique passivization in Russian,” Slavic and East European Journal 40: 519–45.
Fox, Danny and Nissenbaum, Jon 1999. “Extraposition and scope: a case for overt QR,” in Bird, , Carnie, , Haugen, , and Norquest, (eds.), pp. 132–44.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt 1986. “Propositional characterization of categories,” in DeLancey, and Tomlin, (eds.), pp. 108–19.
Franks, Steven 1993. “On parallelism in across-the-board dependencies,” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 509–29.
Franks, Steven 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
Franks, Steven, Holloway-King, Tracy and Yadroff, Michael (eds.) 2001. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Bloomington Meeting 2000. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Frascarelli, Mara (ed.) 2006. Phases of Interpretation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Freidin, Robert (ed.) 1996. Current Issues in Comparative Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, Academic Publishers.
Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos and Zubizaretta, Maria-Luisa (eds.) 2008. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gast, Volker 2005. “I gave it him – On the motivation of the ‘alternative double object construction’ in English,” Paper presented at the Workshop on Ditransitive Constructions, Padang, July 21, 2005.
Gast, Volker 2007. “I gave it him – On the motivation of the ‘alternative double object construction’ in varieties of British English,” Functions of Language 14, 1: 31–56.
Gawron, Mark and Kehler, Andrew 2003. “Respective answers to coordinated questions,” Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory.
Georgopoulos, Carol and Ishihara, Roberta (eds.) 1991. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language. Essays in Honor of S. Y. Kuroda. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gerdts, Donna and McGinnis, Martha 2003. “A phase theoretic analysis of Kinyarwanda multiple applicatives,” in Burelle, and Somesfalean, (eds.), pp. 154–65.
Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Merchant, Jason 1998. “Reverse sluicing in English and Greek,” Linguistic Review 15: 233–56.
Goodall, Grant 1983. “A three-dimensional analysis of coordination,” in Chukerman, , Marks, and Richardson, (eds.), pp. 146–54.
Goodall, Grant 1987. Parallel Structures in Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gračanin-Yüksek, Martina 2006. “Double object construction in Croatian: arguments against Appl0,” in Compton, , Goledzinowska, and Savchenko, (eds.), pp. 94–112.
Gračanin-Yüksek, Martina 2007. “About sharing,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Gračanin-Yüksek, Martina 2008. “Free relatives in Croatian: arguments for the COMP Account,” Linguistic Inquiry 39: 275–94.
Gračanin-Yüksek, Martina In press. “Linearizing multidominance structures,” in Biberauer, and Roberts, (eds.)
Green, Georgia M. 1974. Semantics and Syntactic Regularity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Gribanova, Vera 2009. “Structural adjacency and the typology of interrogative interpretations,” Linguistic Inquiry 40: 133–54.
Grimshaw, Jane 1991. “Extended projections,” manuscript, Brandeis University. [Published as Grimshaw 2005. Words and Structure. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 151, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications].
Grohmann, Kleanthes 2003. Prolific Domains: On the Anti-locality of Movement Dependencies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Grohmann, Kleanthes (ed.) 2009. InterPhases: Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Groos, Anneke and Riemsdijk, Henk 1981. “Matching effects in free relatives: a parameter of core grammar,” in Belletti, , Brandi, and Rizzi, (eds.), pp. 171–216.
Grosu, Alexander 1994. Three Studies in Locality and Case, London: Routledge.
Grosu, Alexander 1996. “The proper analysis of ‘Missing-P’ free relative constructions,” Linguistic Inquiry 27: 257–93.
Grosu, Alexander 2003. “A unified theory of ‘standard’ and ‘transparent’ free relatives,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 247–331.
Grosu, Alexander and Landman, Fred 1998. “Strange relatives of the third kind,” Natural Language Semantics 6: 125–70.
Grosz, Patrick 2009. “Movement and agreement in right-node raising constructions,” unpublished manuscript, MIT.
Gruber, Catherine, Higgins, Derrick, Olson, Kenneth S. and Wysocki, Tamra (eds.) 1998. Chicago Linguistic Society 34: The Main Session. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Guéron, Jacqueline and Lecarme, Jacqueline (eds.) 2004. The Syntax of Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Guimarães, Maximiliano 2000. “In defense of vacuous projections in bare phrase structure,” in Guimarães, , Meroni, , Rodrigues, and San Martin, (eds.)
Guimarães, Maximiliano, Meroni, Luisa, Rodrigues, Cilene and San Martin, Itziar (eds.) 2000. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 9. College Park: University of Maryland Department of Linguistics.
Ha, Seungwan 2006. “Multiple dominance CAN'T, but ellipsis can account for right node raising,” in Bunting, , Desai, , Peachey, , Straughn, , and Tomková, (eds.), pp. 17–31.
Haddican, William 2010. “Theme-goal ditransitives and theme passivisation in British English dialects,” Lingua 120: 2424–34.
Haegeman, Liliane (ed.) 1997. Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Haegeman, Liliane and Lohndal, Terje 2010. “Negative concord and (multiple) agree: a case study of west Flemish,” Linguistic Inquiry 41: 181–211.
Hagstrom, Paul 1998. “Decomposing questions,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Haider, Hubert 1988. “Matching projections,” in Cardinaletti, , Cinque, and Giusti, (eds), pp. 101–23.
Hale, Ken 1983. “Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5–47.
Hale, Ken 1991. “Misumalpan verb sequencing constructions,” in Lefebvre, (ed.), pp. 1–35.
Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.) 2001. The View from Building 20. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
Halle, Morris and Marantz, Alec 1993. “Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection,” in Hale, and Keyser, (eds.), pp. 111–76.
Halle, Morris and Marantz, Alec 1994. “Some key features of distributed morphology,” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 275–88.
Hankamer, Jorge and Sag, Ivan 1976. “Deep and surface anaphora,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.
Hannay, Mike and Steen, Gerard J. (eds.) 2007. Structural-Functional Studies in English Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Harley, Heidi 2002. “Possession and the double object construction,” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2: 29–68.
Harley, Heidi and Noyer, Rolf 2003. “Distributed morphology,” in Cheng, and Sybesma, (eds.), pp. 463–96.
Hartmann, Katharina 2000. Right Node Raising and Gapping: Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hauser, Mark, Chomsky, Noam and Fitch, Tecumseh 2002. “The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science 298: 1569–79.
Heck, Fabian 2008. On Pied-piping: Wh-movement and Beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heck, Fabian 2009. “On certain properties of pied-piping,” Linguistic Inquiry 40: 75–111.
Higginbotham, James and May, Robert 1981. “Questions, quantifiers, and crossing,” The Linguistic Review 1: 41–79.
Hiraiwa, Ken 2005. “Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: agreement and clausal architecture,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Hiraiwa, Ken and Bodomo, Adams 2008. “Object-sharing as symmetric sharing: evidence from Dagaare,” in Chang, and Haynie, (eds.), pp. 243–51.
Hoji, Hajime 1985. “Logical Form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese,” PhD thesis, University of Washington.
Hole, Daniel P., Abraham, Werner and Meinunger, André (eds.) 2006. Datives and Other Cases. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Holmberg, Anders and Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg 2003. “Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions,” Lingua 113: 997–1019.
Holmberg, Anders and Platzack, Christer 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hornstein, Norbert 2009. A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hornstein, Norbert and Nunes, Jairo 2002. “On asymmetries between parasitic gaps and across-the-board constructions,” Syntax 5: 26–54.
Hornstein, Norbert and Nunes, Jairo 2008. “Adjunction, labeling, and bare phrase structure,” Biolinguistics 2.1:57–86.
Hornstein, Norbert and Uriagereka, Juan 2002. “Reprojections,” in Epstein, and Seely, (eds.), pp. 106–32.
Hornstein, Norbert, Nunes, Jairo and Grohmann, Kleanthes 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, James C.-T. 2005. “Syntactic analyticity and the other end of the parameter,” Lecture notes from the LSA Summer Institute.
Huber, Stefan 2007. “Comparative correlatives – the case of German,” Proceedings of the 33th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Hudson, Richard 1992. “So-called ‘double objects’ and grammatical relations,” Language 68: 251–76.
Hughes, Arthur and Trudgill, Peter 1979. English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to the Social and Regional Varieties in the British Isles. London: Arnold.
Ionin, Tania 2002. “The one girl who was kissed by every boy: scope, scrambling and discourse function in Russian,” in Koppen, , Sio, and Vos, (eds.), pp. 79–94.
Izvorski, Roumyana 1997. “The syntax and semantics of correlative proforms,” in Kusumoto, (ed.), pp. 133–47.
Jackendoff, Ray 1971. “Gapping and related rules,” Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21–35.
Jackendoff, Ray and Pinker, Steven 2005. “The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky),” Cognition 97:211–25.
Jacobs, Roderick A. and Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.) 1970. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell Publishing.
Jacobson, Pauline 1999. “Towards a variable-free semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 117–84.
Jäger, Gerhard, Strigin, Anatoli, Wilder, Chris, Zhang, Niina (eds.) 2001, ZAS Papers in Linguistics 22. Berlin: ZAS.
Jaeggli, Osvaldo 1986. “Passive,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 593–9.
Jagodziński, Grzegorz 2007. “More on syntactic typology,” manuscript, downloadable at www.aries.com.pl/grzegorzj/thp/morfosynt.html.
Jenkins, Lyle 2000. Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jensen, John T. and Herk, Gerard (eds.) 2002. Proceedings of the 2001 CLA Annual Conference. Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa: Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa.
Jeong, Youngmi 2007. Applicatives: Structure and Interpretation from a Minimalist Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Johannessen, Janne Bondi 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, Kyle. 1996/2003. “In search of the middle field,” manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Johnson, Kyle 2000. “Few dogs eat Whiskas or cats Alpo,” in Kusumoto, and Villalta, (eds.), pp. 59–82.
Johnson, Kyle 2006. “Gapping,” in Everaert, and Riemsdijk, (eds.), pp. 407–35.
Johnson, Kyle 2007. “LCA+Alignment=RNR,” Handout of a talk presented at the Workshop on Coordination, Subordination and Ellipsis, Tubingen, June 2007.
Johnson, Kyle (ed.) 2008. Topics in Ellipsis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, Kyle 2009. “Gapping is not (VP) ellipsis,” Linguistic Inquiry 40: 289–328.
Kadowaki, Makoto and Kawahara, Shigeto (eds.) 2003. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Kapetangianni, Konstantia and Taylor, Heather 2007. “Comparative correlatives in Greek: the syntax of oso,” Paper presented at the Workshop on Greek Syntax and Semantics.
Kasai, Hironobu 2007. “Multiple dominance in syntax,” PhD thesis, Harvard University.
Kayne, Richard 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kayne, Richard 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard 2005. “Some notes on comparative syntax,” in Cinque, and Kayne, (eds.), pp. 3–69.
Kayne, Richard 2008. “Antisymmetry and the lexicon,” manuscript, downloadable at http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000598.
Kazenin, Konstantin 2001. “On coordination of wh-phrases in Russian,” Paper presented at the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages.
Kiefer, Ferenc, Anderson, Stephen R. and Kiss, Katalin E. (eds.) 1994. The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian. Syntax and Semantics 27. New York: Academic Press.
Kim, Jeong-Seuk 1997. “Syntactic focus movement and ellipsis: a minimalist approach,” PhD thesis, Univesity of Connecticut.
Kim, Min-Joo and Strauss, Uri (eds.) 2000. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Kim, Sun-Woong 2005. “On the dative intervention effect in raising to subject,” Studies in Generative Grammar 4: 649–60.
Kimenyi, Alexandre 1980. A Relational Grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kitahara, Hisatsugu 1993. “Deducing superiority effects from the shortest chain requirement,” Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 109–120.
Kitahara, Hisatsugu 1997. Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kluck, Marlies 2009. “Good neighbors or far friends. Matching and proximity effects in Dutch Right Node Raising,” Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL) 48.
Koppen, Mario, Sio, Joanna, Vos, Mark (eds.) 2002. Proceedings of ConSOLE X. University of Leiden.
Kratzer, Angelika 1993. “The event argument and the semantics of voice,” manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kučerová, Ivona 2007. “The syntax of givenness,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Kuno, Susumo 1976. “Gapping: a functional analysis,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 300–18.
Kusumoto, Kiyomi (ed.) 1997. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the North East Lingustics Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Kusumoto, Kiyomi and Villalta, Elisabeth (eds.) 2000. UMOP 23: Issues in Semantics and its Interface. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Laenzlinger, Christopher 2005. “French adjective ordering: perspectives on DP internal movement types,” Lingua 115: 645–89.
Landau, Idan 1999. “Possessor raising and the structure of VP,” Lingua 107: 1–37.
Lappin, Shalom and Benmamoun, Elabbas (eds.) 1999. Fragments: Studies in Ellipsis and Gapping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larson, Bradley 2007. “In- or ex-situ: a diagnosis of right node raising,” undergraduate honors thesis, University of Washington.
Larson, Richard 1987. “Missing prepositions and the analysis of English free relative clauses,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 239–66.
Larson, Richard 1988. “On the double object construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91.
Larson, Richard 1990. “Double objects revisited: reply to Jackendoff,” Linguistic Inquiry 21: 589–632.
Larson, Richard 1998. “Free relative clauses and missing P's: reply to Grosu,” manuscript, Stony Brook University.
Lasnik, Howard 2000. Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
Lasnik, Howard and Kuppin, Joseph J. 1977. “A restrictive theory of transformational grammar,” Theoretical Linguistics 4: 173–96.
Lavine, James E., Franks, Steven, Tasseva-Kurktchieva, Mila, Filip, Hana (eds.) 2006. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 14: The Princeton Meeting 2005. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Lee, Ju-Eun 2004. “Ditransitive structures and the (anti-)locality principle,” PhD thesis, Harvard University.
Lee, Xah 2007. “Introduction to symmetry,” manuscript, downloadable at http://xahlee.org/Wallpaper_dir/symmetry.html.
Lee-Shoenfeld, Vera 2006. “German possessor datives: raised and affected,” The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9: 101–142.
Lefebvre, Claire (ed.) 1991. Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative, and Cognitive Approaches. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Legate, Julie 2001. “The configuration nature of a non-configurational language,” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 63–99.
Legate, Julie 2002. “Warlpiri: theoretical implications,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Legate, Julie 2003. “Some interface properties of the phase,” Linguistic Inquiry 34: 506–16.
Lema, José and Rivero, Maria-Luisa 1989. “Long Head Movement: ECP vs. HMC,” in Carter, Dechaineet al. (eds.), pp. 333–47.
Levine, Robert D. 1985. “Right node (non-)raising,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 492–97.
Lin, Vivian 2000. “Determiner sharing,” in Billerey, and Lillehaugen, (eds.), pp. 274–87.
Lin, Vivian 2001. “A way to undo A-movement,” in Megerdoomian, and Bar-el, (eds.), pp. 358–71. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Lin, Vivian 2002. “Coordination and sharing at the interfaces,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Lipták, Aniko (ed.) 2009. Correlatives Crosslinguistically. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Lobeck, Anne 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
López, Luis and Winkler, Susanne 2003. “Variation at the syntax–semantics interface,” in Schwabe, and Winkler, (eds.), pp. 227–48.
Malchukov, Andrej 2004. “Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrast marking,” Journal of Semantics 21: 177–98.
Maling, Joan 1972. “On gapping and the order of constituents,” Linguistic Inquiry 3: 101–08.
Marantz, Alec 1993. “Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions,” in Mchombo, (ed.), pp. 113–50.
Marantz, Alec 1997. “No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon,” in Dimitriadis, Siegel, Surek-Clark, and Williams, (eds.), pp. 201–25.
Marantz, Alec 2001. “Words.” Paper presented at WCCFL 20, USC, February 2001.
Marantz, Alec To appear. “Phases and words”.
Martin, Roger and Uriagereka, Juan 2000. “Introduction: Some possible foundations of the minimalist program,” in Martin, Michaels and Uriagereka, (eds.), pp. 1–29.
Martin, Roger, Michaels, David and Uriagereka, Juan (eds.) 2000. Step by Step: Essays in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marušič, Franc 2009. “Non-simultaneous Spell-Out in the clausal and nominal domain,” in Grohmann, (ed.) pp. 151–81.
Marušič, Franc and Žaucer, Rok 2006. “On the intensional feel-like construction in Slovenian,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 1093–1159.
McCawley, James 1982. “Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure,” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.
McCawley, James 1988. “The comparative conditional constructions in English, German and Chinese,” Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 176–87.
McCawley, James 1998. The Syntactic Phenomena of English (2nd edn). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
McCloskey, James 1986. “Right node raising and preposition stranding,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 183–86.
McGinnis, Martha 1998. “Locality in A-movement,” PhD thesis, MIT.
McGinnis, Martha 2000. “Phases and the syntax of applicatives,” in Kim, and Strauss, (eds.), pp. 333–49.
McGinnis, Martha 2001Variation in the phase structure of applicatives,” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 105–46.
McGinnis, Martha 2002. “Object asymmetries in a phase theory of syntax,” in Jensen, and Herk, (eds.), pp. 245–56.
McGinnis, Martha 2004. “Lethal ambiguity,” Linguistic Inquiry 35: 47–95.
McGinnis, Martha 2005. “UTAH at merge: evidence from multiple applicatives,” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49: 183–200.
McGinnis, Martha 2008. “Applicatives,” Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 1225–45.
Mchombo, Sam A. (ed.) 1993. Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar 1. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
McNally, Louise and Kennedy, Chris (eds.) 2008. Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McShane, Marjorie 2005. A Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Megerdoomian, Karine and Bar-el, Leora Anne (eds.) 2001. Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Mikkelsen, Line 2005. Copular Clauses: Specification, Predication and Equation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Miyagawa, Shigeru 1995. “Scrambling as an obligatory movement, Proceedings of the Nanzan Conference on Japanese Linguistics and Language Teaching, Nanzan University, Nagoya, Japan.
Miyagawa, Shigeru 1997. “Against optional scrambling,” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 1–26.
Miyagawa, Shigeru and Tsujioka, Takae 2004. “Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 1–38.
Moltmann, Friederike 1992a. “Coordination and comparatives,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Moltmann, Friederike 1992b. “On the interpretation of three-dimensional syntactic trees,” in Barker, C. and Dowty, D. (eds.) Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univesity, Department of Linguistics, Proceedings of SALT II.
Moore, John, and Perlmutter, David 2000. “What does it take to be a dative subject?,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416.
Moro, Andrea 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moro, Andrea 2007. “Some notes on unstable structures,” manuscript, Università San Raffaele di Milano.
Moulton, Keir and Wolf, Matthew (eds.) 2004. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Muadz, Husni 1991. “Coordinate structures: a planar representation,” PhD thesis, University of Arizona.
Müller, Stefan (ed.) 2006. The Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Munn, Alan 1993. “Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures,” PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
Munn, Alan 1999. “On the identity requirement of ATB movement,” Natural Language Semantics 7: 421–25.
Munn, Alan 2001. “Explaining parasitic gap restrictions,” in Culicover, and Postal, (eds.), pp. 369–92.
Muysken, Pieter, and Veenstra, Tonjes 2006. “Serial verbs,” in Everaert, and Riemsdijk, (eds.), pp. 234–70.
Neijt, Anneke 1979. Gapping: A Contribution to Sentence Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Newport, Elissa, Hauser, Marc, Spaepen, Geertrui and Aslin, Richard 2004. “Learning at a distance: II. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in a non-human primate,” Cognitive Psychology 49: 85–117.
Ngonyani, Deogratias S. 1996. “The morphosyntax of applicatives,” PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
Nunes, Jairo 1999. “Linearization of chains and phonetic realization of chain links in the minimalist program,” PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
Nunes, Jairo 2001. “Sideward movement,” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 303–44.
Nunes, Jairo 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Oehrle, Richard T. 1976. “The grammatical status of the English dative alternation,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Oehrle, Richard T. 1987. “Boolean properties in the analysis of gapping,” Syntax and Semantics 20: 201–40.
Ormazabal, Javier and Romero, Juan. 2007. “The derivation of dative alternation,” Paper presented at the Workshop on Argument Structure, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz.
Otsu, Yukio. (ed.) 2006. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing Company.
Partee, Barbara H., ter Meulen, Alice & Wall, Robert E. 1993. Mathematical Methods in Linguistics, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pereltsvaig, Asya 2008. Copular Sentences in Russian: A Theory of Intra-Clausal Relations. New York: Springer.
Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa and Roberge, Yves (eds.) 2003. Romance Linguistics: Theory and Acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pesetsky, David 1982. “Paths and categories,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Pesetsky, David 1995. Zero Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David 2001. Phrasal Movement and its Kin. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther 2006. “Probes, goals and syntactic categories,” in Otsu, (eds.), pp. 25–60.
Peters, Stanley and Richie, Robert 1973. “On the generative power of transformational grammars,” Information Sciences 6: 49–83.
Postal, Paul 1993. “Parasitic gaps, an across-the-board phenomenon,” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 735–54.
Postal, Paul 1998. Three Investigations of Extraction. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
Postal, Paul 2004. Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Progovac, Ljiljana 1998a. “Structure for coordination (part I)GLOT International 3. 7:3–6.
Progovac, Ljiljana 1998b. “Structure for coordination (part II),” GLOT International 3. 8:3–9.
Progovac, Ljiljana 1999. “Events and economy of coordination,” Syntax 2: 141–59.
Pylkkänen, Liina 2002. “Introducing arguments,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Pylkkänen, Liina 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rackowski, Andrea and Richards, Norvin 2005. “Phase edge and extraction: a Tagalog case study,” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 565–99.
Repp, Sophie 2008. Negation in Gapping, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, Marc 2004. “Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic. A case study in symmetrical syntax,” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Richards, Norvin 2001. Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Riemsdijk, Henk 1998. “Trees and scions – science and trees,” manuscript, Fest-Web-Page for Noam Chomsky.
Riemsdijk, Henk 2000. “Free relatives inside out: transparent free relatives as grafts,” Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English.
Riemsdijk, Henk 2006a. “Free relatives,” in Everaert, and Riemsdijk, (eds.), pp. 338–82.
Riemsdijk, Henk 2006b. “Grafts follow from Merge,” in Frascarelli, (ed.), pp. 17–44.
Rivero, Maria Luisa 1991. “Long head movement and negation: Serbo-Croatian vs. Slovak and Czech,” The Linguistic Review 8: 319–51.
Rivero, Maria Luisa 1994. “Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 63–120.
Rivero, Maria Luisa 2009. “Intensionality, high applicatives, and aspect: Involuntary state constructions in Bulgarian and Slovenian,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 151–96.
Rizzi, Luigi 1986. “On chain formation,” in Borer, (ed.), pp. 65–96.
Rizzi, Luigi 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rooryck, Johan 2000. Configurations of Sentential Complementation: Perspectives from Romance Languages. London: Routledge.
Ross, John R. 1967. “Constraints on variables in syntax,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Ross, John R. 1970. “Gapping and the order of constituents,” in Bierwisch, and Heidolph, (eds.), pp. 249–59.
Rudin, Catherine 2006. “Multiple wh relatives in Slavic,” in Compton, Goledzinowska and Savchenko, (eds.), pp. 299–323.
Rutkowski, Paweł and Maliszewska, Hanna 2007. “On prepositional phrases inside numeral phrases in Polish,” Lingua 117: 784–813.
Sabbagh, Joseph 2007. “Ordering and linearizing rightward movement,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 349–401.
Saffran, Jenny, Hauser, Marc, Seibel, Rebecca, Kapfhamer, Joshua, Tsao, Fritz and Cushman, Fiery 2008. “Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarin monkeys,” Cognition 107: 479–500.
Sag, Ivan A. 1976. “Deletion and logical form,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Sampson, Geoffrey 1975. “The single mother condition,” Journal of Linguistics 11: 1–11.
Sarkar, Anoop and Joshi, Aravind 1996. “Coordination in Tree Adjoining Grammars: formalization and implementation,” in Tsujii, (ed.), pp. 610–15.
Schelfhout, Carla, Coppen, Peter-Arno and Oostdijk, Nelleke 2004. “Transparent free relatives,” in Blaho, Vicente and Vos, (eds.), pp. 81–90.
Schwabe, Kerstin and Winkler, Susanne (eds.) 2003. The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Scott, Gary-John 2002. “Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases,” in Cinque, (ed.), pp. 91–116.
Scott, Tanya 2010. “Spurious coordination in Russian multiple WH,” Paper presented at the 2010 LSA Annual Meeting, Baltimore.
Seely, T. Daniel 2006. “Merge, derivational c-command, and subcategorization in a label- free syntax,” in Boeckx, (ed.), pp. 182–217.
Shahin, Kimary N., Blake, Susan and Kim, Eun-Sook (eds.) 1999. Proceedings of the Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Siegel, Muffy 1984. “Gapping and interpretation,” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 523–30.
Siewierska, Anna and Hollmann, W. 2007. “Ditransitive clauses in English with special reference to Lancashire dialect,” in Hannay, and Steen, (eds.), pp. 83–102.
Sjoblom, Todd 1980. “Coordination,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Soschen, Alona 2005. “Derivation by phase: Russian applicatives,” Proceedings of the 2005 Canadian Linguistic Association Annual Conference.
Sportiche, Dominique 1997. “Reconstruction and constituent structure,” manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
Sproat, Richard and Shih, Chilin 1991. “The cross-linguistic distribution of adjective ordering restrictions,” in Georgopolous, and Ishihara, (eds.), pp. 565–93.
Srivastav, Veneeta 1991. “The syntax and semantics of correlatives,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 637–86.
Stepanov, Arthur and Stateva, Penka 2009. “When QR disobeys superiority,” Linguistic Inquiry 40: 176–85.
Svenonius, Peter 2005. “Extending the Extension Condition to discontinuous idioms,” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5: 227–63.
Svenonius, Peter (ed.) 2002. Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Svenonius, Peter 2008 “The position of adjectives and other phrasal modifiers in the decomposition of DP,” in McNally, and Kennedy, (eds.), pp. 16–42.
Swan, Oscar 2002. A Grammar of Contemporary Polish. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.
Szabolcsi, Anna 1994. “The noun phrase,” in Kiefer, Anderson and Kiss, (eds.), pp. 179–275.
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald 2002. “The que/qui alternation and the distribution of expletives,” in Svenonius, (ed.), pp. 29–42.
Taylor, Heather 2006. “Out on good syntactic behavior,” generals paper. University of Maryland, College Park.
Tomaszewicz, Barbara 2010. “Against spurious coordination in multiple wh-questions,” Paper presented at WCCFL 20, University of Southern California.
Torrego, Esther 1996. “Experiencers and raising verbs,” in Freidin, (ed.), pp. 101–20.
Travis, Lisa 1984. “Parameters and effects of word order variation,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Tsujii, J. (ed.) 1996. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 2. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ura, Hiroyuki 1996. “Multiple feature checking: a theory of grammatical function splitting,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger 1974. “French relative clauses,” PhD thesis, MIT.
Vitale, Anthony 1981. Swahili Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Vries, Mark 2005a. “Merge: properties and boundary conditions,” Linguistics in the Netherlands 22: 219–30.
Vries, Mark 2005b. “Coordination and syntactic hierarchy,” Studia Linguistica 59: 83–105.
Vries, Mark 2008. “Asymmetric merge and parataxis,” Canadian Journal of Linguistics 53: 355–85.
Vries, Mark 2009. “On multidominance and linearization,” Biolinguistics 3: 344–403.
Webelhuth, Gert (ed.) 1994. Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Wexler, Kenneth and Culicover, Peter W 1980. Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Whitman, Neal 2002. “Category neutrality: A type-logical investigation,” PhD thesis, Ohio State University.
Whitman, Neal 2004. “Semantics and pragmatics of English verbal dependent coordination,” Language 80: 403–34.
Wiland, Bartosz 2009. “Paths to remnant movement: a single solution to three problems in the Polish OVS syntax,” Paper presented at NELS 40, MIT.
Wilder, Chris 1999a. “Transparent free relatives,” in Shahin, Blake, and Kim, (eds.), pp. 685–99.
Wilder, Chris 1999b “Right node raising and the LCA,” in Bird, Carnie, Haugen, and Norquest, (eds.), pp. 586–98.
Wilder, Chris 2008. “Shared constituents and linearization,” in Johnson, (ed.), pp. 229–58.
Williams, Edwin 1978. “Across-the-board rule application,” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.
Williams, Edwin 1990. “The ATB theory of parasitic gaps,” The Linguistic Review 6: 265–79.
Willim, Ewa 1989. On Word Order: A Government and Binding Study of English and Polish. Kraków: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Woolford, Ellen 1993. “Symmetric and asymmetric passives,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 679–728.
Woolford, Ellen 2006. “Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure,” Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.
Zabrocki, Tadeusz 1981. Lexical Rules of Semantic Interpretation. Control and NP Movement in English and Polish. Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Zhang, Niina 2007. “Derivations of two paired dependency constructions,” Lingua 117: 2134–58.
Zoerner, Edward 1995. “Coordination: the syntax of &P,” PhD thesis, University of California, Irvine.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.