Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:37:45.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Diagnosing memorial reconstruction: the Poem, the Play, the Text

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Laurie E. Maguire
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access

Summary

Foul! No repetitions…

Foul! No synonyms!…

Foul! No non sequiturs.

Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

I am not so much concerned with discrediting this method as with trying to discover whether there may not be sound ways of using it.

H. T. Price

THE POEM

With suspect texts containing between 757 and 3,416 lines of dialogue (the totals for A Yorkshire Tragedy and Q Richard 3, respectively), the Poem provides our largest catchment area of material for evaluation. This verbal matter can be affected by a number of agents: revising or indecisive authors, playbook annotators, actors, scribes, and compositors. The amorphous category of repetitions, for instance, which critics cite as strong evidence of memorial reconstruction, is easily attributable to all five of the above. How, then, do we distinguish a memorial repetition from any other?

REPETITION

External Echoes/Recollection

Harry Hoppe claimed to have identified twenty-four ‘true inter-play borrowings’ (also known as ‘echoes’, ‘parallels’, and ‘external recollections’) in Q1 Romeo and Juliet. All of his ‘borrowings’ come from Shakespearean texts, twenty of them from plays written in the same period as Romeo and Juliet (Richard 2, The Taming of the Shrew, 3 Henry 6, Titus Andronicus, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, and Richard 3); thus, the possibility of authorial self-borrowing is strong, and undermines any value Hoppe's parallels may have.

His parallels are of negligible value anyway; they contain proverbial phrases (e.g. The Merry Wives of Windsor: ‘we burn daylight’), or common sentiments (Richard 2: ‘And then be gone’) or refer to parallel situations (The Two Gentlemen of Verona: ‘a ladder quaintly made of cords’).

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespearean Suspect Texts
The 'Bad' Quartos and their Contexts
, pp. 159 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×