Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T13:17:05.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2017

Nicholas Luke
Nicholas Luke
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespearean Arrivals
The Birth of Character
 , pp. 242 - 248
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Agamben, G., The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Dailey, Patricia. Trans. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , Poetics, in Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M., eds., Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford: Clarendon, 1972.Google Scholar
Bacon, F., The Major Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Being and Event. Feltham, Oliver. Trans. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Deleuze: The Clamor of Being. Burchill, Louise. Trans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. Hallward, Peter. Trans. London: Verso, 2001.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., In Praise of Love. Bush, Peter. Trans. London: Serpent’s Tail, 2012.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Logic of Worlds. Toscano, Alberto. Trans. London: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Saint Paul: The Foundation for Universalism. Brassie, Ray. Trans. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., The Century. Toscano, Alberto. Trans. Cambridge: Polity, 2007.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Theory of the Subject. Bosteels, Bruno. Trans. London: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar
Belsey, C., ‘The Name of the Rose in Romeo and Juliet’, in White, , 47–67.Google Scholar
Belsey, C., The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama. London: Routledge, 1985.Google Scholar
Benjamin, B., Illuminations. Zohn, Harry. Trans. London: Fontana, 1992.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W., The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Osborne, John. Trans. London: New Left Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Berger Jr, H., Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bergson, H., Creative Evolution. Mitchell, Arthur. Trans. London: Macmillan, 1911.Google Scholar
Bergson, H., Matter and Memory. Paul, Nancy Margaret. Trans. New York: Zone, 1988.Google Scholar
Bergson, H., Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. Pogson, F. L.. Trans. London: George Allen, 1912.Google Scholar
Blanchot, M., The Writing of Disaster. Smock, Ann. Trans. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bloom, H., Hamlet: Poem Unlimited. New York: Riverhead, 2003.Google Scholar
Bloom, H., Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. London: Fourth Estate, 1999.Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C., Oxford Lectures on Poetry. London: Macmillan, 1926.Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C., Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Second Edition. Macmillan: London, 1932.Google Scholar
Broke, A., Romeus and Iuliet. Amsterdam: Da Capo, 1969.Google Scholar
Cavell, S., Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Updated Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Cefalu, P., Tragic Cognition in Shakespeare’s Othello: Beyond the Neural Sublime. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Charney, M., Shakespeare on Love and Lust. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Cinthio, G., Hecatommithi. Taylor, J. E.. Trans. http://shakespeare-navigators.com/othello/Osource.html. Visited 26 April 2017.Google Scholar
Cixous, H., ‘The Laugh of the Medusa’, in Leitch, V. B., ed., The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York: Norton, 2010, 1942–59.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T., Coleridge’s Criticism of Shakespeare. Foakes, R. A.. Ed. London: Athlone, 1989.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T., Coleridge on Shakespeare. Hawkes, T.. Ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1959.Google Scholar
Davis, L., ‘“Death-Marked Love”: Desire and Presence in Romeo and Juliet’, Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996), 57–67.Google Scholar
Davis, P., Shakespeare Thinking. London: Continuum, 2007.Google Scholar
Davis, P., Sudden Shakespeare: The Shaping of Shakespeare’s Creative Thought. London: Athlone, 1996.Google Scholar
De Grazia, M., Hamlet Without Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Hurley, Robert, Seem, M., and Lane, H. R.. Trans. London: Athlone, 1984.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Acts of Literature. Attridge, Derek. Ed. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Politics of Friendship. Collins, George. Trans. London: Verso, 1997.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Kamuf, Peggy. Trans. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., ‘Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences’, in Rice, P. and Waugh, P., eds., Modern Literary Theory: A Reader. London: Edward Arnold, 1989, 149–65.Google Scholar
Dollimore, J., Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries. Third Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T., The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T., William Shakespeare. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
Elam, K., The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. Second Edition. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S., On Poetry and Poets. London: Faber, 1957.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S., Selected Essays. London: Faber, 1932.Google Scholar
Empson, W., Essays on Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Empson, W., Some Versions of Pastoral. Third Impression. London: Chatto, 1968.Google Scholar
Fernie, E., ed., Spiritual Shakespeares. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Fernie, E., ed., The Demonic: Literature and Experience. London: Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernie, E., ed., ‘The Last Act: Presentism, Spirituality and the Politics of Hamlet’, in Fernie, , Spiritual, 186–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foakes, R. A., ‘French Leave, or Lear and the King of France’, Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996), 217–23.Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A., ‘Hamlet versus Lear: Cultural Politics and Shakespeare’s Art’, in Ioppolo, G., ed., A Routledge Literary Sourcebook on William Shakespeare’s King Lear. London: Routledge, 2003, 59–60.Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A., ‘The Reshaping of King Lear’, in Kahan, , 104–123.Google Scholar
Gallagher, L., ‘Waiting for Gobbo’, in Fernie, , Spiritual, 73–93.Google Scholar
Jr Garner, S. B., Bodied Spaces: Phenomenology and Performance in Contemporary Drama. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gibbons, B., ed., Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare, Arden. London: Methuen, 1980.Google Scholar
Gibson, A., Beckett and Badiou: The Pathos of Intermittency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gillies, J., ‘The Question of Original Sin in Hamlet’, Shakespeare Quarterly 64.4 (2013), 396–424.Google Scholar
Girard, R., A Theater of Envy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J., ‘Romeo and Juliet’s Open Rs’, in White, , 194–212.Google Scholar
Grady, H., Shakespeare and Impure Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Grady, H., Shakespeare’s Universal Wolf: Studies in Early Modern Reification. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, H., ‘Theory “After Theory”: Christopher Pye’s Reading of Othello’, Shakespeare Quarterly 60.4 (2009), 453–459.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S., Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Gurr, A., and Ichikawa, M., Staging in Shakespeare’s Theatres. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, W., Characters of Shakespear’s Plays and Lectures on The English Poets. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar
Heffernan, J. J., Shakespeare’s Extremes: Wild Man, Monster, Beast. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. In two vols. Knox, T. M.. Trans. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics. Bosanquet, Bernard. Trans. London: Penguin, 1993.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., The Hegel Reader. Houlgate, Stephen. Ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., The Phenomenology of Mind. Baillie, J. B.. Trans. Second Edition. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1961.Google Scholar
Hill, G., Collected Critical Writings. Haynes, Kenneth. Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Holbrook, P., Shakespeare’s Individualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Holinshed, R., Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland. Text of 1587. www.cems.ox.ac.uk/holinshed/. The Holinshed Project, 2008–2010. Visited 26 April 2017.Google Scholar
Holmer, J. O., ‘The Poetics of Paradox: Shakespeare’s Versus Zeffirelli’s Cultures of Violence’, Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996), 163–179.Google Scholar
Holy Bible. King James Version. New Jersey: Thomas Nelson, 1972.Google Scholar
Hutson, L., The Invention of Suspicion: Law and Mimesis in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Jackson, K., and Marotti, A. F., ‘The Turn to Religion in Early Modern English Studies’, Criticism 46 (2004), 167–190.Google Scholar
Jones, E., Scenic Form in Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon, 1971.Google Scholar
Kahan, J., ed., King Lear: New Critical Essays. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Kermode, F., The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S., Fear and Trembling. Hannay, Alastair. Trans. London: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S., Fear and Trembling and The Sickness Unto Death. Lowrie, Walter. Trans. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S., Repetition: An Essay in Experimental Psychology. Lowrie, Walter. Trans. London: Oxford University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S., The Concept of Anxiety: A Simple Psychologically Orienting Deliberation on the Dogmatic Issue of Hereditary Sin. Thomte, Reidar and Anderson, A. B.. Trans. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S., Works of Love. Swenson, David F.. Trans. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Knight, G. W., ‘The Othello Music’, in Wain, , 72–95.Google Scholar
Knowles, R., ‘Carnival and Death in Romeo and Juliet: A Bakhtinian Reading’, Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996), 69–85.Google Scholar
Ko, Y. J., and Shurgot, M. W., eds., Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Kottman, P. A., A Politics of Scene. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kottman, P. A., ‘Defying the Stars: Tragic Love as the Struggle for Freedom in Romeo and Juliet’, Shakespeare Quarterly 63.1 (2012), 1–38.Google Scholar
Kottman, P. A., Tragic Conditions in Shakespeare: Disinheriting the Globe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., Tales of Love. Roudiez, Leon S.. Trans. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Kuzner, J., Shakespeare as a Way of Life: Skeptical Practice and the Politics of Weakness. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kyd, T., The Spanish Tragedy, in Maus, K. E., ed., Four Revenge Tragedies. Oxford: Oxford, University Press, 2008, 1–91.Google Scholar
Latour, B., Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R., ‘Diabolic Intellect and the Noble Hero’, in Wain, , 120–140.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Shakespeare’s Hamlet and the Controversies of Self. Oxford: Clarendon, 2000.Google Scholar
Levao, R., Renaissance Minds and Their Fictions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Levinas, E., Entre Nous: Thinking-of-the-Other. Smith, Michael B. and Harshav, B.. Trans. London: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar
Locke, J., An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: J. M. Dent, 1961.Google Scholar
Lupton, J. R., Thinking with Shakespeare: Essays on Politics and Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Luther, M., Martin Luther’s Basic Theological Writings. Second Edition. Lull, Timothy F.. Ed. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2005.Google Scholar
Maguire, L., ‘Othello, Theatre Boundaries, and Audience Cognition’, in Orlin, L. C., ed., Othello: The State of Play. London: Bloomsbury, 2014, 17–43.Google Scholar
Marion, J., The Crossing of the Visible. Smith, James K. A.. Trans. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Mauss, M., The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Halls, W. D.. Trans. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Meisel, M., How Plays Work: Reading and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M., Essays. In three vols. Florio, John. Trans. London: Dent, 1980.Google Scholar
Nancy, J., A Finite Thinking. Sparks, Simon. Ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Nancy, J., The Ground of the Image. Fort, Jeff. Trans. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., The Birth of Tragedy and The Genealogy of Morals. Golffing, Francis. Trans. New York: Doubleday, 1956.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., Untimely Meditations. R. Hollingdale, J.. Trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Palfrey, S., Poor Tom: Living King Lear. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Palfrey, S., Shakespeare’s Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Palfrey, S. and Stern, T., Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Pater, W., Walter Pater: Three Major Texts. Buckler, William E.. Ed. New York: New York University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Pechter, E., ‘Character Criticism, the Cognitive Turn, and the Problem of Shakespeare Studies’, Shakespeare Studies 42 (2014), 196–228.Google Scholar
Petrarch, , Petrarch’s Lyric Poems: The Rime Sparse and Other Lyrics. Durling, Robert M.. Ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Ponech, T., ‘The Reality of Fictive Cinematic Characters’, in Yachnin, and Slights, , 41–61.Google Scholar
Potter, N., Othello. London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
Pye, C., ‘“To throw out our eyes for brave Othello”: Shakespeare and Aesthetic Ideology’, Shakespeare Quarterly 60.4 (2009), 425–447.Google Scholar
Reynolds, B., Transversal Enterprises in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar
Jr Roche, T. P., ‘“Nothing Almost Sees Miracles”: Tragic Knowledge in King Lear’, in Halio, J. L., ed., Critical Essays on Shakespeare’s King Lear. New York: G. K. Hall, 1996, 149–169.Google Scholar
Ruda, F., ‘Badiou with Hegel: Preliminary Remarks on A(ny) Contemporary Reading of Hegel’, in Vernon, and Calcagno, , 105–121.Google Scholar
Ryan, M., Literary Theory: A Practical Introduction. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 1999.Google Scholar
Ryan, K., ‘The Murdering Word’, in White, , 116–128.Google Scholar
Sawday, J., Engines of the Imagination: Renaissance Culture and the Rise of the Machine. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W., The Norton Shakespeare. Greenblatt, S. et al. Eds. New York: Norton, 1997.Google Scholar
Shaw, P., The Sublime. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Shoaf, R. A., Lucretius and Shakespeare on the Nature of Things. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2014.Google Scholar
Smith, S., ‘Love, Pity, and Deception in Othello’, Papers on Language and Literature, 44.1 (2008), 3–51.Google Scholar
Sidney, P., Astrophil and Stella, in Abrams, M. H. et al., eds., The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Seventh Edition. Vol. 1. New York: Norton, 2000.Google Scholar
Sinfield, A., ‘From Bradley to Cultural Materialism’, Shakespeare Studies 34 (2006), 25–34.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J., Montaigne in Motion. Goldhammer, Arthur. Trans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Snyder, S., ‘Ideology and the Feud in Romeo and Juliet’, Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996), 87–96.Google Scholar
States, B. O., Great Reckonings in Little Rooms: On the Phenomenology of Theater. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar
States, B. O., Hamlet and the Concept of Character. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Tanner, T., Prefaces to Shakespeare. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 2010.Google Scholar
Tate, N., The History of King Lear. Black, James. Ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1976.Google Scholar
Thomasson, A., Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Toscano, A., ‘Taming the Furies: Badiou and Hegel on The Eumenides’, in Vernon, and Calcagno, , 193–205.Google Scholar
Tribble, E., ‘Distributing Cognition in the Globe’, Shakespeare Quarterly 56.2 (2005), 135–155.Google Scholar
Tribble, E. B., Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Vernon, J., ‘Badiou and Hegel on Love and the Family’, in Vernon, and Calcagno, , 155–176.Google Scholar
Vernon, J., and Calcagno, A., eds., Badiou and Hegel: Infinity, Dialectics, Subjectivity. Lanham: Lexington, 2015.Google Scholar
Wain, J., ed., Othello: A Casebook. Second Edition. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1994.Google Scholar
Watts, I., ‘Alas! And Did My Savious Bleed?’ Hymns and Spiritual Songs, 1707–9. www.hymntime.com/tch/htm/a/l/a/alasand.htm. Visited on 18 April 2017.Google Scholar
Weimann, R., ‘Mimesis in Hamlet’, in Parker, Patricia and Hartman, G., eds., Shakespeare and the Question of Theory. New York: Routledge, 1990, 275–291.Google Scholar
Welsford, E., ‘The Fool in King Lear’, in Kermode, F., ed., King Lear: A Casebook. London: Macmillan, 1969, 137–149.Google Scholar
White, R. S., ed., Romeo and Juliet, William Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N., Adventures of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N., Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Witmore, M., Culture of Accidents: Unexpected Knowledges in Early Modern England. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Witmore, M., Shakespearean Metaphysics. London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
Yachnin, P. and Selkirk, M. W., ‘Metatheater and the Performance of Character in The Winter’s Tale’, in Yachnin, and Slights, , 139–157.Google Scholar
Yachnin, P. and Slights, J., eds., Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Young, R. V., ‘Hope and Despair in King Lear: The Gospel and The Crisis of Natural Law’, in Kahan, , 253–277.Google Scholar
Žižek, S., In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso, 2008.Google Scholar
Žižek, S., On Belief. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Žižek, S., The Fragile Absolute or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
Žižek, S., The Metastases of Enjoyment: Six Essays on Woman and Causality. London: Verso, 1994.Google Scholar
Žižek, S., The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso, 1989.Google Scholar
Žižek, S., The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso, 1999.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Nicholas Luke, University of Queensland
  • Book: Shakespearean Arrivals
  • Online publication: 21 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108380881.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Nicholas Luke, University of Queensland
  • Book: Shakespearean Arrivals
  • Online publication: 21 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108380881.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Nicholas Luke, University of Queensland
  • Book: Shakespearean Arrivals
  • Online publication: 21 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108380881.009
Available formats
×