Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T14:30:14.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Sex ratios in primate groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Joan B. Silk
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Gillian R. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Peter M. Kappeler
Affiliation:
Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany
Carel P. van Schaik
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

I formerly thought that when a tendency to produce the two sexes in equal numbers was advantageous to the species, it would follow from natural selection, but I now see the whole problem is so intricate that it is safer to leave its solution for the future.

Charles Darwin, 1871

Introduction

Sexual selection is an important evolutionary force in mammalian species because of one simple fact – males are a glut on the market. From the females' point of view, there are more males than needed to meet their reproductive requirements. And from the males' point of view, there are not nearly enough females to go around to satisfy their reproductive potential. The relative abundance of males generates strong intrasexual competition among them.

The goals of this chapter are to explore the selective factors that influence the evolution of birth sex ratios, and to weigh the empirical evidence that primate females facultatively manipulate birth sex ratios to enhance their own fitness. We will begin by briefly enumerating some of the ways in which adult sex ratios influence the evolution of male and female life histories, morphology and reproductive strategies in primate groups. Then, we will explain how natural selection shapes the evolution of birth sex ratios, and consider the empirical evidence for adaptive manipulation of birth sex ratios in primate groups.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sexual Selection in Primates
New and Comparative Perspectives
, pp. 253 - 265
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, S. A. & Altmann, J. 1995. Preparation and activation: determinants of age at reproductive maturity in male baboons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 36, 397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, J., Hausfater, G. & Altmann, S. A. 1988. Determinants of reproductive success in savannah baboons. In Reproductive Success, ed. T. H. Clutton-Brock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 403–18
Altmann, J., Alberts, S. C., Haines, S. A.et al. 1996. Behavior predicts genetic structure in a wild primate group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93, 5797–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercovitch, F. B. 1993. Dominance rank and reproductive maturation in male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 99, 113–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercovitch, F. B. 2002. Sex-biased parental investment in primates. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 905–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercovitch, F. B., Widdig, A. & Nürnberg, P. 2000. Maternal investment in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): reproductive costs and consequences of raising sons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, C. M. 1988. Maternal condition and offspring sex ratio in a group of free-ranging rhesus monkeys: an 11-year study. American Naturalist, 131, 307–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramblett, C. A., Bramblett, S. S., Bishop, D. & Coelho, A. M. Jr. 1982. Longitudinal stability in adult hierarchies among vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). American Journal of Primatology, 2, 10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. R. 2001. Sex-biased investment in nonhuman primates: can Trivers and Willard's theory be tested?Animal Behaviour, 61, 683–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. R. & Silk, J. B. 2002. Reconsidering the null hypothesis: is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 11252–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M. G. & Taylor, P. D. 1980. Sex ratio under the haystack model. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 86, 83–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapais, B. 1992. The role of alliances in social inheritance of rank among female primates. In Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals, ed. A. H. Harcourt & F. B. M. de Waal. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, pp. 29–59
Charnov, E. L. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 76, 2480–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. B. 1978. Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science, 201, 163–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1986. Sex ratio variation in birds. Ibis, 128, 317–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Albon, S. D. 1982. Parental investment in male and female offspring in mammals. In Current Problems in Sociobiology, ed. King's College Sociobiology Group. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–47
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H. & Rudder, B. 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio, and body weight in primates. Nature, 269, 797–800CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D. & Guinness, F. E. 1984. Maternal dominance, breeding success, and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature, 308, 358–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D. & Guinness, F. E. 1986. Great expectations: maternal dominance, sex ratios, and offspring reproductive success in red deer. Animal Behaviour, 34, 460–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowlishaw, G. & Dunbar, R. I. M. 1991. Dominance rank and mating success in male primates. Animal Behaviour, 41, 1045–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray
Debyser, I. W. J. 1995a. Prosimian juvenile mortality in zoos and primate centers. International Journal of Primatology, 16, 889–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debyser, I. W. J. 1995b. Platyrrhine juvenile mortality in captivity and in the wild. International Journal of Primatology, 16, 909–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debyser, I. W. J. 1995c. Catarrhine juvenile mortality in captivity, under seminatural conditions, and in the wild. International Journal of Primatology, 16, 935–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, J. R., Scheffrahn, W., Trommelen, G. J. J. M. et al. 1992. Male social rank and reproductive success in wild long-tailed macaques. In Paternity in Primates: Genetic Tests and Theories, ed. R. D. Martin, A. F. Dixson & E. J. Wickings. Basel: Karger, pp. 175–91
Dittus, W. P. J. 1998. Birth sex ratios in toque macaques and other mammals: integrating the effects of maternal condition and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 44, 149–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixson, A. F. & Nevison, C. M. 1997. The socioendocrinology of adolescent development in male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Hormones and Behavior, 31, 126–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drews, C. 1996. Contexts and patterns of injuries in free-ranging male baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Behaviour, 133, 443–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fedigan, L. M. & Zohar, S. 1997. Sex differences in mortality of Japanese macaques: twenty-one years of data from the Arashiyama West population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 102, 161–753.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Greenwood, P. J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry, and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1140–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156, 477–88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D. 1975. Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. In Biosocial Anthropology, ed. R. Fox. New York, NY: John Wiley, pp. 133–55
Hamilton, W. D. 1979. Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. In Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, ed. M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 167–220
Harcourt, A. H. 1987. Dominance and fertility among female primates. Journal of Zoology, London, 213, 471–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, A. H., Harvey, P. H., Larson, S. G. & Short, R. V. 1981. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature, 293, 55–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, P. H. & Harcourt, A. H. 1984. Sperm competition, testis size and breeding systems in primates. In Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, ed. R. L. Smith. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 589–600
Hausfater, G., Altmann, J. & Altmann, S. A. 1982. Long-term consistency of dominance relations among female baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Science, 217, 752–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. & Whitten, P. L. 1987. Patterning of sexual activity. In Primate Societies, ed. B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham & T. T. Struhsaker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 370–84
Johnson, C. N. 1988. Dispersal and the sex ratio at birth in primates. Nature, 332, 726–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Launhardt, K., Borries, C., Hardt, C., Epplen, J. T. & Winkler, P. 2001. Paternity analysis of alternative male reproductive routes among the langurs (Semnopithecus entellus) of Ramnagar. Animal Behaviour, 61, 53–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leimar, O. 1996. Life history analysis of the Trivers and Willard sex-ratio problem. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 316–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Meikle, D. B., Tilford, B. L. & Vessey, S. H. 1984. Dominance rank, secondary sex ratio, and reproduction of offspring in polygynous primates. American Naturalist, 124, 173–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitani, J. C., Gros-Louis, J. & Richards, A. 1996b. Sexual dimorphism, the operational sex ratio, and the intensity of male competition in polygynous primates. American Naturalist, 147, 966–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, C. L. & Pereira, M. E. 2000. Group histories and offspring sex ratios in ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, C., Collins, D. A. & Eberly, L. E. 2000. Problems with primate sex ratios. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 355, 1627–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, A. R. 2000. Quasireplication and the contract of error: lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 441–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palombit, R. A. 1994. Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous ape. Animal Behaviour, 47, 721–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palombit, R. A. 2000. Infanticide and the evolution of male–female bonds in animals. In Infanticide by Males and Its Implications, ed. C. P. van Schaik & C. H. Janson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–68
Palombit, R. A., Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. 1997. The adaptive value of ‘friendships’ to female baboons: experimental and observational evidence. Animal Behaviour, 54, 599–614CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, A. & Kuester, J. 1990. Adaptive significance of sex ratio adjustment in semifree-ranging Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) at Salem. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 287–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A., Kuester, J. & Arnemann, J. 1992. Maternal rank affects reproductive success of male barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) – evidence from DNA fingerprinting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30, 337–41Google Scholar
Pusey, A. E. & Packer, C. 1987. Dispersal and philopatry. In Primate Societies, ed. B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham & T. T. Struhsaker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 250–66
Rawlins, R. G. & Kessler, M. J. 1986. Secondary sex ratio variation in the Cayo Santiago macaque population. American Journal of Primatology, 10, 9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhine, R. J. 1994. A twenty-one-year study of maternal dominance and secondary sex ratio in a colony group of stumptail macaques (Macaca arctoides). American Journal of Primatology, 32, 145–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhine, R. J., Norton, G. W., Rogers, J. & Wasser, S. K. 1992. Secondary sex ratio and maternal dominance rank among wild yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. American Journal of Primatology, 27, 261–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorie, R. W. 1999. Effect of timing on artificial insemination on sex ratio. Theriogenology, 52, 1273–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuels, A., Silk, J. B. & Altmann, J. 1987. Continuity and change in dominance relations among female baboons. Animal Behaviour, 35, 785–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J. B. 1983. Local resource competition and facultative adjustment of sex ratio in relation to competitive abilities. American Naturalist, 121, 56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J. B. 1984. Local resource competition and the evolution of male-biased sex ratios. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 108, 203–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silk, J. B. 1987. Social behavior in evolutionary perspective. In Primate Societies, ed. B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham & T. T. Struhsaker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 318–29
Silk, J. B. 1988. Maternal investment in captive bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata). American Naturalist, 132, 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J. B., Clark-Wheatley, C. B., Rodman, P. S. & Samuels, A. 1981. Differential reproductive success and facultative adjustment of sex ratios among captive female bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata). Animal Behaviour, 29, 1106–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J. B., Short, J ., Roberts, J. & Kemnitz, J. 1993. Gestation length in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). International Journal of Primatology, 14, 95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, M. J. A. & Simpson, A. E. 1982. Birth sex ratios and social rank in rhesus monkey mothers. Nature, 300, 440–1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, M. F. & Hrdy, S. B. 1986. Secondary sex ratios by maternal rank, parity, and age in captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). International Journal of Primatology, 7, 289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuts, B. B. 1987. Gender, aggression, and influence. In Primate Societies, ed. B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham & T. T. Struhsaker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 400–12
Soltis, J. & McElreath, R. 2001. Can females gain extra paternal investment by mating with multiple males? A game theoretic approach. American Naturalist, 58, 519–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, V. 2000. The holy wars about infanticide: which side are you on? And why? In Infanticide by Males and Its Implications, ed. C. P. van Schaik & C. H. Janson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–26
Sommer, V. & Reichard, U. 2000. Rethinking monogamy: the gibbon case. In Primate Males: Causes and Consequences of Variation in Group Composition, ed. P. M. Kappeler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–68
Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, ed. B. Campbell. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 136–79
Trivers, R. L. 1985. Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings
Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. 1973. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 90–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uyenoyama, M. & Feldman, M. 1980. Theories of kin and group selection: a population genetics perspective. Theoretical Population Biology, 17, 380–414CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noordwijik, M. A. & Schaik, C. P. 1999. The effects of dominance rank and group size on female lifetime reproductive success in wild long-tailed macaques, Macaca fasicularis. Primates, 40, 105–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordwijik, M. A. & Schaik, C. P. 2001. Career moves: transfer and rank challenge decision by male long-tailed macaques. Behaviour, 138, 359–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaik, C. P. & Visser, J. A. G. M. 1990. Fragile sons or harassed daughters? Sex differences in mortality among juvenile primates. Folia Primatologica, 55, 10–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaik, C. P. & Hrdy, S. B. 1991. Intensity of local resource competition shapes the relationship between maternal rank and sex ratios at birth in cercopithecine primates. American Naturalist, 138, 1555–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Schaik, C. P. & Janson, C. H. (eds.) 2000. Infanticide by Males and Its Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wade, M. J. 1978. A critical review of the models of group selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 53, 101–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasser, S. K. & Norton, G. 1993. Baboons adjust secondary sex ratio in response to predictors of sex-specific offspring survival. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 273–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, K., Mori, A. & Kawai, M. 1992. Characteristic features of the reproduction of Koshima monkeys, Macaca fuscata fuscata: a summary of thirty-four years of observation. Primates, 33, 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S. A. & Sheldon, B. C. 2002. Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science, 295, 1685–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, S. A., Herre, E. A. & Sheldon, B. C. 2000. The benefits of allocating sex. Science, 290, 288–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. C. 1979. On the question of adaptive sex ratio in outcrossed vertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 205, 567–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, D. S. 1977. Structured demes and the evolution of group advantageous traits. American Naturalist, 111, 157–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S. 1980. The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings
Wilson, D. S. & Colwell, R. K. 1981. Evolution of sex ratio in structured demes. Evolution, 35, 882–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×