Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:31:54.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - A Social Psychological Interpretation of the Hermeneutic of Suspicion in Contemporary American Legal Thought

from Part III - Structures of the Legal Contemporary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

By
Duncan Kennedy
Edited by
Justin Desautels-Stein  and
Christopher Tomlins
Justin Desautels-Stein
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Law
Christopher Tomlins
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 365 - 385
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited – Chapter 19

Arnold, Thurman 1937. The Folklore of Capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix 1935. “Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach,” Columbia Law Review 35: 809–49.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1982. “Law as interpretation,” Critical Inquiry 9: 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund 1963. “Certain neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia and homosexuality,” in Freud, Sigmund, Sexuality and the Psychology of Love. Rieff, Philip (ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 1986. “Freedom and constraint in adjudication: a critical phenomenology,” Journal of Legal Education 36: 518–62.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 1997. A Critique of Adjudication. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 2004. “The disenchantment of logically formal legal rationality, or Max Weber's sociology in the genealogy of the contemporary mode of western legal thought,” Hastings Law Journal 55: 1031–76.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 2007. “A left phenomenological alternative to the Hart/Kelsen theory of legal interpretation,” in Kennedy, Duncan, Essays on Adjudication. Boulder, CO: Davies, available at http://www.duncankennedy.net/documents/Photo%20articles/A%20Left%20Phenomenological%20Alternative%20to%20the%20HartKelsen%20Theory%20of%20Legal%20Interpretation.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 2014. “The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought,” Law and Critique 25: 91–139.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mathias 2006. “Who is afraid of the total constitution? Constitutional rights as principles and constitutionalization of private law,” German Law Journal 7: 341–69.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 2013. “Ronald Dworkin: the moral quest,” New York Review of Books 60(18), available at www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/nov/21/ronald-dworkin-moral-quest/?pagination = false. Accessed March 6, 2014.Google Scholar
Peller, Gary 1985. “The metaphysics of American law,” California Law Review 73: 1151–290.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 1972. “A theory of negligence,” The Journal of Legal Studies 1: 1–29.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 1997. “Bad faith: review of Duncan Kennedy, A Critique of Adjudication (Fin De Siecle). New Republic (June 9), pp. 34–7.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 1998. “The problematics of moral and legal theory,” Harvard Law Review 111: 1637–717.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 2008. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Savage, Denis (transl.) New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 2007. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×