Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T13:27:01.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Contentious Politics and Civil Society in Varanasi

from Part I - Political Society and Protest Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jolie M. F. Wood
Affiliation:
Asian University for Women, Bangladesh
Get access

Summary

How do interest groups and associations representing people at different class levels make demands upon the state in India? Do lower-class associations resort to electoral politics more than middle- and upper-class associations? Do they tend to use more confrontational tactics than middle-class associations? Are middle-class associations more cooperative with the state, preferring to ‘operate’ rather than ‘agitate’, as John Harriss finds? Are their demands made in a more orderly, contained fashion? And what do these patterns of engagement with the state tell us about ‘civil society’ in India? Need we make a distinction between the orderly, bourgeois civil society of Western political theory and a more contentious, lower-class ‘political society’?

A study of occupational associations in Varanasi can shed some light on these questions. We examine and compare the means by which associations representing four occupational groups at two different class levels – boatmen and weavers, representing lower-class occupations, and traders and lawyers, representing middle-class occupations – make demands upon the state. First, we find that the associations representing the middle-class occupations were far more contentious in making their demands, carrying out a much higher number of protests and strikes, than associations representing the lower-class occupations. Associations representing the interests of lower-class occupations tended to prefer formal, institutionalized, or more contained means of making demands upon the state. These methods are not only less costly and less risky, but also less efficient and more time-consuming in the long run.

Type
Chapter
Information
Re-framing Democracy and Agency in India
Interrogating Political Society
, pp. 93 - 124
Publisher: Anthem Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×