Book contents
- Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South
- Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South
- 2 The South and Alternative Models of Trade and Investment Regulation
- 3 The Chilean Experience in South-South Investment and Trade Agreements
- 4 Australia and the Asia-Pacific
- 5 India’s Trade and Investment Agreements
- 6 Navigating between Resistance and Conformity with the International Investment Regime
- 7 The New South African Protection of Investment Act
- 8 Experimenting with International Investment Law
- 9 Foreign Investment, Development Strategies, and the New Era in International Economic Law
- Index
- References
5 - India’s Trade and Investment Agreements
Striking a Balance between Investor Protection Rights and Development Concerns
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2017
Book contents
- Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South
- Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South
- 2 The South and Alternative Models of Trade and Investment Regulation
- 3 The Chilean Experience in South-South Investment and Trade Agreements
- 4 Australia and the Asia-Pacific
- 5 India’s Trade and Investment Agreements
- 6 Navigating between Resistance and Conformity with the International Investment Regime
- 7 The New South African Protection of Investment Act
- 8 Experimenting with International Investment Law
- 9 Foreign Investment, Development Strategies, and the New Era in International Economic Law
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abbott, Kennith W. ‘The Many Faces of International Legalization’. American Society of International Law Proceedings 92 (1998).Google Scholar
Aldrich, George. ‘What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property? The Decisions of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal’. American Journal of International Law 88 (1994).Google Scholar
Appleton, Barry. ‘Why it is Time to Stop Talking About an International Investment Arbitration Appellate Body’. American Society International Law Proceedings 107 (2013).Google Scholar
Balasubramanyam, V. N., and Sapsford, David. ‘Does India Need a Lot More FDI?’. Economic and Political Weekly 42 (17) (2007).Google Scholar
Bazrafkan, Azernoosh. ‘The (R)evolution of Indian Model Bilateral Investment Treaty: Escaping Liability without Mitigation of Risks’. Jindal Global Law Review 7(2) (2016).Google Scholar
Bettauer, Ronald J. ‘India and International Arbitration: The Dabhol Experience’. George Washington International Law Review 41 (2009).Google Scholar
Bhatia, Ujal Singh. ‘G-20 – Combining Substance with Solidarity and Leadership’. In Reflections from the Frontline: Developing Country Negotiators in the WTO edited by Mehta, Pradeep S.. CUTS International, 2012.Google Scholar
Brown, Chester. Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian. Principles of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.Google Scholar
Chubb, Kelly. ‘The “State of Necessity” Defense: A Burden Not a Blessing to the International Arbitration System’, Cardozo Journal of Dispute Resolution 14 (2013).Google Scholar
Dhar, Biswajit, Joseph, Reji and James, T. C. ‘India’s Bilateral Investment Agreements: Time to Review’. Economic and Political Weekly Vol. XLVII No. 52 (2012).Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolph and Schreuer, Christoph. Principles of International Investment Law, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Zachary. ‘The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2 (2011).Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary. The International Law of Investment Claims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, Rochelle S. ‘TRIPS and Essential Medicines: Must One Size Fit All? Making the WTO Responsive to Global Health Crisis’. In Incentives for Global Public Health: Patent Law and Access to Essential Medicines edited by Pogge, Thomas, Rimmer, Matthew and Rubenstein, Kim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.Google Scholar
Garg, Saurabh, Tripathy, Ishitha and Roy, Sudhanshu. ‘The Indian Model Bilateral Investment Treaty: Continuity and Change’. In Rethinking Bilateral Investment Treaties: Critical Issues and Policy Choices edited by Singh, Kavaljit and Ilge, Burghard, 69–81. Netherlands: Both Ends, Madhyam & SOMO, 2016.Google Scholar
Gopakumar, K M. ‘Product Patents and Access to Medicine in India: A Critical Review of the Implementation of the TRIPS Regime’. The Law and Development Review 3 (2010): 326–338.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew. ‘Why LDCs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties’. Virginia Journal International Law 38 (1998).Google Scholar
Hannessian, Grant and Duggal, Kabir. ‘The 2015 Indian Model BIT: Is This the Change the World Wishes to See’. ICSID Review (2015).Google Scholar
Harten, Gus Van. ‘TWAIL and the Dabhol Arbitration’. Trade Law and Development 3 (2011).Google Scholar
Herz, John. ‘Expropriation of Foreign Property’. American Journal of International Law 35 (1941).Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard. ‘Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment’. Journal of International Economic Law 8 (2) (2005).Google Scholar
Joseph, Sharmila Mary. ‘Patents versus Patients: The Indian Supreme Court’s Decision in the Novartis Case’. Global Trade and Customs Journal 8 (2014): 239.Google Scholar
Kapczynski, Amy. ‘Harmonization and its Discontents: A Case Study of TRIPS Implementation in India’s Pharmaceutical Sector’. California Law Review 97 (2009): 1571, 1574.Google Scholar
Mehta, Rajesh. ‘Removal of QRs and Impact of India’s Import’. Economic and Political Weekly 35 (19) (2000).Google Scholar
Mohan, C. Raja. ‘Crossing the Rubicon: The Shaping of India’s New Foreign Policy’. Foreign Affairs 83 (5) (2003): 182.Google Scholar
Narlikar, Amrita. ‘India and the World Trade Organization’. In The World Trade Organization: A Very Short Introduction edited by Smith, Steve. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Nedumpara, James. ‘Naming, Shaming and Blaming: Harnessing India’s Legal Capacity in WTO Dispute Settlement’. Trade Law and Development 5(2) (2013).Google Scholar
Nedumpara, James J., and Polanco, Rodrigo. ‘Does India need a Model BIT?’ Jindal Global Law Review 7(2): 117–125.Google Scholar
Papa, Mihaela. ‘Emerging Powers in International Dispute Settlement: From Legal Capacity Building to a Level Playing Field’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 3(3) (2012).Google Scholar
Ranjan, Prabhash. ‘India and Bilateral Investment Treaties – A Changing Landscape’. ICSID Review -– Foreign Investment Law Journal 29(2): 419-450.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea. ‘State-to-State Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Hybrid Theory of Interdependent Rights and Shared Interpretive Authority’. Harvard Journal of International Law 55 (2014).Google Scholar
Roessler, Frieder.‘The Institutional Balance between the Judicial and the Political Organs of the WTO’. In New Directions in International Economic Law edited by Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.Google Scholar
Rossow, Richard M. ‘A Bit Can be a Lot’. In U.S. – India Insight. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2014.Google Scholar
Santos, Alvaro. ‘Carving out Policy Autonomy for Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization: The Experience of Brazil and Mexico’. Virginia Journal of International Law 52 (2012): 551, 573.Google Scholar
Saxena, Prabodh. ‘Pathological Pace of Dispute Settlement in India: Implications of an International Arbitration’. Jindal Journal of Public Policy 1 (1) (2012).Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’. Journal of World Investment and Trade 6 (2005).Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, Nedumpara, James and Sinha, Aseema. ‘Indian Trade Lawyers and the Building of State Trade-Related Legal Capacity’. Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-08 (2014).Google Scholar
Singh, Kavaljit. ‘An Analysis of India’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty’. In Rethinking Bilateral Investment Treaties: Critical Issues and Policy Choices edited by Singh, Kavaljit and Ilge, Burghard. Netherlands: Both Ends, Madhyam & SOMO, 2016.Google Scholar
Sinha, Aseema. Globalizing India: How Global Rules and Markets are Shaping India’s Rise to Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Aseema. When David Meets Goliath: How Global Markets and Rules are Shaping India’s Rise to Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016.Google Scholar
Spears, Suzanne A. ‘The Quest for Policy Space in New Generation of International Investment Agreements’. Journal of International Economic Law 13 (4) (2010).Google Scholar
Trubek, David. Reversal of Fortune? International Economic Governance, Alternative Development Strategies and the Rise of BRICS, accessed on 1 June 2017 https://media.law.wisc.edu/s/c_638/3fwq9/eui_paper_final_june_2012.pdf.Google Scholar
Watal, Jayashree. ‘Intellectual Property Rights in Indian Agriculture’. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations Working Paper No. 44 (1998).Google Scholar
Wolf, Martin. ‘India in the World’. In India’s Economy: Performance and Challenges edited by Acharya, Shankar and Mohan, Rakesh 369, 389. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Yadava, Raag, Yelamanchili, Shiva and Agrawal, Divyanshu. ‘Vodafone and India: A Review of Claims in Investment Arbitration’. National Law School of India University Working Paper Series (2012).Google Scholar