Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: June 2012

13 - The Problem of Deduction


Our main concern is not with the explanation of rational action generally but with the particular cluster of rational activities which are directed toward answering the questions about the way the world is. Engaging in inquiry is of course itself a form of rational behavior and the pragmatic picture implies that such behavior should be explained according to the same belief-desire pattern as the naive, unreflective behavior of dogs and children. But in order to treat the special problems that arise in explaining those actions which explicitly concern the evaluation and modification of the agent's beliefs, we need a more specialized apparatus designed to describe that specific kind of activity. We need to be able to talk about an agent's beliefs about his beliefs, about the form in which his beliefs are expressed, and about the ways in which his beliefs may change in response to his experience.

The concept of acceptance will be a central concept in the account of inquiry developed here. Acceptance, as I shall use this term, is a broader concept than belief; it is a generic propositional attitude concept with such notions as presupposing, presuming, postulating, positing, assuming and supposing as well as believing falling under it. Acceptance is a technical term: claims I make about acceptance are not intended as part of an analysis of a term from common usage. But I do want to claim that this technical term picks out a natural class of propositional attitudes about which one can usefully generalize.

Dretske, Fred I. (1970). “Epistemic Operators,Journal of Philosophy, 67, 1007–1023.
Dretske, Fred I. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
Goodman, Nelson (1947). “The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals,Journal of Philosophy, 44, 113–128. Reprinted in Goodman (1955), 3–27.
Goodman, Nelson (1955). Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press,
Kyburg, Henry F. (1970). “Conjunctivitis,” in Swain, Marshall, ed., Induction, Acceptance and Rational Belief, 55–82, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Lewis, David (1969). Convention. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Lewis, David (1982). “Logic for Equivocators,Nous, 16, 431–441.
Schiffer, Stephen (1972). Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, Robert (1974). “Pragmatic Presuppositions,” in Munitz, Milton and Unger, Peter, eds., Semantics and Philosophy, 197–214. New York: New York University Press.
Stine, Gail (1976). “Skepticism, Relevant Alternatives, and Deductive Closure,Philosophical Studies, 29, 249–261.