Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:29:23.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2018

Alexander Kaufman
Alexander Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rawls's Egalitarianism , pp. 253 - 262
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acs, G., and Loprest, P.. 2004. Leaving Welfare: Employment and Well-Being of Families That Left Welfare in the Post-Entitlement Era. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.Google Scholar
Acs, G., and Loprest, P. 2007. Final Report: TANF Caseload Composition and Leavers Synthesis Report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Acs, G., Loprest, P., and Robert, T.. 2001. Final Synthesis Report of Findings from ASPE's “Leavers” Grants. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Agarwala, B. K. 1986. “In Defence of the Use of Maximin Principle of Choice under Uncertainty in Rawls's Original Position.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 13/2: 250–54.Google Scholar
Alejandro, R. 1988. The Limits of Rawlsian Justice. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Allais, M. 1979. “The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of Postulates and Axioms in the American School,” in Allais, M. and Hagen, Otto, eds., Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 27–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?,” Ethics 109/2: 287–337.Google Scholar
Angner, E. 2004. “Revisiting Rawls: A Theory of Justice in the Light of Levi's Theory of Decision,” Theoria 70/1: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. J. 1989. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare,” Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. J. 1999. “Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity,” Philosophical Studies 93: 77–112.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1973. “Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls's Theory of Justice,” Journal of Philosophy 70: 245–63.Google Scholar
Baier, K. 1989. “Justice and the Aims of Philosophy,” Ethics 99: 771–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, M. J., and Dynarski, S. M.. 2011. “Inequality in Post-Secondary Education,” in Duncan and Murnane, Whither Opportunity, pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
Bane, M. J., and Ellwood, D.. 1994. Welfare Realities: From Rhetoric to Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barnow, B. 1987. “The Impact of CETA Programs on Earnings: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Human Resources 22: 157–93.Google Scholar
Barry, B. 1973. The Liberal Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, B. 1989. Theories of Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bassi, L. J., and Ashenfelter, O.. 1986. “The Effect of Direct Job Creation and Training Programs on Low-Skilled Workers,” in Danziger and Weinberg, Fighting Poverty, pp. 133–51.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 1994. Game Theory and the Social Contract: Vol. I. Playing Fair. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Blank, R. M. 2002. “Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States,” Journal of Economic Literature 40/4: 1105–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, R. M. 2007. “Improving the Safety Net for Single Mothers Who Face Serious Barriers to Work,” The Future of Children 17/2: 183–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blinder, A. S. 1987. Hard Heads, Soft Hearts. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Blocker, H. G., and Smith, E. H. (eds.). 1980. John Rawls’ Theory of Social Justice: An Introduction. Athens, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Bouchey, H., and Weller, C. E.. 2005. “What the Numbers Tell Us,” in Lardner and Smith, Inequality Matters, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
Brauner, S., and Loprest, P.. 1999. Where Are They Now? What States’ Studies of People Who Left Welfare Tell Us, New Federalism Series A, No. A-32, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. 1980. “A Critical Introduction to Rawls’ Theory of Justice,” in Blocker and Smith, John Rawls’ Theory of Social Justice: An Introduction, pp. 5–41.Google Scholar
Cancian, M., and Danziger, S. (eds.). 2009. Changing Poverty, Changing Policies. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Cancian, M., et al. 2000. Before and after TANF: The Economic Well-Being of Women Leaving Welfare. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. 1996. Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Charney, E. 1998. “Political Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and the Public Sphere,” American Political Science Review 92/1 (March): 97–110.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice,” Ethics 99/4: 906–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2011. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice and Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1989. “Democratic Equality,” Ethics 99/4: 736–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. 1993. “Moral Puralism and Political Consensus,” in Copp, , Hampton, , and Roemer, , The Idea of Democracy, pp. 270–91.Google Scholar
Copp, D., Hampton, J., and Roemer, J., eds. 1993. The Idea of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corrado, G. 1980. “Rawls, Games, and Economic Theory,” in Blocker, and Smith, , John Rawls’ Theory of Justice: An Introduction, pp. 71–109.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. 1996. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, S. H., and Weinberg, D. H. (eds.). 1986. Fighting Poverty: What Works and What Doesn't. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Doppelt, G. 1989. “Is Rawls's Kantian Liberalism Coherent and Defensible?” Ethics 99: 811–51.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. J., and Murnane, R. J (eds.). 2011. Whither Opportunity: Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children's Life Chances. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Economic Mobility Project of the Pew Charitable Trusts. 2011. “Does America Promote Mobility as Well as Other Nations?,” http://economicmobility.org/assets/pdfs/CRITA_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Ellsberg, D. 1961. “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, D. 1998. “The Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth,” Ethics 108: 252–75.Google Scholar
Freeman, S. 1994. “Political Liberalism and the Possibility of a Just Democratic Constitution,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 69: 619–68.Google Scholar
Freeman, S. 2003. “Introduction: John Rawls – An Overview,” in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
Freeman, S. 2007. Rawls. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlander, D., Hoerz, G., Long, D., and Quint, J.. 1985. Maryland: Final Report of the Employment Initiatives Evaluation. New York: Manpower Development Research Corporation.Google Scholar
Galston, W. A. 1989. “Pluralism and Social Unity,” Ethics 99: 711–26.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. 1974. “Justice and Natural Endowment: Towards a Critique of Rawls's Ideological Framework,” Social Theory and Practice 3: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, H., and Schott, L.. 2000. A Compliance Oriented Approach to Sanctions in State and County TANF Programs. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.Google Scholar
Goldman, B., Friedlander, D., and Long, D.. 1986. California: Final Report on the San Diego Job Search and Work Experience Demonstration. New York, NY: Manpower Development Research Corporation.Google Scholar
Goldman, H. S. 1980. “Rawls and Utilitarianism,” in Blocker, and Smith, , John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, pp. 346–94.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, P., and Spolaore, E.. 2002. “On the Evaluation of Economic Mobility,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 191–208.Google Scholar
Gueron, J., and Pauly, E.. 1991. From Welfare to Work. New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. 1980. Liberal Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1995. “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism,” Journal of Philosophy 92 (March): 109–31.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. 1989. “Should Political Philosophy Be Done without Metaphysics?,” Ethics 99: 791–815.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. 1994. “The Common Faith of Liberalism,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75: 186–216.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 1988. Morality within the Limits of Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1989. Essays on Political Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1976. “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of Rawls's Theory,” in Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior and Scientific Explanation. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel, pp. 37–63.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M., and McPherson, M. S.. 1996. Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, B. 1989. “Justification and Objectivity: Comments on Rawls and Allison,” in Forster, Eckhardt (ed.), Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 131–44.Google Scholar
Hill, T. E. 1994. “The Stability Problem in Political Liberalism,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75: 333–52.Google Scholar
Hill, T. E. 2002. Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. 1993. “John Rawls and the Limits of Tolerance: The Gatekeeper,” The New Republic, October 11, 39–47.Google Scholar
Huggett, M., Ventura, G., and Yaron, A.. 2011. “Sources of Life-time Inequality,” American Economic Review 101/7: 2923–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A. 2005. “Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33/3: 281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A. 2007. “Constructivism about Practical Reasons,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74/2: 302–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jantti, M. 2009. “Mobility in the United States in Comparative Perspective,” in Cancian and Danziger, Changing Poverty, Changing Policies, pp. 180–200.Google Scholar
Julius, A. J. 2003. “Basic Structure and the Value of Equality,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 31: 321–55.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. 1999. Welfare in the Kantian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosko, G. 1993. “Rawls's ‘Political’ Philosophy and American Democracy,” American Political Science Review 87: 348–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosko, G. 1994. “Rawls's Argument from Political Stability,” Columbia Law Review 94: 1882–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosko, G. 1997. “Political Constructivism in Rawls’ Political Liberalism,” American Political Science Review 91: 635–46.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. 2008. The Constitution of Moral Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasnoff, L. 1999. “How Kantian Is Constructivism?,” Kant-Studien 90: 385–409.Google Scholar
Kukathas, C., and Pettit, P.. 1990. Rawls: A Theory of Justice and Its Critics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1989. “Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality,” Ethics 99: 883–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1990. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lardner, J., and Smith, D. A. (eds.). 2005. Inequality Matters. New York, NY: New Press.Google Scholar
Levi, I. 1967. Gambling with Truth. New York, NY: A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Levi, I. 1974. “On Indeterminate Probabilities,” Journal of Philosophy 71: 391–418.Google Scholar
Levi, I. 1980. The Enterprise of Knowledge: An Essay on Knowledge, Credal Probability and Chance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levi, I. 1984. Decisions and Revisions: Philosophical Essays on Knowledge and Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, I. 1986. “The Paradoxes of Allais and Ellsberg,” Economics and Philosophy 2: 23–53.Google Scholar
Levitan, S. A. 1990. Programs in Aid of the Poor. 6th ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Loprest, P. J. 1999. Families Who Left Welfare: Who Are They and How Are They Doing? Assessing the New Federalism: An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Loprest, P. J. 2011. Disconnected Families and TANF. OPRE Research Brief #02. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Maloy, K. A., Pavetti, L. A., Shin, P., Darnell, J., and Scarpulla-Nolan, L.. 1998. “Description and Assessment of State Approaches to Diversion Programs and Activities under Welfare Reform.” http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/hsp/isp/diverzn/.Google Scholar
Martin, R. 1985. Rawls and Rights. Lawrence, KA: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
McClennen, E. 1990. Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. 1996. “Democracy, Power, and the ‘Political,’” in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 245–56.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. 1999. “Institutions and the Demands of Justice,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 27: 251–91.Google Scholar
National Campaign for Jobs and Income Support. 2001. Poverty amidst Plenty: Unspent TANF Funds and Persistent Poverty. Washington, DC: Center for Community Change.Google Scholar
National Women's Law Center. 2013. Insecure and Unequal: Poverty and Income among Women. Washington, DC: National Women's Law Center.Google Scholar
Neal, P. 1994. “Does He Mean What He Says? (Mis)Understanding Rawls's Practical Turn,” Polity 27/1: 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1990. “Aristotelian Social Democracy,” in Douglass, R. B., Mara, G. R., and Richardson, H. S. (eds.), Liberalism and the Good. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–52.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill [Nell], O. 1975. Acting on Principle: An Essay in Kantian Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill [Nell], O 1988. “Ethical Reasoning and Ideological Pluralism.” Ethics 98: 705–22.Google Scholar
O'Neill [Nell], O 1989. Constructions of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill [Nell], O 2008. “Constructivism in Rawls and Kant,” in Freeman, Samuel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 347–67.Google Scholar
Osterman, P. 1988. Employment Futures: Reorganization, Dislocation, and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Page, S. B., and Larner, M. B.. 1997. “Introduction to the AFDC Program,” Welfare to Work 7/1: 20–27.Google Scholar
Palmer, John, and Mills, Gregory. 1982. “Budget Policy,” in Palmer, J. and Sawhill, I. (eds.), The Reagan Experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, pp. 59–96.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. T. 1981. America's Struggle against Poverty: 1900–1980. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pear, R. 2013. “House Endorses Stricter Work Rules for the Poor,” New York Times, February 13.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 2000. “On the Site of Distributive Justice: Reflections on Cohen and Murphy,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 29: 137–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1951. “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics,” Philosophical Review 60/2: 177–97. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1955. “Two Concepts of Rules,” Philosophical Review 64/1: 3–32. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1958. “Justice as Fairness,” Philosophical Review 67/2: 164–94. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 47–72.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1963a. “Constitutional Liberty and the Concept of Justice,” in Nomos, vol. VI, Justice. New York, NY: Atherton Press, pp. 98–125. Reprinted in Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 73–95.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1963b. “The Sense of Justice,” Philosophical Review 72/3: 281–305. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 96–116.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1964. “Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play,” in Hook, Sidney (ed.), Law and Philosophy: A Symposium. New York, NY: New York University Press, pp. 3–18. Reprinted in Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 117–29.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1967. “Distributive Justice,” in Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G. (eds.), Politics, Philosophy, and Society. Oxford: Blackwell. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 130–53.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1968. “Distributive Justice: Some Addenda,” Natural Law Forum 13: 51–71. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 154–75.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. “Justice as Reciprocity,” in Gorowitz, S. (ed.), John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism, with Critical Essays. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs Merrill. Reprinted in Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 190–224.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1975. “The Independence of Moral Theory,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48: 5–22. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1980. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 77: 515–72. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 303–58.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1985. “Justice as Fairness: Political, not Metaphysical,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 14 (1985): 223–52. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 388–414.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1987. “The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7: 1–25. Reprinted in Samuel Freeman (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 421–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993) 1996. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, including the paper “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.”Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2000. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. N.d.-a. “Justice as Fairness: A Guided Tour.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. N.d.-b. “Lectures on Kant's Ethics.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1990. “Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 19: 3–46.Google Scholar
Reardon, S. F. 2011. “The Widening Academic Achievement Gap between the Rich and the Poor: New Evidence and Possible Explanations,” in Duncan and Murnane, Whither Opportunity, pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
Rector, R. E., and Youssef, S. E.. 1999. The Determinants of Welfare Caseload Decline. Report 99–04. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. 1996. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saez, E. 2008. “Striking It Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States,” Pathways Magazine, Winter.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1982) 1998. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1976. “Nozick on Rights, Liberty, and Property,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 6/1: 3–25.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M 2003. “Rawls on Justification,” in Freeman, Samuel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–67.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. 1994. “The Appeal of Political Liberalism,” Ethics 105: 4–22.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. 2003. “Rawls and Utilitarianism,” in Freeman, Samuel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 426–59.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. 2006. “Is the Basic Structure Basic?,” in Snypowich, C. (ed.), The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honor of G. A. Cohen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 102–29.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. 2010. Equality & Tradition: Questions of Value in Moral and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schramm, S., and Soss, J.. 2001. “Success Stories: Welfare Reform, Policy Discourse, and the Politics of Research,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 577: 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, S., Soss, J., Fording, R. C., and Houser, L.. 2009. “Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform,” American Sociological Review 74: 398–422.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1985. “Rationality and Uncertainty,” Theory and Decision 81: 109–27.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shaefer, H. L., and Edin, K.. 2014. Rising Extreme Poverty in the United States and the Response of Federal Means-Tested Transfer Programs. Washington, DC: National Poverty Center.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1907) 1981. The Method of Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John. 1989. John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. 2012. The Price of Inequality. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tawney, R. H. 1952. Equality. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1989. “Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate,” in Rosenblum, N. (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 159–82.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. 2011. Reconstructing Rawls: The Kantian Foundations of Justice as Fairness. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Trisi, T., and Pavetti, L.. 2012. TANF Weakening as a Safety Net for Poor Families. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.Google Scholar
Turner, L. J., Danziger, S., and Seefeldt, K. S.. 2006. “Failing the Transition from Welfare to Work: Women Chronically Disconnected from Employment and Cash Welfare,” Social Science Quarterly 87/2: 227–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2000. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau 2009. Current Population Reports: Educational Attainment in the United States. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau 2012. Current Population Report: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. 2003. “Difference Principles,” in Freeman, Samuel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200–240.Google Scholar
Wang, M. C., and Ramp, E. A.. 1987. The National Follow-Through Program: Design, Implementation, and Effects. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Center for Research.Google Scholar
Wenar, L. 1995. “Political Liberalism: An Internal Critique,” Ethics 106 (October): 32–62.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 1998. “Incentives, Inequality and Publicity,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 27/3: 225–47.Google Scholar
Williams, B. W. 1962. “The Idea of Equality,” in Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G. (eds.), Politics, Philosophy, and Society: Second Series. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 110–31.Google Scholar
Williams, B. W. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wingenbach, E. 1999. “Unjust Context: The Priority of Stability in Rawls's Contextualized Theory of Justice,” American Journal of Political Science 43/1: 213–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, C. 2000. “Fundamental Rights, Reasonable Pluralism, and the Moral Commitments of Liberalism,” in Davion, V. and Wolf, C. (eds.), The Idea of a Political Liberalism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 103–4.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. 1995. “Rawls's Political Liberalism,” Journal of Political Philosophy 3 (June): 181–90.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Alexander Kaufman, University of Georgia
  • Book: Rawls's Egalitarianism
  • Online publication: 31 May 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108554138.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Alexander Kaufman, University of Georgia
  • Book: Rawls's Egalitarianism
  • Online publication: 31 May 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108554138.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Alexander Kaufman, University of Georgia
  • Book: Rawls's Egalitarianism
  • Online publication: 31 May 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108554138.011
Available formats
×