Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 15
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
October 2013
Print publication year:
2013
Online ISBN:
9781139094313

Book description

While recent studies in neuroscience and psychology have shed light on our sensory and perceptual experiences of art, they have yet to explain how contemporary art downplays perceptual responses and, instead, encourages conceptual thought. The Psychology of Contemporary Art brings together the most important developments in recent scientific research on visual perception and cognition and applies the results of empirical experiments to analyses of contemporary artworks not normally addressed by psychological studies. The author explains, in simple terms, how neuroaesthetics, embodiment, metaphor, conceptual blending, situated cognition and extended mind offer fresh perspectives on specific contemporary artworks - including those of Marina Abramović, Francis Alÿs, Martin Creed, Tracey Emin, Felix Gonzales-Torres, Marcus Harvey, Mona Hatoum, Thomas Hirschorn, Gabriel Orozco, Marc Quinn and Cindy Sherman. This book will appeal to psychologists, cognitive scientists, artists and art historians, as well as those interested in a deeper understanding of contemporary art.

Reviews

‘This book is well written and clear in its presentation. The author explores experimental aesthetics, neuroaesthetics, and cognitive psychology in depth, incisively pointing out problematic issues in each area related to processes underlying the creation and appreciation of contemporary art. A pleasure to read.’

Gerald Cupchik - University of Toronto Scarborough

‘A really ambitious work that provides an impressive review of much recent psychological, and especially neuropsychological, research as well as many perceptive suggestions on how it can be applied to contemporary art. Highly sophisticated in its handling of both psychology and art.’

John Onians - University of East Anglia

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents


Page 1 of 2



Page 1 of 2


References

Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. (2009). ‘Why the mind is still in the head.’ In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–95.
Anderson, J. R. (1990). The Adaptive Character of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Andreasen, N. C., O’Leary, D. S., Cizadlo, T., et al. (1995). ‘Remembering the past: two facets of episodic memory explored with positron emission tomography.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1576–1585.
Archer, M. (2002). Art Since 1960. London: Thames and Hudson.
Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual Thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Augustin, M. D., Leder, H., Hutzler, F. and Carbon, C. C. (2007). ‘Style follows content: on the microgenesis of art perception.’ Acta Psychologica, 128, 127–138.
Baddeley, A. D. (1993). ‘Working memory and conscious awareness.’ In A. F. Colins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway and P. E. Morris (eds.), Theories of Memory. Hove: Erlbaum, pp. 11–28.
Baddeley, A. D. (1996). ‘Exploring the central executive.’ Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 5–28.
Badiou, A. (2004). Fifteen Theses on Contemporary Art. Lacanian link, Vol. 23, www.lacan.com/frameXXIII7.htm
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. C. Emerson (ed. and trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Bar, M. (2004). ‘Visual objects in context.’ Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617–629.
Bar, M. (2009). ‘A cognitive neuroscience hypothesis of mood and depression.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(11), 456–463.
Barrett, L. F. (2006). ‘Solving the emotion paradox: categorization and the experience of emotion.’ Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 20–46.
Barrett, L. F. (2009). ‘Variety is the spice of life: a psychological construction approach to understanding variability in emotion.’ Cognitive Emotion, 23(7), 1284–1306.
Barrett, L. F., Lindquist, K. A. and Gendron, M. (2007). ‘Language as context for the perception of emotion.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 327–332.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). ‘Perceptual symbol systems.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
Barsalou, L. W. (2003). ‘Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems.’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 358, 1177–1187.
Barsalou, L. W. (2009). ‘Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction.’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 364, 1281–1289.
Barsalou, L. W. and Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). ‘Situating abstract concepts.’ In D. Pecher and R. Zwaan (eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thought. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–163.
Bartels, A. (2009). ‘Visual perception: converging mechanisms of attention, binding, and segmentation?Current Biology, 19(7), 300–302.
Bartels, A. and Zeki, S. (2004). ‘Functional brain mapping during free viewing of natural scenes.’ Human Brain Mapping, 21, 75–85.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baxandall, M. (1988). Painting and Experience Fifteenth Century Italy: A Primer in the Social History of Pictorial Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bell, C. (1914). Art. London: Chatto and Windus.
Berendt, B., Barkowsky, T., Freksa, C. and Kelter, S. (1998). ‘Spatial representation with aspect maps.’ In C. Freksa, C. Habel and K. F. Wender (eds.), Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 616–617.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, P. S., et al. (1999). ‘Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: a functional MRI study.’ Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 11, 80–93.
Bird, J. (1999). ‘Minding the Body’. In M. Newman and J. Bird (eds.). Rewriting Conceptual Art. London: Reaktion, pp. 88–106.
Bishop, C. (2006). Participation. London: Whitechapel; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bishop, C. (2010). ‘Antagonism and relational aesthetics.’ In A. Dezeuze (ed.), The ‘Do-It-Yourself’ Artwork: Participation from Fluxus to New Media. Manchester: Manchester University Press; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 257–280.
Boetzkes, A. (2009). ‘Phenomenology and interpretation beyond the flesh.’ Art History, 32(4), 690–711.
Bonk, E. and Duchamp, M. (1989). The Box in a Valise. D. Britt (trans.). Paris: Rizzoli.
Bonnardel, N. (2000). ‘Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: analogies in a constrained cognitive environment.’ Knowledge-Based Systems, 13, 505–513.
Bosanquet. B. (1915/1963). Three Lectures on Aesthetics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs.
Bourriaud, N. (1998). Relational Aesthetics. Paris: Presses du réel.
Bowden, E. M. and Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). ‘Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere.’ Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(3), 730–737.
Brandt, P. A. (2006). ‘Form and meaning in art.’ In M. Turner (ed.), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–188.
Brooks, R. A. (1991). ‘Intelligence without representation.’ Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159.
Brown, S. and Dissanayake, E. (2009). ‘The arts are more than aesthetics: neuroaesthetics as narrow aesthetics.’ In M. Skov and O. Vartanian (eds.), Neuroaesthetics. Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 43–57.
Burger, P. (1984). Theory of the Avant-Garde. M. Shaw (trans.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Burgin, V. (2009). Situational Aesthetics: Selected Writings by Victor Burgin. A. Streitberger (ed.). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Butler, J. (1989). Gender Trouble, Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. (2002). Postmodernism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cabanne, P. (1979). Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp. R. Padgett (trans.). London: A Da Capo.
Camille, M. (1992). Image on the Edge: Margins of Medieval Art. London: Reaktion Books.
Cantwell-Smith, B. (1999). ‘Situatedness/embeddedness.’ In R. A. Wilson and F. C. Keil (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 769–770.
Caramazza, A. and Shelton, J. R. (1998). ‘Domain specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate–inanimate distinction’. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11, 1–34.
Carroll, J. M. and Russell, J. A. (1997). ‘Facial expressions in Hollywood’s portrayal of emotion.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 164–176.
Carroll, N. (2006). ‘Aesthetic experience: a question of content.’ In M. Kieran (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 69–97.
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cavell, S. (1994). A Pitch of Philosophy: Autobiographical Exercises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cela-Conde, C. J., Agnati, L., Huston, J. P., Mora, F. and Nadal, M. (2011). ‘The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation.’ Progress in Neurobiology, 94, 39–48.
Celant, G. (1989). Giuseppe Penone, exhibition catalogue. Bristol: Arnolfini Gallery.
Changeux, J. P. (1994). ‘Art and neuroscience.’ Leonardo 27(3), 189–201.
Chase, W. G. and Simon, H. A. (1973). ‘Perception in chess’. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.
Chatard-Pannetier, A., Brauer, M., Chambres, P. and Niedenthal, P. (2002). ‘Représentation, catégorisation et évaluation: différences entre experts et novices dans le domaine des meubles d’antiquité.’ L’Année psychologique, 102, 423–448.
Chatterjee, A. (2003). ‘Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics.’ Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 4(2), 55–60.
Chatterjee, A. (2010a). ‘Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story.’ Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 53–62.
Chatterjee, A. (2010b). ‘Disembodying cognition.’ Language and Cognition 2(1), 79–116.
Cherry, D. (2002). ‘Tracey Emin’s My Bed’, www.egs.edu/faculty/tracey-emin/articles/tracey-emins-my-bed/ Accessed 20/02/2012.
Chrisley, R. and Ziemke, T. (2003). ‘Embodiment.’ In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. London: Macmillan Publishers, pp. 1102–1108.
Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R. and Schooler, J. W. (2009a). ‘Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(21), 8719–8724.
Christoff, K., Keramatian, K., Gordon, A. M., Smith, R. and Mädler, B. (2009b). ‘Prefrontal organization of cognitive control according to levels of abstraction.’ Brain Research, 1286(25), 94–105.
Christoff, K., Ream, J. M. and Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). ‘The cognitive and neural basis of spontaneous thought processes.’ Cortex, 40, 623–630.
Christoff, K., Ream, J. M., Geddes, L. P. T. and Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003). ‘Evaluating self-generated information: anterior prefrontal contributions to human cognition.’ Behavioural Neuroscience, 117(6), 1161–1168.
Church, J. (2000). ‘“Seeing as” and the double-bind of consciousness.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(8/9), 99–112.
Clark, A. (1998). Being There. Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (2001). ‘Visual experience and motor action: are the bonds too tight?Philosophical Review, 110(4), 495–519.
Clark, A. (2005). ‘Intrinsic content, active memory and the extended mind.’ Analysis, 65(1), 1–11.
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (2011). ‘Finding the mind.’ Philosophical Studies, 152, 447–461.
Clunas, C. (1997). Art in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Colman, A. M. (ed.). (2009). A Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford Reference Online, Oxford University Press. Accessed from Auckland University, 19 January 2011, www.oxfordreference.com
Collins, A. M. and Quillian, M. R. (1969). ‘Retrieval time from semantic memory.’ Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–248.
Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crutch, S. J. and Warrington, E. K. (2005). ‘Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks.’ Brain, 128, 615–627.
Cupchik, G. C. (2002). ‘The evolution of psychical distance as an aesthetic concept.’ Culture and Psychology, 8(2), 155–227.
Cupchik, G. C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A. and Mikulis, D. J. (2009). ‘Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience.’ Brain and Cognition, 70, 84–91.
Currie, G. (2003). ‘Aesthetics and cognitive science.’ In J. Levinson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 706–721.
Currie, G. (2006). ‘Anne Brontë and the uses of imagination.’ In M. Kieran (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 209–221.
Dahl, D. W. and Moreau, P. (2002). ‘The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation.’ Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 47–60.
Damasio, R. (1989). ‘The brain binds entities and events by multiregional activation from convergence zones.’ Neural Computation, 1(1), 123–132.
Damasio, R. (1995). ‘Toward a neurobiology of emotion and feeling: operational concepts and hypotheses.’ Neuroscience, 1, 19–25.
Danto, A. C. (1964). ‘The artworld.’ Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 571–584.
Danto, A. C. (1981). The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Danto, A. C. (1997). After the End of Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Davies, S. (1991). Definitions of Art. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Davies, S. (2004). ‘The cluster theory of art.’ British Journal of Aesthetics, 44, 297–300.
Davies, S. (2006). The Philosophy of Art. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
de Araujo, I. E., Rolls, E. T., Velazco, M. I., Margot, C. and Cayeux, I. (2005). ‘Cognitive modulation of olfactory processing.’ Neuron, 46(4), 671–679.
de Beauvoir, S. (1949). Le deuxième sexe. Paris: Gallimard.
de Beni, R. and Moè, A. (2003). ‘Imagery and rehearsal as study strategies for written or orally presented passages.’ Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 975–980.
de Bruin, L. C. and Kästner, L. (2011). ‘Dynamic embodied cognition.’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–23. Online: www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9223-1
de Groot, A. D. (1978). Thought and Choice in Chess. Oxford: Mouton.
de Preester, H. and Tsakiris, M. (2009). ‘Body-extension versus body-incorporation: is there a need for a body-model?Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 307–319.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy? H. Tomlinson and G. Burchill (trans.). London: Verso.
Donald, M. (2006). ‘Art and cognitive evolution.’ In M. Turner (ed.), The Artful Mind, Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–20.
Doumas, A. A., Hummel, J. E. and Sandhofer, C. M. (2008). ‘A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts.’ Psychological Review, 115(1), 1–43.
Dickie, G. (1984/1997). The Art Circle: A Theory of Art. Evanston, IL: Chicago Spectrum Press.
Dove, G. (2009). ‘Beyond perceptual symbols: a call for representational pluralism.’ Cognition, 110(3), 412–431.
Egan, F. and Matthews, R. J. (2006). ‘Doing cognitive neuroscience: a third way.’ Synthese, 153, 377–391.
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M. and Christoff, K. (2012). ‘Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process.’ NeuroImage, 59, 1783–1794.
Ellis, R. D. (1999). ‘The dance form of the eyes. What cognitive science can learn from art.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 161–175.
Everhart, D. E., Shucard, J. L., Quatrin, T. and Shucard, D. W. (2001. ‘Sex-related differences in event-related potentials, face recognition, and facial affect processing in prepubertal children.’ Neuropsychology, 15(3), 329–341.
Fairhall, S. L. and Ishai, A. (2008). ‘Neural correlates of object indeterminacy in art compositions.’ Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 923–932.
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2008). ‘Rethinking metaphor.’ In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–66.
Figdor, C. (2010). ‘Neuroscience and the multiple realization of cognitive functions.’ Philosophy of Science, 77, 419–456.
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.
Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York, NY: Thomas Crowell.
Fodor, J. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Foster, H. (1996). The Return of the Real. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fredrickson, B. L. and Harrison, K. (2005). ‘Throwing like a girl: self-objectification predicts adolescent girls’ motor performance.’ Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29(1), 79–101.
Fredrickson, B. L. and Roberts, T. A. (1997). ‘Objectification theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks.’ Psychology of Women Quarterly 21(2), 173–206.
Freedberg, D. (2006). ‘Composition and emotion.’ In M. Turner (ed.), The Artful Mind, Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 73–89.
Freedberg, D. (2009). ‘Movement, embodiment, emotion.’ In T. Dufrenne and A.-C. Taylor (eds.), Cannibalismes Disciplinaires. Quand l histoire de l art et l anthropologie se rencontrent. Paris INHA/Musee du Quai Branly, pp. 37–61.
Freedberg, D. (2011) ‘Memory in art: history and the neuroscience of response.’ In S. Nalbantian, P. M. Matthews and J. L. McClelland (eds.), The Memory Process: Neuroscientific and Humanistic Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 337–358.
Freedberg, D. and Gallese, V. (2007). ‘Motion, emotion and empathy in aesthetic experience.’ Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(5), 197–203.
Freksa, C., Barkowsky, T. and Klippel, A. (1999). ‘Spatial symbol systems and spatial cognition: a computer science perspective on perception-based symbol processing.’ Commentary on Barsalou’s ‘Perceptual symbol systems.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 616.
Fried, M. (1967). ‘Art and objecthood.’ Artforum 5, 12–23.
Friston, K. (2002). ‘Beyond phrenology: what can neuroimaging tell us about distributed circuitry?Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 221–250.
Fry, R. (1924). Art and Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.
Fuster, J. (2003). Cortex and Mind: Unifying Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabora, L. (1999). ‘Grounded in perceptions yet transformed into amodal symbols.’ Commentary on Barsalou’s ‘Perceptual symbol systems.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 617.
Gadamer, H. G. (1997). Truth and Method. New York, NY: Continuum.
Gallagher, S. and Cole, J. (1995). ‘Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject.’ Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16, 369–390.
Gallagher, S. and Crisafi, A. (2009). ‘Mental institutions.’ Topoi, 28, 45–51.
Gallese, V. (2007). The ‘conscious’ dorsal stream: embodied simulation and its role in space and action conscious awareness.’ Psyche, 13(1), 1–12. Archived electronic journal: www.psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/
Garis, L. (1975). ‘The Margaret Mead of Madison Avenue.’ Ms. (March), pp. 7–40.
Gaut, B. (2006). ‘Art and cognition.’ In M. Kieran (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 115–126.
Gauthier, I. Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C. Anderson, A. W. (2000). ‘Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.’ Nature and Neuroscience, 3(2), 191–197.
Gauthier, I. and Tarr, M. J. (1997). ‘Becoming a “Greeble” expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition.’ Vision Research, 37(12), 1673–1682.
Gentner, D. (1983). ‘Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy.’ Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
Gentner, D. (1989). ‘Metaphor as structure mapping: the relational shift.’ Child Development, 59, 47–59.
Gentner, D. and Bowdle, B. (2008). ‘Metaphor as structure-mapping.’ In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–128.
Gentner, D. and Kurtz, K. J. (2006). ‘Relations, objects, and the composition of analogies.’ Cognitive Science, 30, 609–642.
Gibbs, R. W. (ed.). (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). ‘The theory of affordances.’ In R. Shaw and J. Bransford (eds.), Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 67–82.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Glaser, R. (1994). ‘Expertise.’ In M. W. Eysenck, et al. (eds.), The Blackwell Dictionary of Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 139–142.
Glenberg A. M. and Kaschak M. P. (2002). ‘Grounding language in action.’ Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 9, 558–565.
Glucksberg, S. (2008). ‘How metaphors create categories quickly.’ In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–83.
Godfrey, T. (1993). ‘Richard Serra: London and Düsseldorf.’ The Burlington Magazine, 135(1079), 160–161.
Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldie, P. (2003). The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Goldie, P. and Schellekens E.(eds.) (2007). Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford: Clarendon.
Goldie, P. and Schellekens E.(2010). Who’s Afraid of Conceptual Art? London: Routledge.
Goldstone, R. L., Feng, Y., Rogosky, B. J., Pecher, D. and Zwaan, R. A. (2005). ‘Connecting concepts to each other and the world.’ In D. Pecher and R. A. Zwaan (eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role Of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 282–314.
Goldstone, R. L. and Rogosky, B. J. (2002). ‘Using relations within conceptual systems to translate across conceptual systems.’ Cognition, 84, 295–320.
Gombrich, E. H. (1966). Norm and Form: Studies in the Art of the Renaissance. London: Phaidon Press.
Gooding, D. C. (2004). ‘Cognition, construction and culture: visual theories in the sciences.’ Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 551–593.
Gorno-Tempini, M. L. and Price, C. J. (2001). ‘Identification of famous faces and buildings: a functional neuroimaging study of semantically unique items.’ Brain, 124(10), 2087–2097.
Greeno, J. G., Smith, D. R. and Moore, J. L. (1993). ‘Transfer of situated learning’. In D. K. Detterman and R. J. Sternberg (eds.), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and Instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 99–167.
Griffiths, P. E. and Scarantino, A. (2009). ‘Emotions in the wild: the situated perspective on emotion.’ In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 437–453.
Grush, R. and Mandik, P. (2002). ‘Representational parts.’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 389–394.
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H. and Phillips, S. (2010). ‘Relational knowledge: the foundation of higher cognition.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(11), 497–505.
Harnad, S. (1990). ‘The symbol grounding problem.’ Physica D, 42, 335–346.
Harth, E. (2004). ‘Art and reductionism.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(3–4), 111–116.
Hasenkamp, W., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Duncan, E. and Barsalou, L. W. (2012). ‘Mind wandering and attention during focused meditation: a fine-grained temporal analysis of fluctuating cognitive states.’ NeuroImage, 59, 750–760.
Haser, V. (2005). Metaphor, Metonymy and Experientialist Philosophy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hauser, M. and Spelke, E. (2004). ‘Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: a case study of mathematics.’ In M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press, Vol. 3, pp. 853–864.
Hayhoe, M. and Ballard, D. (2005). ‘Eye movements in natural behaviour.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 188–194.
Hekkert, P. and van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). ‘Aesthetic preference for paintings as a function of expertise level and various stimulus properties.’ Acta Psychologica, 94, 117–131.
Held, J. S. and Posner, D. (n.d.). Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Art, Baroque Painting, Sculpture and Architecture. New York, NY: Prentice Hall/Abrams.
Henderson, J. M. (1997). ‘Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception.’ Psychological Science, 8, 51–55.
Hermans, H., Rijks, T. and Kempen, H. (1993). ‘Imaginal dialogues in the self: theory and method.’ Journal of Personality, 61, 207–235.
Hiller, S. (1994/2006). ‘Working through objects.’ In C. Merewether (ed.), The Archive. London: Whitechapel and Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 41–48.
Hohwy, J. (2007). ‘The sense of self in the phenomenology of agency and perception.’ Psyche, 13(1), 1–20. Archived electronic journal: www.psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/
Holyoak, K. J. and Thagard, P. (1995). Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hopkins, D. (2006). ‘Re-thinking the Duchamp effect’. In A. Jones (ed.), A Companion to Contemporary Art Since 1945. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 215–245.
Hubbard, E. M. (2003). ‘A discussion and review of Uttal (2001), “The New Phrenology”.’ Cognitive Science Online, 1, 22–33.
Huppert, F. A. and Piercy, M. (1976). ‘Recognition memory in amnesic patients: effect of temporal context and familiarity of material.’ Cortex, 12, 3–20.
Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. F. Kersten (trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hutchins, E. (2005). ‘Material anchors for conceptual blends.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577.
Hutchins, E. (2011). ‘Enculturating the supersized mind.’ Philosophical Studies, 152, 437–446.
Hyman, J. (2008). ‘Art and neuroscience.’ Interdisciplines. www.interdisciplines.org/artcognition/papers/15
Ione, A. (2000). ‘Connecting the cerebral cortex with the artist’s eyes, mind and culture.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(8–9), 21–27.
Ione, A. (2003) ‘Examining Semir Zeki’s neural concept formation and art: Dante, Michelangelo, Wagner.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(2), 58–66.
Irigaray, L. (1993). An Ethics of Sexual Difference. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Ishizu, T. and Zeki, S. (2011). ‘Toward a brain-based theory of beauty.’ PLoS One, 6(7), e21852.
Itkonen, E. (2003). What is Language? A Study in the Philosophy of Linguistics. Turku: Turku University Press.
Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jacob, P. and Jeannerod, M. (2005). ‘The motor theory of social cognition: a critique.’ Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 21–25.
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Oxford: Holt.
Jeannerod, M. and Jacob, P. (2005). ‘Visual cognition: a new look at the two-visual systems.’ Neuropsychologia, 43, 301–312.
Johnson, M. (2008a). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, M. (2008b). ‘Philosophy’s debt to metaphor.’ In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–52.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Miller, G. A. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Jones, A. (1994). Postmodernism and the En-Gendering of Marcel Duchamp. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, A. (1998). Body Art/Performing the Subject. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
Jones, A. (2010). ‘Space, body and the self in the work of Bruce Nauman.’ In A. Dezeuze (ed.), The ‘Do-It-Yourself’ Artwork: Participation From Fluxus To New Media. Manchester: Manchester University Press and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 145–164.
Joselit, D. (2003). American Art Since 1945. London: Thames and Hudson.
Judovitz, D. (1998). Unpacking Duchamp: Art in Transit. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Jung, C. G. (1921/1971). Psychological Types, Collected Works, Vol. 6. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kästner, S. (2004). ‘Attentional response modulation in the human visual system.’ In M. I. Posner (ed.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 144–156.
Kawabata, H. and Zeki, S. (2004). ‘The neural correlates of beauty.’ Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1699–1705.
Kemmerer, D. J., Castillo, G., Talavage, T., Patterson, S. and Wiley, C. (2008). ‘Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: evidence from fMRI.’ Brain and Language, 107(1), 16–43.
Kemp, C., Tenenbaum, J. B., Niyogi, S. and Griffiths, T. L. (2010). ‘A probabilistic model of theory formation.’ Cognition, 114, 165–196.
Kennedy, J. M. (2008). ‘Metaphor and art.’ In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 447–461.
Kieran, M. (2004). Revealing Art: Why Art Matters. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kirchhoff, M. (2012). ‘Extended cognition and fixed properties: steps to a third-wave version of extended cognition.’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 287–308.
Kirk, U., Skov, S. Hulme, O., Christensen, M. S., and Zeki, S. (2009). ‘Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study.’ NeuroImage, 44, 1125–1132.
Kirsh, D. (2009). ‘Problem solving and situated cognition.’ In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 264–306.
Kirsh, D. and Maglio, P. (1994). ‘On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic actions.’ Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.
Kober, H., Feldman Barrett, L., Joseph, J., et al. (2008). ‘Functional grouping and cortical–subcortical interactions in emotion: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.’ NeuroImage, 42(2), 998–1031.
Korsmeyer, C. (2006). ‘Terrible beauties.’ In M. Kieran (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 51–64.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1999). ‘If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 354(1387), 1283–1294.
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L. and Ganis, G. (2006). The Case for Mental Imagery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kounios, J., Frymiare, J. L., Bowden, E. M., et al. (2006). ‘The prepared mind: neural activity prior to problem presentation predicts subsequent solution by sudden insight.’ Psychological Science, 17(10), 882–890.
Kowatari, Y., Lee, S. H, Yamamura, H., et al. (2009). ‘Neural networks involved in artistic creativity.’ Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1678–1690.
Krauss, R. (1977). ‘Notes on the index: seventies art in America.’ 3, 68–81.
Krauss, R. (1981). Passages in Modern Sculpture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kraynak, J. (2010). ‘Rirkrit Tiravanija’s liability.’ In A. Dezeuze (ed.), The ‘Do-It-Yourself’ Artwork: Participation From Fluxus To New Media. Manchester: Manchester University Press and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 165–184.
Kringelbach, M. L. (2005). ‘The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience.’ National Review of Neuroscience, 6(9), 691–702.
Lacey, S., Hagtvedt, H., Patrick, V.  M. et al. (2011). ‘Art for reward’s sake: visual art recruits the ventral striatum.’ NeuroImage, 55(1), 420–433.
Lakoff, G. (2006). ‘The neuroscience of art.’ In M. Turner (ed.), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–170.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Lamarque, P. (2006). ‘Cognitive values in the arts: marking boundaries.’ In M. Kieran (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 127–140.
Lambon-Ralph, M., Lowe, C. and Rogers T. T. (2007).‘Neural basis of category-specific semantic deficits for living things: evidence from semantic dementia, HSVE and a neural network model.’ Brain, 130, 1127–1137.
Lambon-Ralph, M. A., Sage, K., Jones R. W. and Mayberry, E. J. (2010). ‘Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107(6), 2717–2722.
Lamm, C., Batson, C. D. and Decety, J. (2007). ‘The neural basis of human empathy, effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal: an event-related functional MRI study.’ Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 42–58.
Langacker, R. W. (1999). ‘A view from cognitive linguistics.’ Commentary on Barsalou’s ‘Perceptual symbol systems’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 625.
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A. and Augustin, D. (2004). ‘A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.’ British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508.
Leder, H., Carbon, C. C. and Ripsas, A. L. (2006). ‘Entitling art: influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings.’ Acta Psychologica, 121, 176–198.
Levinson, J. (1996). The Pleasures of Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
LeWitt, S. (1969). ‘Sentences on conceptual art.’ 0–9, 5 (New York).
Limb, C. J. and Braun, A. R. (2008). ‘Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: an fMRI study of jazz improvisation.’ PLoS One, 3, e1679.
Lippard, L. (1973). The Dematerialization of the Art Object from 1966 to 1972. New York, NY: Praeger.
Livingstone, M. (2002). Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.
Locher, P. J., Smith, J. K. and Smith, L. F. (2001). ‘The influence of presentation format and viewer training in the visual arts on the perception of pictorial and aesthetic qualities of paintings.’ Perception, 30, 449–465.
Low, G. (2008). ‘Metaphor in literature.’ In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–231.
Luchjenbroers, J. (2004). ‘Verbal and visual cues for navigating mental space.’ In G. Malcolm (ed.), Multidisciplinary Studies of Visual Representations and Interpretations, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 147–164.
Machery, E. (2007). ‘Concept empiricism: a methodological critique.’ Cognition, 104, 19–46.
Mack, J. (2003). The Museum of the Mind: Art and Memory in World Cultures. London: British Museum.
Magnani, L. (2003). ‘Constraining questions about the organisation and representation of conceptual knowledge.’ Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 433–450.
Magnani, L. (2007). ‘Creating chances through cognitive niche construction.’ Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4693, 917–925.
Mahon, B. Z. and Caramazza, A. (2008). ‘A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content.’ Journal of Physiology, 102, 59–70.
Mandler, J. (2010). ‘The spatial foundations of the conceptual system.’ Language and Cognition, 2(1), 21–44.
Manovich, L. (2006). ‘Visual technologies as cognitive prostheses: a short history of the externalization of the mind.’ In M. Smith and J. Morra (eds.), The Prosthetic Impulse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mar, R., Djikic, M. and Oatley, K. (2008). ‘Effects of reading on knowledge, social abilities, and selfhood.’ In S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova and J. Auracher (eds.), Directions in Empirical Literary Studies: In Honor of Willie van Peer. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 127–137.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York, NY: Freeman.
Martin, A. (2007). ‘The representation of object concepts in the brain.’ Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45.
Martindale, C. (1984). ‘The pleasures of thought: a theory of cognitive hedonics.’ Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 49–80.
Martindale, C. (1988). ‘Aesthetics, psychobiology and cognition.’ In F. H. Farley and R. W. Neperud (eds.), The Foundations of Aesthetics, Art, and Art Education. New York, NY: Praeger, pp. 7–42.
Massey, I. (2009). The Neural Imagination: Aesthetic and Neuroscientific Approaches to the Arts. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
Mazzone, M. and Lalumera, E. (2010). ‘Concepts: stored or created?Minds and Machines, 20, 1–19.
Mesquita, B. (1993). Cultural Variations in Emotions: A Comparative Study of Dutch, Surinamese, and Turkish People in the Netherlands. Unpublished PhD thesis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Mesquita, B., Feldman Barrett, L. and Smith, E. R. (eds.). (2010). The Mind in Context. New York, NY: Guilford.
Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B. and Vigliocco, G. (2012). ‘Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics.’ Cortex, 48(7), 788–804.
Michelson, A. (1969–1970). Robert Morris. Washington, DC: Corcoran Gallery of Art and Detroit: Detroit Institute of Art.
Miller, E. K., Freedman, D. J. and Wallis, J. D. (2002). ‘The prefrontal cortex: categories, concepts and cognition.’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 357(1424), 1123–1136.
Milner, D. and Goodale, M. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Minsky, M. (1975). ‘A framework for representing knowledge.’ In P. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, pp. 211–277.
Muelder Eaton, M. (2006). ‘Beauty and ugliness in and out of context.’ In M. Kieran (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 37–50.
Mulvey, L. (1989). Visual and Other Pleasures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Munroe, A. (2000). YES Yoko Ono. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.
Murphy, G. and Medin, D. (1985). ‘The role of theories in conceptual coherence.’ Psychological Review, 92, 289–316.
Muzur, A., Pace-Schott, E. F. and Hobson, J. A. (2002). ‘The prefrontal cortex in sleep.’ Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(11), 475–481.
Myin, E. and Veldman, J. (2011). ‘Externalism, mind, and art.’ In R. Manzotti (ed.), Situated Aesthetics: Art Beyond the Skin. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Nakayama, K. and Shimojo, S. (1992). ‘Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces.’ Science, 257, 1357–1363.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Newell, A. (1980). ‘Physical symbol systems.’ Cognitive Science, 4, 135–183.
Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. (1976). ‘Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search.’ Communications of the ACM, 19(3), 113–126.
Niedenthal, P. M. (1990). ‘Implicit perception of affective information.’ Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 505–527.
Niedenthal, P. M. (2006). ‘Emotion.’ In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com Accessed 03/09/2012.
Noë, A. (2000). ‘Experience and experiment in art.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8–9, 123–135.
Noë, A. (2005). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Noë, A.(2006) ‘Précis of Action in Perception.’ Psyche, 12(1): 1–34. Archived electronic journal: www.psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/
Noë, A. and Thompson, E. (2004) ‘Are there neural correlates of consciousness?Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(1), 3–28.
Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., et al. (2006). ‘Self-referential processing in our brain: a meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self.’ NeuroImage, 31, 440–457.
O’Shea, M. (2005). The Brain: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ohlsson, S. (1999). ‘Selecting is not abstracting.’ Commentary on Barsalou’s ‘Perceptual symbol systems’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 631.
Okada, T., Yokochi, S., Ishibashi, K., Namba, K. and Ueda, K. (2009). ‘Analogical modification in the creation of contemporary art.’ Cognitive Systems Research, 10(3), 189–203.
Onians, J. (2008). Neuroarthistory: From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K. V. and Raichle, M. E. (1990). ‘The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 87, 256–259.
Pepperell, R. (2011). ‘Art and extensionism.’ In R. Manzotti (ed.), Situated Aesthetics: Art Beyond the Skin. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Pessoa, L. (2010a). ‘Emergent processes in cognitive-emotional interactions.’ Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 12(4), 433–448.
Pessoa, L. (2010b). ‘Emotion and cognition and the amygdala: from “what is it?” to “what’s to be done?”Neuropsychologia, 48, 3416–3429.
Pessoa, L. and Adolphs, R. (2010). ‘Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a “low road” to “many roads” of evaluating biological significance.’ National Review of Neuroscience, 11(11), 773–783.
Piazza, M. and Dehaene, S. (2004). ‘From number neurons to mental arithmetic: the cognitive neuroscience of number sense.’ In M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, Vol 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 865–875.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works. New York, NY: Norton.
Pizzichini, L. (1998). ‘Art: another pile of bricks at the Tate.’ The Independent, Sunday, 8 February.
Plassmann, H., O’Doherty, J., Shiv, B. and Rangel, A. (2008). ‘Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesUSA, 105(3), 1050–1054.
Pobric, G., Jefferies, E. and Lambon-Ralph, M. A. (2007). ‘Anterior temporal lobes mediate semantic representation: mimicking semantic dementia by using rTMS in normal participants.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 20137–20141.
Poincaré, H. (1905). Science and Hypothesis. London: Walter Scott Publishing.
Potts, A. (2000). The Sculptural Imagination: Figurative, Modernist, Minimalist. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Prinz, J. (2006). ‘Putting the brakes on enactive perception.’ Psyche, 12(1), 1–19. Archived electronic journal: www.psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/
Prinz, J. (2009). ‘Is consciousness embedded?’ In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 419–436.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2006). Seeing and Visualizing. It’s Not What You Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. and Storm, R. W. (1998). ‘Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.’ Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179–197.
Radua, J. and Mataix-Cols, D. (2009). ‘Voxel-wise meta-analysis of grey matter changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 195, 393–402.
Ramachandran, V. S. and Hirstein, W. (1999). ‘The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51.
Ramnani, N. and Owen, A. M. (2004). ‘Anterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging.’ National Review of Neuroscience, 5(3), 184–194.
Rancière, J. (2009). The Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso.
Rensink, R. A. (2000). ‘The dynamic representation of scenes.’ Visual Cognition, 7(1–3), 17–42.
Ricoeur, P. (1991). A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination. M. J. Valdes (ed.).Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. (2004). ‘The mirror-neuron system.’ Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Rosch, E. (1973). ‘On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories.’ In T. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Rosch, E. (1999). ‘Principles of categorization’. In E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 189–206.
Rowlands, M. (1999). The Body in Mind: Understanding Cognitive Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rüschemeyer, S. A., Brass, M. and Friederici, A. D. (2007). ‘Comprehending prehending: neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems.’ Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 855–865.
Ryle, G. (1954). ‘The world of science and the everyday world.’ In G. Ryle (ed.), Dilemmas: The Tanner Lectures 1953. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–81.
Schwarz, A. (1969). The Complete Works of Marcel Duchamp. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.
Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C. and Mumford, M. D. (2005). ‘Conceptual combination: alternative knowledge, structures, alternative heuristics.’ Creativity Research Journal, 17, 79–98.
Searle, A. (2011). ‘Tracey Emin: excess all areas.’ The Guardian, Monday, 16 May.
Setti, A. and Caramelli, N. (2005). ‘Different domains in abstract concepts.’ In B. Bara, L. Barsalou and M. Bucciarelli (eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1997–2002.
Shepard, R. N. and Metzler, J. (1971). ‘Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.’ Science, 171, 701–703.
Simmons, W. K. and Barsalou, L. W. (2003). ‘The similarity in topography principle: reconciling theories of conceptual deficits.’ Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 451–486.
Skrebowski, L. (2008). ‘All systems go: recovering Hans Haacke’s systems art.’ Grey Room, 30, 54–83.
Smallwood, J., Fishman, D. and Schooler, J. (2007). ‘Counting the cost of an absent mind: mind wandering as an under-recognized influence on educational performance.’ Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(2), 230–236.
Smith, E. R. and Conrey, F. R. (2009). ‘The social context of cognition.’ In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 454–466.
Solso, R. (2003). The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sontag, S. (1995). ‘Against interpretation.’ In E. Fernie (ed.), Art History and its Methods. London: Phaidon.
Sowden, P. T. and Schyns, P. G. (2006). ‘Channel surfing in the visual brain.’ Trends in the Cognitive Sciences, 10, 538–545.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2008). ‘A deflationary account of metaphors.’ In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–108.
Sporns, O. (2010). ‘Brain networks and embodiment.’ In B. Mesquita, L. Feldman Barrett and E. R. Smith (eds.), The Mind in Context. New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 43–64.
Stafford, B. M. (2007). Echo Objects: The Cognitive Work of Images. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Storr, R. (1995). ‘Félix González-Torres: être un espion.’ ArtPress, January, pp. 24–32.
Stuss, D. T., Gallup, G. G. and Alexander, M. P. (2001). ‘The frontal lobes are necessary for “theory of mind”.’ Brain, 124, 279–286.
Sutton, J. (2009). ‘Remembering.’ In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–235.
Tallis, R. (1996). Times Literary Supplement, April 19, pp. 5–6.
Talmy, L. (1996). ‘Fictive motion in language and “ception”.’ In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 211–276.
Teasdale, J. D., Dritschell, B. H., Taylor, M. J., et al. (1995). ‘Stimulus-independent-thought depends upon central executive resources.’ Memory and Cognition, 28, 551–559.
Thomas, N. J. T. (1997). ‘Mental Imagery’, plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-imagery/
Tong, F., Meng, M. and Blake, R. (2006). ‘Neural bases of binocular rivalry.’ Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 502–511.
Tranel, D., Damasio, H. and Damasio, A. R. (1997). ‘A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge.’ Neuropsychologia, 35(10), 1319–1327.
Tribble, E. B. (2005). ‘Distributed cognition in the Globe.’ Shakespeare Quarterly, 56(2), 135–155.
Tulving, E. (1983). ‘Ecphoric processes in episodic memory.’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 302(1110), 361–370.
Turner, M. (2003). ‘The Origin of Selkies.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(5–6), 90–115.
Turner, M. (2006). ‘The Art of Compression.’ In M. Turner (ed.), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–114.
Turvey, M. T. and Carello, C. (1995). ‘Some dynamical themes in perception and action.’ In R. Port and T. van Gelder (eds.), Mind as Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 373–402.
Tversky, B. (2010). ‘Visualizing thought.’ Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 1–37.
Uttal, W. R. (2001). The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vartanian, O. and Goel, V. (2004). ‘Emotion pathways in the brain mediate aesthetic preference.’ Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 5(1), 37–42.
Versace, R., Labeyea, E., Badarda, G. and Rosea, M. (2009). ‘The contents of long-term memory and the emergence of knowledge.’ European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 522–560.
Vickery, J. (2003). ‘Art and the ethical: modernism and the problem of Minimalism.’ In D. Arnold and M. D. Iverson (eds.), Art and Thought. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 111–128.
Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M. and Kousta, S. (2009). ‘Toward a theory of semantic representation.’ Language and Cognition, 1–2, 219–247.
Visser, M., Jefferies, E. and Lambon-Ralph, M. A. (2010). ‘Semantic processing in the anterior temporal lobes: a meta-analysis of the functional neuroimaging literature.’ Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1083–1094.
Wallendorf, M. and Arnould, E. J. (1988). ‘“My Favorite Things”: a cross-cultural inquiry into object attachment, possessiveness and social linkage.’ Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 531–547.
Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. and Shinkareva, S. V. (2010). ‘Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.’ Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1459–1468.
Weisberg, R. W. (1995). ‘Case studies of creative thinking: reproduction versus restructuring in the real world.’ In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward and R. A. Finke (eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 53–72.
Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.
Wheeler, M. (2010). ‘In defense of extended functionalism.’ In R. Menary (ed.), The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 245–270.
Wiemer-Hastings, K. and Graesser, A. C. (2000). ‘Contextually representing abstract concepts with abstract structures.’ In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 983–988.
Wiemer-Hastings, K., Krug, J. and Xu, X. (2001). ‘Imagery, context availability, contextual constraints and abstractness.’ In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1106–1111.
Wiemer-Hastings, K. and Xu, X. (2005). ‘Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts.’ Cognitive Science, 29(5), 719–736.
Williams, R. F. (2008). ‘Gesture as a conceptual mapping tool.’ In A. Cienki and C. Müller (eds.), Metaphor and Gesture [Gesture Studies 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 55–92.
Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K. and Barsalou, L. W. (2011). ‘Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization.’ Neuropsychologia, 49, 1105–1127.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Xu, F. (2005). ‘Categories, kinds, and object individuation in infancy.’ In L. Gershkoff-Stowe and D. Rakison (eds.), Building Object Categories in Developmental Time: Papers from the 32nd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 63–89.
Young, I. (1980). ‘Throwing like a girl: a phenomenology of feminine body comportment motility and spatiality.’ Human Studies, 3(1), 137–156.
Zaidel, D. W. (2010). ‘Art and brain: insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution.’ Journal of Anatomy, 216, 177–183.
Zeki, S. (1999). ‘Neural concept formation and art: Dante, Michelangelo, Wagner.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(3), 53–76.
Zeki, S. (2002). Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zeki, S. (2009). Splendours and Miseries of the Brain: Love, Creativity, and the Quest for Human Happiness. London: Blackwell.
Zlatev, J. (2010). ‘Phenomenology and cognitive linguistics.’ In S. Gallagher and D. Schmicking (eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 415–446.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.