Anderson, T., Schum, D., and Twining, W. Analysis of Evidence 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubry, C. and Rau, C. Droit Civil Français Book Six 6th edition (Esmein, P. (ed.)) (Paris: Librairies Techniques Juris-Classeurs, 1951)Google Scholar

Balkin, R.P. and Davis, J.L.R. Law of Torts 4th edition (London: Butterworths, 2008)Google Scholar

Ballot-Léna, A. La Responsabilité Civile en Droit Des Affaires Des Régimes Spéciaux Vers Un Droit Commun (Paris: LGDJ, 2008)Google Scholar

Barker, K., Cane, P., Lunney, M., and Trindade, F. The Law of Torts in Australia 5th edition (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Beever, A. Rediscovering the Law of Negligence (Oxford: Hart, 2007)Google Scholar

Bénabent, A. Droit Civil: Les Obligations 12th edition (Paris: Montchrestien, 2010)Google Scholar

Bénabent, A. La Chance et Le Droit (Paris: LGDJ, 1973)Google Scholar

Bennett, J. Events and Their Names (Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Brinkmann, M. Das Beweismaß im Zivilprozess aus rechtsvergleichender Sicht (Cologne: Heymanns, 2005)Google Scholar

Broome, J. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time (Oxford: Basil Blackwell Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Burrows, A. The Law of Restitution 3rd edition (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Buxbaum, W. Solidarische Schadenshaftung bei ungeklärter Verursachung im deutsche, französichen und anglo-amerikanischen Recht (Karlsruhe: CF Müller, 1965)Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F. Probleme der Schadensverursachung nach deutschem und österreichischem Recht (Stuttgart: F Enke, 1964)Google Scholar

Cane, P. Atiyah's Accidents, Compensation and the Law 8th edition (Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cane, P. Responsibility in Law and Morality (Oxford: Hart, 2002)Google Scholar

Cane, P. The Anatomy of Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 1997)Google Scholar

Cane, P., Lunney, M., and Trindade, F. The Law of Torts in Australia 4th edition (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Chabas, F. L'influence de la pluralité de causes sur le droit à la réparation (Paris: LGDJ, 1967)Google Scholar

Chartier, Y. La réparation du préjudice (Paris: Dalloz 1983)Google Scholar

Chatelain, C. La Théorie de la Perte de Chance en Droit Hospitalier (Thesis, Lille, 2002)Google Scholar

Clerk, J.F. (Jones, M. ed.) Clerk & Lindsell on Torts 19th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)Google Scholar

Clerk, J.F. Clerk & Lindsell on Torts 20th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010)Google Scholar

Clerk, J.F. Clerk & Lindsell on Torts 21st edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2014)Google Scholar

Cohen, L.J. The Probable and the Provable (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, J. Risks and Wrongs (Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Coleman, J. The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Cooter, R. and Porat, A. Getting Incentives Right Improving Torts, Contracts, and Restitution (Princeton University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Cranor, C.F. Toxic Torts: Science, Law and the Possibility of Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, R. and Tapper, C. Cross & Tapper on Evidence 12th edition (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Darwall, S. Welfare and Rational Care (Princeton University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deakin, S., Johnston, A., and Markesinis, B. Markesinis and Deakin’s Tort Law 7th edition (Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demarez, J. L'indemnisation du dommage occasionné par un member inconnu d'un groupe determine (Paris: LGDJ, 1967)Google Scholar

Demogue, R. Traité des Obligations en Général Tomes III-IV (Paris: Librairie Arthur Rousseau, 1924)Google Scholar

Descheemaeker, E. The Division of Wrongs (Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, E. Haftungsrecht: Erster Band: Allgemeine Lehren (Cologne, Germany: Carl Heymanns, 1976)Google Scholar

Deutsch, E. and Spickhoff, A. Medizinrecht 6th edition (Berlin: Springer, 2008)Google Scholar

Dobbs, D. The Law of Torts (St. Paul, MN: West, 2000)Google Scholar

Douglas, S. Liability for Wrongful Interference with Chattels (Oxford: Hart, 2011)Google Scholar

Dowe, P. ‘A Counterfactual Theory of Prevention and “Causation” By Omission’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79 (2001), 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dressler, J. Understanding Criminal Law 4th edition (New York: Bender & Co, 2006)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.M. Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.M. Law's Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Dwyer, D. The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence (Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehlgen, C. Probabilistische Proportionalhaftung und Haftung für den Verlust von Chancen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013)Google Scholar

Emson, R. Evidence 4th edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)Google Scholar

Epstein, R. Cases and Materials on Torts 9th edition (New York: Aspen, 2009)Google Scholar

Fabre-Magnan, M. Droit des Obligations: Tome 2 2nd edition (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2010)Google Scholar

Feinberg, J. Harm to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar

Finnis, J. Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon, 1980)Google Scholar

Fleming, J.G. The Law of Torts 9th edition (Sydney: LBC, 1999)Google Scholar

Fletcher, G. Rethinking Criminal Law (Boston: Little Brown & Co, 1978)Google Scholar

Franzki, D. Die Beweisregeln im Arzthaftungsprozeß (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fröhlich, D. Die Beweisvereitelung im Zivilprozess (Thesis submitted at Julius Maximilian University Würzburg: opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/files/2990/dissFroehlich.pdf, 2008)Google Scholar

Fuchs, M. Deliktsrecht 6th edition (Berlin: Springer, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, M. Deliktsrecht 7th edition (Berlin: Springer, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, J. Offences and Defences (Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gebauer, M. Hypothetische Kausalität (Tübingen: Mohr, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghestin, J., Goubeaux, G., and Fabre-Magnan, M. Traité de droit civil, Introduction générale 4th edition (Paris: LGDJ, 1994)Google Scholar

Gilead, I., Green, M., and Koch, B. (eds.) Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillies, D. Philosophical Theories of Probability (Oxford: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar

Goldberg, J. and Zipursky, B. Torts: Oxford Introductions to US Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Goldberg, R. Causation and Risk in the Law of Torts: Scientific Evidence and Medicinal Product Liability (Oxford: Hart, 1999)Google Scholar

Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)Google Scholar

Green, S. Causation in Negligence (Oxford: Hart, 2014)Google Scholar

Großerichter, H. Hypothetischer Geschehensverlauf und Schadensfestellung – Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung vor dem Hintergrund der perte d'une chance (Munich: Beck, 2001)Google Scholar

Guégan-Lécuyer, A. Dommages de Masse et Responsabilité Civile (Paris: LGDJ, 2006)Google Scholar

Hald, A. A History of Probability and Statistics and Their Applications before 1750 (New Jersey: Wiley, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanau, P. Die Kausalität der Pflichtwidrigkeit (Göttingen: Schwartz & Co, 1971)Google Scholar

Harder, Y. Die Beweisfigur des Befunderhebungs-und Befundsicherungsfehlers im Arzthaftungsprozess nach der Rechtsprechung des BGH und der Instanzgerichte (Thesis, Regensburg, 2009)Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A. Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H.L.A. and Honoré, T. Causation in the Law 1st edition (Oxford: Clarendon, 1959)Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A. Causation in the Law 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Handfield, T. A Philosophical Guide to Chance (Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausch, A. Der grobe Behandlungsfehler in der gerichtlichen Praxis: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme (Karlsruhe: Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft, 2007)Google Scholar

Häusler, M. Haftung ohne Kausalitätsnachweis (Dissertation, Universität Wien, 2010)Google Scholar

Hawthorne, J. Knowledge and Lotteries (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Heck, P. Grundriß des Schuldrechts (Tübingen: Mohr, 1929)Google Scholar

Heinrich, E. Haftung bei alternative Kausalität mit Zufall (Vienna: Verlag Osterreich, 2010)Google Scholar

Helbron, H. Entwicklungen und Fehlentwicklungen im Arzthaftungsrecht (Munich: Herbert Utz, 2001)Google Scholar

Hensler, D.R. and Carroll, S. Asbestos Litigation (Cambridge: Rand Institute, 2005)Google Scholar

Hernan, M. and Robins, J. Causal Inference (Online book draft: www.hsph.harvard.edu/miguel-hernan/causal-inference-book/)Google Scholar

Ho, H.L. Philosophy of Evidence Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofmann, E. Die Umkehr der Beweislast in der Kausalfrage (Karlsruhe: Verlag Verisicherungswirtschaft, 1972)Google Scholar

Howarth, D. Textbook on Tort (London: Butterworths, 1995)Google Scholar

Hurley, P. Beyond Consequentialism (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Jackson, R. and Powell, J. (and Stewart, R.) Jackson and Powell on Professional Liability 6th edition with 4th supplement (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010)Google Scholar

Jansen, N. Die Struktur des Haftungsrechts (Tübingen: Mohr, 2003)Google Scholar

Kasche, M. Verlust von Heilungschancen – Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1999)Google Scholar

Katzenmeier, C. Arzthaftung (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002)Google Scholar

Keeton, R, Dobbs, D., and Owen, D. Prosser & Keeton on Torts, 5th edition (St. Paul, Mn: West, 1984)Google Scholar

Keren-Paz, T. Torts, Egalitarianism and Distributive Justice (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007)Google Scholar

Keynes, J. A Treatise on Probability (London: Macmillan & Co, 1921)Google Scholar

Khoury, L. Uncertain Causation in Medical Liability (Oxford: Hart, 2006)Google Scholar

Klar, L. Tort Law 3rd edition (Canada: Thomson, 2003)Google Scholar

Klar, L. Tort Law 4th edition (Canada: Thomson, 2008)Google Scholar

Knight, F.H. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1921)Google Scholar

Kötz, H. and Wagner, G. Deliktsrecht, 11th edition (Munich: Vahlen, 2010)Google Scholar

Koziol, H. Grundfragen des Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Jan Sremak Verlag, 2010)Google Scholar

Krüse, C. Alternative Kausalität (Munich: LIT, 2006)Google Scholar

Kyburg, H. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1961)Google Scholar

Lambert-Faivre, Y. and Porchy-Simon, S. Droit du dommage corporel 7th edition (Paris: Dalloz, 2012)Google Scholar

Lange, H. and Schiemann, G. Schadensersatz (Handbuch des Schuldrechts) 3rd edition (Tübingen: Mohr, 2003)Google Scholar

Larenz, K. and Canaris, CW. Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts Band II/2: Besonderer Teil 13th edition (Munich: Beck, 1994)Google Scholar

Laudan, L. Truth, Error and Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laufs, A., Katzenmeier, C., and Lipp, V. Arztrecht (Munich: Beck, 2009)Google Scholar

LeBrun, P. Responsabilité civile extra-contractuelle 2nd edition (LexisNexis, Litec: Paris, 2009)Google Scholar

Lepa, M. Die Verteilung der Beweislast im Privatrecht und ihre rationelle Begründung (Dissertation, Cologne, 1963)Google Scholar

LeTourneau, P. Droit de la responsabilité et des contrats 7th edition (Paris: Dalloz, 2008)Google Scholar

Linden, A.M. Canadian Tort Law, 7th edition (London: Butterworths, 2002)Google Scholar

Lipton, P. Inference to Best Explanation (London: Routledge, 1993)Google Scholar

Lord, R.A. Williston on Contracts vol 24 4th edition. (Thomson West, 2002)Google Scholar

Lunney, M. and Oliphant, K. Tort Law: Text Cases and Materials 4th edition (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Lunney, M. and Oliphant, K.Tort Law: Text Cases and Materials 5th edition (Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, J.L. The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation (Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Maassen, B. Beweismaßprobleme im Schadensersatzprozeß (Carl Heymanns Verlag: Cologne, 1975)Google Scholar

Mäsch, G. Chance und Schaden (Tübingen: Mohr, 2004)Google Scholar

Markesinis, B.S. and Unberath, H. The German Law of Torts (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Markesinis, B.S., Unberath, H., and Johnston, A. The German Law of Contract 2nd edition (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Mazeaud, H. and Mazeaud, L. Traité Théorique et Pratique de la Responsabilité Civile Délictuelle et Contractuelle 3rd edition (Paris: Sirey, 1939)Google Scholar

Mazeaud, H., Mazeaud, L., and Mazeaud, J. Traité Théorique et Pratique de la Responsabilité Civile Délictuelle et Contractuelle Tome II 6th edn (Paris: Montchrestien, 1970)Google Scholar

Mazeaud, H., Mazeaud, L., and Tunc, A. Traité Théorique et Pratique de la Responsabilité Civile Délictuelle et Contractuelle Tome I 6th edition (Paris: Montchrestien, 1965)Google Scholar

McCormick, C.T. McCormick on Evidence 5th edition (Strong, J.W., Broun, K.S., Dix, G.E., Inmwinkelried, E.J., Kaye, D.H., Mosteller, R.P. and Roberts, E.F. Contributors) (St. Paul, Mn: West, 1999)Google Scholar

McBride, N. and Bagshaw, R. Tort Law 3rd edition (London: Pearson, 2008)Google Scholar

McBride, N. Tort Law 4th edition (London: Pearson, 2012)Google Scholar

McGregor, H. McGregor on Damages 18th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2009)Google Scholar

McGregor, H. McGregor on Damages 19th edition (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2014)Google Scholar

Mehring, T. Beteiligung und Rechtswidrigkeit bei 830 I 2 BGB (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merkin, R. and Steele, J. Insurance and the Law of Obligations (Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mislawski, R. La Causalité dans la Responsabilité Civile: Recherches sur ses Rapports Avec la Causalité Scientifique (Thesis: University Cergy-Pontoise, 2006)Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. Zur Lehre vom Interesse (Braunschweig: Schwetschke, 1855)Google Scholar

Moore, M. Causation and Responsibility: Essays in Law, Metaphysics and Morals (Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Motsch, R. Vom rechtsgenügenden Beweis (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mouralis, J.L. Dalloz Civil: Preuve (Paris: Dalloz, 2002)Google Scholar

Müller, C. La Perte d'une Chance (Bern: Staempfli, 2002)Google Scholar

Müller-Stoy, W. Schadensersatz für verlorene Chancen – Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung (Freiburg, Thesis, 1973)Google Scholar

Murphy, J. and Witting, C. Street on Torts, 13th edition (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Neyers, J. and Chamberlain, E. (eds.) Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 2007)Google Scholar

O'Malley, F., et al. (eds.) Federal Jury Practice and Instructions 6th edition (Thomson West, 2009)Google Scholar

Osborne, P.H. The Law of Torts, 2nd edition (Toronto: Carswell, 2003)Google Scholar

Otsuka, M. Libertarianism without Inequality (Oxford University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, D (ed) Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Tort (Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Parfit, D. On What Matters Volumes I & II (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Parfit, D. Reasons and Persons (Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar

Paul, L.A. and Hall, N. Causation: A User's Guide (Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phipson, S.L. (co-contributors: Howard, M.N. and Bagshaw, R.) Phipson on Evidence, 5th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2005)Google Scholar

Planiol, M. and Ripert, G. Traité Pratique de Droit Civil Français Tome VI Obligations 2nd edition, Esmein, P. (ed.) (Paris: LGDJ, 1952)Google Scholar

Porat, A. and Stein, A. Tort Liability under Uncertainty (Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, R. and Landes, W. Economic Structure of Tort Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Posner, R. Economic Analysis of Law (Aspen Publishers, 2007)Google Scholar

Pradel, X. Le Préjudice dans le droit civil de la responsabilité (Paris: LGDJ, 2004)Google Scholar

Prütting, H. Gegenwartsprobleme der Beweislast (Munich: CH Beck, 1983)Google Scholar

Quentin, A. Kausalität und deliktische Haftungsbegr?ndung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994)Google Scholar

Quézel-Ambrunaz, C. Essai sur la causalité en droit de la responsabilité civile (Paris: Dalloz, 2010)Google Scholar

Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, J. From Normativity to Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, J. The Practice of Value (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Raz, J. The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988) Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Paperback Edition) (Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Restatements (1931–2010 published by the American Law Institute)Google Scholar

Restatements Restatement of Contracts (1931)Google Scholar

Restatements Restatement (Second) Contracts (1981)Google Scholar

Restatements Restatement (Second) Torts (1965–1979)Google Scholar

Restatements Restatement (Third) Torts (1998): Products LiabilityGoogle Scholar

Restatements Restatement (Third) Torts (2010): Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm, Volume 1Google Scholar

Riegger, T. Die historische Entwicklung der Arzthaftung (Thesis, Regensburg University, 2007)Google Scholar

Ripstein, A. Equality, Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Ripstein, A. Force and Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Röckrath, L. Kausalität, Wahrscheinlichkeit und Haftung (Munich: Beck, 2004)Google Scholar

Rogers, W.V.H. Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort, 17th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)Google Scholar

Rogers, W.V.H. Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort, 18th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2011)Google Scholar

Romerio, F. Toxische Kausalität. Eine rechtsvergleichende und interdisziplinäre Studie (Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1996)Google Scholar

Rothman, K. Epidemiology: An Introduction, 2nd edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Rothman, K., Greenland, S., and Lash, T. Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition (Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2008)Google Scholar

Sappideen, C. and Vines, P. (eds.) Flemming's Law of Torts, 10th edition. (Prymont: Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia, 2010)Google Scholar

Savatier, R. Traité de la Responsabilité Civile en Droit Français Tomes I-II (Paris : LGDJ, 1939)Google Scholar

Scanlon, T.M. What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schäfer, H. and Ott, C. Lehruch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechts (Berlin: Springer, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schauer, F. Profiles, Probabilities and Stereotypes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seifert, R. Ärztlicher Behandlungsfehler und schicksalhafter Verlauf: Zur haftungsrechtlichen Bewältigung eines Kausalitätsdilemmas (Baden: Nomos, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, A. The Idea of Justice (London: Penguin, 2010)Google Scholar

Seyfert, C. Mass Toxic Torts: Zum Problem der kausalen Unaufklärbarkeit toxischer Massenschäden (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sick, J. Beweisrecht im Arzthaftungsprozeß (Bern: Peter Lang, 1987)Google Scholar

Spickhoff, A. Folgenzurechnung in Schadensersatzrecht: Gründe und Grenzen (ed. Lorenz, E.) (Karlsruher Forum 2007; Munich: Beck, 2008)Google Scholar

Stapleton, J. Disease and the Compensation Debate (Oxford: Clarendon, 1986)Google Scholar

Stauch, M. The Law of Medical Negligence in England and Germany (Oxford: Hart, 2008)Google Scholar

Steele, J. Risks and Legal Theory (Oxford: Hart, 2004)Google Scholar

Stein, A. Foundations of Evidence Law (Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sträter, J. Grober Behandlungsfehler und Kausalitätsvermutung. Beweislastumkehr ohne medizinwissenschaftliche Basis? (Baden: Nomos, 2006)Google Scholar

Stevens, R. Torts and Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strong, J.W., Roberts, E.F., Kaye, D.H., and Broun, K.S. (eds.) McCormick on Evidence, 5th edition (St Paul, MN: West, 1999)Google Scholar

Tadros, V. The Ends of Harm (paperback edition) (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Tillers, P, and Green, E. Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence: The Uses and Limits of Bayesianism (Dordrecht: Springer, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Todd, S., et al. The Law of Torts in New Zealand, 5th edition (London: Thomson Reuters, 2009)Google Scholar

Traeger, L. Der Kausalbegriff im Straf-und Zivilrecht (Marburg: Elwert, 1904)Google Scholar

van Dam, C. European Tort Law, 1st edition (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Viney, G. and Jourdain, P. Les Conditions de la Responsabilité 3rd edition (Paris: LGDJ, 2006)Google Scholar

Viney, G. (with Carval, S.) Les Conditions de la Responsabilité (4th edition, Paris: LGDJ, 2013)Google Scholar

Von Bar, C. The Common European Law of Torts Volume 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Von Bar, C. The Common European Law of Torts Volume 2 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Von Bar, C. Verkehrspflichten (Cologne: Heymanns, 1980)Google Scholar

Wagner, G. Neue Perspektiven im Schadensersatzrecht – Kommerzialisierung, Strafschadensersatz, Kolletivschaden Gutachten A für den 66 Deutschen Juristentag (Munich: Beck, 2006)Google Scholar

Wagner, G. Schadensersatz: Zwecke, Inhalte, Grenzen (Karlsrüher Forum 2006, 2006)Google Scholar

Wahrendorf, V. Die Prinzipien der Beweislast im Haftungsrecht (Köln: Heymann, 1976)Google Scholar

Weber, H. Der Kausalitätsbeweis im Zivilprozeß (Tübingen: Mohr, 1997)Google Scholar

Weinrib, E. The Idea of Private Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Weinrib, E. Corrective Justice 1st edition (Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weir, T. Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weir, T. Tort Law 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Wilburg, W. Die Elemente des Schadensrechts (Marburg: Elwert, 1941)Google Scholar

Wilhelmi, R. Risikoschutz durch Privatrecht (Tubingen: Mohr, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, B. Moral Luck (Cambridge University Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, B. Shame and Necessity (California: University of California Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Williamson, T.W. Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B., Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Digest of European Tort Law: vol 1: Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna: Springer, 2007)Google Scholar

Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B., Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Digest of European Tort Law: vol 2: Essential Cases on Damage (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011)Google Scholar

Zuckermann, A. The Principles of Criminal Evidence (Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Aberkane, H. ‘Du dommage causé par une personne indéterminée dans un groupe déterminé de personnes’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil (1958)Google Scholar

Aboodi, R., Borer, A., and Enoch, D. ‘Deontology, Individualism, and Uncertainty, a Reply to Jackson and Smith’ Journal of Philosophy, 105 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, K.S. ‘Self-Proving Causation’ Virginia Law Review, 99 (2013): 1811Google Scholar

Adler, M.D. ‘Risk, Death and Harm: The Normative Foundations of Risk Regulation’, Minnesota Law Review, 87 (2003): 1293Google Scholar

Ahrens, H. ‘Die Verteilung der Beweislast’ in Lorenz, E. (ed.) Karlsruher Forum 2008 (2009)Google Scholar

Alexander, L. and Moore, M. ‘Deontological Theories of Morality’, Zalta, E. (ed) Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007)Google Scholar

Allen, C. ‘Note: Loss of Chance in Wyoming’ Wyoming Law Review, 6 (2006): 533CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R.J. ‘Rationality, Algorithms, and Juridical Proof: A Preliminary Enquiry’, The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, (1996–7): 254CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R.J. and Stein, A. ‘Evidence, Probability and the Burden of Proof’ Arizona Law Review, 55 (2013): 557Google Scholar

Amirthalingham, K. ‘Causation and the Gist of Negligence’ Cambridge Law Journal, 64 (2004): 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amirthalingham, K. ‘Causation, Risk and Damage’ Law Quarterly Review, 126 (2010): 162Google Scholar

Anscombe, G.E.M. ‘Causality and Determination’ in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind (The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 2) (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981)Google Scholar

Ashworth, A. ‘A Change of Normative Position: Determining the Contours of Culpability in Criminal Law’ New Criminal Law Review, 11 (2008): 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arens, P. ‘Dogmatik und Praxis der Schadensschätzung’ Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess, 88 (1975): 1Google Scholar

Bacher, K. Entry on Beweisvereitelung in §284 ZPO in Vorwerk, V. and Wolf, C. (eds.) Beck'scher Online-Kommentar ZPO (2012)Google Scholar

Bagchi, A. ‘Distributive Injustice and Private Law’ Hastings Law Jourrnal 60 (2008) 105Google Scholar

Bagshaw, R. ‘Causing the Behaviour of Others and Other Causal Mixtures’ in Goldberg, R. (ed). Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar

Bailey, S.H. ‘Causation in Negligence: What is a Material Contribution?’ Legal Studies, 30 (2010): 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balaguer, M. ‘Why There are No Good Arguments for any Interesting Version of Determinism’ Synthese, 168 (2009): 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballhausen, B. ‘Anwendung der Beweislastumkehr nach den für die Arzthaftung entwickelten Grundsätzen bei einem groben Behandlungsfehler im Rahmen der Arzneimittelhaftung’ Medizinrecht, 29 (2011): 575Google Scholar

Barker, K. ‘Unfamiliar Waters: Negligent Advocates, Egregious Errors and Lost Chances of Acquittal’ University of Queensland Law Journal, 24 (2005): 469Google Scholar

Barker, S. ‘Counterfactuals, Probabilistic Counterfactuals and Causation’ Mind, 108 (1999): 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, M. ‘Die Problematik gesamtschuldnerischer Haftung trotz ungeklärter Verursachung’ Juristenzeitung, (1971): 4Google Scholar

Baumgartner, M. ‘A Regularity Theoretic Approach to Actual Causation’ Erkenntnis, 78 (2013): 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beebee, H. ‘Does Anything Hold the Universe Together?’ Synthese, 149 (2006): 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beever, A. ‘Cause-in-Fact: Two Steps Out of the Mire’ University of Toronto Law Journal, 51 (2001): 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beever, A. ‘Gregg v Scott and Loss of a Chance’ University of Queensland Law Journal, 24 (2005): 201Google Scholar

Beever, A. ‘Policy in Private Law: An Admission of Failure’ University of Queensland Law Journal, 25 (2006): 287Google Scholar

Ben-Shahar, O. ‘Causation and Foreseeability’ in Faure, M. (ed.) Tort Law and Economic: Volume 1: Encyclopedia of Law and Economics 2nd edition (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009)Google Scholar

Béraud, R. ‘Les Mythes de la Responsabilité Civile’ Semaine Juridique 1964.I.1837Google Scholar

Béraud, R. ‘Quelques difficultés de preuve de la responsabilité délictuelle’ Semaine Juridique 1950.I.870Google Scholar

Berger, M.A. ‘Eliminating General Causation: Notes Toward a New Theory of Justice and Toxic Torts’ Columbia Law Review, 97 (1997): 2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, M.A. and Twerski, A.D. ‘Uncertainty and Informed Choice: Unmasking Daubert’ Michigan Law Review, 104 (2005): 257Google Scholar

Bernstein, A. ‘Asbestos Achievements’ Southwestern University Law Review, 37 (2008): 691Google Scholar

Bernstein, A. ‘Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.: Markets of Mothers’, in Rabin, and Sugarman, (eds). Torts Stories (New York: Foundation Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Bernstein, A. ‘Keep it Simple: An Explanation of the Rule of No Recovery for Pure Economic Loss’ Arizona Law Review, 48 (2006): 773Google Scholar

Berryman, J. ‘The Compensation Principle in Private Law’, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 42 (2008): 91Google Scholar

Bernstein, D. ‘Getting to Causation in Toxic Tort Cases’ Brooklyn Law Review, 74 (2008): 51Google Scholar

Bieri, L. and Marty, P. ‘The Discontinuous Nature of the Loss of a Chance System’ Journal of European Tort Law, 2 (2011): 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birks, P. ‘The Concept of Civil Wrong’ in Owen, D. (ed.) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Black, V. ‘Decision Causation: Pandora's Tool-Box’, in Chamberlain, Neyers, Pitel, (eds). Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 2007)Google Scholar

Black, V. and Klimchuk, D. ‘Comment on Athey v. Leonati: Causation, Damages, and Thin Skulls’, University of British Columbia Law Review, 31 (1997): 163Google Scholar

Bloch, C. ‘Exposition à un risque et perte de chance’ Semiane Juridique 2010.III.1914–1915Google Scholar

Bloch, C. ‘Exposition à un risque et préjudice moral d'anxiété’ Semaine Juridique 2010.III.1914Google Scholar

Bodewig, T. ‘Probleme Alternative Kausalität bei Massanschaden’ Archiv für civilistische Praxis, 185 (1985): 505Google Scholar

Boivin, D. ‘Factual Causation in the Law of Manufacturer Failure to Warn’ Ottawa Law Review, 30 (1998): 47Google Scholar

Boon, A. ‘Causation and the Increase of Risk’ Modern Law Review, 51 (1988): 508Google Scholar

Boré, J. ‘L'indemisation pour les chances perdues: une forme d'appréciation quantative de la causalité d'un fait dommageable’ La Semaine Juridique 1974.I.2620Google Scholar

Borghetti, J-S. ‘La reparation de la perte d'une chance en droit Suisse et en droit français’ European Review of Private Law, (2008): 1072Google Scholar

Borghetti, JS. ‘Note under Cass Civ 1e, 25 Nov 2010’ Semaine Juridique G.2011.79Google Scholar

Boston, G. ‘A Mass-Exposure Model of Toxic Causation: The Content of Scientific Proof and the Regulatory Experience” Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 18 (1993): 181Google Scholar

Boston, G. ‘Apportionment of Harm in Tort Law: A Proposed Restatement’ University of Dayton Law Review, 21 (1995): 268Google Scholar

Botterell, A. and Essert, C. ‘Normativity, Fairness, and the Problem of Factual Uncertainty’ Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 47 (2009): 663CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boysen, J. ‘Shifting the Burden of Proof on Causation in Legal Malpractice Actions’ St Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics, 1 (2011): 308Google Scholar

Braun, J. ‘Zur schadensersatzrechtlichen Problematik des hypothetischen Inzidentprozesses bei Regreßklagen gegen den Anwalt’ Zeitschrift für Zivilprozessrecht, 96 (1983): 89Google Scholar

Brehm, W. ‘Zur Haftung bei alternativer Kausalität’ Juristenzeitung, (1980): 585Google Scholar

Brennan, T.A. ‘Causal Chains and Statistical Links’ Cornell Law Review, 73 (1987–8): 469Google Scholar

Brennan, T.A. ‘Environmental Torts’ Vanderbilt Law Review, 46 (1993): 1Google Scholar

Broadbent, A. ‘Epidemiological Evidence in Proof of Specific Causation’ Legal Theory, 17 (2011): 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. ‘Consequentialize This’ Ethics, 121 (2011): 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. ‘Material Contribution's Expanding Hegemony: Factual Causation After Hanke v. Resurfice Corp.’ Canadian Business Law Journal, 45 (2007): 432Google Scholar

Brown, R. ‘The Possibility of “Inference Causation”: Inferring Cause-in-Fact and the Nature of Legal Fact Finding’ McGill Law Journal, 55 (2010): 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchak, L. ‘Belief, Credence and Norms’ Philosophical Studies, 169 (2014): 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchberger, M. ‘Le role de l'article 1315 du code civil en cas d'inexécution d'un contrat’ Dalloz Doctrine, (2011): 465Google Scholar

Burrows, A. ‘Comparing Compensatory Damages in Tort and Contract’ in Degeling, S., Edelman, J., and Goudkamp, J. Torts in Commercial Law (Law Book Co., 2011)Google Scholar

Burrows, A. ‘Uncertainty about Uncertainty: Damages for Loss of a Chance’ Journal of Personal Injury Law, 1 (2008): 31Google Scholar

Bush, RAB. ‘Between Two Worlds: The Shift from Individual to Group Responsibility in the Law of Causation of Injury’ University of California Los Angeles Law Review, 33 (1985–6): 1473Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F. ‘Aktuelle Streitfragen um die alternative Kausalität’ in Sandrock, O. (ed.) Festschrift Beitzke (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1979)Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F. ‘Causation as a Legal Phenomenon’ in Tichy, L. (ed.) Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Carlova, 2007)Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F. ‘Haftung bei alternativer Kausalität’ Juristische Blätter, (1959): 1Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F. ‘Haftungsgrund und Zufall als alternative mögliche Schadensursachen’ in Enziger, M., et al. (eds.) Festschrift Frotz (Vienna: Manz, 1993)Google Scholar

Calabresi, G. ‘Concerning Cause and the Law of Torts: An Essay for Harry Kalven, Jr.’, University of Chicago Law Review, 43 (1975): 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, D. ‘The End of Posnerian Law and Economics’ The Modern Law Review, 73 (2010): 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canaris, C.W. ‘Die Vermutung “aufklärungsrichtigen Verhaltens” und ihre grundlagen’ in Festschrift für Hadding (Berlin: De Gruyter,2004)Google Scholar

Cane, P. ‘Corrective Justice and Correlativity in Private Law’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 16 (1996): 471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cane, P. ‘Distributive Justice and Tort Law’ New Zealand Law Review, (2001): 401Google Scholar

Cane, P. ‘The Anatomy of Private Law Theory: A 25th Anniversary Essay’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25 (2005): 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cane, P. ‘The General/Special Distinction in Criminal Law, Tort Law, and Legal Theory’, Law and Philosophy, 26 (2007): 465CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carbone, M. and Yang, H. ‘Molecular Pathways: Targeting Mechanisms of Asbestos and Erionite Carcinogenesis in Mesothelioma’ Clinical Cancer Research, 18 (2012): 598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cartwright, N. ‘Are RCTs the Gold Standard?’ Biosocieties, 2 (2007): 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chabas, F. ‘La perte d'une chance en droit français’ in Guillod, O. (ed.) Colloque Développements récents du droit de la responsabilité civile (Zurich: Schulthess, 1991)Google Scholar

Cheifitz, D. ‘Materially Increasing the Risk of Injury as Factual Cause of Injury’ The Advocates’ Quarterly, 29 (2004): 253Google Scholar

Cheifitz, D. ‘Not Clarifying Causation’ (unpublished, 2011)Google Scholar

Cheifitz, D. and Black, V. ‘Through the Looking Glass, Darkly: Resurfice v. Hanke’ Alberta Law Review, 45 (2007–8): 241Google Scholar

Chignell, A. ‘Belief in Kant’ Philosophical Review, 116 (2007): 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clermont, K. ‘Standards of Proof Revisited’ Vermont Law Review, 43 (2009): 469Google Scholar

Clermont, K. and Sherwin, E. ‘A Comparative View of Standards of Proof’ American Journal of Comparative Law, 50 (2002): 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, L.J. ‘Subjective Probability and the Paradox of the Gatecrasher’ Arizona State Law Journal, (1981): 627Google Scholar

Coleman, J. ‘Doing Away with Tort’ Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 41 (2008): 1149Google Scholar

Coleman, J. ‘Mistakes, Misunderstanding, and Misalignments’ Yale Law Journal Online, 121 (2012): 541Google Scholar

Coleman, J. ‘On the Moral Argument for the Fault System’ The Journal of Philosophy, 71 (1974): 473CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, J. ‘Property, Wrongfulness and the Duty to Compensate’ Chicago-Kent Law Review, 63 (1987): 451Google Scholar

Coleman, J. ‘Tort Law and Tort Theory: Preliminary Reflections on Method’ in Postema, G. Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Collins, J. ‘Pre-emptive Pre-emption’ in Collins, J., et al. (eds.) Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coons, J.E. ‘Approaches to Court Imposed Compromise–The Uses of Doubt and Reason’ North Western University Law Review, 58 (1964): 750Google Scholar

Coons, J.E. ‘Compromise as Precise Justice’ California Law Review, 68 (1980): 250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, K. ‘Assessing Possibilities in Damages Awards: The Loss of a Chance or the Chance of a Loss’ Saskatchewan Law Review, 37 (1973): 193Google Scholar

Cour de Cassation. Annual Report (2007)Google Scholar

Dan-Cohen, M. ‘Luck and Identity’ Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 9 (2008): 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniels, N. ‘Reflective Equilibrium’ in Zalta, E. (ed.) Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011)Google Scholar

Dannemann, G. ‘Comparative Law: Study of Similarities or Differences’ in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Davies, P. ‘Complicity’ in Dyson, M. (ed.) Unravelling Tort and Crime (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Dawid, A.P. ‘The Difficulty about Conjunction’ The Statistician, 36 (1987): 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawid, A.P. ‘The Role of Scientific and Statistical Evidence in Assessing Causality’ in Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar

Deffains, B. and Fluet, C. ‘Legal Liability when Individuals have Moral Concerns’ Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 29 (2013): 930CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Déjean de la Batie, N. ‘Note under Cass Civ 3e, 19 May 1976 (3 decisions)’ Semaine Juridique 1978.II.18773 (1978)Google Scholar

Delgado, R. ‘Beyond Sindell: Relaxation of Cause-in-Fact Rules for Indeterminate Plaintiffs’, California Law Review, 70 (1982): 881CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demougin, D. and Fluet, C. ‘Preponderance of Evidence’ European Economic Review, 50 (2006): 963CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Department for Work and Pensions. ‘Asbestos-Related Diseases’ (London: Crown Copyright, 2005)Google Scholar

Descorps-Declère, F. ‘La Cohérence de la jurisprudence de la Cour de Cassation sur la perte de chance consécutive à la faute du médecin’ Dalloz, 2005.742Google Scholar

Deutsch, E. ‘Die dem Gesch?gten nachteilige Ad?anz: Zur einschr?enden Auslegung des ���830 I 2 BGB durch den BGB’ Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1981): 2731Google Scholar

Dewes, D. and Trebilcock, M. ‘The Efficacy of the Tort System and its Alternatives: A Review of Empirical Evidence’ Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 30 (1992): 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowe, P. ‘Absences, Possible Causation, and the Problem of Non-locality’ The Monist, 92 (2009): 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durry, G. ‘Faute médicale et perte de chances de survie’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1972): 408Google Scholar

Durry, G. ‘Jurisprudence française en matière de droit civil’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1971): 377Google Scholar

Durry, G. ‘La faute du médecin diminuant les “chances de guérison” du malade’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1967): 181Google Scholar

Durry, G. ‘La faute du médecin diminuant les “chances de guérison” du malade’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1969): 797Google Scholar

Dworkin, G. ‘Note on Cass Civ 2e, 19 May 1976’ in Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil (1977): 129Google Scholar

Dworkin, G. ‘Risk and Remoteness. Causation Worse Confounded’ The Modern Law Review, 27 (1964): 344Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.M. ‘Hart's Postscript and the Character of Political Philosophy’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24 (2004): 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, R.M. ‘Is Wealth a Value?’ The Journal of Legal Studies, 9 (1980): 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, R.M. ‘Principle, Policy, Procedure’ in Dworkin, R.M. A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Eberl-Borges, C. ‘§830 BGB und die Gefährdungshaftung’ Archiv für civilistische Praxis, 196 (1996): 491Google Scholar

Eberl-Borges, C. Commentary in J von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: §830 BGB (2008)Google Scholar

Edelman, J. ‘The Meaning of Loss and Enrichment’ in Chambers, R., Mitchell, C., and Penner, J. Philosophical Foundations of Unjust Enrichment (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Edelman, J. ‘Loss of a Chance’ Torts Law Journal 21 (2013). 1Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M.A. ‘Probability and Chance in Contract Law’ UCLA Law Review 45 (1998): 1005Google Scholar

Ellis, L. ‘Note, Loss of Chance as Technique: Toeing the Line at Fifty Percent’ Texas Law Review, 72 (1993): 369Google Scholar

Engel, C. ‘Preponderance of the Evidence Versus Intime Conviction’ Vermont Law Review, 33 (2008–9): 435Google Scholar

Enoch, D. and Fisher, T. “‘Sense and Sensitivity’: Epistemic and Instrumental Approaches to Statistical Evidence” Stanford Law Review 67 (2015): 557Google Scholar

Enoch, D., Spectre, L., and Fisher, T. ‘Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge’ Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40 (2012): 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esmein, P. ‘Note under Cour d'Appel Riom, 5 February 1964’ Semaine Juridique 1964.II.13640Google Scholar

Evans, H. ‘Lost Litigation and Later Knowledge’ Professional Negligence, 23 (2007): 204Google Scholar

Evans, H. ‘The Scope of Sephton: Limitation Where You Don't Get what You Ought’ Professional Negligence, 25 (2009): 15Google Scholar

Evatt, P.L. ‘A Closer Look at Loss of Chance under Nebraska Medical Law’ Nebraska Law Review, 76 (1997): 979Google Scholar

Faure, M.G. and Bruggeman, V. ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability’ in Tichy, L. (ed.) Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Carlova, 2007)Google Scholar

Faure, M.G. ‘The Complementary Roles of Liability, Regulation and Insurance in Safety Management: Theory and Practice’ Journal of Risk Research, 17 (2014): 689CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrante, M. ‘Causation in Criminal Responsibility’ New Criminal Law Review, 11 (2008): 470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelstein, C. ‘Is Risk a Harm?’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151 (2003): 963CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis, J. ‘Allocating Risks and Suffering: Some Hidden Traps’ Cleveland State Law Review, 38 (1990): 193Google Scholar

Finn, M. ‘Anmerkung zu BGH, Urt v.19.6.2012 – VI ZR 77/11’, Medizinrecht, 31 (2013): 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, D.A. ‘Causation in Fact in Omission Cases’ Utah Law Review, (1992): 1335Google Scholar

Fischer, DA. ‘Causation in Fact in Products. Liability Failure to Warn Cases’ Journal of Products & Toxic Liability, 17 (1995): 271Google Scholar

Fischer, DA. ‘Insufficient Causes’ Kentucky Law Journal, 94 (2005–6): 277Google Scholar

Fischer, DA. ‘Products Liability – An Analysis of Market Share’ Vanderbilt Law Review, 34 (1981): 1623Google Scholar

Fischer, DA. ‘Proportional Liability, Statistical Evidence, and the Probability Paradox’ Vanderbilt Law Review, 46 (1993): 1201Google Scholar

Fischer, DA. ‘Successive Causes and the Enigma of Duplicated Harm’ Tennessee Law Review, 66 (1998–9): 1127Google Scholar

Fischer, DA. ‘Tort Recovery for Loss of a Chance’ Wake Forest Law Review, 36 (2001): 605Google Scholar

Fischer, J.M. ‘“Ought-Implies-Can” Causal Determinism and Moral Responsibility’ Analysis, 63 (2003): 244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, J.M. and Ennis, R.H. ‘Causation and Liability’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, 15 (1986): 33Google Scholar

Fisher, T. ‘Conviction without Conviction’ Minnesota Law Review, 96 (2012): 833Google Scholar

Fleischer, H. ‘Schadensersatz für verlorene Chancen im Vertrags-und Deliktsrecht’ Juristenzeitung, (1999): 766Google Scholar

Fleming, J. ‘Probabilistic Causation in Tort Law’ Canadian Bar Review, 68 (1989): 661Google Scholar

Fletcher, G.P. ‘Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory’ Harvard Law Review, 85 (1972): 537CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foerste, U. Commentary to §§286–287 ZPO in Musielak, H. (ed.) Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung 9th edition (Munich: Beck, 2009)Google Scholar

Foerste, U. Commentary on §§286–287 ZPO in Musielak, H. (ed.) Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung 10th edition (Munich: Beck, 2013)Google Scholar

Fossier, T. and Lévêque, F. ‘Le “presque vrai” et le “pas tout à fait faux”: probabilities et decision juridictionnelle’ JCP no. 14, doctr. 427 (2012)Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. ‘Alternative Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’ Journal of Philosophy, 23 (1969): 829CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frasca, R. ‘Loss of Chance Rules and the Valuation of Loss of Chance Damages’ Journal of Legal Economics, 15 (2008–9): 91Google Scholar

Fraser, J.D. and Howarth, D.R. ‘More Concern for Cause’, Legal Studies, 4 (1984): 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fumerton, R. and Kress, K. ‘Causation and the Law: Preemption, Lawful Sufficiency and Causal Sufficiency’ Law and Contemporary Problems, 64 (2001): 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galand-Carval, S. ‘Causation under French Law’ in Spier, J. (ed.) Unification of Tort Law: Causation (Hague: Kluwer, 2000)Google Scholar

Galand-Carval, S. ‘Country Report for France’ in Oliphant, K. (ed.) Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage (Vienna: Springer, 2009)Google Scholar

Galia-Beauchesne, A. ‘Note under Cass Crim. 19 May 1978’ Dalloz, (1980): 3Google Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘Corrective Justice, Corrected’ Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche, 12 (2012): 9Google Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘Law's Aim in Law's Empire’ in Hershovitz, Scott (ed.) Exploring Law's Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘Obligations and Outcomes in the Law of Torts’ in Cane, P. and Gardner, J. (eds.) Relating to Responsibility: Essays for Tony Honoré (Oxford: Hart, 2001)Google Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘Some Rule-of-Law Anxieties about Strict Liability in Private Law’ in Austin, L. and Klimchuk, D. (eds.) Private Law and the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘The Mark of Responsibility’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (2003): 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘The Wrongdoing That Gets Results’ Philosophical Perspectives: 18 (2004): 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘Torts and Other Wrongs’ Florida State University Law Review, 39 (2011): 43Google Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘What is Tort Law For? Part 1: The Place of Corrective Justice’ Law and Philosophy, 30 (2011): 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘What is Tort Law For? Part 2: The Place of Distributive Justice’ in Oberdiek, J. (ed.) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘Wrongs and Faults’ The Review of Metaphysics, 59 (2005): 95Google Scholar

Geiger, S. and Kruse, C. ‘House of Lords 3 May 2006, Barker v. Corus Neue Impulse für das Europäische Deliktsrecht vom House of Lords’ European Review of Private Law, (2008): 339CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geistfeld, M. ‘Inadequate Product Warnings and Causation’ University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 30 (1996–7): 309Google Scholar

Geistfeld, M. ‘Scientific Uncertainty and Causation in Tort Law’ Vanderbilt Law Review, 54 (2001): 1011Google Scholar

Geistfeld, M. ‘Social Value as a Policy-Based Limitation on the Ordinary Duty to Exercise Reasonable Care’ Wake Forest law Review, 44 (2009): 899Google Scholar

Geistfeld, M. ‘The Analytics of Duty: Medical Monitoring and Related Forms of Economic Loss’ Vanderbilt Law Review, 88 (2002): 1921Google Scholar

Geistfeld, M. ‘The Doctrinal Unity of Alternative Liability and Market Share Liability’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155 (2006): 447CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gernhuber, J. ‘Haftung bei alternativer Kausalität’ Juristenzeitung (1961): 152Google Scholar

Giesen, I. ‘The reversal of the burden of proof in the Principles of European Tort Law A comparison with Dutch tort law and civil procedure rules’ Utrecht Law Review, 6 (2010): 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gifford, D. ‘The Challenge to the Individual Causation Requirement in Mass Products Torts’ Washington & Lee Law Review, 62 (2005): 873Google Scholar

Gilead, I., Green, M. and Koch, B., ‘General Report: Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Report’ in Gilead, I., Green, M., and Koch, B. (eds.) Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, S. ‘Causation in Toxic Torts: Burdens of Proof, Standards of Persuasion, and Statistical Evidence’ Yale Law Journal, 96 (1986–7): 376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, S.C. ‘Causation in Toxic Torts: Burdens of Proof, Standards of Persuasion, and Statistical Evidence’ Yale Law Journal, 96 (1986): 376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, S.C. ‘The More We Know, The Less Intelligent We Are? – How Genomic Information Should and Should Not, Change Toxic Tort Doctrine’ Harvard Environmental Law Review, 34 (2010): 369Google Scholar

Gold, S.C. ‘The “Reshapement” of the False Negative Asymmetry Doctrine in Toxic Tort Causation’ William Mitchell Law Review, 37 (2011): 1507Google Scholar

Goldberg, J.C.P. ‘What Clients Are Owed: Cautionary Observations on Lawyers and Loss of a Chance’ Emory Law Journal, 52 (2003): 1201Google Scholar

Goldberg, J.C.P and Zipursky, B. ‘Rights and Responsibility’ in Nolan, D. and Robertson, A. Rights and Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012)Google Scholar

Goldberg, J.C.P ‘Torts as Wrongs’ Texas Law Review, 88 (2010): 917Google Scholar

Goldberg, J.C.P ‘Unrealized Torts’ Virginia Law Review, 88 (2002): 1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, R. ‘Using Scientific Evidence to Resolve Causation Problems in Product Liability: UK, US and French Perspectives’ in Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)Google Scholar

Goldstein, B. and Henifin, M. ‘Reference Guide on Toxology’ in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 3rd edition (Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Graßhoff, G. and May, M. ‘Causal Regularities’ in Spohn, W., Ledwig, M., and Esfeld, M. (eds.) in Current Issues in Causation (Paderborn, Mentis, 2001)Google Scholar

Grechenig, C. and Stremitzer, A. ‘Der Einwand rechtmäßigen Alternativverhaltens – Rechtsvergleich, ökonomische Analyse und Implicationen für die Proportionalhaftung’ Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law, 73 (2009): 336Google Scholar

Green, M.D. ‘Pessimism About Milward’ Wake Forest Journal of Law and Policy, 3 (2005): 41Google Scholar

Green, M.D. ‘Second Thoughts about Apportionment in Asbestos Litigation’ Southwestern University Law Review, 37 (2008): 531Google Scholar

Green, M.D. ‘The Future of Proportional Liability: The Lessons of Toxic Substances Causation’ in Madden, S. (ed.) Exploring Tort Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Green, M.D. ‘The Intersection of Factual Causation and Damages’ De Paul Law Review, 55 (2006): 571Google Scholar

Green, M.D., Freedman, M., and Gordis, L. ‘Reference Guide on Epidemiology’ in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 3rd edition (Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Green, M.D., Powers, W., and Sanders, J. ‘The Insubstantiality of the ‘Substantial Factor’ Test for Causation’ Missouri Law Review, 73 (2008): 399Google Scholar

Green, S. ‘The Risk Pricing Principle: a Pragmatic Approach to Causation and Apportionment of Damages’ Law, Probability and Risk, 4 (2005): 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grey, B. ‘The Plague of Causation in National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act’ Harvard Journal of Legislation, 48 (2011): 343Google Scholar

Griffin, L. ‘“Which one of you did it?” Criminal Liability for “Causing or Allowing” the Death of a Child’ Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 15 (2004–5): 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grodsky, J. ‘Genomics and Toxic Torts: Dismantling the Risk-Injury Divide’ Stanford Law Review, 59 (2007): 1671Google ScholarPubMed

Gunson, J. ‘Turbulent Causal Waters: The High Court, Causation and Medical Negligence’ Tort Law Review, 9 (2000): 53Google Scholar

Haack, S. ‘Proving Causation: The Holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert’ Journal of Health and Biomedical Law, 4 (2009): 253Google Scholar

Haack, S. ‘Risky Business: Statistical Proof of Individual Causation’ in Ferrer, J. (ed.) Causalidad y Atribución de Responsibilidad (Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2012)Google Scholar

Häger, J. ‘Die Kausalität bei Massenschäden’ in Festschrift für Canaris (Munich: Beck, 2007)Google Scholar

Hajek, A. ‘Interpretations of Probability’ in Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011)Google Scholar

Hajek, A. ‘Mises Redux’ – Redux: Fifteen Arguments Against Finite Frequentism” Erkenntnis, 45 (1996): 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halbersberg, Y. and Guttel, E. ‘Behavioural Economics and Tort Law’ in Zamir, E. and Teichman, D. The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Hall, N. ‘Two Concepts of Causation’ in Collins, J. et al. (eds.) Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Halpérin, J. ‘French Legal Doctrine’ in Jansen, N. (ed.) The Development and Making of Legal Doctrine (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Hamer, D. ‘Before the High Court - Mind the Evidential Gap: Causation and Proof in Amaca Pty Ltd v Ellis’ Sydney Law Review, 31 (2009): 465Google Scholar

Hamer, D. ‘Chance would be a fine thing: Proof of Causation and Quantum in an Unpredictable World’ Melbourne University Law Review, 23 (1999): 24Google Scholar

Hamer, D. ‘Probabilistic Standards of Proof: Their Complements and the Errors that Are Expected to Flow from Them’ University of New England Law Journal, 1 (2004): 71Google Scholar

Hamer, D. ‘The Civil Standard of Proof Uncertainty: Probability, Belief and Justice’ Sydney Law Review, 16 (1994): 506Google Scholar

Hanau, P. ‘Anmerkung zum Urteil des BGH vom 11.6.1968 (VI ZR 116/67)’ Neue Juristische Wochenschrift,(1968): 2291Google Scholar

Handfield, T. and Wilson, A. ‘Chance and Context’ in Wilson, A. (ed.) Chance and Temporal Asymmetry (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Handfield, T. and Pisciotta, T. ‘Is Risk-Liability Theory Compatible with Negligence Law?’ Legal Theory, 11 (2005): 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harel, A. and Porat, A. ‘Aggregating Probabilities Across Cases: Criminal Responsibility for Unspecified Offenses’ Minnesota Law Review, 94 (2009): 261Google Scholar

Harman, E. ‘Harming as Causing Harm’ in Roberts, M. and Wasserman, D. (eds.) Harming Future Persons (Dordrecht: Springer, 2009)Google Scholar

Hausch, A. ‘Vom therapierenden zum dokumentierenden Arzt — Über die zunehmende haftungsrechtliche Bedeutung der ärztlichen Dokumentation’ VersR, (2006): 612Google Scholar

Heinemann, K. ‘Baustein anwaltlicher Berufshaftung: die Beweislast’ Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, (1990): 2345Google Scholar

Henckel, W. ‘Grenzen richterlicher Schadensschätzung’ JuS, (1975): 221Google Scholar

Hensler, D.R. ‘Has the Fat Lady Sung? The Future of Mass Toxic Torts’ Review of Litigation, 26 (2007): 883Google Scholar

Hernán, M. and Jick, S.S. ‘Hepatitis B vaccination and multiple sclerosis: the jury is still out’ Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 15 (2006): 653CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hill, A.B. ‘The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58 (1965): 295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hill, J., Reiter, J., and Zanutto, E. ‘A Comparison of Experimental and Observational Data Analyses’ in Gelman, A. and Weng, X. (eds.) Applied Bayesian Modelling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives (New York: Wiley, 2004)Google Scholar

Hill, T. ‘A Lost Chance for Compensation in the Tort of Negligence by the House of Lords’, Modern Law Review, 4 (1991): 511CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hocquet-Berg, S. 10052 ‘La perte d'une chance pour fixer la réparation à la mesure statistique du lien causal entre les fautes et le dommage’ Semaine Juridique 2010.II.878Google Scholar

Hocquet-Berg, S. ‘Note’ in Semaine Juridique 2007.II.Google Scholar

Hoefer, C. ‘Causal Determinism’ in Zalta, E. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2010)Google Scholar

Hoefer, C. ‘The Third Way on Objective Probability: A Sceptic's Guide to Objective Probability’ Mind, 116 (2007): 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, L. ‘Causation’ Law Quarterly Review, 121 (2005): 421Google Scholar

Hoffmann., L. ‘Fairchild and After’ in Burrows, A., Johnston, D., and Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Judge and Jurist: Essays in Memory of Lord Rodger (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Hoffmann., L. ‘Common Sense and Causing Loss’ (Lecture to the Chancery Bar Association, 1999)Google Scholar

Hogan, T.B. ‘Cook v. Lewis Re-examined’ Modern Law Review, 24 (1961): 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogg, M. ‘Developing Causal Doctrine’ in Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)Google Scholar

Hohfeld, W.N. ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ Yale Law Journal, 23 (1913–14): 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honoré, A.M. ‘Necessary and Sufficient Conditions in Tort Law’ in Owen, D. (ed.) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Honoré, A.M. ‘Review: Legal Cause in the Law of Torts by Robert E. Keeton’ Harvard Law Review, 77 (1964): 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honoré, A.M. ‘Responsibility and Luck: The Moral Basis of Strict Liability’, Law Quarterly Review, 104 (1988): 530Google Scholar

Honoré, A.M. ‘The Morality of Tort Law – Questions and Answers’ in Owen, D. (ed.) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Lord Hope of Craighead. ‘James McGhee – A Second Mrs. Donoghue?’ Cambridge Law Journal, 62 (2003): 587CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howarth, D.H. ‘Three Forms of Responsibility: On the Relationship between Tort Law and The Welfare State’ Cambridge Law Journal, 60 (2001): 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howarth, D.H. ‘Libel: Its Purpose and Reform’ Modern Law Review, 74 (2011): 845CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huet, J. ‘Perte d'une Chance: du plus ou moins classique?’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1986): 117Google Scholar

Hylton, K. ‘Causation in Tort Law: A Reconsideration’ in Arlen, J. (ed.) Research Handbook on the Economics of Torts (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013)Google Scholar

Ibbetson, D.J. ‘Harmonisation of the Law of Tort and Delict’ in Zimmermann, R. (ed.) Grundstrukturen des Europäischen Deliktsrechts (Baden: Nomos, 2003)Google Scholar

IIAC. ‘Laryngeal Cancer and Asbestos Exposure’ www.iiac.org.uk (Position Paper 22) (2008)Google Scholar

Illari, P. and Williamson, J. ‘What is a Mechanism? Thinking About Mechanisms Across the Sciences’ European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2 (2012): 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakubowitz, D. ‘“Help I've Fallen and Can't Get Up!” New York's Application of the Substantial Factor Test’ St John's Journal of Legal Commentary, 18 (2003–4): 593Google Scholar

Jansen, N. Entry on §249 and § 252 BGB in Schmoeckel, M., Rückert, J., and Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Historisch-kritischer Kommentar zum BGB Band II: Schuldrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. 1. Teilband: §§ 241–304. 2. Teilband: §§ 305–432 (Tübingen: Mohr, 2007)Google Scholar

Jansen, N. ‘The Concept of Non-Contractual Obligations: Rethinking the Divisions of Tort, Unjustified Enrichment, and Contract Law’ Journal of European Tort Law, 1 (2010): 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jansen, N. ‘The Idea of a Lost Chance’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19 (1999): 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, E. ‘Criminal Liability for Loss of a Chance’ Iowa Law Review, 91 (2005): 59Google Scholar

Jourdain, P. ‘Comment traiter le dommage potentiel?’ Responsabilité Civile et Assurances n° 3, March 2010, dossier 11Google Scholar

Jourdain, P. ‘Sur la perte d'une chance’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1992): 109Google Scholar

Jourdain, P. ‘Un recul de la responsabilité “in solidum” des members d'un groupe de personnes dont l'un d'entre eux est l'auteur non identifié du dommage’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1988): 769Google Scholar

Jourdain, P. ‘Usage et abus de la notion de perte d'une chance’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1989): 85Google Scholar

Julia, G. ‘La réception juridique de l'incertitude médicale’ Medicine et Droit, (2009): 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jungk, A. ‘Grundsätze und manche Ausnahme: Beweislastfragen im Regressprozess’ Anwaltsblatt, (2013): 142Google Scholar

Kadner-Graziano, T. ‘Alles oder nichts oder anteilige Haftung bei Verursachungszweifeln? – Zur Haftung für perte d'une chance/loss of a chance-Entscheidungen des schweizerischen Bundesgerichts vom 13. Juni 2007, des belg. Hof van Cassatie vom 5. Juni 2008 u.a.’ Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrecht, (2011): 171Google Scholar

Kadner-Graziano, T. ‘Loss of a Chance in European Private Law “All or Nothing” or Partial Liability in Cases of Uncertain Causation’ European Review of Private Law, 6 (2008): 1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahan, M. ‘Causation and the Incentives to Take Care under the Negligence Rule’, Journal of Legal Studies, 18 (1989): 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kagan, S. ‘Causation, Liability, and Internalism’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, 15 (1986): 41Google Scholar

Karner, E. ‘The Function of the Burden of Proof in Tort Law’ in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. (eds.) European Tort Law 2008 (Springer: Vienna, 2008)Google Scholar

Katz, L. ‘Proximate Cause in Michael Moore's Act and Crime’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 142 (1993–4): 1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenmeier, C. ‘Beweismaßreduzierung und probabilistische Proportionalhaftung’ Zeitschrift für Zivilprozessrecht, 117 (2004): 187Google Scholar

Katzenmeier, C. ‘Haftung für HIV-kontaminierte Blutprodukte’ Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, (2005): 3391Google Scholar

Katzenmeier, C. ‘Verschärfung der Berufshaftung durch Beweisrecht – der grobe Behandlungsfehler’ in Humaniora: Medizin, Recht, Geschichte 2006, Part 4 (Berlin: Springer, 2006)Google Scholar

Kaye, D.H. ‘The Error of Equal Rates’ Law Probability and Risk, 1 (2002): 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaye, DH. ‘Statistical Significance and the Burden of Persuasion’ Law and Contemporary Problems, 46 (1983): 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaye, DH. ‘The Limits of the Preponderance of Evidence Standard: Justifiably Naked Statistics and Multiple Causation’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal, (1982): 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaye, DH. ‘The Paradox of the Gatecrasher and Other Stories’ Arizona State Law Journal, (1979): 101Google Scholar

Keating, G.C. ‘The Heroic Enterprise of the Asbestos Cases’ Southwestern University Law Review, 38 (2008): 623Google Scholar

Keeler, J. ‘Increased Risk, causation and Speeding: Van den H’euvel v Tucker’ Torts Law Journal, 12 (2004): 1Google Scholar

Kegel, G. ‘Der Individualanscheinsbeweis und die Verteilung der Beweislast nach überwiegender Wahrscheinlichkeit’ in Festgabe für Kronstein (Karlsruhe: C F Mueller, 1967)Google Scholar

Keren-Paz, T. ‘Risks and Wrongs’ Account of Corrective Justice in Tort Law: Too Much or Too Little?’ Diritto e questioni publiche, 12 (2012): 75Google Scholar

Kerkorian, P.G. ‘Negligent Spoliation of Evidence: Skirting the “Suit Within a Suit” Requirement of Legal Malpractice Actions’ The Hastings Law Journal, 41 (1989–90): 1077Google Scholar

Kessler, L.W. ‘Alternative Liability in Litigation Malpractice Actions’ San Diego Law Review, 37 (2000): 401Google Scholar

Khoury, L. ‘Causation and Risk in the Highest Courts of Canada, England and France’ Law Quarterly Review, 124 (2008): 103Google Scholar

King, J.H. ‘Causation, Valuation and Chance in Personal Injury Torts Involving Preexisting Conditions and Future Consequences’ Yale Law Journal, 90 (1981): 1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, J.H. ‘“Reduction of Likelihood” Reformulation and Other Retrofitting of the Loss-of-a-Chance Doctrine’ University of Memphis Law Review, 28 (1997–8): 491Google Scholar

Klein, A. ‘A Model for Enhanced Risk Recovery in Tort’, Washington & Lee Law Review, 56 (1999): 1173Google Scholar

Klein, A. ‘Beyond DES: Rejecting the Application of Market Share Liability in Blood Products Litigation’ Tulane Law Review, 66 (1993–4): 883Google Scholar

Klein, A. ‘Causation and Uncertainty: Making Connections in a Time of Change’ Jurimetrics Journal, 49 (2008): 5Google Scholar

Klein, A. ‘Fear of Disease and the Puzzle of Future Cases in Tort’ University of California, Davis Law Review, 35 (2001–2): 965Google Scholar

Klein, A. ‘Rethinking Medical Monitoring’ Brooklyn Law Review, 64 (1998): 1Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, J. ‘Kausalität’ in Handwörterbuch des europäischen Privatrechts (Tübingen: Mohr, 2009)Google Scholar

Kletecka, A. ‘Alternative Verursachungskonkurrenz mit dem Zufall – Die Wahrscheinlichkeit als Haftungsgrund?’ Juristische Blätter, (2009): 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klöhn, L. ‘Wertende Kausalität im Spiegel von Rechtsvergleichung, Rechtsdogmatik und Rechtsökonomik’ Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft, 105 (2006): 455Google Scholar

Koehler, J. ‘When do Courts Think Base Rae Statistics are Relevant?’ Jurimetrics Journal, 42 (2002): 373Google Scholar

Koehler, J. (with Meixner, J.) ‘Decision Making and the Law: Truth Barriers’ (on SSRN) (2013)Google Scholar

Koziol, H. ‘Schadenersatz für den Verlust einer Chance?’ in Festschrift für Hans Stoll zum 75. Geburtstag (Tübingen: Mohr, 2001)Google Scholar

Kraus, J. ‘A Non-Solution to a Non-Problem: A Comment on Alan Strudler's “Mass Torts and Moral Principles’ Law & Philosophy, 16 (1997): 91Google Scholar

Kriebel, D. ‘How Much Evidence is Enough? Conventions of Causal Inference’ Law and Contemporary Problems, 72 (2009): 121Google Scholar

Knutsen, E.S. ‘Ambiguous Cause-in-Fact and Structured Causation: A Multi-Jurisdictional Approach’ Texas International Law Journal, 38 (2003): 249Google Scholar

Kortmann, J.S. ‘Ab alio ictu(s): Misconceptions about Julian's View on Causation’ Journal of Legal History, 20 (1999): 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laleng, P. ‘Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd. and Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council: A Material Contribution to Uncertainty’ Modern Law Review, 74 (2012): 777CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. ‘Strange Bedfellows: Inference to the Best Explanation and the Criminal Standard of Proof’ The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 11 (2007): 292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, J. ‘Fidelity in Interpretation: Lord Hoffmann and the Adventure of the Empty House’ Legal Studies, 28 (2008): 1Leipold, D. Commentary to §§286–287 ZPO in Stein, F. & Jonas, M. Kommentar zur Zivilprozeßordnung Band 3 §§253–299a 22nd edition (Tübingen, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leshem, S. and Miller, G. ‘All-or-Nothing versus Proportionate Damages’ Journal of Legal Studies, 38 (2009): 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LeSourd, N. ‘La Perte d'une Chance’ Gazette du Palais 1963 2.doct.49Google Scholar

Levmore, S. ‘Probabilistic Recoveries, Restitution, and Recurring Wrongs’ Journal of Legal Studies, 19 (1990): 691CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, D. ‘Causation’ Journal of Philosophy, 70 (1973): 556CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, A.C. ‘Beyond Tort: Compensating Victims of Environmental Toxic Injury’ South California Law Review, 78 (2004–5): 1439Google Scholar

List, C. and Pivato, M. ‘Emergent Chance’ (ms on file with the author, 2014)Google Scholar

Lord, P.A. ‘Loss of Chance in Legal Malpractice’ Washington Law Review, 61 (1986): 1479Google Scholar

Lunney, M. ‘Chances of Recovery in Tort’ King's College Law Journal, 7 (1996)Google Scholar

Lunney, M. ‘What Price a Chance?’ Legal Studies, 15 (1995): 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luntz, H. ‘A View from Abroad’ New Zealand Law Review, (2008): 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luntz, H. ‘Loss of a Chance in Medical Negligence’ University of Melbourne Law Research Series, (2010): 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luntz, H. ‘Loss of Chance’ in Freckelton, and Mendelson, (eds.) Causation in Law and Medicine (Surrey: Ashgate, 2002)Google Scholar

Madden, M.S. and Holian, J. ‘Defendant Indeterminacy: New Wine into Old Skins’ Louisiana Law Review, 67 (2006–7): 785Google Scholar