Wikland, M. and Sjoblom, C. The application of quality systems in ART programs. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 166:3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brinster, R. L. In vitro cultivation of mammalian ova. Adv Biosci 1969; 4:199–233.Google Scholar

Almeida, P. A. and Bolton, V. N. The effect of temperature fluctuations on the cytoskeletal organization and chromosomal constitution of the human oocyte. Zygote 1995; 3(4):357–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Higdon, H. L., 3rd, Blackhurst, D. W. and Boone, W. R. Incubator managements in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 2008; 89(3):703–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swain, J. E. Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21:6–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Swain, J. E. and Pool, T. B. New pH-buffering system for media utilized during gamete and embryo manipulations for assisted reproduction. Reprod. Biomed Online 2009; 18:799–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koustas, G. and Sjoblom, C. Epigenetic consequences of pH stress in mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:i78.Google Scholar

Fitzharris, G. and Baltz, J. Regulation of intracellular pH during oocyte growth and maturation in mammals. Reproduction 2009; 138:619–27.Google Scholar

Squirrell, J. M., Lane, M. and Bavister, B. D. Altering intracellular pH disrupts development and cellular organization in preimplantation hamster embryos. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:1845–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Swain, J. E. Is there an optimal pH for culture media used in clinical IVF? Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18(3):333–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Quinn, P. and Cooke, S. Equivalency of culture media for human in vitro fertilization formulated to have the same pH under an atmosphere containing 5% or 6% carbon dioxide. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:1502–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Graves, C. N. and Biggers, J. D. Carbon dioxide fixation by mouse embryos prior to implantation. Science 1970; 167:1506–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peng, H., Shi, W., Zhang, W., Xue, X., Li, N. et al. Better quality and more usable embryos obtained on day 3 cultured in 5% than 20% oxygen: a controlled and randomized study using the sibling oocytes. Reprod Sci 2015; pii:1933719115602761.Google ScholarPubMed

Morbeck, D. E. Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32(7):1019–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boone, W. R., Johnson, J. E., Locke, A. J., Crane, M. M. 4th and Price, T. M. Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 1999; 71(1):150–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Directive 2003/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union, L 102, 7.4.2004, pp. 48–58, available at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/oj/.Google Scholar

Alikani, A., Go, K. J., McCaffrey, C. and McCulloh, D. H. Comprehensive evaluation of contemporary assisted reproduction technology laboratory operations to determine staffing levels that promote patient safety and quality care. Fertil Steril 2014; 102:1350–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Revised guidelines for human embryology and andrology laboratories. Fertil Steril 2008; 90(Suppl. 3): S45–59.Google Scholar

Lundin, K. and Ahlström, A. Quality control and standardization of embryo morphology scoring and viability marker. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, M. P., Morbeck, D. E., Hudson, S. B. A., Fredrickson, J.R., Walker, D.L et al. Peroxides in mineral oil used for in vitro fertilization: defining limits of standards quality control assays. J Assist Reprod. Genet 27:87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morbeck, D. E., Khan, Z., Barnidge, D. R. and Walker, D. Washing mineral reduces contaminants and embryotoxicity. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2747–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed