Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:52:21.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The prevention of eating disorders

from Part two - Early detection in primary care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Tony Kendrick
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Andre Tylee
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Paul Freeling
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Prevalence of eating disorders

The reported prevalence of eating disorders has risen exponentially over the last 30 years and continues to rise. Some have questioned whether this is due to a true change in incidence or merely a reflection of greater public and professional awareness of the disorders. It may also be that the total sum of neurotic disorder within a given population is constant, but the type of problem presented varies with time, ethnicity and gender.

Changing patterns of neurosis

Regarding women and neurosis generally, hysterical symptoms are not the everyday occurrence they once were. One view is that the recognition of eating disorders parallels their evolution. Vomiting was not part of the original descriptions of anorexia nervosa. As the condition evolved, vomiting may have made the condition more visible. Restrictive anorexia nervosa was the standard form in the 1960s, the bulimic variant was recognised in the 1970s, before normal weight bulimia nervosa firmly established itself as a separate entity in the 1980s (Box 12.1). Although they are still in the minority, the number of women with the multi-impulsive form of bulimia nervosa is increasing through the 1990s.

It is most likely that a combination of explanations is relevant. As methods of epidemiological research have improved a consensus has been reached that the prevalence of disorder among women according to the strict American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III-R) diagnostic criteria is between 1% and 2% for bulimia nervosa (Fairburn & Beglin, 1990) and between 0.02% and 0.04% (Rooney et al., 1995; Hoek, 1991) for anorexia nervosa. Box 12.1 gives DSM-IV diagnostic criteria.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×