Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:11:02.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Evolution in agriculture

from Part II - Evolution and Food Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2012

Aldo Poiani
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

Applications of ecological principles to agriculture are usually developed within the discipline of agroecology, a term first used by the Russian agronomist Basil M. Bensin in the late 1920s (Wezel et al., 2009). Traditionally, however, agroecological research has focused on ecology, socioeconomics and sustainability of productivity. It is only recently that more explicit evolutionary approaches have been applied in this discipline, so much so that even articles published as recently as 2003, devoted to the issue of scaling – including time scaling – in agroecology, do not explicitly address evolutionary dynamics and processes (e.g. Dalgaard et al., 2003). Nevertheless, such a situation is being redressed in more recent work, where a new emphasis on evolutionary agroecology is steadily surfacing (Thrall et al., 2010; Weiner et al., 2010). However, the role of evolution in agriculture has been central since the very beginning of this practice: agriculture itself is, indeed, a long coevolutionary process (e.g. Hart, 1999). In this chapter, we aim to briefly review some major applications of evolutionary principles to agriculture and in the ‘Looking forward’ section we will endeavour to suggest some future directions in evolutionary agroecology. Agriculture has been called ‘the greatest ecological experiment on Earth’ and has also been described as always being in a state of ‘tension’. We are now beginning to realise more fully how the ‘experiment’ and the ‘tension’ implicate evolutionary processes as well as ecological ones.

The main issues

The fundamental premise behind almost all agricultural systems worldwide is that ecological succession is halted. In arable and vegetable cropping, for instance, annual plants can dominate the landscape. Virtually all interspecific competition is reduced to a minimum; this includes weed management within and around the crop and sometimes the reduction or removal of largely woody field margin plants. Similarly, farming attempts to reduce any negative impacts of evolutionary processes on the farming activity. These may include the development of insecticide resistance in insect pests, fungicide resistance in fungal plant diseases and weed resistance to herbicides. As well as attempting to reduce the impacts of evolutionary processes, farming also largely ignores the benefits which can accrue from a more complete understanding of the role that a knowledge of evolution can play in helping to make agriculture more ‘sustainable’. Examples of some of the evolutionary processes which are either ignored or restricted in some way are given below.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pragmatic Evolution
Applications of Evolutionary Theory
, pp. 53 - 64
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berryman, A.A.Lima Arce, M.Hawkins, B.A 2002 Population regulation, emergent properties, and a requiem for density dependenceOikos 99 600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, D 1977 Encapsulation of parasitoid eggs in soft scales (Homoptera: Coccidae)Ecological Entomology 2 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuperus, G.W.Radcliffe, E.B.Barnes, D.K. 1982 Economic injury levels and economic thresholds for pea aphid, (Harris), on alfalfaCrop Protection 1 453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgaard, T.Hutchings, N.J.Porter, J.R 2003 Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarityAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 100 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denholm, I.Rowland, M.W 1992 Tactics for managing pesticide resistance in arthropods, theory and practiceAnnual Review of Entomology 37 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, R.F.Kiers, E.T.West, S.A 2003 Darwinian Agriculture: when can humans find solutions beyond the reach of natural selection?The Quarterly Review of Biology 78 145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downes, S.Mahon, R.J.Rossiter, L. 2010 Adaptive management of pest resistance by species (Noctuidae) in Australia to the Cry2Ab Bt toxin in Bollgard II (R) cottonEvolutionary Applications 3 574CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downes, S.Parker, T.Mahon, R 2010 Incipient resistance of to the Cry2Ab Bt toxin in BollgardII (R) cottonPLoS ONE 5 e12567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, P.J.Wratten, S.D.Greenwood, S 1986 Palatability of British trees to insects: constitutive and induced defencesOecologia 69 316CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feeny, P 1976 Plant apparency and chemical defenseWallace, J.W.Nansel, R.LBiological Interactions Between Plants and Insects. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 10 Plenum PressNew York, NY1Google Scholar
Gerling, D.Roitberg, B.D.MacKauer, M 1990 Instar specific defense of the pea aphid, – influence on oviposition success of the parasite (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae)Journal of Insect Behaviour 3 504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, F 1998 Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: Integrating pest genetics and ecologyAnnual Review of Entomology 43 701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajek, A.E. 2004 Natural Enemies: An Introduction to Biological ControlCambridge University PressCambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J.P. 1999 Maize agriculture evolution in the Eastern woodlands of North America: a Darwinian perspectiveJournal of Archaeological Method and Theory 6 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M.P.Godfray, H.C.J 2009 The Population biology of insect parasitoidsCrawley, M.J.Natural Enemies: The Population Biology of Predators, Parasites and DiseasesBlackwell ScientificOxford265Google Scholar
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) 2009
Jonsson, M.Wratten, S.D.Landis, D.A. 2008 Recent advances in conservation biological control of arthropods by arthropodsBiological Control 45 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, M 2006 Are island forests vulnerable to invasive defoliators? Strength in simplicityPaine, T.D.Invasive Forest Insects, Introduced Forest Trees, and Altered Ecosystems: Ecological Pest Management in Global Forests of a Changing WorldSpringerDordrecht1Google Scholar
Krebs, C.J. 1991 The experimental paradigm and long-term population studiesIbis 133 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, A.W.Mumford, J.D. 2008 Pesticide environmental accounting: a method for assessing the external costs of individual pesticide applicationsEnvironmental Pollution 151 139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacIntosh, S.C. 2010 Managing the risk of insect resistance to transgenic insect control traits: practical approaches in local environmentsPest Management Science 66 100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, B.P.Wratten, S.D.Poehling, M. 1991 The economics of reduced-rate insecticide applications to control aphids in winter-wheatAnnals of Applied Biology 119 451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvier, M.McCreedy, C.Regetz, J. 2007 A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebratesScience 5830 1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadyen, R 2008 Return on investment: determining the economic impact of biological control programmesProceedings of the XII International Symposium on Biological Control of WeedsLa Grande MotteFrance22Google Scholar
McGaughey, W.H.Whalon, M.E 1992 Managing insect resistance to toxinsScience 258 1451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenzie, J.A. 1996 Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects of Insecticide ResistanceAcademic Press/R.G. Landes, Austin, TXUSAGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, J.A.Batterham, P 1994 The genetic, molecular and phenotypic consequences of selection for insecticide resistanceTrends in Ecology and Evolution 9 166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, A.J. 1933 The balance of animal populationsJournal of Animal Ecology 2 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A.J.Bailey, V.A 1935 The balance of animal populations. Part IProceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1935 551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orre, G.U.S.Wratten, S.D.Jonsson, M. 2010 Effects of an herbivore-induced plant volatile on arthropods from three trophic levels in brassicasBiological Control 53 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlak, F.J.Deaton, R.W.Armstrong, T.A. 1990 Insect-resistant cotton plantsBio-Technology 8 939Google ScholarPubMed
Poehling, H.M. 1989 Selective application strategies for insecticides in agricultural cropsPaul, C.J.Pesticides and Non-Target InvertebratesInterceptDorset151Google Scholar
Root, R.B. 1973 Organization of a plant/arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards ()Ecological Monographs 43 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roush, R.T. 1989 Designing resistance management programs. How can you choose?Pesticide Science 26 423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roush, R.T.Daly, J.C 1990 The role of population genetics in resistance research and managementRoush, R.T.Tabashnik, B.E.Pesticide Resistance in ArthropodsChapman and HallNew York97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W.E.Evans, E.W 2006 Ecological effects of invasive arthropod generalist predatorsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. 1961 The number of species of insect associated with various treesJournal of Animal Ecology 30 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrall, P.H.Bever, J.D.Burdon, J.J 2010 Evolutionary change in agriculture: the past, present and futureEvolutionary Applications 3 405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Emden, H.F. 1987 Cultural methods: the plantBurn, A.J.Coaker, T.H.Jepson, P.C.Integrated Pest ManagementAcademic PressLondon27Google Scholar
van Mele, P 2008 A historical review of research on the weaver ant in biological controlAgriculutural and Forest Entomology 10 13Google Scholar
Weiner, J.Andersen, S.B.Wille, W.K.-M. 2010 Evolutionary agroecology: the potential for cooperative, high density, weed-suppressing cerealsEvolutionary Applications 3 473CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wezel, A.Bellon, S.Doré, T. 2009 Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A reviewAgronomy for Sustainable Development 29 503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, J.A.Jepson, P.C 1995 Dosage reduction to improve the selectivity of deltamethrin between aphids and coccinellids in cerealsEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 76 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, T.A.Rajasekaran, K.Anderson, D.M 2000 Cotton BiotechnologyCritical Reviews in Plant Sciences 19 511CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×