Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:06:54.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - How to Manage the Patient with Fluid in the Endometrium Prior to Embryo Transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2018

Ying Cheong
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Togas Tulandi
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Tin-Chiu Li
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schoolcraft, W. B., Surrey, E. S. and Gardner, D. K.. Embryo transfer: Techniques and variables affecting success. Fertility and Sterility 2001;76(5):863–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papageorgiou, T. C., Hearn-Stokes, R. M., Leondires, M. P., Miller, B. T., Chakraborty, P., Cruess, D. and Segars, J.. Training of providers in embryo transfer: What is the minimum number of transfers required for proficiency? Human Reproduction 2001;16(7):1415–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abou-Setta, A M., Al-Inany, H. G, Mansour, R. T., Serour, G. I. and Aboulghar, M. A.. Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction 2005;20(11):3114–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, R. H., Gao, H. J., Li, Y. Q. and Zhu, X. M.. The associated factors to endometrial cavity fluid and the relevant impact on the IVF-ET outcome. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2010;8(46):16.Google Scholar
Chien, L. W., Au, H. K., Xiao, J. and Tzeng, C. R.. Fluid accumulation within the uterine cavity reduces pregnancy rates in women undergoing IVF. Human Reproduction 2002;17(2):351–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, R. K. K., Yu, S. L., Chih, Y. F., Tsai, Y. C., Lin, M. H., Hwu, Y. M., Huang, W. Y., and Su, J. T.. Effect of endometrial cavity fluid on clinical pregnancy rate in tubal embryo transfer (TET). Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2006;23(5):229–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polat, M., Boynukalin, F. K., Yarali, I., Erdoğan, B. D., Bozdağ, G. and Yaralı, H.. Transient intrauterine fluid accumulation not due to hydrosalpinx or any identifiable pelvic pathology is not detrimental to IVF outcome. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2014;290(3):569–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, S., Peng, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Cao, Q., Li, R., Zhang, Y., Yan, L., Duan, E. and Qiao, J.. Excessive intrauterine fluid causes aberrant implantation and pregnancy outcome in mice. PLoS One 2013;8(10):18.Google ScholarPubMed
Strandell, A.. The influence of hydrosalpinx on IVF and embryo transfer: A review. Human Reproduction Update 2000;6(4):387–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strandell, A. and Lindhard, A.. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid. Human Reproduction 2002;17(5):1141–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granot, I., Dekel, N., Segal, I., Fieldust, S., Shoham, Z. and Barash, A.. Is hydrosalpinx fluid cytotoxic? Human Reproduction 1998;13(6):1620–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, C. A, Clarke, H. J., Tulandi, T. and Tan, S. L.. Inhibitory effect of human hydrosalpingeal fluid on mouse preimplantation embryonic development is significantly reduced by the addition of lactate. Human Reproduction 1997;12(11):2504–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Wit, W., Gowrising, C. J., Kuik, D. J., Lens, J. W and Schats, R.. Only hydrosalpinges visible on ultrasound are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction 1998;13(6):16961701.Google Scholar
Rawe, V. J., Liu, J., Shaffer, S., Compton, M. G., Garcia, J. E. and Katz, E.. Effect of human hydrosalpinx fluid on murine embryo development and implantation. Fertility and Sterility 1997;68(4):668–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strandell, A., Sjogren, A., Bentin-Ley, U., Thorburn, J., Hamberger, L. and Brannstrom, M.. Hydrosalpinx fluid does not adversely affect the normal development of human embryos and implantation in vitro. Human Reproduction 1998; 13(10):2921–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessey, B. A., Castelbaum, A. J., Buck, C. A., Lei, Y., Yowell, C. W. and Sun, J.. Further characterization of endometrial integrins during the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility 1994;62(3):497506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, W. R., Castelbaum, A. J., Somkuti, S., Sagoskin, A. W., Doyle, M., Harris, J. E. and Lessey, B. A.. Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity. Human Reproduction 1997;12(7):1393–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawin, S. W., Loret de Mola, J. R., Monzon-Bordonaba, F., Wang, C. L. and Feinberg, R. F.. Hydrosalpinx fluid enhances human trophoblast viability and function in vitro: Implications for embryonic implantation in assisted reproduction. Fertility and Sterility 1997;68:6571.Google Scholar
Johnson, N., van Voorst, S., Sowter, M. C., Strandell, A. and Mol, B. W. J.. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010;1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, K., Lier, M. C. I., Emanuel, M. H., Twisk, J. W. R., Mol, B. W. J., Schats, R., Hompes, P. G. A. and Mijatovic., V. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: An RCT. Human Reproduction 2016;0(0):112.Google Scholar
Johnson, N., van Voorst, S., Sowter, M. C., Strandell, A. and Mol, B. W. J.. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010;Issue1:142.Google Scholar
Sills, E. S., Walsh, D. J., Jones, C. A. and Wood, S. H.. Endometrial fluid associated with Essure implants placed before in vitro fertilization: Considerations for patient counseling and surgical management. Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 2015;42(3):126–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smit, J. G., Kasius, J. C., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Koks, C. A. M., van Golde, R., Nap, A. W., Scheffer, G. J., Manger, P. A. P., Hoek, A., Schoot, B. C., van Heusden, A. M., Kuchenbecker, W. K. H., Perquin, D. A. M., Fleischer, K., Kaaijk, E. M., Sluijmer, A., Friederich, J., Dykgraaf, R. H. M., van Hooff, M., Louwe, L. A., Kwee, J., de Koning, C. H, Janssen, I. C. A. H., Mol, F., Mol, B. W. J., Broekmans, F. J. M. and Torrance, H. L.. Hysteroscopy before in-vitro fertilisation (inSIGHT): A multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Toukhy, T., Campo, R., Khalaf, Y., Tabanelli, C., Gianaroli, L., Gordts, S. S., Gordts, S., Mestdagh, G., Mardesic, T., Voboril, J., Marchino, G. L., Benedetto, C., Al-Shawaf, T., Sabatini, L., Seed, P. T., Gergolet, M., Grimbizis, G., Harb, H. and Coomarasamy, A.. Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY): A multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellicer, A. and Galliano, D.. Comment. Hysteroscopy before IVF: Can it improve outcomes? Lancet 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akman, M. A., Erden, H. F. and Bahceci, M.. Endometrial fluid visualized through ultrasonography during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles impairs the outcome in tubal factor, but not PCOS, patients. Human Reproduction 2005;20(4):906–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, A. N., Watermeyer, S. R. and Klentzeris, L. D.. SHORT COMMUNICATION. Fluid within the endometrial cavity in an IVF cycle – a novel approach to its management. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2002;19(6):298301.Google Scholar
van der Gaast, M. H., Beier-Hellwig, K., Fauser, B. C., Beier, H. M. and Macklon, N. S.. Endometrial secretion aspiration prior to embryo transfer does not reduce implantation rates. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2003;7(1):105–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhusane, K., Bhutada, S., Chaudhari, U., Savardekar, L., Katkam, R. and Sachdeva, G.. Secrets of endometrial receptivity: Some are hidden in uterine secretome. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 2016;75(3):226–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×