Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:32:26.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 5 - Applied Basic Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2019

Edited by
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz  and
Deiary F. Kader
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Deiary F. Kader
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Postgraduate Orthopaedics
Viva Guide for the FRCS (Tr & Orth) Examination
 , pp. 429 - 712
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference

Kocher, MS, Zurakowski, D, Kasser, JR. Differentiating between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children: an evidence-based clinical prediction algorithm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(12):1662–1670.Google Scholar

Reference

Stannard, JP, Sheils, TM, Lopez-Ben, RR, McGwin, G Jr, Robinson, JT, Volgas, DA. Vascular injuries in knee dislocations: the role of physical examination in determining the need for arteriography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86A(5):910–915.Google Scholar

Bibliography/Further reading

Welker, JA, Henshaw, RM, Jelinek, J, Shmookler, BM, Malawer, MM. The percutaneous needle biopsy is safe and recommended in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal masses. Cancer. 2000;89(12):2677–2686.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enneking, WF, Spanier, SS, Malawer, MM. The effect of the anatomic setting on the results of surgical procedures for soft parts sarcoma of the thigh. Cancer. 1981;47(5):1005–1022.Google Scholar
Enneking, WF, Spanier, SS, Goodman, MA. Current concepts review. The surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(6):1027–1030.Google Scholar
NCCN. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Soft Tissue Sarcoma. V.2.2008. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2008.Google Scholar
Bullough, PG. Orthopaedic Pathology. Fourth Edition. Edinburgh: Mosby; 2007.Google Scholar
Beckingsale, TB, Gerrand, CH. Osteosarcoma. Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(5):321–331.Google Scholar
Meyers, PA, Schwartz, CL, Krailo, MD, et al. Osteosarcoma: the addition of muramyl tripeptide to chemotherapy improves overall survival – a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:633–638.Google Scholar
Beckingsale, TB, Gerrand, CH. The management of soft-tissue sarcomas. Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(4):240–247.Google Scholar
Jeys, LM, Thorne, CJ, Parry, M, Gaston, CL, Sumanthi, VP, Grimer, JR. A novel system for the surgical staging of primary high-grade osteosarcoma: the Birmingham classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(3):842–850.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T, Kawashima, H, Ogose, A, et al. Receptor-activator of nuclear kappa b ligand expression as a new therapeutic target in primary bone tumors. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0154680.Google Scholar
Van der Hejden, L, Dijkstra, PDS, Blay, JY, Gelderblom, H. Giant cell tumour of bone in the denosumab era. Eur J Cancer. 2017;77:75–73.Google Scholar
Dubory, A, Missenard, G, Domont, J, Court, C. Interest of denosumab for the treatment of giant cell tumours and aneurysmal bone cysts of the spine. About nine cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(11):E654–660.Google Scholar
McKee, GK, Watson-Farrar, J. Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee–Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966;48:245–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charnley, J. Surgery of the hip-joint: present and future developments. Br Med J. 1960;1:821–826.Google Scholar
Charnley, J. Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. Lancet. 1961;1:1129–1132.Google Scholar
Ingham, E, Fisher, J. The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement. Biomaterials. 2005;26(11):1271–1286.Google Scholar
Russell, TA, Leighton, RK. Comparison of autogenous bone graft and endothermic calcium phosphate cement for defect augmentation in tibial plateau fractures. A multicentre, prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(10):2057–2061.Google Scholar
Johal, HS, Buckley, RE, Le, IL, Leighton, RK. A prospective randomized controlled trial of a bioresorbable calcium phosphate paste (alpha-BSM) in treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Trauma. 2009;67(4):875–882.Google Scholar
Gruen, TA, McNeice, GM, Amstutz, HC. ‘Modes of failure’ of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop. 1979;141:17–27.Google Scholar
Shen, G. Femoral stem fixation. An engineering interpretation of the long-term outcome of Charnley and Exeter stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(5):754–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petheram, TG, Whitehouse, SL, Kazi, HA, et al. The Exeter Universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years: a report of 382 hips. Bone Joint J. 2016;98B(11):1441–1449.Google Scholar
Kanis, JA, Gluer, CC. An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:192–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanis, JA, McCloskey, EV, Johansson, H, Oden, A, Melton, LJ, 3rd, Khaltaev, N. A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Bone. 2008;42:467–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). 2017.Google Scholar
NICE guidelines:Google Scholar
Compston, J, Cooper, A, Cooper, C, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK. Maturitas. 2009;62:105–108.Google Scholar
Compston, J, Bowring, C, Cooper, A, et al. Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men in the UK: National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) update 2013. Maturitas. 2013;75:392–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, EJ, Whyte, W, Blowers, R, Stanley, SJ, Lowe, D. Effect of ultra clean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomised study. Br Med J. 1982;285:10–14.Google Scholar
Charnley, J. Postoperative infection after total hip replacement with special reference to air contamination in the operating room. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1972;87:167–187.Google Scholar
Hooper, GJ, Rothwell, AG, Frampton, C, Wyatt, MC. Does the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early deep infection after total hip and knee replacement? The ten-year results of the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):85–90.Google Scholar

References

Hooper, GJ, Rothwell, AG, Frampton, C, Wyatt, MC, et al. Does the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early deep infection after total hip and knee replacement? The ten-year results of the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2011;93:85–90.Google Scholar
Lidwell, OM, Elson, RA, Lowbury, RJ, et al. Ultraclean air and antibiotics for prevention of postoperative infection – a multicentre study of 8,052 joint replacement operations. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58:4–13.Google Scholar
McGovern, PD, Albrecht, M, Belani, K, et al. Forced-air warming and ultra-clean ventilation do not mix – an investigation of theatre ventilation, patient warming and joint replacement infection in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2011;93(11):1533–1544.Google Scholar
Nicolay, CR. Hand hygiene: an evidence-based review for surgeons. Int J Surg. 2006;4(1):53–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odinsson, A, Finsen, V. Tourniquet use and its complications in Norway. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006;88B:1090–1092.Google Scholar
Pinder, EM, Bottle, A, Aylin, P, Loeffler, MD, et al. Does laminar flow ventilation reduce the rate of infection? An observational study of trauma in England. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2016;98:1262–1269.Google Scholar
Ritter, MA, Eitzen, H, French, ML, Hart, JB, et al. The operating room environment as affected by people and the surgical face mask. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;111:147–150.Google Scholar

References

Wright, JG. A practical guide to assigning levels of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(5):1128–1130.Google Scholar
Phillips, B, et al. Levels of Evidence (March 2009), Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2009 [cited 2012; available from: www.cebm.net].Google Scholar
Harbour, R, Miller, J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence-based guidelines. BMJ. 2001;323(7308):334–336.Google Scholar
Alshryda, S, Huntley, J, Banaszkiewicz, P. Chapter 1: Introduction to evidence-based practice. In Alshryda, H, Huntley, JS, Banaszkiewicz, P (Eds.), Paediatric Orthopaedics: An Evidence-Based Approach to Clinical Questions, Cham: Springer; 2016: 51–75.Google Scholar
Howick, J, et al. The 2011 Oxford CEBM Evidence Levels of Evidence (Introductory Document). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. 2011.Google Scholar
Sibbald, B, Roland, M. Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ. 1998;316(7126):201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, M, Torgerson, DJ. What are pragmatic trials? BMJ. 1998;316(7127):285.Google Scholar
Wright, J, Eastwood, DM. Clinical surveillance, selective or universal ultrasound screening in DDH. In Alshryda, H, Huntley, JS, Banaszkiewicz, P (Eds.), Paediatric Orthopaedics: An Evidence-Based Approach to Clinical Questions, Cham: Springer; 2016.Google Scholar
Goel, MK, Khanna, P, Kishore, J. Understanding survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier estimate. Int J Ayurveda Res. 2010;1(4):274–278.Google Scholar
Grades of Recommendation, Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. 2009. Available from: www.cebm.net/?o=1025.Google Scholar
Suk, M, Hanson, BP, Norvell, DC, Helfet, SL (Eds.). AO Handbook. Musculoskeletal Outcome Measures and Instruments. Basel: Thieme; 2004.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×