Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: March 2012

9 - Two Conceptions of Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law: An Essay Inspired by Bill Stuntz

Summary

1.

My goal in this essay is to reexamine a solution to an important puzzle about the significance of emotions in substantive criminal law. Indeed, the reexamination is in the nature of a qualification bordering on confession of error. The position I want to question was forged in the course of a sustained, multifaceted, and very satisfying scholarly conversation in which I myself played a part. But now, as a result of my participation in another set of scholarly conversations – ones that had until recently struck me as entirely collateral to emotions and criminal law – I find myself compelled to call attention to what I regard as the likely inadequacy of an account I had a significant hand in promoting.

I am not disheartened, though, to find myself in this position. There is, to be sure, discomfort in admitting doubt about arguments that had once struck me as both compelling and complete. Yet there is an even bigger reward: the discovery of continuing vitality in a problem that once filled me, and now does again, with intellectual energy. Other scholars, too, might find it awkward for me to express misgivings at this point about claims that built on and were extended by their work. But I feel confident that they, rather than resenting my second thoughts, are likely to welcome them for supplying an occasion to test whether conclusions they once formed continue to warrant their considered assent.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Kahan, Dan M.Nussbaum, Martha C.Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law 96 1996
Nourse, VictoriaPassion's Progress: Modern Law Reform and the Provocation Defense 106 1997
Steiker, Carol S.Punishing Hateful Motives: Old Wine in a New Bottle Revives Calls for Prohibition 97 1999
Kahan, Dan M.The Secret Ambition of Deterrence 113 1999
Nourse, VictoriaThe New Normativity: The Abuse Excuse and the Resurgence of Judgment in the Criminal Law 50 1998
Kahan, Dan M.Two Liberal Fallacies in the Hate Crimes Debate 20 175 2001
1921
Kunda, ZivaThe Case for Motivated Reasoning 108 1990
Kahan, Dan M.The Cognitively Illiberal State 60 2007
Kahan, Dan M.Hoffman, David A.Braman, DonaldWhose Eyes Are You Going to Believe? Scott v. Harris and the Perils of Cognitive Illiberalism 122 2009
Kahan, Dan M.Hoffman, David H.Braman, DonaldEvans, DanieliRachlinski, Jeffrey J.They Saw a Protest”: Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction 64 2012
Alicke, Mark D.Culpable Control and the Psychology of Blame 126 2000
Nadler, JaniceThe Psychology of Blame: Criminal Liability and the Role of Moral Character 97 2012
Sood, Avani M.Darley, John M. 2012
Kahan, Dan M.Braman, DonaldThe Self-defensive Cognition of Self-defense 45 2008