Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 25
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2012
Print publication year:
2012
Online ISBN:
9781139088350

Book description

In response to critics who charged him with plagiarism, Virgil is said to have responded that it was easier to steal Hercules' club than a line from Homer. This was to deny the allegations by implying that Virgil was no plagiarist at all, but an author who had done the hard work of making Homer's material his own. Several other texts and passages in Latin literature provide further evidence for accusations and denials of plagiarism. Plagiarism in Latin Literature explores important questions such as, how do Roman writers and speakers define the practice? And how do the accusations and denials function? Scott McGill moves between varied sources, including Terence, Martial, Seneca the Elder and Macrobius' Virgil criticism to explore these questions. In the process, he offers new insights into the history of plagiarism and related issues, including Roman notions of literary property, authorship and textual reuse.

Reviews

'McGill provides a valuable overview of the Romans' understanding of literary plagiarism and offers various definitions of the concept. Students of Latin literature will learn much from these pages, especially about the relationship of Latin literature to its illustrious Greek predecessor... After reading McGill's clear, thorough, and nuanced treatment, one not only understands more clearly this important topic but also appreciates the distinctive role it played in various genres and periods of Latin literature … Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty, general readers, and professionals.'

M. J. Johnson Source: Choice

'[This book] significantly advances our awareness of the extent to which processes of textual creation were theorized and explicated by Roman authors.'

Joseph A. Howley Source: Language and Literature

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography

Adam, L. 1906. Über die Unsicherheit literarischen Eigentums bei Griechen und Römern. Düsseldorf.
Alexander, L. 1993. The Preface to Luke’s Gospel: Literary Convention and Social Context in Luke 1.1–4 and Acts 1.1. Cambridge.
Amherdt, D. (ed.) 2004. Ausone et Pauline de Nole: Correspondence. Sapheneia: Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 9. Bern.
Anderson, P. 2006. “Martial 1.29: Appearance and Authorship.” RhM 149: 119–22.
Anderson, W. S. 1982. Essays on Roman Satire. Princeton, NJ.
André, J. M. 1985. “Le prologue scientifique et la rhétorique: Les préfaces de Vitruve.” BAGB 43: 375–84.
André, J. M. 1987. “La rhétorique dans les préfaces de Vitruve.” In Filologia e forme letterarie: Studi offerti a Francesco Della Corte. Urbino: 265–89.
Arnott, W. G. 1985. “Terence’s Prologues.” Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 1–7.
Baldwin, B. 1990. “The Date, Identity, and Career of Vitruvius.” Latomus 49: 425–34.
Bardon, H. 1940. Le vocabulaire de la critique littéraire chez Sénèque le Rhéteur. Paris.
Barnes, T. D. 1998. Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality. Ithaca, NY.
Barsby, J. A. 1993. “Problems of Adaptation in the Eunuchus of Terence.” In Intertextualität in der griechischen–römischen Komödie, ed. N. W. Slater and B. Zimmermann. Stuttgart: 160–79.
Barwick, K. (ed.) 1999. Terence:Eunuchus. Cambridge.
Barwick, K. 1958. “Zyklen bei Martial und in der kleinen Gedichten des Catull.” Philologus 102: 284–318.
Baumgartner, A. J. 1981. Untersuchungen zur Anthologie des Codex Salmasianus. Baden.
Beacham, R. C. 1991. The Roman Theater and Its Audience. London.
Beagon, M. 1992. Roman Nature: The Thought of Pliny the Elder. Oxford.
Beall, S. M. 1997. “Translation in Aulus Gellius.” CQ 47: 215–26.
Beare, W. 1937. “Recent Work on the Roman Theatre.” CR 51: 105–11.
Beare, W. 1959. “Contaminatio.” CR 9: 7–11.
Beare, W. 1964. The Roman Stage: A Short History of Latin Drama in the Time of the Republic. 3rd rev. edn. London.
Bernabei, R. 1970. “The Treatment of Sources in Macrobius’ Saturnalia and the Influence of the Saturnalia during the Middle Ages.” Diss., Cornell University.
Bernstein, N. W. 2009. “Adoptees and Exposed Children in Roman Declamation: Commodification, Luxury, and the Threat of Violence.” CP 104: 331–53.
Berti, E. 2007. Scholasticorum Studia: Seneca il Vecchio e la cultura retorica e letteraria della prima età imperiale. Pisa.
Bloomer, W. M. 1997. Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia, PA.
Bonner, S. F. 1949. Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Berkeley, CA.
Booth, W. C. 1974. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago, IL.
Bornecque, H. (ed.) 1932. Sénèque le Rhéteur: Controverses et Suasoires. Paris.
Bornecque, H. (ed.) 1967. Les déclamations et les déclamateurs d’après Sénèque le Père. Hildesheim.
Bowditch, P. L. 2001. Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage. Berkeley, CA.
Bowers, N. 1997. Words for the Taking: The Hunt for a Plagiarist. New York.
Bowersock, G. W. 1986. “Symmachus and Ausonius.” In Symmaque à l’occasion du mille six centième anniversaire du conflit de l’autel de la Victoire, ed. F. Paschoud, G. Fry, and Y. Rütsche. Paris: 1–12.
Bretzigheimer, G. 2005. “Poeta memor ludensque oder The Making of Ciris.” In Die Appendix Vergiliana: Pseudepigraphen im literarischen Kontext, ed. N. Holzberg. Tübingen: 142–224.
Brink, C. O. 1972. “Ennius and the Hellenistic Worship of Homer.” AJP 93.4: 547–67.
Brothers, A. J. (ed.) 2000. Terence: TheEunuch. Warminster.
Brown, F. E. 1963. “Vitruvius and the Liberal Art of Architecture.” Bucknell Review 11.4: 99–107.
Bruère, R. T. 1956. “Pliny the Elder and Virgil.” CP 51.4: 228–46.
Bruggisser, P. 1993. Symmaque ou le rituel épistolaire de l’amitié littéraire. Fribourg.
Brugnoli, G. 1987. “Nocte pluit.” GIF 39: 105–27.
Büchner, K. 1974. Das Theater des Terenz. Heidelberg.
Cameron, A. 1966. “The Date and Identity of Macrobius.” JRS 56: 25–38.
Cameron, A. 2004. Greek Mythography in the Roman World. Oxford.
Cameron, A. 2011. The Last Pagans of Rome. Oxford.
Carey, S. 2003. Pliny’s Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in theNatural History. Cambridge.
Carey Miller, D. L. 1998. “Property.” In A Companion to Justinian’s Institutes, ed. E. Metzger. Ithaca, NY: 42–79.
Casson, L. 2001. Libraries in the Ancient World. New Haven, CT.
Castiglioni, L. 1928. “In Senecam rhetorem, Pomponium Melam, Cornelius Nepotem, animadversiones criticae.” In Raccolta di scritti in onore di Felice Ramorino. Milan: 101–29.
Christo, S. 1977. “Some Thoughts on the Dating of the Saturnalia.” Athenaeum 55: 314–27.
Citroni, M. (ed.) 1975. M. Valerii Martialis: Epigrammaton liber primus. Florence.
Citroni, M. (ed.) 1988. “Publicazione e dediche dei libri in Marziale.” Maia 40: 3–39.
Clausen, W. (ed.) 1994. Virgil:Eclogues. Oxford.
Clift, E. H. 1945. Latin Pseudepigrapha: A Study in Literary Attributions. Baltimore, MD.
Colebrook, C. 2004. Irony. London.
Constable, G. 1983. “Forgery and Plagiarism in the Middle Ages.” Archiv für Diplomatik, Schriftgeschichte, Siegel- und Wappenkunde 29: 1–41.
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, trans. C. Segal. Ithaca, NY.
Conte, G. B. 1994. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’sEncyclopedia, trans. G. Most. Baltimore, MD.
Courtney, E. (ed.) 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.
Cova, P. V. 1989. Il poeta Vario. Milan.
Coyne, P. (ed.) 1991. Priscian of Caesarea’sDe Laude Anastasii Imperatoris. Lewiston, ME.
Curtius, E. R. 1953. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ.
Dalby, A. 2006. Rediscovering Homer: Inside the Origins of the Epic. New York.
D’Alton, J. F. 1931. Roman Literary Theory and Criticism: A Study in Tendencies. London.
Damon. C. 1997. The Mask of the Parasite: A Pathology of Roman Patronage. Ann Arbor, MI.
Damon. C. 2011. “Pliny on Apion.” In Pliny the Elder: Themes and Contexts, ed. R. K. Gibson and R. Morello. Leiden: 131–45.
Davies, P. V. (trans.) 1969. Macrobius: TheSaturnalia. New York.
De la Durantaye, K. 2007. “The Origins of the Protection of Literary Authorship in Ancient Rome.” Boston University International Law Journal 25: 37–111.
Dér, K. 1989. “Terence and Luscius Lanuvinus.” AAntHung 32: 283–97.
Dessen, C. S. 1995. “The Figure of the Eunuch in Terence’s Eunuchus.” Helios 22: 123–39.
Doody, A. 2010. Pliny’s Encyclopedia: The Reception of the Natural History. Cambridge.
Duckworth. G. E. 1994. The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. 2nd edn. Norman, OK.
Dutton, D. 1998. “Plagiarism and Forgery.” In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, vol. iii, ed. R. Chadwick. San Diego, CA: 503–10.
Dziatzko, K. 1894. “Autor- und Verlagsrecht im Altertum.” RhM 49: 559–76.
Dziatzko, K. and Kauer, R. 1903. Ausgewählte Komödien des P. Terentius Afer, vol. ii: Adelphoe, 2nd edn. Leipzig.
Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore, MD.
Edward, W. A. 1928. Seneca the Elder:Suasoriae. Cambridge.
Evan-Jones, R. and MacCormack, G. 1998. “Obligations.” In A Companion to Justinian’s Institutes, ed. E. Metzger. Ithaca, NY: 127–207.
Fabia, P. 1888. Les prologues de Térence. Paris.
Fairweather, J. 1974. “Fiction in the Biographies of Ancient Writers.” Anc. Soc. 5: 231–75.
Fairweather, J. 1981. Seneca the Elder. Cambridge.
Fantham, E. 1978. “Imitation and Decline: Rhetorical Theory and Practice in the First Century after Christ.” CP 73.2: 102–16.
Farrell, J. 1997. “The Virgilian Intertext.” Ιn The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, ed. C. Martindale. Cambridge: 222–38.
Farrell, J. 2009. “The Impermanent Text in Catullus and Other Roman Poets.” In Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, ed. W. A. Johnson and H. N. Parker. Oxford: 164–85.
Farrell, J. 2010. “Vergil’s Detractors.” In A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and Its Reception, ed. J. Farrell and M. C. J. Putnam. London: 435–48.
Fedeli, P. 1989. “I sistemi di produzione e diffusione.” In Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. ii, ed. G. Cavallo, P. Fedeli, and A. Giardina. Rome: 343–78.
Fiske, G. C. 1966. Lucilius and Horace: A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation. Hildesheim.
Fitzgerald, W. 2007. Martial: The World of the Epigram. Chicago, IL.
Flickinger, R. C. 1927. “A Study of Terence’s Prologues.” PhQ 6: 235–69.
Focardi, G. 1972. “Linguaggio forense nei prologhi terenziani.” SIFC 44: 55–88.
Focardi, G. 1978. “Lo stile oratorio nel prologhi terenziani.” SIFC 50: 70–89.
Foucault, M. 1979. “What Is an Author?” In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, ed. J. V. Harari. Ithaca, NY: 141–60.
Fowler, D. P. 1995. “Martial and the Book.” Ramus 24: 31–58.
Fraser, P. M. 1970. “Aristophanes of Byzantion and Zoilos Homeromastix in Vitruvius: A Note on Vitruvius vii, praef. 4–9.” Eranos 68: 115–22.
Friedlander, L. (ed.) 1961. M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton Libri. Amsterdam.
Furhmann, M. 1961. “Review of Reiff 1959.” Gnomon 33: 445–8.
Galán Vioque, G. (ed.) 2002. Martial, Book vii: A Commentary, trans. J. J. Zoltowski. Leiden.
Garland, R. 2006. Celebrity in Antiquity: From Media Tarts to Tabloid Queens. London.
Garton, C. 1972. Personal Aspects of the Roman Theatre. Toronto.
Gelhaus, H. 1972. Die Prologe des Terenz: Eine Erklärung nach den Lehren von der Inventio und Dispositio. Heidelberg.
Genette, G. 1987. Seuils. Paris.
Gilula, D. 1989. “The First Realistic Roles in European Theatre: Terence’s Prologues.” QUCC 33: 95–106.
Gold, B. K. 2003. “Accipe Divitias et Vatum Maximus Esto: Money, Poetry, Mendicancy and Patronage in Martial.” In Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text, ed. A. J. Boyle and W. J. Dominick. Leiden: 591–612.
Goldberg, S. M. 1986. Understanding Terence. Princeton, NJ.
Goldberg, S. M. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Goldstein, P. 1994. Copyright’s Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial Highway. New York.
Goold, G. P. (ed.) 1985. Manilius:Astronomica. Leipzig.
Gowers, E. 2004. “The Plot Thickens: Hidden Outlines in Terence’s Prologues.” Ramus 33: 150–66.
Grafton, A. 1997. The Footnote: A Curious History. Cambridge, MA.
Grahame-Smith, S. 2009. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. Philadelphia, PA.
Gratwick, A. S. 1999. Terence:Adelphi. 2nd edn. Warminster.
Graziosi, B. 2002. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge.
Green, R. P. H. (ed.) 1991. The Works of Ausonius. Oxford.
Green, R. P. H. (ed.) 1999. Decimi Magni Ausonii Opera. Oxford.
Green, S. P. 2002. “Plagiarism, Norms, and the Limits of Theft Law: Some Observations on the Use of Criminal Sanctions in Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights.” Hastings Law Journal 54: 167–242.
Greene, T. M. 1982. Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven, CT.
Greenwood, M. A. P. 1998. “Martial, Gossip, and the Language of Rumour.” In Toto Notus in Orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, ed. F. Grewing. Stuttgart: 278–314.
Grewing, F. (ed.) 1997. Martial, Buch vi. Hypomnemata 115. Göttingen.
Griffiths, E. 2011. “Tradition and Originality: How to Deal with Classical Plagiarism.” CJ 106.3: 349–58.
Grimal, P. 1970. “L’ennemi de Térence, Luscius de Lanuvinium.” CRAI 114.2: 281–8.
Grisart, A. 1961. “Suétone et les deux Sénèque.” Helikon 1: 302–8.
Gros, P. 1994. “Munus non ingratum: Le traité vitruvien et la notion de service.” In Le projet de Vitruve: Objet, destinataires, et réception duDe architectura. Actes du colloque internationale, École française de Rome. Rome: 75–90.
Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Rome. Ithaca, NY.
Gunderson, E. 2003. Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity. Cambridge.
Habinek, T. 2005. Ancient Rhetoric and Oratory. Oxford.
Håkanson, L. (ed.) 1989. L. Annaeus Seneca Maior:Oratorum et Rhetorum Sententiae Divisiones Colores. Leipzig.
Hall, B. (ed.) 2008. Borrowed Feathers: Plagiarism and the Limits of Imitation in Early Modern Europe. Oslo.
Hanson, A. 1998. “Galen: Author and Critic.” In Editing Texts, ed. G. W. Most. Göttingen: 22–53.
Hardie, C. (ed.) 1954. Vitae Vergilianae antiquae. Oxford.
Harrill, J. A. 2006. Slaves in the New Testament: Literary, Social, and Moral Dimensions. Minneapolis, MN.
Harris-McCoy, D. E. 2008. “Varieties of Encyclopedism in the Early Roman Empire: Vitruvius, Pliny the Elder, Artemidorus.” Diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Hathaway, N. 1989. “Compilatio: From Plagiarism to Compiling.” Viator 20: 19–44.
Heath, M. 1990. “Aristophanes and His Rivals.” G&R 37.2: 143–58.
Heath, M. 2002. Interpreting Classical Texts. London.
Hegemann, H. 2010. Axolotl Roadkill. Berlin.
Henderson, A. A. R. (ed.) 1979. P. Ovidi NasonisRemedia Amoris. Edinburgh.
Henderson, J. 2002. “Knowing Someone through Their Books: Pliny on Uncle Pliny (Epistles 3.5).” CP 97.3: 256–84.
Herrnstein Smith, B. 1984. “Contingencies of Value.” In Canons, ed. R. von Hallberg. Chicago, IL: 5–39.
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.
Hollis, A. S. (ed.) 2007. Fragments of Roman Poetry c. 60 b.c. – a.d. 20. Oxford.
Holzberg, N. 2002. Martial und das antike Epigramm. Stuttgart.
Horsfall, N. 1976. “The Collegium Poetarum.” BICS 23: 79–95.
Hosius, C. 1913. “Plagiatoren und Plagiatbegriff im Alterum.” NJKlPh 31: 176–93.
Housman, A. E. 1917. “The Thyestes of Varius.” CQ 11: 42–9.
Howard, R. M. 1999. Standing in the Shadow of Giants: Plagiarists, Authors, Collaborators. Stamford, CT.
Howell, P. (ed.) 1980. A Commentary on Book One of the Epigrams of Martial. London.
Howell, P. 2009. Martial. London.
Hubaux, J. 1934. “La ‘maîtresse’ de Virgile.” REL 12: 343–59.
Hubbard, T. K. 1991. The Mask of Comedy: Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis. Ithaca, NY.
Hunter, R. 1985. The New Comedy of Greece and Rome. Cambridge.
Hutcheon, L. 1994. Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. London.
Janson, T. 1964. Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions. Studia Latina Stockholmiensia 13. Stockholm.
Jocelyn, H. D. 1964. “Ancient Scholarship and Virgil’s Use of Republican Latin Poetry I.” CQ 14.2: 280–95.
Jocelyn, H. D. 1980. “The Fate of Varius’ Thyestes.” CQ 30.2: 387–400.
Johnson, A. P. 2006. Ethnicity and Argument in Eusebius’Preparatio Evangelica. Oxford.
Johnson, W. A. 2009. “Constructing Elite Reading Communities in the High Empire.” In Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, ed. W. A. Johnson and H. N. Parker. Oxford: 320–30.
Johnson, W. A. 2010. Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire. Oxford.
Kajanto, I. 1965. The Latin Cognomina. Helsinki.
Kaster, R. A. 1980. “Macrobius and Servius: Verecundia and the Grammarian’s Function.” HSCP 84: 219–62.
Kaster, R. A. 1988. Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley, CA.
Kaster, R. A. (ed.) 1995. C. Suetonius Tranquillus:De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus. Oxford.
Kaster, R. A. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford.
Kaster, R. A. (ed.) 2011. Macrobius:Saturnalia. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA.
Kay, N. M. (ed.) 1985. Martial Book xi: A Commentary. London.
Kay, N. M. (ed.) 2006. Epigrams from theAnthologia Latina. London.
Kenney, E. J. 1973. “The Style of the Metamorphoses.” In Ovid, ed. J. W. Binns. London: 116–53.
Kenney, E. J. 1982. “Books and Readers in the Roman World.” In The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. ii, ed. E. J. Kenney and W. V. Clausen. Cambridge: 3–32.
Ker, J. 2004. “Nocturnal Writers in Imperial Rome: The Culture of Lucubratio.” CP 99: 209–42.
Kernan, A. B. 1959. The Cankered Muse: Satire of the English Renaissance. New Haven, CT.
Kewes, P. 1998. Authorship and Appropriation: Writing for the Stage in England, 1660–1710. Oxford.
Kleberg, T. 1969. Buchhandel und Verlagswesen in der Antike. Darmstadt.
Klose, D. 1966. Die Didaskalien und Prologe des Terenz. Bamberg.
Knell, H. 1985. Vitruvs Architekturtheorie: Versuch einer Interpretation. Darmstadt.
König, A. 2009. “From Architect to Imperator: Vitruvius and His Addressee in the De Architectura.” In Authorial Voices in Greco-Roman Technical Writing, ed. L. Taub and A. Doody. Trier: 31–52.
König, J. 2009. “Conventions of Prefatory Self-Presentation in Galen’s On the Order of My Own Books.” In Galen and the World of Knowledge, ed. C. Gill, T. Whitmarsh, and J. Wilkins. Cambridge: 35–58.
König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. 2007. “Introduction: Ordering Knowledge.” In Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire, ed. J. König and T. Whitmarsh. Cambridge: 3–39.
König, R. and G. Winkler. (eds.) 1973. C. Plinius Secundus:Naturkunde. Munich.
Kroll, W. 1964. Studien zum Versändnis der Römischen Literatur. Darmstadt.
Kruschwitz, P. 2004. Terenz. Hildesheim.
Lebek, W. D. 1996. “Moneymaking on the Roman Stage.” In Roman Theater and Society, ed. W. J. Slater. Ann Arbor, MI: 29–48.
Leeman, A. D. 1963. Orationis Ratio, vol. i. Amsterdam.
Lefkowitz, M. R. 1981. The Lives of the Greek Poets. Baltimore, MD.
Leigh, M. 2001. “Primitivism and Power: The Beginnings of Latin Literature.” In Literature in the Roman World, ed. O. Taplin. Oxford: 4–26.
Lethem, J. 2007. “The Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism.” Harper’s Magazine, April 4: 59–71.
Lim, R. 2004. “Augustine, the Grammarians, and the Cultural Authority of Vergil.” In Romane memento: Vergil in the Fourth Century, ed. R. Rees. London: 112–27.
Liou, B. and Zuinghedau, M. (eds.) 1995. Vitruve: De l’architecture: Livre vii. Paris.
Lindey, A. 1952. Plagiarism and Originality. New York.
Linke, H. 1880. “Quaestiones de Macrobii Saturnaliorum fontibus.” Diss., Breslau.
Lockyer, C. W., Jr. 1970. “The Fiction of Memory and the Use of Written Sources: Convention and Practice in Seneca the Elder and Other Authors.” Diss., Princeton University.
Long, J. 1996. Claudian’s In Eutropium: Or, How, When, and Why to Slander a Eunuch. Chapel Hill, NC.
Long, P. O. 2001. Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Baltimore, MD.
Lorenz, S. 2002. Erotik und Panegyrik: Martials epigrammatische Kaiser. Classica Monacensia 23. Tübingen.
Love, H. 2002. Attributing Authorship: An Introduction. Cambridge.
Lowe, J. C. B. 1983. “The Eunuchus: Terence and Menander.” CQ 33.2: 428–44.
Lowe, N. J. 2007. Comedy. Greece and Rome: New Surveys in the Classics 37. Cambridge.
Ludwig, W. 1968. “The Originality of Terence and His Greek Models.” GRBS 9: 169–82.
Macfarlane, R. 2007. Original Copy: Plagiarism and Originality in Nineteenth-Century Literature. Oxford.
Mallon, T. 1989. Stolen Words: Forays into the Origins and Ravages of Plagiarism. New York.
Maltby, R. 2006. “Proper Names as a Linking Device in Martial 5.43–8.” In What’s in a Name?, ed. J. Booth and R. Maltby. Swansea: 159–67.
Maltby, R. 2008. “Verbal and Thematic Links Between Poems and Books in Martial.” In Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 13, ed. F. Cairns. Liverpool: 255–68.
Marincola, J. 1997. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.
Marinone, N. 1946. Elio Donato, Macrobio, e Servio. Vercelli.
Marinone, N. (ed.) 1977. I Saturnalia di Macrobio Teodosio. 2nd edn. Turin.
Marsh, B. 2007. Plagiarism: Alchemy and Remedy in Higher Education. New York.
Marshall, C. W. 2006. The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.
Martin, R. H. (ed.) 1976. Terence:Adelphoe. Cambridge.
Martindale, C. 1993. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge.
Mason, H. A. 1963. “Is Juvenal a Classic?” In Essays on Roman Literature: Satire, ed. J. P. Sullivan. London: 93–176.
Masterson, M. 2004. “Status, Pay, and Pleasure in the De Architectura of Vitruvius.” AJP 125: 387–416.
Mayer, R. (ed.) 1994. Horace: Epistles Book i. Cambridge.
Mazzeo, T. J. 2007. Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period. Philadelphia, PA.
McElduff, S. 2004. “More Than Menander’s Acolyte: Terence on Translation.” Ramus 33.1–2: 120–9.
McEwen, I. K. 2003. Vitruvius: Writing the Body of Architecture. Cambridge, MA.
McGill, S. 2005. “Seneca the Elder on Plagiarizing Cicero’s Verrines.” Rhetorica 23.4: 337–46.
McGill, S. 2010. “Another Man’s Miracles: Recasting Aelius Donatus in Phocas’s Life of Virgil.” In From the Tetrarchs to the Theodosians: Later Roman History and Culture, 284–450 ce, ed. S. McGill, C. Sogno, and E. Watts. Cambridge: 153–69.
Mellor, R. 1993. Tacitus. New York.
Meltzer, F. 1994. Hot Property: The Stakes and Claims of Literary Originality. Chicago, IL.
Migliario, E. V. 2007. Retorica e storia: una lettura delle Suasoriae di Seneca Padre. Bari.
Morello, R. 2011. “Pliny and the Encyclopaedic Addressee.” In Pliny the Elder: Themes and Contexts, ed. R. K. Gibson and R. Morello. Leiden: 147–65.
Morgan, M. H. 1914. Vitruvius: The Ten Books of Architecture. Cambridge, MA.
Muecke, D. C. 1970. Irony. London.
Mülke, M. 2008. Der Autor und sein Text: Die Verfälschung des Originals im Urteil antiker Autoren. Berlin.
Munari, F. 1998. Studi sullaCiris. Trent.
Murphy, T. 2003. “Pliny’s Naturalis Historia: The Prodigal Text.” In Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text, ed. A. J. Boyle and W. J. Dominick. Leiden: 301–22.
Murphy, T. 2004. Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in Encyclopedia. Oxford.
Nauta, R. R. 2002. Poetry for Patrons: Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Leiden.
Nettleship, H. 1898. “On Some of the Early Criticism of Virgil’s Poetry.” In The Works of Virgil, ed. J. Conington and H. Nettleship. London: xxix–liii.
Newman, J. K. 1967. The Concept of  Vates in Augustan Poetry. Collection Latomus 89. Brussels.
Nicholas, B. 1996. An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford.
Nisbet, G. 2003. Greek Epigrams in the Roman Empire: Martial’s Forgotten Rivals. Oxford.
Norden, E. 1915. Ennius und Vergilius: Kriegsbilder aus Roms grosser Zeit. Leipzig.
Norwood, G. 1923. The Art of Terence. Oxford.
Novara, A. 2005. Auctor in bibliotheca: Essai sur les texts préfaciels de Vitruve et une philosophie latine du livre. Paris.
Nylander, E. N. 1992. “Prefaces and Problems in Vitruvius’ De Architectura.” Diss., University of Gothenburg.
Parker, H. N. 1996. “Plautus vs. Terence: Audience and Popularity Re-Examined.” AJP 117: 585–617.
Parker, H. N. 2009. “Books and Reading Latin Poetry.” In Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, ed. W. A. Johnson and H. N. Parker. Oxford: 186–229.
Pavanello, R. 1994. “Nomi di persona allusive in Marziale.” Paideia 49: 161–78.
Pernerstorfer, M. J. (ed.) 2009. Menanders Kolax: Ein Beitrag zu Rekonstruktion und Interpretation der Komödie. Berlin.
Perutelli, A. 2001. “Sui proemi ii e iii di Manilio.” MD 47: 67–84.
Pescucci, G. 1982. “La lettera prefatoria di Plinio alla Naturalis Historia.” In Plinio il Vecchio sotto il profilo storico e letterario. Como: 177–97.
Pohlenz, M. 1956. “Der Prolog des Terenz.” SIFC 27.8: 434–53.
Potter, D. S. 1999. Literary Texts and the Roman Historian. London.
Posner, R. A. 2007. The Little Book of Plagiarism. New York.
Préchac, F. (ed.) 1957. Sénèque: Lettres à Lucilius. Paris.
Pucci, J. 1998. The Full-Knowing Reader: Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition. New Haven, CT.
Puelma, M. 1995. “Dichter und Gönner bei Martial.” In Labor et Lima: Kleine Schriften und Nachträge, ed. I. Fasel. Basel: 415–66.
Quinn, K. 1982. “The Poet and His Audience in the Augustan Age.” ANRWii. 30.1: 75–180.
Randall, M. 2001. Pragmatic Plagiarism: Authorship, Profit, and Power. Toronto.
Regel, G. 1907. “De Vergilio poetarum imitatore testimonia.” Diss., University of Göttingen.
Reiff, A. 1959. “Interpretatio, Imitatio, Aemulatio: Begriff und Vorstellung literarischer Abhängigkeit bei den Römern.” Diss., University of Cologne.
Reifferscheid, A. (ed.) 1860. C. Suetonii Tranquilli praeter Caesarum libros reliquiae. Leipzig.
Ribbeck, O. 1866. Prolegomena critica ad P. Vergili Maronis opera minora. Leipzig.
Ricks, C. 2002. Allusion to the Poets. Oxford.
Riggsby, A. M. 2007. “Guide to the Wor(l)d.” In Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire, ed. J. König and T. Whitmarsh. Cambridge: 88–107.
Rimell, V. 2008. Martial’s Rome: Empire and the Ideology of Epigram. Cambridge.
Roberts, M. 1989. The Jeweled Style: Poetry and Poetics in Late Antiquity. Ithaca, NY.
Roman, L. 2001. “The Representation of Literary Materiality in Martial’s Epigrams.” JRS 91: 113–45.
Roscalla, F. 2006. “Storie di plagi e di plagiari.” In L’autore e l’opera: attribuzioni, appropriazioni, apocrifi nella Grecia antica. Atti del convegno internazionale (Pavia, 27–28 maggio 2005). Memorie e atti di convegni 34, ed. F. Roscalla. Pisa: 69–102.
Rosenthal, L. J. 1996. Playwrights and Plagiarists in Early Modern England: Gender, Authorship, Literary Property. Ithaca, NY.
Rowland, I. D. and Howe, T. N. (eds.) 1999. Vitruvius: Ten Books on Architecture. Cambridge.
Russell, D. A. 1979. “De Imitatione.” In Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, ed. D. West and T. Woodman. Cambridge: 1–15.
Ruthven, K. K. 2001. Faking Literature. Cambridge.
Saint-Amour, P. K. 2003. The Copywrights: Intellectual Property and the Literary Imagination. Ithaca, NY.
Salanitro, M. 1991. “Il sale romano negli epigrammi di Marziale.” Atene e Roma 36: 1–25.
Saller, R. P. 1983. “Martial on Patronage and Literature.” CQ 33: 246–57.
Santini, C., Scivolini, N., and Zurli, L. (eds.) 1990–8. Prefazioni, prologhi, proemi di opere tecnico-scientifiche Latine. Rome.
Schöffel, C. (ed.) 2002. Martial: Buch 8. Stuttgart.
Schofield, R. (trans.) 2009. Vitruvius:On Architecture. London.
Schultze, C. 2011. “Encyclopaedic Exemplarity in Pliny the Elder.” In Pliny the Elder: Themes and Contexts, ed. R. K. Gibson and R. Morello. Leiden: 167–86.
Seo, J. M. 2009. “Plagiarism and Poetic Identity in Martial.” AJP 130: 567–93.
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed.) 1990. M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammata. Stuttgart.
Sharrock, A. 2009. Reading Roman Comedy: Poetics and Playfulness in Plautus and Terence. Cambridge.
Shields, D. 2010. Reality Hunger: A Manifesto. New York.
Simon, M. 1961. “Contaminatio und Furtum bei Terenz.” Helikon 1: 487–92.
Sinclair, P. 1995. Tacitus the Sententious Historian: A Sociology of Rhetoric in Annales 1–6. University Park, PA.
Sinclair, P. 2003. “Rhetoric of Writing and Reading in the Preface to Pliny’s Naturalis Historia.” In Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text, ed. A. J. Boyle and W. J. Dominick. Leiden: 277–99.
Slater, N. W. 1992. “Two Republican Poets on Drama: Terence and Accius.” In Antike Dramentheorien und ihre Rezeption, ed. B. Zimmermann. Stuttgart: 85–103.
Slings, S. R. 1990. “The I in Personal Archaic Lyric: An Introduction.” In The Poet’s I in Archaic Greek Lyric, ed. S. R. Slings. Amsterdam: 1–30.
Sogno, C. 2006. Q. Aurelius Symmachus: A Political Biography. Ann Arbor, MI.
Spahlinger, L. 2004. “Quem recitas, meus est, o Fidentine, libellus. Martials Fidentinus-Zyklus und das Problem des Plagiats.” Hermes 132: 472–94.
Speyer, W. 1971. Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum. Munich.
Spisak, A. 2007. Martial: A Social Guide. London.
Starr, R. J. 1987. “The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World.” CQ 37: 213–23.
Starr, R. J. 1995. “Vergil’s Seventh Eclogue and Its Readers: Biographical Allegory as an Interpretive Strategy.” CP 90.2: 129–38.
Stein, M. 2003. “Der Dichter und sein Kritiker: Interpretationsprobleme im Prolog des Terenzischen ‘Eunuchus.” RhM 146.2: 184–217.
Steiner, G. 2000. Grammars of Creation. London.
Stemplinger, E. 1912. Das Plagiat in der griechischen Literatur. Leipzig.
Stok, F. 1994. “Virgil between the Middle Ages and Renaissance.” IJCT 1.2: 15–22.
Stok, F. (ed.) 1997. “Vita Donatiana.” In Vitae Vergilianae Antiquae, ed. G. Brugnoli and F. Stok. Rome: 15–56.
St. Onge, K. R. 1988. The Melancholy Anatomy of Plagiarism. Lanham, MD.
Suerbaum, W. 1983. “Vergil als Ehebrecher – L. Varius Rufus als Plagiator. Anekdoten um Plotia Hieria in der Vergil-Tradition.” In Festschrift für R. Muth zum 65. Geburtstag am 1. Januar 1981, ed. P. Händel and W. Meid. Innsbruck: 507–29.
Sullivan, J. P. 1991. Martial: The Unexpected Classic. Cambridge.
Sussman, L. A. 1972. “The Elder Seneca’s Discussion of the Decline of Roman Eloquence.” CSCA 5: 195–210.
Sussman, L. A. 1978. The Elder Seneca. Mnemosyne Supplement 51. Leiden.
Syme, R. 1972. “Fraud and Imposture.” In Pseudepigrapha i, ed. K. von Fritz. Fondation Hardt 18. Geneva: 3–21.
Szelest, H. 1981. “Humor bei Martial.” Eos 69: 293–301.
Tarrant, R. 2002. “Ovid and Ancient Literary History.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, ed. P. Hardie. Cambridge: 13–33.
Thilo, G. and Hagen, H. (eds.) 1961. Servii grammatici qui feruntur in Vergilii carmina commentarii. 3 vols. Hildesheim.
Thomas, R. F. 2001. Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge.
Toohey, P. 1996. Epic Lessons: An Introduction to Ancient Didactic Poetry. London.
Uría, J. 2006. “Personal Names and Invective in Cicero.” In What’s in a Name?, ed. J. Booth and R. Maltby. Swansea: 13–31.
Vaidhyanathan, S. 2001. Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York.
Valette-Cagnac, E. 1997. La lecture à Rome: Rites et pratiques. Paris.
Vallat, D. 2006. “Bilingual Word-Play on Personal Names in Martial.” In What’s in a Name?, ed. J. Booth and R. Maltby. Swansea: 121–43.
Vardi, A. D. 1996. “Diiudicatio Locorum: Gellius and the History of a Mode of Ancient Comparative Criticism.” CQ 46.2: 492–514.
Vardi, A. D. 2007. “The Reception of Literary Translations in Rome: Critics, Grammarians, and Rhetoricians.” In Übersetzung: Ein internationals Handbuch zur Übersetzungforschung, vol. ii, ed. H. Kittel, J. House, and B. Schultze. Berlin: 1150–7.
Volk, K. 2002. The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford.
Volk, K. 2009. Manilius and His Intellectual Background. Oxford.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1990. “Pliny the Elder and Man’s Unnatural History.” G&R 37: 80–96.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1997. “Mutatio Morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution.” In The Roman Cultural Revolution, ed. T. Habinek and A. Schiesaro. Cambridge: 3–22.
Watson, L. and Watson, P. (eds.) 2003. Martial: Select Epigrams. Cambridge.
Wessner, P. (ed.) 1962–3. Aeli Donati Commentum Terenti. 3 vols. Stuttgart.
West, M. L. (ed.) 2003. Homeric Hymns, Homeric Apocrypha, Lives of Homer. Cambridge, MA.
White, P. 1974. “The Presentation and Dedication of the Silvae and the Epigrams.” JRS 64: 40–61.
White, P. 1975. “The Friends of Martial, Statius, and Pliny, and the Dispersal of Patronage.” HSCP 79: 265–300.
White, P. 1978. “Amicitia and the Profession of Poetry in Early Imperial Rome.” JRS 68: 74–92.
White, P. 1996. “Martial and Pre-Publication Texts.” EMC/CV 15: 397–412.
White, P. 2009. “Bookshops in the Literary Culture of Rome.” In Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, ed. W. A. Johnson and H. N. Parker. Oxford: 268–87.
Whitehead, D. and P. Blyth. (eds.) 2004. Athenaeus Mechanicus: On Machines. Historia-Einzelschrift 182. Stuttgart.
Wigodsky, M. 1972. Vergil and Early Latin Poetry. Hermes Einzelschriften 24. Wiesbaden.
Williams, C. 2002. “Sit nequior omnibus libellis: Text, Poet, and Reader in Martial’s Epigrams.” Philologus 146: 150–71.
Williams, C. (ed.) 2004. Martial: Epigrams Book Two. Oxford.
Wills, G. (trans.) 2008. Martial’s Epigrams : A Selection. New York.
Willis, J. (ed.) 1970. Macrobius, vol. i. Leipzig.
Winsbury, R. 2009. The Roman Book: Books, Publishing, and Performance in Classical Rome. London.
Winterbottom, M. (ed.) 1974. The Elder Seneca:Declamations. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.
Wray, D. 2001. Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood. Cambridge.
Wright, J. 1974. Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of theComoedia Palliata. Rome.
Zerby, C. 2002. The Devil’s Details: A History of Footnotes. New York.
Ziegler, K. 1950. “PlagiatRE 20.2: 1956–97.
Ziolkowski, J. M. and M. C. J. Putnam (eds.) 2008. The Virgilian Tradition: The First Fifteen Hundred Years. New Haven, CT.
Zwierlein, O. 1999. Die Ovid- und Vergil-Revision in Tiberischer Zeit, vol. i, Prolegomena. Berlin.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.