Barnett, Randy E.Interview by Ronald Collins and David Skover. Tape recording, June 2, 2012. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, October 8, 2004. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Donahue, Phil. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, September 20, 2010. New York City.Google Scholar

Gitlin, Todd. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, July 19, 2004. Columbia University, New York City.Google Scholar

Green, Steven K.Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, January 8, 2011. Willamette University School of Law, Salem, OR.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, July 20, 2004. Columbia University, New York City.Google Scholar

Jansen, Sue Curry. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, August 25, 2010. Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA.Google Scholar

Jhally, Sut. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, August 12, 2010. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar

Krug, Anita K.Interview by Ronald Collins and David Skover. Tape recording, May 12, 2012. University of Washington School of Law, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

Linde, Hans A.Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, February 14, 2004. Willamette University School of Law, Salem, OR.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A.Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, May 17, 2004. University of Chicago School of Law, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Nader, Ralph. Interview by Ronald Collins and David Skover. Tape recording, September 16, 2010. Center of Study for Responsive Law, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Newman, Judge Jon O.Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, January 26, 2011. Sarasota, FL.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C.Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, January 18, 2011. University of Chicago School of Law, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, October 11, 2004. Harvard University School of Law, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Shiffrin, Steven. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, August 27, 2010. Cornell University School of Law, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Stevelman, Faith. Interview by Ronald Collins and David Skover. Tape recording, April 15, 2012. Seattle University School of Law, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

Stone, Geoffrey. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, May 17, 2004. University of Chicago School of Law, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Strossen, Nadine. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, September 21, 2010. New York Law School, New York City.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, September 20, 2010. New York University, New York City.Google Scholar

West, Cornel. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, September 22, 2010. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Zinn, Howard. Interview by David Skover. Tape recording, October 11, 2004. Boston University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Carter, Stephen L.The Dissent of the Governed: A Meditation on Law, Religion, and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. (Describing the legitimacy of the state as measured by its dissenters’ tolerance for authority.)Google Scholar

Commager, Henry Steele. Freedom, Loyalty, Dissent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954. (Recognizing that American history was rooted in dissent, and that we encourage it because a healthy state cannot live without it.)Google Scholar

Euchner, Charles C.Extraordinary Politics: How Protest and Dissent Are Changing American Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996. (With an eye to the dynamics of “ordinary politics,” an exploration of dissent and protest as forms of “extraordinary politics.”)Google Scholar

Fortas, Abe. Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience. New York: Signet Books, 1968. (Focusing on the contours of the right to dissent and offering classic cases of civil disobedience as examples of rightful dissent.)Google Scholar

Gitlin, Todd. The Intellectuals and the Flag. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006. (Examining popular culture as a surrogate for political action.)Google Scholar

Lovell, Jarret S.Crimes of Dissent: Civil Disobedience, Criminal Justice, and the Politics of Conscience. New York: New York University Press, 2009. (Detailing the actions of “criminals” who deliberately and publicly violate the law as expressions of protest against perceived racial, economic, or other social injustices.)Google Scholar

Penalver, Eduardo Moises and Katyal, Sonia K.. Property Outlaws: How Squatters, Pirates, and Protesters Improve the Law of Ownership. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010. (Drawing attention to the general question of change within real and intellectual property rights and the crucial function played by criminal and civil disobedience within that process.)Google Scholar

Shiffrin, Steven. Dissent, Injustice, and the Meanings of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. (Positing that dissenters stand at the center of the First Amendment, and not at its periphery.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003. (Legitimating dissent as a necessary counterforce to the destabilizing and dysfunctional social consequences of conformity; more a study of the phenomenon of conformity in its various guises and operations than a study of the phenomenon of dissent per se.)Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. The Company of Critics. New York: Basic Books, 2002. (Arguing that criticism is most properly the work of “insiders,” men and women mindful of and committed to the people whose practices and policies they call into question.)Google Scholar

Bay, Christian. “Civil Disobedience: The Inner and Outer Limits.” In Dissent and the State, edited by Franks, C. E. S., 40–59. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1989. (Exploring the parameters of civil disobedience as a phenomenon.)Google Scholar

Berlant, Lauren. “The Epistemology of State Emotion.” In Dissent in Dangerous Times, edited by Austin Sarat, 46–78. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005. (Explaining that the contemporary “war on terrorism” capitalizes on the emotionality of public rhetoric to normalize a collective response that abhors “nuanced” dissent.)Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. “Social Movements.” In The Sociology of Dissent, edited by Denisoff, R. Serge, 4–20. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974. (Contrasting “reform” with “revolution,” and discussing “expressive movements,” such as fashion and lifestyle choices.)Google Scholar

Bosmajian, Haig A. “Introduction.” In Dissent: Symbolic Behavior and Rhetorical Strategies, edited by Bosmajian, Haig A., 1-11. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1972. (Studying symbolic behavior as the strategy of dissenters.)Google Scholar

Brown, Wendy. “Political Idealization and Its Discontents.” In Dissent in Dangerous Times, edited by Austin Sarat, 23–45. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005. (Exploring political love, fealty and critique through a consideration of love and idealization.)Google Scholar

Cheney, George and Lair, Daniel J.. “Elevating Dissent and Transcending Fear-Based Culture at War and at Work.” In Dissent and the Failure of Leadership, edited by Banks, Stephen P., 182–207. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. (Exploring contemporary fear in entertainment views outside mainstream positions.)Google Scholar

Clark, Ramsey. “The First Amendment and the Politics of Confrontation.” In Dissent, Power, and Confrontation, edited by Klein, Alexander, 3–31. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co., 1971.Google Scholar

Corbett, Edward P. J. “The Rhetoric of the Open Hand and the Rhetoric of the Closed Fist.” In Dissent: Symbolic Behavior and Rhetorical Strategies, edited by Bosmaijan, Haig A., 71–83. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1972. (Analyzing the characteristics of “open hand” versus “closed fist” dissent.)Google Scholar

Cromley, Brent R. “The Right to Dissent in a Free Society.” Montana Law Review 32 (1971): 215–226. (Describing the tension between a “free society” that suggests the tolerance of a right of dissent and a “system of laws” that presupposes no right to disobey the law.)Google Scholar

Gerken, Heather K. “Dissenting by Deciding.” Stanford Law Review 47 (2005): 1745–1785. (Describing the phenomenon whereby those who hold a minority view within the culture as a whole enjoy majoritarian power within a local constituency.)Google Scholar

Grace, Elizabeth and Leys, Colin. “The Concept of Subversion and Its Implications.” In Dissent and the State, edited by Franks, C. E. S., 62–85. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1989. (Exploring the origins and modern understanding of “subversion.”)Google Scholar

Gusterson, Hugh. “The Weakest Link? Academic Dissent in the ‘War on Terrorism.’” In Dissent in Dangerous Times, edited by Sarat, Austin, 81–110. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005. (Attempts to constrict academic critics of governmental policy typically failed, because such dissent was largely ineffectual.)Google Scholar

Hackett, Robert A. “Dissent May Not Need to Be Disciplined: Corporate Influence in the News Media.” In Disciplining Dissent, edited by Bruneau, William and Turk, James L., 143–161. Toronto: James Lorimer and Company, 2004. (Arguing that dissent does not need to be disciplined, because mass media's institutional procedures and socialization preempt such expression in the first place.)Google Scholar

Horowitz, Irving Louis and Liebowitz, Martin. “Social Deviance and Political Marginality.” In The Sociology of Dissent, edited by Denisoff, R. Serge, 263–280. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974. (Differentiating political dissent from personal deviancy.)Google Scholar

Ibsen, Henrik. “Introduction.” In Protest: Man against Society, edited by Armstrong, Gregory, 15–91. New York: Bantam Books, 1969. (Examining the function of mass protest in American democratic system, and arguing that there is a duty of the citizen to protest.)Google Scholar

Koffler, Judith Schenck and Gershman, Bennett L.. “The New Seditious Libel.” Cornell Law Review 69 (1984): 816–882. (Tracking the history of seditious libel in Anglo-American law and analyzing our current “national state of insecurity.”)Google Scholar

Martin, Brian. “Varieties of Dissent.” In Dissent and the Failure of Leadership, edited by Banks, Stephen P., 22–36. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. (Analyzing the distinctions among disagreement, dissent, rebellion, and heresy.)Google Scholar

Quigley, William P. “The Necessity Defense in Civil Disobedience Cases: Bring In the Jury.” New England Law Review 38 (2003): 3–72. (In the context of civil disobedience jury trials, it is troubling if the court refuses to permit the necessity defense to be made in cases of indirect civil disobedience.)Google Scholar

Rubin, Edward L. “John Newman's Theory of Disparagement and the First Amendment in the Administrative State.” New York Law Review 46 (2002–2003): 249–277. (Suggesting that the flaccid state of dissent in modern America is partially a result of the structure and organization of the modern administrative state and the character of contemporary mass media.)Google Scholar

Rush, Gary B. “Toward a Definition of the Extreme Right.” In The Sociology of Dissent, edited by Denisoff, R. Serge, 210–225. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974. (According dissenter status to the ideology and practices of the “extreme right” in contemporary America.)Google Scholar

Sarat, Austin. “Terrorism, Dissent, and Repression: An Introduction.” In Dissent in Dangerous Times, edited by Sarat, Austin, 1–19. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005. (Characterizing dissent during the current “war on terrorism” and the dangers of dissent during wartime.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sawicki, Nadia N. “The Hollow Promise of Freedom of Conscience.” Cardozo Law Review 33 (2012): 1389–1449. (Examining the contexts in which conscience intersects most often with law – religious claims, refusals by medical providers, and military objections, among others – and arguing that U.S. law does not demonstrate respect for the theory of freedom of conscience as a general matter.)Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “The Boundaries of the First Amendment: A Preliminary Exploration of Constitutional Salience.” Harvard Law Review 117 (2004): 1765–1809. (Explaining America's obsession with freedoms of speech as a function, in part, of the magnetism of events of dissent and protest.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunder, Madhavi. “Cultural Dissent.” Stanford Law Review 54 (2001): 495–567. (Describing an approach to cultural conflict that recognizes “cultural dissent” within contemporary culture.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Theoharis, Athan G. “The FBI and Dissent in the United States.” In Dissent and the State, edited by Franks, C. E. S., 86-110. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1989. (Examining the history of the FBI from the Roosevelt to Reagan administrations and its investigations of leftist dissenters.)Google Scholar

Toscano, Paul. “The Sanctity of Dissent.” In Dissent and the Failure of Leadership, edited by Banks, Stephen P., 169–181. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. (Providing ten reasons for viewing dissent as a “holy” act.)Google Scholar

Bleiker, Roland. Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Nancy. Silencing Political Dissent: How Post-September 11 Anti-Terrorism Measures Threaten Our Civil Liberties. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cohen, Alfred E.Minerva's Progress: Tradition and Dissent in American Culture. New York: Harcourt Brace & World, 1946, reissued 1969.Google Scholar

Dunbar, Anthony, ed. Where We Stand: Voices of Southern Dissent. Montgomery, AL: NewSouth Books, 2004.Google Scholar

Dunham, Barrows. Heroes and Heretics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964.Google Scholar

Gaustad, Edwin Scott. Dissent in American Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, rev. ed. 2006.Google Scholar

Green, Steven K.The Second Disestablishment: Church and State in Nineteenth Century America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, Neil. Rebels and Renegades. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Hecht, Jennifer Michael. Doubt: A History. San Francisco: Harper, 2003.Google Scholar

Howe, Irving, ed. Twenty-Five Years of Dissent: An American Tradition. New York: Methuen, 1979.Google Scholar

Ivie, Robert L.Dissent from War. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Jackson, Perceival E.Dissent in the Supreme Court: A Chronology. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Kampf, Louis, ed. Counter-Tradition: A Reader in the Literature of Dissent and Alternatives. New York: Basic Books, 1971.Google Scholar

Kalven, Jr., Harry. The Negro and the First Amendment. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Klement, Frank L.The Limits of Dissent: Clement L. Vallandigham and the Civil War. New York: Fordham University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Larsen, Ojvind. The Right to Dissent: The Critical Principle in Discourse Ethics and Deliberative Democracy. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press / University of Copenhagen, 2009.Google Scholar

Laursen, John Christian, ed. Difference and Dissent: Theories of Toleration in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Leonard. Blasphemy: Verbal Offense against the Sacred, from Moses to Salman Rushdie. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993.Google Scholar

Lovell, Jarrett S.Crimes of Dissent: Civil Disobedience, Criminal Justice, and the Politics of Conscience. New York: New York University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Martin, Robert, W. T. Government by Dissent: Protest, Resistance, and Radical Democratic Thought in The Early American Republic. New York: New York University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Masheder, Richard. Dissent and Democracy: Their Mutual Relations and Common Object: An Historical Review. London: Bradbury and Evans, 1864.Google Scholar

Mayers, David. Dissenting Voices in America's Rise to Power. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, R. I.The Origins of European Dissent. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Morison, Samuel Eliot, Merck, Frederick, and Freidel, Frank. Dissent in Three American Wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nederman, Cary J. and Laursen, John Christian. Difference and Dissent: Theories of Toleration in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C.Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America's Tradition of Religious Equality. New York: Basic Books, 2008.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah. Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Routley, Erik. English Religious Dissent. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Schultz, Bud and Schultz, Ruth. The Price of Dissent. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Shepard, Benjamin and Hayduck, Ronald. From ACT UP to the WTO. New York: Verso, 2002.Google Scholar

Stein, Stephen J.Communities of Dissent: A History of Alternative Religions in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Young, Ralph E.Dissent in America: The Voices That Shaped a Nation. New York: Pearson Education, 2006.Google Scholar

Zick, Timothy. Speech Out of Doors: Preserving First Amendment Liberties in Public Places. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar