Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T10:00:44.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Prenatal care

from Section III - Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Botros Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Office Care of Women , pp. 129 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnancy mortality surveillance system; 2013. Available from: www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pmss.html. Accessed December 5, 2015.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Women’s health USA 2010. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010. Available from: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/whusa10/hstat/mh/pages/237mm.html#footnote1. Accessed December 5, 2015.Google Scholar
Edwards, JE, Hanke, JC. An update on maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States. Nursing for women’s health. 2013;17(5):376–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Gabbe, SG. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012: xvii, 1, 291.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL and Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2012: xiv, 580.Google Scholar
Phillippi, JC. Women’s perceptions of access to prenatal care in the United States: a literature review. Journal of midwifery & women’s health. 2009;54(3):219–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitworth, M, Bricker, L, Neilson, JP, Dowswell, T. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010;4:CD007058.Google Scholar
Hardy, LM, Institute of Medicine (US), Committee on Prenatal and Newborn Screening for HIV Infection. HIV screening of pregnant women and newborns. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991: 146.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 60: Pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2005;105(3):675–85.Google Scholar
Dunne, F, Brydon, P, Smith, K, Gee, H. Pregnancy in women with type 2 diabetes: 12 years outcome data 1990–2002. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2003;20(9):734–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: Management of stillbirth. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;113(3):748–61.Google Scholar
Preboth, M. ACOG guidelines on antepartum fetal surveillance. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. American family physician. 2000;62(5):1184, 7–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Sokol, RJ, Blackwell, SC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice B-G. ACOG practice bulletin: Shoulder dystocia. Number 40, November 2002. (Replaces practice pattern number 7, October 1997). International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2003;80(1):8792.Google ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 597: Committee on Obstetric Practice: Labor induction or augmentation and autism. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;123(5):1140–2.Google Scholar
MacDorman, MF, Kirmeyer, SE, Wilson, EC. Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2006. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. 2012;60(8):122.Google Scholar
Creasy, RK, Resnik, R, Greene, MF, et al. Creasy and Resnik’s maternal-fetal medicine: principles and practice. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2014.Google Scholar
Berghella, V. Preterm birth: prevention and management. Chichester, West Sussex; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meis, PJ, Klebanoff, M, Thom, E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;348(24):2379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J, Hankins, G, Iams, JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;201(4):375.e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Collaborating Centre for Women and Children’s Health. Diabetes in pregnancy management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. NICE Guideline No. 3. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2015 Feb 25.Google Scholar
ACOG Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2013: 4751.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 518: Intimate partner violence. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;119(2 p. 1):412–17.Google Scholar
Workowski, KA, Berman, S, CDC. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR recomm rep. 2010 Dec 17;59(RR-12):1110.Google ScholarPubMed
WHO. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 86: Viral hepatitis in pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2007;110(4):941–56.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 131: Screening for cervical cancer. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;120(5):1222–38.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 140: Management of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results and cervical cancer precursors. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;122(6):1338–67.Google Scholar
House, TE, Williams, BL Jr., Meares, GM, Hester, LL Jr. Pregnancy complicated by urinary tract infections. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1969;34(5):670–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Merkatz, IR, Nitowsky, HM, Macri, JN, Johnson, WE. An association between low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and fetal chromosomal abnormalities. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1984;148(7):886–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wald, NJ, Cuckle, HS, Densem, JW, et al. Maternal serum screening for Down’s syndrome in early pregnancy. BMJ. 1988;297(6653):883–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renier, MA, Vereecken, A, Van Herck, E, et al. Second trimester maternal dimeric inhibin-A in the multiple-marker screening test for Down’s syndrome. Human reproduction. 1998;13(3):744–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, LA, Shahabi, S, Oz, UA, et al. Hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin (invasive trophoblast antigen) immunoassay: a new basis for gestational Down syndrome screening. Clinical chemistry. 1999;45(12):2109–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wapner, RJ. First trimester aneuploidy screening: results of the NICHD multi-center study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2002;185(S70).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunstan, FD, Nix, AB. Screening for Down’s syndrome: the effect of test date on the detection rate. Annals of clinical biochemistry. 1998;35(Pt 1):5761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, TM, Wapner, RJ. Integrated screening for Down’s syndrome. The New England journal of medicine. 1999;341(25):1935; author reply 6.Google ScholarPubMed
Rhoads, GG, Jackson, LG, Schlesselman, SE, et al. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. The New England journal of medicine. 1989;320(10):609–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saura, R, Gauthier, B, Taine, L, et al. Operator experience and fetal loss rate in transabdominal CVS. Prenatal diagnosis. 1994;14(1):70–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odibo, AO, Gray, DL, Dicke, JM, et al. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center’s 16-year experience. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2008;111(3):589–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, DW, Platt, LD, Goldberg, JD, et al. Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;119(5):890901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 545: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;120(6):1532–4.Google Scholar
Crane, JP, LeFevre, ML, Winborn, RC, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1994;171(2):392–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyberg, DA, Souter, VL, El-Bastawissi, A, et al. Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2001;20(10):1053–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, MW, Coustan, DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1982;144(7):768–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coustan, DR. Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Seminars in perinatology. 1994;18(5):407–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Meis, PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. The New England journal of medicine. 1996;334(9):567–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, R, Nicolaides, K, Conde-Agudelo, A, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;206(2):124.e119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, AG, Odibo, AO, Caughey, AB, et al. Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(6):548.e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colin, Y, Cherif-Zahar, B, Le Van Kim, C, et al. Genetic basis of the RhD-positive and RhD-negative blood group polymorphism as determined by Southern analysis. Blood. 1991;78(10):2747–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 485: Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011;117(4):1019–27.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 145: Antepartum fetal surveillance. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;124(1):182–92.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):386–97.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 561: Nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;121(4):911–15.Google Scholar
Towers, CV, Freeman, RK, Nageotte, MP, et al. The case for amniocentesis for fetal lung maturity in late-preterm and early-term gestations. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;210(2):95–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 559: Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;121(4):904–7.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 146: Management of late-term and postterm pregnancies. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):390–6.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×