Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:32:24.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Operative Vaginal Delivery (Vacuum and Forceps Extraction)

from Section 3 - Pathology of Labor and Labor and Delivery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

By
P.J. Dörr ,
G.G.M. Essed  and
F.K. Lotgering
Edited by
P. Joep Dörr ,
Vincent M. Khouw ,
Frank A. Chervenak ,
Amos Grunebaum ,
Yves Jacquemyn  and
Jan G. Nijhuis
P. Joep Dörr
Affiliation:
HMC Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague
Vincent M. Khouw
Affiliation:
VMK Designs, Utrecht
Frank A. Chervenak
Affiliation:
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Amos Grunebaum
Affiliation:
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Yves Jacquemyn
Affiliation:
Antwerp University Hospital
Jan G. Nijhuis
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Interventions , pp. 137 - 157
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Essed, GGM. Complicaties bij kunstverlossingen. In: Heineman, MJ (ed.). Complicaties in obstetrie en gynaecologie. Bussum: Medicom Europe, 1994, pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
NVOG. Vaginale kunstverlossing (vacuümextractie, forcipale extractie). NVOG richtlijn, 2005.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Guideline No 26, Operative Vaginal Delivery, 2011.Google Scholar
Lumbiganon, P, Laopaiboon, M, Gülmezoglu, M, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–8. Lancet. 2010;375:490–9.Google Scholar
Goetzonger, KR, Macones, GA. Operative vaginal delivery: current trends in obstetrics. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2008;4:281–90.Google Scholar
Births: Final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;61:1–70.Google Scholar
ACOG. Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No 17, 2000.Google Scholar
Meijer, K, Bouman, K, Sollie, KM, et al. Begeleiding van de zwangerschap en de partus bij draagsters van hemofilie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008;152:1249–53.Google Scholar
Roberts, IF, Stone, M. Fetal hemorrhage: complication of vacuum extractor after fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132:109.Google Scholar
Thierry, M. Fetal hemorrhage following blood sampling and use of vacuum extractor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134:251Google Scholar
Wegner, EK, Lockwood, CJ, Baras, VA. Operative vaginal delivery. UpToDate. 2013; April.Google Scholar
Kolderup, LB, Laros, RK Jr, Musci, TJ. Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infant: association with mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:37–41.Google Scholar
Morales, R Adair, CD, Sanchez-Ramos, L, et al. Vacuum extraction of preterm infants with birthweights of 1500 to 2499 grams. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:127–30.Google Scholar
Castro, MA, Hoey, SD, Towner, D. Controversies in the use of the vacuum extractor. Semin Perinatal 2003;27:46–53.Google Scholar
Hankins, DV, Rowe, TF. Operative vaginal delivery – Year 2000. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:275–82.Google Scholar
Zahalka, N, Sadan, O, Malinger, G, et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:381–6.Google Scholar
Ramphul, M, Kennelly, M, Murphy, DJ. Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: a validation study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;164:35–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphey, DJ, Liebling, RE, Patel, R, et al. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110:610–15.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, JW, de Wit, C, Kuijken, JPJA, et al. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:104–8.Google Scholar
Räisänen, SH, Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K, Gissler, M, et al. Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:1365–72.Google Scholar
Macleod, M, Strachan, B, Bahl, R, et al. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:1688–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphey, DJ, Macleod, M, Bahl, R, et al. A randomized controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicenter pilot study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:1695–702.Google Scholar
Anim-Somuah, M, Smyth, RM, Jones, L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD000331. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3.Google Scholar
Roberts, CL, Torvaldsen, S, Camaron, CA, et al. Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2004;111:1333–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torvaldsen, S, Roberts, CL, Bell, JC, et al. Discontinuation of epidural analgesia late in labour for reducing adverse delivery outcomes associated with epidural analgesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;4:CD004457.Google Scholar
Johanson, RB, Menon, V. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1999;2:CD000224. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000224.Google Scholar
Smit-Wu, MN, Moonen-Delarue, DM, Benders, MJ, et al. Onset of vacuum-related complaints in neonates. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165:374–9.Google Scholar
Demissie, K, Rhoads, GC, Smulian, JC, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analyses. BMJ. 2004;329:1–6.Google Scholar
Towner, D, Castro, MA, Eby-Wilkins, BS, et al. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial delivery. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1709–14.Google Scholar
Carmody, F, Grant, A, Mutch, L, et al. Follow up of babies delivered in a randomized controlled comparison of vacuum extraction and forceps delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65:763–6.Google Scholar
Johanson, RB, Heycock, E, Carter, J, et al. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five year follow of a randomized controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:544–9.Google Scholar
Sedan, O, Dishi, M, Somekh, E, et al. Vacuum extraction and herpes simplex virus infections. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;89:242–6.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Zhu, O, Zhang, X. Effect of delivery mode on maternal-infant transistor of hepatitis B virus by immunoprophylaxis. Chin Med J. 2002;115:1510–12.Google Scholar
MacArthur, C, Glazener, CM, Wilson, PD, et al. Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG. 2006;113:218–24.Google Scholar
Glazener, CM, Herbison, GP, MacArthur, C, et al. New postnatal urinary incontinence: obstetric and other risk factors in primiparae. BJOG. 2006;113:208–17.Google Scholar
Gartland, D, Donath, S, MacArthur, C, Brown, SJ. The onset, recurrence and associated obstetric risk factors for urine incontinence in the first 18 months after a first birth: an Australian nulliparous cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119:1361–9.Google Scholar
Pretlove, SJ, Thompson, PJ, Toosz-Hobson, PM, et al. Does the mode of delivery predispose women to anal incontinence in the first year postpartum? A comparative systematic review. BJOG. 2008;115:421–34.Google Scholar
Handa, VL, Brubaker, L, Flak, S. Pelvic floor disorders associated with pregnancy. UpToDate. 2008;May.Google Scholar
Tegerstedt, G, Miedel, A, Maehle-Schmidt, M, et al. Obstetric risk factors for symptomatic prolapse: a population-based approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:75–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essed, GGM. Geschiedenis van de vaginale kunstverlossing. In: Merkus, JMWM (ed.). Obstetrische interventies. Bussum: Medicom Europe, 1991, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
O’Grady, JP, McIlhargie, CJ. Instrumental delivery. In: O’Grady, JP, Gomovski, ML, McIlhargie, CJ (eds). Operative obstetrics. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995.Google Scholar
Johanson, R, Menon, V. Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000446. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000446.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J, Lockwood, CJ, Barss, V. Procedure for vacuum assisted operative vaginal delivery. UpToDate. 2013, March.Google Scholar
Suwannachat, B, Lumbiganon, P, Laopaiboon, M. Rapid versus stepwise negative pressure application for vacuum extraction assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD006636. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006636.pub3.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, F, Hofmeyr, GJ, Menon, V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:CD005455. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub2.Google Scholar
Muise, KL, Duchon, MA, Brown, RH. The effect of artificial caput on performance of vacuum extractors. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:170–3.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×