Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T21:30:54.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The making of NGOs: the relevance of Foucault and Bourdieu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Alnoor Ebrahim
Alnoor Ebrahim
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Get access

Summary

In 1994, the European Commission (EC) granted over US $14 million to fund rural development and environment activities in western India. The grant, entitled “Community Management of Natural Resources,” was to jointly support two of the country's largest and most reputed non-governmental organizations (NGOs) – the Aga Khan Rural Support Programme, India (AKRSP (I)) and the Navinchandra Mafatlal Sadguru Water and Development Foundation (Sadguru). The EC funds, to be disbursed over the course of eight years, signaled a precedent for development aid: it was the European Community's largest and first bilateral allocation of funds directly to the non-governmental sector in India.

The proposal which was the basis for the EC grant, began by outlining the social and physical conditions of rural western India:

Social development is failing in large areas of rural India because of environmental degradation. Population pressure, poverty and competition are undermining the natural resource base on which rural communities depend. Most rural families still rely on rainfed cultivation of unimproved crops, livestock grazing on degraded commons, and foraging for fuelwood in un-managed forests. As a direct consequence, large numbers of people continue to live below the official poverty line. Much of rural Gujarat and the neighbouring states of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Maharastra fit this pattern.

(Aga Khan Foundation 1993:1)

This early passage in the proposal points to a central assumption of the EC's “Community Management of Natural Resources” (CMNR) project.

Type
Chapter
Information
NGOs and Organizational Change
Discourse, Reporting, and Learning
 , pp. 7 - 20
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×