Adams, F. C. Stars in other universes: Stellar structure with different fundamental constants. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 08:10, 2008.
Adams, F. C. The degree of fine-tuning in our universe – and others. Physics Reports, 807:1–111, 2019.
Adams, F. C., and Grohs, E. On the habitability of universes without stable deuterium. Astroparticle Physics, 91:90–104, 2017.
Adlam, E. The problem of confirmation in the Everett interpretation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 47:21–32, 2014.
Aguirre, A., and Johnson, M. C. A status report on the observability of cosmic bubble collisions. Reports on Progress in Physics, 74:074901, 2011.
Aguirre, A., and Tegmark, M. Multiple universes, cosmic coincidences and other dark matters. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2005:003, 2005.
Albert, D., and Loewer, B. Interpreting the many worlds interpretation. Synthese, 77:195–213, 1988.
Albrecht, A., and Sorbo, L. Can the universe afford inflation? Physical Review D, 70:063528, 2004.
Amrhein, V. Greenland, S., and McShane, B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567:305–307, 2019.
Arkani-Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., and Dvali, G. The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter. Physics Letters B, 429:263–272, 1998.
Arntzenius, F., and Dorr, C. Self-locating priors and cosmological measures. In Chamcham, K., Barrow, J., Saunders, S., and Silk, J., editors, The Philosophy of Cosmology, pages 396–428. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Azhar, F. Prediction and typicality in multiverse cosmology. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 31:035005, 2014.
Baker, D. J. Measurement outcomes and probability in Everettian quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38:153–169, 2007.
Barbieri, R., and Guidice, G. F. Upper bounds on suupersymmetric particle masses. Nuclear Physics B, 306:63–76, 1988.
Barnes, L. A. The fine-tuning of the universe for intelligent life. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 29:529–564, 2012.
Barnes, L. A. Fine-tuning in the context of Bayesian theory testing. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8:253–269, 2018.
Barnes, L. A., Elahi, P. J., Salcido, J. et al. Galaxy formation efficiency and the multiverse explanation of the cosmological constant with EAGLE simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 477:3727–3743, 2018.
Barr, S. M., and Khan, A. Anthropic Tuning of the weak scale and of mu/md in two-Higgs-doublet models. Physical Review D, 76:045002, 2007.
Barrow, J. D., and Tipler, F. J. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Baun, L., and Frampton, P. H. Turnaround in cyclic cosmology. Physical Review Letters, 98:071301, 2007.
Behe, M. J. Darwin’s, Black Box. New York: The Free Press, 1996.
Bekenstein, J. D. Relativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dynamics paradigm. Physical Review D, 70:083509, 2004.
Bell, J. S. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics, 1:195–200, 1964.
Bell, J. S. On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 38:447–452, 1966.
Bénétreau-Dupin, Y. Blurring out cosmic puzzles. Philosophy of Science, 82:879–891, 2015a.
Bénétreau-Dupin, Y. The Bayesian who knew too much. Synthese, 192:1527–1542, 2015b.
Bertone, G., and Tait, T. M. P. A new era in the search for dark matter. Nature, 562:51–56, 2018.
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., and Silk, J. Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints. Physics Reports, 405:279–390, 2005.
Bertrand, J. L. F. Calcul des probabilités. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1889.
Boddy, K. K., Carroll, S. M., and Pollack, J. Why Boltzmann brains do not fluctuate into existence from the de Sitter vacuum. In Chamcham, K., Barrow, J., Saunders, S., and Silk, J., editors, The Philosophy of Cosmology, pages 228–240. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Bohm, D. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables, I and II. Physical Review, 85:166–193, 1952.
Boltzmann, L. On certain questions of the theory of gases. Nature, 51:413–415, 1895.
Borrelli, A., and Castellani, E. The practice of naturalness: A historical-philosophical perspective. Foundations of Physics, 49:860–878, 2019.
Bostrom, N. The doomsday argument, Adam & Eve, UN++, and Quantum Joe. Synthese, 127:359–387, 2001.
Bostrom, N. Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Bostrom, N. Sleeping Beauty and self-location: A hybrid model. Synthese, 157:59–78, 2007.
Bostrom, N. Where are they? Why I hope the search for extraterrestrial life finds nothing. MIT Technology Review, May/June:72–77, 2008.
Bousso, R. Holographic properties in eternal inflation. Physical Review Letters, 97:191302, 2006.
Bousso, R. Complementarity in the multiverse. Physical Review D, 79:123524, 2009.
Bousso, R., Harnik, R., Kribs, G. D., and Perez, G. Predicting the cosmological constant from the causal entropic principle. Physical Review D, 76:043513, 2007.
Bousso, R., Freivogel, B., and Yang, I. Boltzmann babies in the proper time measure. Physical Review D, 77:103514, 2008.
Bousso, R., Freivogel, B., and Yang, I. Properties of the scale factor measure. Physical Review D, 79:063513, 2009.
Bousso, R., and Polchinski, J. Quantization of four-form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2000:06, 2000.
Bradley, D. J. Multiple, Universes and Observation Selection Effects. American Philosophical Quarterly, 46:61–72, 2009.
Bradley, D. J. Self-location is no problem for conditionalization. Synthese, 182:393–411, 2011.
Bradley, D. J. Four problems about self-locating belief. Philosophical Review, 121:149–177, 2012.
Bradley, D. J. Everettian confirmation and Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Wilson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66:683–693, 2015.
Bradley, D. J., and Leitgeb, H. When betting odds and credences come apart: More worries for Dutch book arguments. Analysis, 66:119–127, 2006.
Briggs, R. Putting a value on beauty. In Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J., editors, Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 3, pages 3–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Buckareff, A., and Nagasawa, Y., editors. Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Carlson, E., and Olsson, E. J. Is our existence in need of further explanation? Inquiry, 41:255–275, 1998.
Carr, B. J., and Rees, M. J. The anthropic principle and the structure of the physical world. Nature, 278:605–612, 1979.
Carretero-Sahuquillo, M. A. The charm quark as a naturalness success. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 58:51–61, 2019.
Carroll, S. M. From, Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. London: Plume, 2010.
Carroll, S. M. Why Boltzmann brains are bad. In S. Dasgupta and B. Weslake, editors, Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science. Routledge, 2020.
Carroll, S. M. Beyond falsifiability: Normal science in a multiverse. R. Dawid, R. Dardashti, and K. Thébault, editors, Why Trust a Theory? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pages 300–314 of the book, 2019.
Carter, B. The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A310:347–363, 1983.
Carter, B. J. Large number coincidences and the anthropic principle in cosmology. In Longair, M. S., editor, Confrontation of Cosmological Theory with Astronomical Data, pages 291–298. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974.
Ćirković, M. M., Sandberg, A., and Bostrom, N. Anthropic shadow: Observation selection effects and human extinction risks. Risk Analysis, 30:1495–1506, 2010.
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., and Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden variables theories. Physical Review Letters, 23:880–884, 1969.
Colbeck, R., and Renner, R. No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power. Nature Communications, 2:411, 2011.
Collins, R. The teleological argument: An exploration of the fine-tuning of the cosmos. In Craig, W. L. and Moreland, J. P., editors, The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, pages 202–281. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.
Colyvan, M., Garfield, J. L., and Priest, G. Problems with the argument from fine-tuning. Synthese, 145:325–338, 2005.
Conitzer, V. A devastating example for the Halfer Rule. Philosophical Studies, 172:1985–1992, 2015a.
Conitzer, V. A Dutch Book against Sleeping Beauties who are evidential decision theorists. Synthese, 192:2887–2899, 2015b.
Corbelli, E., and Salucci, P. The extended rotation curve and the dark matter halo of M33. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 311:441–447, 2000.
Cozic, M. Imaging and Sleeping Beauty: A case for double-halfers. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52:137–143, 2011.
Craig, W. L. Design and the anthropic fine-tuning of the universe. In Manson, N. A., editor, God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, pages 155–177. London: Routledge, 2003.
Davies, P. The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life? London: Allen Lane, 2006.
Dawid, R. String Theory and the Scientific Method. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Dawid, R., and Thébault, K. P. Against the empirical viability of the Deutsch-Wallace-Everett approach to quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 47:55–61, 2014.
Dawid, R., and Thébault, K. P. Many worlds: Decoherent or incoherent. Synthese, 192:1559–1580, 2015.
Dawid, R. Hartmann, D., and Sprenger, J. The no alternatives argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66:213–234, 2015.
Dawkins, R. The Ancestor’s Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2004.
De Simone, A., Guth, A. H., Salem, M. P., and Vilenkin, A. Predicting the cosmological constant with the scale-factor cutoff measure. Physical Review D, 78:063520, 2008.
Dembski, W. A. The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Deutsch, D. Quantum theory of probability and decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 455:3129–3137, 1999.
Dicke, R. H. Dirac’s, Cosmology and Mach’s Principle. Nature, 192:440–441, 1961.
Dieks, D. Doomsday–Or: The dangers of statistics. The Philosophical Quarterly, 42:778–784, 1992.
Dieks, D. Reasoning about the future: Doom and beauty. Synthese, 156:427–439, 2007.
Dirac, P. A. M. A New Basis for Cosmology. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 165:199–208, 1938.
Dizadji-Bahmani, F. The probability problem in Everettian quantum mechanics persists. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66:257–283, 2015.
Donoghue, J. F. The fine-tuning problems of particle physics and anthropic mechanisms. In Carr, Bernard, editor, Universe of Multiverse?, pages 231–246. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Dorr, C. Sleeping beauty: In defence of Elga. Analysis, 62:292–296, 2002.
Draper, K., and Pust, J. Probabilistic arguments for multiple universes. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 88:288–307, 2007.
Draper, K., and Pust, J. Diachronic dutch books and Sleeping Beauty. Synthese, 164:281–287, 2008.
Draper, P., Meade, P., Reece, M., and Shih, D. Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs boson for the MSSM and low-scale supersymmetry breaking. Physical Review D, 85:095007, 2012.
Earman, J. The SAP also rises: A critical examination of the anthropic principle. Philosophical Quarterly, 24:307–317, 1987.
Earman, J., and Mosterín, J. A critical look at inflationary cosmology. Philosophy of Science, 66:1–49, 1999.
Eckhardt, W. Probability theory and the Doomsday argument. Mind, 102:483–488, 1993.
Eddington, A. S. The end of the world: From the standpoint of mathematical physics. Nature, 127:447–453, 1931. reprinted in The Book of the Cosmos: Imagining the Universe from Heraclitus to Hawking, ed. by D. R. Danielson, Cambridge, MA: Perseus, 2000, p. 406.
Einstein, A. Autobiographical notes. In Schilpp, P. A., editor, Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, pages 1–94. Peru, IL: Open Court, 1949.
Elga, A. Self-locating belief and the sleeping beauty problem. Analysis, 60:143–147, 2000.
Elga, A. Defeating Dr. Evil with self-locating belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69:383–396, 2004.
Ellis, G. F. R., and Stoeger, W. R. A note on infinities in eternal inflation. General Relativity and Gravitation, 41:1475–1484, 2009.
Epstein, P. F. The fine-tuning argument and the requirement of total evidence. Philosophy of Science, 84:639–658, 2017.
Everett, H. ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29:454–462, 1957.
Forrest, P. Occam’s razor and possible worlds. The Monist, 65:456–464, 1982.
Forrest, P., and Armstrong, D. M. An argument against David Lewis’ theory of possible worlds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62:164–168, 1984.
Friederich, S. Motivating Wittgenstein’s perspective on mathematical sentences as norms. Philosophia Mathematica, 19:1–19, 2011.
Friederich, S. Interpreting Quantum Theory: A Therapeutic Approach. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Friederich, S., and Evans, P. W. Retrocausality in quantum mechanics. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Summer 2019 edition, 2019. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-retrocausality/.
Fuchs, C. A., and Schack, R. QBism and the Greeks: Why a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality. Physica Scripta, 90:015104, 2015.
Gaillard, M. K., and Lee, B. W. Rare decay modes of the K mesons in gauge theories. Physical Review D, 10:897, 1974.
Garber, D. Old evidence and logical omniscience in bayesian confimation theory. In Earman, J., editor, Testing Scientific Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
Garriga, J. and Vilenkin, A. Prediction and explanation in the multiverse. Physical Review D, 77:043526, 2008.
Garriga, J., Schwartz-Perlov, D., Vilenkin, A., and Winitzki, S. Probabilities in the inflationary multiverse. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2006:017, 2006.
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., and Weber, T. Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physical Review D, 34:470, 1986.
Gibbons, G. W., Hawking, S. W., and Stewart, J. M. A natural measure on the set of all universes. Nuclear Physics B, 281:736–751, 1987.
Gibbons, G. W., and Turok, N. Measure problem in cosmology. Physical Review D, 77:063516, 2008.
Giudice, G. The dawn of the post-naturalness era. CERN reports, CERN-TH-2017-205, 2017. arXiv:1710.07663v1.
Glashow, S.L., Iliopoulos, J., and Maiani, L. Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry. Physical Review D, 2:1285, 1970.
Glymour, C. Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.
Goldstein, S., Struyve, W., and Tumulka, R. The Bohmian approach to the problem of cosmological quantum fluctuations. In A. Ijjas and B. Loewer, editors, Guide to the Philosophy of Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 2017. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01017.
Gould, S. J. Mind and supermind. Natural History, 92:34–38, 1983.
Greaves, H., and Myrvold, W. Everett and evidence. In Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., and Wallace, D., editors, Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality, pages 264–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A., and Zeilinger, A. Going beyond Bell’s theorem. In Kafatos, M., editor, Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, pages 69–72. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989.
Greene, B. The Hidden Reality. New York: Vintage, 2011.
Grinbaum, A. Which fine-tuning arguments are fine? Foundations of Physics, 42:615–631, 2012.
Grohs, E., Howe, A. R., and Adams, F. C. Universes without the weak force: Astrophysical processes with stable neutrons. Physical Review D, 97:043003, 2018.
Guth, A. H. Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Physical Review D, 23:347–356, 1981.
Guth, A. H. Inflation and eternal inflation. Physics Reports, 333:555–574, 2000.
Guth, A. H. Eternal inflation and its implications. Journal of Physics A, 40:6811, 2007.
. The inverse gambler’s fallacy: The argument from design; The anthropic principle applied to Wheeler Universes. Mind, 96:331–340, 1987.
Hall, L. J., Pinner, D., and Ruderman, J. T. The weak scale from BBN. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014:134, 2014.
Halpern, J. Y. Sleeping Beauty reconsidered: Conditioning and reflection in asynchronoûs systems. In Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J., editors, Oxford Studies in Epistemology, pages 111–142. Oxford: Oxford University, 2005.
Harnik, R., Kribs, G. D., and Perez, G. A universe without weak interactions. Physical Review D, 2006:035006, 2006.
Hartle, J. B., and Srednicki, M. Are we typical? Physical Review D, 75:123523, 2007.
Hartmann, S., and Fitelson, B. A new Garber-style solution to the problem of old evidence. Philosophy of Science, 82:712–717, 2015.
Hawking, S. W., and Page, D. N. How probable is inflation? Nuclear Physics B, 298:789–809, 1988.
Hawthorne, J., and Isaacs, Y. Fine-tuning fine-tuning. In Benton, M. A., Hawthorne, J., and Rabinowitz, D., editors, Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology, pages 136–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Healey, R. A. The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Hill, C. T., and Simmons, E. H. Strong dynamics and electroweak symmetry breaking. Physics Reports, 381:235–402, 2003.
Hitchcock, C. Beauty and the bets. Synthese, 139:405–420, 2004.
Hogan, C. J. Why the universe is just so. Reviews of Modern Physics, 72:1149–1161, 2000.
Hogan, C. J. Quarks, electrons, and atoms in closely related universes. In Carr, Bernard, editor, Universe of Multiverse?, pages 221–230. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Holder, R. D. Fine-tuning, multiple universes and theism. Noûs, 36:295–312, 2002.
Hollands, S., and Wald, R. M. Essay: An alternative to inflation. General Relativity and Gravitation, 34:2043–2055, 2002.
Horgan, T. Sleeping Beauty awakened: New odds at the dawn of the new day. Analysis, 64:10–21, 2004.
Hossenfelder, S. Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. Basic Books, 2014.
Howson, C. The “old evidence” problem. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 42: 547–555, 1991.
Hoyle, F., Dunbar, D. N. F., Wenzel, W. A., and Whaling, W. A state in C12 predicted from astrophysical evidence. Physical Review, 92:1095, 1953.
Ijjas, A., Steinhardt, P. J., and Loeb, A. Inflationary paradigm in trouble after Planck2013. Physics Letters B, 723:547–555, 2013.
Ijjas, A., Steinhardt, P. J., and Loeb, A. Cosmic inflation theory faces challenges. Scientific American, February 1, 2017. Available online at www.scientificamerican.com/article/cosmic-inflation-theory-faces-challenges/, accessed 23 August 2019.
Jenkins, C. S. Sleeping Beauty: A wake-up call. Philosophia Mathematica, 13:194–201, 2005.
Juhl, C. Fine-tuning, many worlds, and the ‘inverse gambler’s fallacy’. Noûs, 39:337–347, 2005.
Juhl, C. Fine-tuning is not surprising. Analysis, 66:269–275, 2006.
Juhl, C. Fine-tuning and old evidence. Noûs, 41:550–558, 2007.
Kachru, S., Kallosh, R., Linde, A., and Trivedi, S. P. De Sitter vacua in string theory. Physical Review D, 68:046005, 2003.
Kent, A. One world versus many: The inadequacy of Everettian accounts of evolution, probability, and scientific confirmation. In Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., and Wallace, D., editors, Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality, pages 307–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Keynes, J. M. A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan, 1921.
Kierland, B., and Monton, B. Minimizing inaccuracy for self-locating beliefs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70:384–395, 2005.
Knight, F. H. Risk, , Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 1921.
Kochen, S., and Specker, E. P. The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17:59–87, 1967.
Koperski, J. Should we care about fine-tuning? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56:303–319, 2005.
Kotzen, M. Selection biases in likelihood arguments. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63:825–839, 2012.
Kripke, S. Naming and Necessity. In D. Davidson and G. Harman, editors, Semantics of Natural Language, pages 253–355, 763–769. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972. repr. 1980 by Harvard University Press.
Kroupa, P., Pawlowski, M., and Milgrom, M. The failures of the Standard Model of cosmology require a new paradigm. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 21: 1230003, 2012.
Landsman, K. The fine-tuning argument: Exploring the improbability of our own existence. In Landsman, K. and van Wolde, E., editors, The Challenge of Chance, pages 111–128. Heidelberg: Springer, 2016.
Leegwater, G. An impossibility theorem for parameter independent hidden variable theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 54:18–34, 2016.
Lehners, J.-L., and Steinhard, P. J. Planck 2013 results support the cyclic universe. Physical Review D, 87:123533, 2013.
Lerche, W., Lüst, D., and Schellekens, A. N. Chiral four-dimensional heterotic strings from selfdual lattices. Nuclear Physics B, 287:477, 1987.
Leslie, J. Anthropic explanations in cosmology. In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, pages 87–95, 1986.
Leslie, J. No inverse gambler’s fallacy in cosmology. Mind, 97:269–272, 1988.
Leslie, J. Universes. London: Routledge, 1989.
Lewis, D. Causal decision theory. Australasion Journal of Philosophy, 59:5–30, 1981.
Lewis, D. A subjectivists’s guide to objective chance. In Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, pages 83–132. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986a. originally published in R. C. Jeffrey, editor, Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. II, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
Lewis, D. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford, New York: Blackwell, 1986b.
Lewis, D. Sleeping beauty: Reply to Elga. Analysis, 61:171–176, 2001.
Lewis, G. J., and Barnes, L. A. Fortunate Universe: Life in a Finely Tuned Cosmos. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Lewis, P. J. Quantum Sleeping Beauty. Analysis, 67:59–65, 2007.
Lewis, P. J. A note on the doomsday argument. Analysis, 70:27–30, 2010.
Linde, A. A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems. Physics Letters B, 108:389–393, 1982.
Linde, A. Sinks in the landscape, Boltzmann brains and the cosmological constant. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2007:002, 2007.
Linde, A. Inflationary cosmolgoy after Planck 2013. 2014. Available online at arXiv:1402.0526, retrieved 3 January 2019.
Linde, A., Linde, D., and Mezhlumian, A. Nonperturbative amplifications of inhomogeneities in a self-reproducing universe. Physical Review D, 54:2504, 1995.
Loeb, A., Batista, R. A., and Sloan, D. Relative likelihood for life as a function of cosmic time. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 08:40, 2016.
MacDonald, J., and Mullan, D. J. Big bang nucleosynthesis: The strong nuclear force meets the weak anthropic principle. Physical Review D, 80:043507, 2009.
Manson, N. A. The fine-tuning argument. Philosophy Compass, 492:29, 2009.
Manson, N. A., and Thrush, M. J. Fine-tuning, multiple universes, and the “This Universe” Objection. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 84:67–83, 2003.
Martel, H., Shapiro, P. R., and Weinberg, S. Likely values of the cosmological constant. The Astrophysical Journal, 492:29, 1998.
Martin, J. Cosmic inflation: Trick or treat? In Fine-tuning in the Physical Universe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, in press arXiv:1902.02586v1.
McCoy, C. D. Does inflation solve the hot big bang model’s fine-tuning problems? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 51:23–36, 2015.
McCoy, C. D. The implementation, interpretation, and justification of likelihoods in cosmology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 62:19–35, 2018.
McGrath, P. J. The inverse gambler’s Fallacy and cosmology: A reply to hacking. Mind, 97:331–340, 1988.
McGrew, T., McGrew, L., and Vestrup, E. Probabilities and the fine-tuning argument: A sceptical view. Mind, 110:1027–1038, 2001.
McKenzie, K. Arguing against fundamentality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42:244–255, 2011.
McMullin, E. Indifference principle and anthropic principle in cosmology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 24:359–389, 1993.
McQueen, K. J., and Vaidman, L. In defence of the self-location uncertainty account of probability in the many-worlds interpretation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 66:14–23, 2019.
Meacham, C. J. G. Sleeping, Beauty and the dynamics of de se belief. Philosophical Studies, 138:245–2699, 2008.
Milgrom, M. A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. Astrophysical Journal, 270:365–370, 1983.
Miller, K. R., Finding Darwin’s God: A Scientist’s Search for Common Ground between God and Evolution. New York: Cliff Street Books, 1999.
Monton, B. God, fine-tuning, and the problem of old evidence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57:404–425, 2006.
Mukhanov, V. Inflation without selfreproduction. Fortschritte der Physik, 63:36–41, 2015.
Narveson, J. God by design? In God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, pages 88–105. London: Routledge, 2003.
Neal, R. M. Puzzles of anthropic reasoning resolved using full non-indexical conditioning. 2006. arXiv:math/0608592v1.
Norton, J. D. Ignorance and indifference. Philosophy of Science, 75:45–68, 2008.
Norton, J. D. Cosmic confusion: Not supporting versus supporting not. Philosophy of Science, 77:501–523, 2010.
Norton, J. D. Eternal inflation: When probabilities fail. Synthese, in press https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229–018-1734-7.
Oberhummer, H., Csótó, A., and Schlattl, H. Stellar production rates of carbon and its abundance in the universe. Science, 289:88–90, 2000.
Olum, K. The Doomsday Argument and the number of possible observers. The Philosophical Quarterly, 52:164–184, 2002.
Page, D. N. Is our universe likely to decay within 20 billion years? Physical Review D, 78:063535, 2008.
Parfit, D. Why Anything? Why This?. London Review of Books, January 22:24–27, 1998.
Pearl, J. Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Penrose, R. The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. London: Vintage, 2004.
Phillips, D., and Albrecht, A. Effects of inhomogeneity on the causal entropic prediction of Λ. Physical Review D, 84:123530, 2011.
Pisaturo, R. Past longevity as evidence for the future. Philosophy of Science, 76:73–100, 2009.
Planck Collaboration. Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 594:A1, 2016.
Price, H. Against causal decision theory. Synthese, 67:195–212, 1986.
Randall, L., and Sundrum, R. Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension. Physical Review Letters, 83:3370, 1999.
Rees, M. Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
Rees, M. Our Final Hour: A Scientist’s Warning. New York: Basic Books, 2003.
Roberts, J. T. Fine-tuning and the infrared bull’s eye. Philosophical Studies, 160:287–303, 2012.
Rosaler, J., and Harlander, R. Naturalness, Wilsonian renormalization, and “fundamental parameters” in quantum field theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 66:118–134, 2019.
Ross, J. Sleeping Beauty, countable additivity, and rational dilemmas. Philosophical Review, 119:411–447, 2010.
Rota, M. Taking Pascal’s Wager: Faith, Evidence, and the Abundant Life. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 2016.
Salem, M. P. Bubble collisions and measures of the multiverse. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2012(01):021, 2012.
Sandberg, A., Drexler, E., and Ord, T. Dissolving the Fermi paradox. 2018. arXiv:1806 .02404.
Saunders, S. Derivation of the Born rule from operational assumptions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 460:1771–1788, 2004.
Schellekens, A. N. Life at the interface of particle physics and string theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 85:1491, 2013.
Schulz, M. The dynamics of indexical belief. Erkenntnis, 72:337–351, 2010.
Schwarz, W. Belief update across fission. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66: 659–682, 2015.
Sebens, C. T., and Carroll, S. M. Self-locating uncertainty and the origin of probability in Everettian quantum mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2018 (69):25–74, 2018.
Shackel, N. Bertrand’s paradox and the principle of indifference. Philosophy of Science, 74:150–175, 2007.
Shiffrin, J. S., and Wald, R. M. Measure and probability in cosmology. Physical Review D, 86:023521, 2012.
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., and Simonsohn, U. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22:1359–1366, 2011.
Smart, J. J. C. Our, Place in the Universe: A Metaphysical Discussion. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
Smeenk, C. Predictability crisis in early universe cosmology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46:122–133, 2014.
Smolin, L. The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2006.
Smolin, L. Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle. In Carr, B., editor, Universe of Multiverse, pages 323–366. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Sober, E. The design argument. In Manson, N. A., editor, God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, pages 27–54. London: Routledge, 2003.
Sober, E. Absence of evidence and evidence of absence: Evidential transitivity in connection with fossils, fishing, fine-tuning and firing squads. Philosophical Studies, 143:63–90, 2009.
Spekkens, R. W Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements. Physical Review A, 71:052108, 2005.
Sprenger, J. A novel solution to the problem of old evidence. Philosophy of Science, pages 383–401, 2015.
Srednicki, M., and Hartle, J.B. Science in a very large universe. Physical Review D, 81:123524, 2010.
Starkman, G. D., and Trotta, R. Why anthropic reasoning cannot predict Λ. Physical Review Letters, 97:201301, 2006.
Steinhardt, P. J. The inflation debate. Scientific American, April:36–43, 2011.
Steinhardt, P. J., and Turok, N. Cosmic evolution in a cyclic universe. Physical Review D, 65:126003, 2001.
Steinhardt, P. J. and Turok, N. Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang. New York: Doubleday, 2008.
Stenger, V. J. The, Fallacy of Fine-tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us. New York: Prometheus Books, 2011.
Susskind, L. The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design. New York: Back Bay Books, 2005.
Swimburne, R. The argument to God from fine-tuning reassessed. In Manson, N. A., editor, God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, pages 105–123. London: Routledge, 2003.
Swimburne, R. The Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edition, 2004.
Swimburne, R. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edition, 2016.
‘t Hooft, G. Naturalness, chiral symmetry and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. In G.’t Hooft , editor, Recent Developments in Gauge Theories, pages 135–157. New York: Plenum Press, 1980.
Tegmark, M. Is “the theory of everything” merely the ultimate ensemble theory? Annals of Physics, 270:1–51, 1998.
Tegmark, M. What does inflation really predict? Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2005:001, 2005.
Tegmark, M. Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. New York: Knopf, 2014.
Tegmark, M. Aguirre, A. Rees, M. J., and Wilczek, F. Dimensionless constants, cosmology, and other dark matters. Physical Review D, 73:023505, 2006.
Tegmark, M., and Rees, M. J. Why is the cosmic microwave background fluctuation level 10−5? The Astrophysical Journal, 499:526–532, 1998.
Thomas, H. Modal realism and inductive scepticism. Noûs, 27:331–354, 1993.
Titelbaum, M. G. The relevance of self-locating beliefs. Philosophical Review, 117:555–605, 2008.
Titelbaum, M. G. An embarrassment for double-halfers. Thought, 1:146–151, 2012.
Titelbaum, M. G. Quitting Certainties: A Bayesian Framework Modelling Degrees of Belief. Oxford: Clarendon, revised edition, 2013a.
Titelbaum, M. G. Ten reasons to care about the Sleeping Beauty problem. Philosophy Compass, 8:1003–1017, 2013b.
Tolman, R. C. Relativity, , Thermodynamics, and Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon, 1934. reissued 1987 by Dover, New York.
Torres, P. Morality, Foresight, and Human Flourishing: An Introduction to Existential Risks. Durham, NC: Pitchstone, 2017.
Uzan, J.-Ph. The fundamental constants and their variation: Observational and theoretical status. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75:403, 2003.
Uzan, J.-Ph. Varying constants, gravitation and cosmology. Living Reviews in Relativity, 14:2, 2011.
Vaidman, L. On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 12:245–261, 1998.
van Fraassen, B. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.
van Inwagen, P. Metaphysics. Colorado: Westview Press, 1993.
Van Schaik, C., and Michel, K. The Good Book of Human Nature: An Evolutionary Reading of the Bible. New York: Basic Books, 2016.
Venn, J. The Logic of Chance. New York: Chelsea, 1866.
Vilenkin, A. Predictions from quantum cosmology. Physical Review Letters, 74:846–849, 1995.
Vilenkin, A. A measure of the multiverse. Journal of Physics A, 40:6777–6785, 2007.
Wallace, D. Quantum probability from subjective likelihood: Improving on Deutsch’s proof of the probability rule. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38:311–332, 2007.
Wallace, D. The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Ward, P., and Brownlee, D. E. Rare Earth: Why Complex Life Is Uncommon in the Universe. New York: Copernicus, 2000.
Weatherson, B. Should we respond to evil with indifference? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70:613–635, 2005.
Weinberg, S. Anthropic bound on the cosmological constant. Physical Review Letters, 59:2607, 1987.
Weinstein, S. Anthropic reasoning and typicality in multiverse cosmology and string theory. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23:4231, 2006.
Weisberg, J. Firing squads and fine-tuning: Sober on the design argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56:809–821, 2005.
Weisberg, J. A note on design: What’s fine-tuning go to do with it? Analysis, 70:431–438, 2010.
Weisberg, J. The argument from divine indifference. Analysis, 72:707–715, 2012.
Wells, J. D. The utility of Naturalness, and how its application to Quantum Electrodynamics envisages the Standard Model and Higgs boson. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 49:102–108, 2015.
Wetterich, C. Fine-tuning problem and the renormalization group. Physics Letters B, 140:215–222, 1984.
Wetterich, C. Where to look for solving the gauge hierarchy problem? Physics Letters B, 718:573–576, 2012.
White, R. Fine-tuning and multiple universes. Noûs, 34:260–267, 2000.
White, R. What’s fine-tuning got to do with it: A reply to Weisberg. Analysis, 71:676–679, 2011.
Williams, P. Naturalness, the autonomy of scales, and the 125GeV Higgs. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 51:82–96, 2015.
Wilson, A. Everettian confirmation and Sleeping Beauty. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65:573–598, 2014.
Woit, P. Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law. Basic Books, 2006.
Woodward, J. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Zuboff, A. One self: The logic of experience. Inquiry, 33:39–68, 1990.
Zurek, W. H. Probabilities from entanglement, Born’s rule pk = |ψk|2 from envariance. Physical Review A, 71:052105, 2005.